Kevin Spacey Threatens Musician For Offering Album Called 'Kevinspacey'

from the new-name-is-better-anyway dept

Tue, May 17th 2011 7:28am — Mike Masnick

Apparently Kevin Spacey had his lawyers send musician Jason Drake (Cassettes Won't Listen) a cease & desist letter for putting out an album called "Kevinspacey." Apparently, his lawyers say that since Spacey's name is trademarked for use in both music and film, this was trademark infringement. I have to admit, I like how Drake responded. He's retitled the album as "Evinspacey." That may be worth buying just for the name change...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cassettes won't listen, evinspacey, jason drake, kevin spacey, kevinspacey

34 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2011 @ 7:35am

That really conflicts with my new album, "Kevinspace".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Spaceboy (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 7:46am
  
  Re:
  You are infringing on my trademark! My album is called Kevinspaceboy. Prepare for legal bombardement.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - el_segfaulto (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:06am
    
    Re: Re:
    What about my book? Zero Degrees Kevin. It's gonna be a best seller!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Raphael (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 9:14am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      That's pretty space-y
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2011 @ 7:39am

The follow-up album is tentatively entitled "Evenspacier".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 7:46am
  
  Re:
  This should be a trilogy of concept albums:
  
  Evinspacey, Kevinspacier and Ekevinspaciest.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vincent Clement (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 7:58am

Mr. Spacey, Jason Drake thanks you for the free publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Julian Sanchez, 17 May 2011 @ 8:09am

Hmm
Gotta say, after looking at the album art, I'm inclined to side with Spacey on this one... It does actually look apt to confuse buyers. ("Oh look, Kevin Spacey made an album! I think it's called Cassettes Won't Listen?") http://www.cassetteswontlisten.com/preorder/pics/EVINSPACEY.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2011 @ 8:10am

Does this mean anyone who happens to have the same name will be barred from being a musician or actor because that 'spot' was taken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Huph, 17 May 2011 @ 8:30am
  
  Re:
  No, not if it's your real name. This has come up many, many times. If your given name is Kevin Spacey, then you can use it, but you can't assume the name Kevin Spacey.
  
  Although, I have no idea what the rule of law would be if you first legally changed your name to Kevin Spacey.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - techflaws.org (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 10:36pm
    
    Re: Re:
    No, not if it's your real name.
    
    Unless of course your name is "Shell" and some oil company decides it wants your .de domain.
    
    http://archiv.jura.uni-saarland.de/lawweb/pressreleases/shelldomainname.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Call me Al, 17 May 2011 @ 8:36am
  
  Re:
  "Does this mean anyone who happens to have the same name will be barred from being a musician or actor because that 'spot' was taken."
  
  That happens all the time. There are many actors who use a screen name because their actual name is already in use by another actor. For example David Tennant (per wikipedia) "adopted the professional name "Tennant" � inspired by Neil Tennant of the Pet Shop Boys, after reading a copy of Smash Hits magazine[11] � because there was another David McDonald already on the books of the Equity union."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Greg G (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:38am
  
  Re:
  No, you can be an actor, but thanks to the SAG, no actor/actress can have the same screen name. At least if you register with the union (SAG), you can't have the same name because you could not be distinguished from the other actor with the same name without descriptions or pictures every time, which would be a pain in the ass.
  
  As for musicians, I don't think the same thing applies.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jupiterkansas (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 9:01am
  
  Re:
  David Jones had to change his stagename to David Bowie, because Davy Jones of the Monkees had already made the name famous. I think it was a good change.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:20am

I don't see the problem. There is a big difference between Kevin Spacey and Kevins Pacey... or Kev in space y? Omitting the space (no not Keviny) between his name and surname along with not capitalizing the S makes it a completely different word...or name for that matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2011 @ 8:31am

