House Committee Approves 'Keep Every American's Digital Data for Submission to the Federal Government Without a Warrant Act of 2011'
from the unfortunate dept
A few weeks ago we wrote about a ridiculously cynical attempt by some in Congress (mainly, Reps Lamar Smith, Bill Flores, Randy Forbes, Dutch Ruppersberger and Debbie Wasserman Schultz) to sneak through a massive data retention bill by pretending it was an anti-child porn bill. Of course, as we noted, the bill does almost nothing to stop or prevent child porn. Instead, it adds tremendously dangerous data retention requirements that will decrease user privacy, increase the risk of data being exposed, increase the value of certain hacking targets... all because some law enforcement folks want to be able to cruise through the data at will. Thankfully there was at least some criticism of the data retention aspect of the bill, and an attempt to remove the data retention pieces from the bill... but none of it succeeded and the bill was voted out of committee, meaning it will go to a full House debate. Lamar Smith defended the bill with this bit of ridiculous insanity:"Every piece of prematurely discarded information could be the footprint of a child predator.... This bill ensures that the online footprints of predators are not erased."If he actually believes that, he's a fool. First of all, those who are actually preying on children likely already know how to disguise their "footprints" online. Second, just because some criminals might use some technology doesn't mean we should give up all of our privacy and civil rights. I mean, it would be just as easy to say that every piece of prematurely discarded email written by Lamar Smith could be the footprint of a criminal. It might not be. In fact, it likely isn't... but by requiring that all of Lamar Smith's emails be made public, we ensure that such online footprints are not erased. See the problem with that logic? Tragically, Smith apparently doesn't recognize how he's selling out the privacy of pretty much the entire country.
Kudos, however, to those who pushed back against this aspect of the bill. Rep. Zoe Lofgren brilliantly pushed a proposal (seriously) to rename the bill the: "Keep Every American's Digital Data for Submission to the Federal Government Without a Warrant Act of 2011." She's right. If only there were some sort of "truth in advertising" law for Congressional bills that would require such bills to be labeled properly....
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: child porn, data retention, lamar smith, privacy, zoe lofgren
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Not a bad idea
Hey, lets all get together and lobby our politicians to get this passed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not a bad idea
"Save the children by correctly labelling Bills for Congress Act"
Every badly labelled bill could do unspeakable damage to children, so this bill is essential.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not a bad idea
Unfortunately, I can' find a link to the study anymore. It's mysteriously disappeared from my browsing history. The KGB-infiltrated Anonymous hackers probably hacked my system so I couldn't share it with others!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not a bad idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So that means that there isn't really an issue since ISPs keep this data for normal business billing practices anyways. They are not being forced to keep the URLs of the sites you visit - which would be a real invasion of privacy. Just the normal stuff that they have to keep anyways for liability and billing reasons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The quote, properly formatted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm very sorry
I personally have lost all faith in my U.S. representative. He does not listen to anything except cash.
Maybe the rest of you still believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm very sorry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I'm very sorry
Yes. Actually.
I used to have a U.S. representative who made a real effort to talk to his constituents. Then I moved to a different city: into an area with a long history of corruption. It's different. No one here has any faith in the political process. It's all rigged, and people are just resigned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Intention to vote for either Republicans or Democrats
BUNCH OF SHIT IS WHAT WE ARE HANDED !!!!
Time for me to never vote for either of these parties.It is rather obvious who their masters are and how they will not stand up for the freedoms they are supposed to be defending.
These asses put us into the huge debt and then they argue like a bunch of little kids on recess.
We the people have to make a choice next election and I am hoping more of us will see the light and really use our brains.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Intention to vote for either Republicans or Democrats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vote NO
And, as always, vote EVERY sitting senator and congress-person out of office at the next election! Oh, and don't forget to un-elect Obama!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Vote NO
Toll the beginning of the end?
The beginning of the end?
Dude, what are you smoking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Leo Laporte of This Week in Tech discussed this on the July 17th episode http://twit.tv/310
There was, she says, an initial pushback about electrifying homes in the U.S.: “If you electrify homes you will make women and children and vulnerable. Predators will be able to tell if they are home because the light will be on, and you will be able to see them. So electricity is going to make women vulnerable. Oh and children will be visible too and it will be predators, who seem to be lurking everywhere, who will attack.
“There was some wonderful stuff about [railway trains] too in the U.S., that women’s bodies were not designed to go at 50 miles an hour. Our uteruses would fly out of our bodies as they were accelerated to that speed.”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In their defense, the only way previous to railway trains to get a woman to reach speeds of 50mph was to push her off a cliff, which nearly every time ended badly for the woman. It's science. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To hear these vapid legislators whining...
It isn't.
They're not.