Ragging on Kevin Spacey for demanding that a band/guy not sell albums with "Kevinspacey" emblazoned on the cover (with a picture that bears some likelness to the actor) is ridiculous, folks. This is one of those cases where trademark law is doing what it's supposed to do -- protecting customers from confusion about the soruce of something. Look at the cover of the album, and tell me whether you think the average person might be confused about whether it's an album made by the actor Kevin Spacey. (Hint: yes.) It doesn't mean Cassettes Won't Listen is a bad band/guy (they/he are actually quite good), or that CWL needs to be punished or anything. It's just that it's perfectly reasonable for Kevin Spacey to object to the use of his name by someone else, in a confusing manner, to sell that other person's products. Save your umbrage for cases where trademark is being misused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:49am
  
  Re:
  I'd kind of agree with you except to say "where's the magic line?" It's not like it's an uncommon phenomenon to put someone famous on an album cover... I doubt Warner music asked Charles Hawtrey for example (since he was dead at the time).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - grav (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 10:40am
    
    Re: Re:
    I agree here. You've got two artists - Kevin Spacey and CWL, who are both pushing it a little too far, I think. It's tough to draw a line for this, but it's even tougher to leave things subjective. On the one hand, Kevin Spacey could just as easily have said "screw it, it's just a name let him use it" or "call the album whatever you want, just put something on the inside jacket that I had nothing to do with it" (personally I think having the phrase "Kevin Spacey is in no way affiliated with this album" would have been funny/cool if all this legal nonsense had never been brought up as a point). On the other hand you have an artist who very clearly designed album art implying that the album artist is Kevin Spacey - sort of a "push-the-envelope" move to begin with. (As for the picture looking like Kevin Spacey, sorry but that picture could be anyone - there's no definable marks or traits anywhere on it)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 9:02am
  
  Re:
  Look at the cover of the album, and tell me whether you think the average person might be confused about whether it's an album made by the actor Kevin Spacey. (Hint: yes.)
  
  If the word Kevinspacey wasn't on the cover I would never have guessed that it is him...if it even is. All you can see is hair, glasses, and a shirt collar...could be anybody.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David Liu (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 11:39am
    
    Re: Re:
    But that's the point. As an average music listener, I would've never thought that CWL in the glasses was the artist name. But I do know the name "Kevin Spacey", and if I see that along the side of the album, I'll immediately associate the CD with his name.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 11:39am
  
  Re:
  But song - and by extension album - titles are specifically exempted from the rules - that is why there are many songs called "The Power of Love"
  
  Kevin Spacey is importing a rule from a domain (acting) where it applies - to one (music titles) where it doesn't.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pickle Monger (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:36am

Name change
How about "Evilspacey"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- non-breaking space, 17 May 2011 @ 5:47pm
  
  Re: Name change
  I think I'd go with the html version: KEVIN[ ]E
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ofb2632 (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 8:38am

a better idea
They should have called it 'Evinspacey, you can add the K because if we do, we will get sued.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John, 17 May 2011 @ 8:43am

This how good.
There would have been someone out there that would have thought Kevin Spacey was involved with the album and purchased it. That is why we have trademarks. This shows no originality in naming their album and probably just wanted the free publicity. I would have never heard of the album if they had named it "Our Album".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2011 @ 8:44am

Would yecapsnivek be okay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
chuck, 17 May 2011 @ 9:34am

Kevin_______y

"There would have been someone out there that would have thought Kevin Spacey was involved with the album and purchased it. That is why we have trademarks. "

Boy, the Beatles are in big trouble for Sergeant Peppers then...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stu (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 10:52am

He better hope that Ryan Adams hasn't patented dropping the first letter of an existing artist's name or he'll be in even more trouble!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RobShaver (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 11:18am

It's a publicity stunt ...
and it worked. We're talking about it aren't we? They wanted that C&D for the publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nick Burns (profile), 17 May 2011 @ 11:46am

Should've renamed it: Kev, in space, see?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), 18 May 2011 @ 9:22am
  
  Re:
  Should've renamed it: Kev, in space, see?
  
  Only permitted if you affect a Welsh accent while saying it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Difster, 17 May 2011 @ 1:33pm

Kay Vin Spacey
It would have been even better if he changed it to notkevinspacey.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence D�Oliveiro, 17 May 2011 @ 6:12pm

But I Thought ...
... you can�t trademark your own name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
netjeff, 18 May 2011 @ 2:08pm

Kevin's spacey
Drake could also have renamed it kevinsspacey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]