I've spent an entire career studying, analyzing and cataloging (online) abusers of all descriptions. Child porn is a tiny and insigificant problem. (Which is NOT, careless readers, to suggest that it is tiny and insignificant to those affected by it. It is not. It IS, however, tiny and insignificant on the scale of the Internet.)
There are far worse problems affecting far more people to be dealt with: spam, phishing, pathetically weak "security", etc. These problems really ARE epidemic -- and they are not susceptible to legislative solutions, by the way.
What we see here is cowardice and stupidity: the legislators voting for this have never run a tcpdump nor have they dissected a child porn web site to see what's there. This is all beyond their pitifully feeble minds and limited comprehension; one might as well attempt to explain Kant to a beagle. So they will pass this and crow about it to their constituents, congratulating themselves on having done something useful and moving on to grapple with the next issue that's equally outside the reach of their defective brains.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: To hear these vapid legislators whining...
When they get caught -- and they do -- it's usually just a happy accident. Of course those who catch them beat their chests and claim victory, but this is laughable: it's a minor win in a skirmish of no importance, not a major achievement in a battle of strategic significance.
This is not to say that that these people (child porn types) are commendable: they're filth, of course. But it is to say that they will simply note this legislation's passage, engineer around it within days (if not hours) and keep right on doing what they do. And as usual, only those who are sloppy or caresless will be apprehended -- because all that the idiots in law enforcement can reach is the low-hanging fruit. They are hopelessly outclassed by the rest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just like they passed CALEA back in 1994.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A permanent crime scene?
Great, so she wants the entire internet--and everyone's account details and history--to be treated as a permanent crime scene.
Well, heck, why not make re-formatting your hard drive a federal crime? And taking out your garbage. And...well, just think of the children... :-o
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A permanent crime scene?
Lamar Smith is a he, not she.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A permanent crime scene?
Are you sure? Do you have proof? Maybe if we didn't destroy critical Internet communications as a matter of course, we might be able to settle this burning issue.
Until we have the bodyScan/CellPhonePicture/ChildhoodBathShots/DetailedAccountsFromPreviousGirlFriends(Or BoyFriends) I don't think we can close this question.
One more reason the People of the U.S. need this act, and need it now!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great idea
Should be LOTS of fun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$500 Million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$500 Million
From “The Implementation of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act”, Audit Report 06-13, March 2006, Office of the Inspector General :
So, how much money is Congress going to pass out this time? How much money are the ISPs going to demand to upgrade their data retention facilities?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The "If you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to worry about Act of 2011"
-----------------
Whereas,
The internet is used primarily by child pornographers, drug counterfeiters & music pirates,
Whereas upstanding citizens are happy to have their lives intruded upon,
Whereas the most upstanding of these citizens are our congressional representatives,
It is the will of the Congress that the following law be enacted.
Pursuant to federal regulations pertaining to the retention of internet browsing histories for all computers, smartphones, tablets & other devices accessing the network via Internet Service Providers ("ISPs"), and pursuant to this body's stated goals of ensuring maximum transparency in the dealings of Congress, and pursuant to demonstrating the forthright ways in which Congress conducts itself, the following new rule shall be put into place.
For any & all communications stored in accordance with "The Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act of 2011" that pertain to the actions of any sitting member of Congress, these records may be accessed, examined and shared by any citizen of that member's district. Forthwith, this includes necessarily all internet logs from any computer or smartphone in the congress person's office in Washington or home district. This shall further include any personal device owned by the congress critter and used to conduct official business of the congress, including but not limited to voting, researching on bills, conducting fundraising or lobbying activities. This bill extends the authority to any computer, phone or tablet that the Congress critter borrows to do the same, which may include (but not be limited to) computers of spouses, children, other close family members and friends of one sort or another. To facilitate enforcement of this law, all congress critters will be required to submit a daily report identifying which computers they have used to access the internet for official business. This law will take effect on the same day as The Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act of 2011 and will be automatically repealed when that legislation is found to be constitutionally lacking or otherwise repealed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also, every time you mow your yard or sweep the sidewalk you could be erasing literal footprints of child predators. As well as every time the tide comes in, or when the wind blows across a dusty hill...
The obvious solution is to eliminate all children... for their own safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You live in Seattle too?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's the votes
A pat on the back to those who voted against it:
Sensenbrenner
Issa
Chaffetz
Conyers
Nadler
Scott
Watt
Lofgren
Waters
Johnson
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"write your congressman..."
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "write your congressman..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ridiculous and dangerous legislation
It is common to pick a minority and invent all sorts of reasons to see them as "evil", usually lawyers, sometimes doctors, sometimes police, etc. Politicians are a frequent target, but Zoe Lofgren is obviously working in our behalf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]