Anti-Piracy Lawyer John Steele Caught Copying Content From Other Anti-Piracy Lawyer

from the now-that-would-be-a-fun-lawsuit dept

Fri, Jul 29th 2011 4:05am — Mike Masnick

A year and a half ago, in writing about all the new law offices jumping into the mass "anti-piracy" shakedown lawsuit business, one of the early ones we covered was an operation called the Copyright Enforcement Group -- or CEG. Oddly, we haven't seen many stories of CEG in action threatening people... but we do keep coming across stories of other such lawyers copying content from CEG. Almost exactly a year ago, we wrote about how US Copyright Group had copied large parts of CEG's website into its own website and, now, TorrentFreak has pointed out that infamous, mass-suing lawyer John Steele has been caught copying parts of CEG's website as well. This is doubly ironic, given Steele's usual bravado and talk about the evils of copyright infringement. From Steele's website

From CEG's website

TorrentFreak asked CEG about this and it claimed that this was not authorized and that it might have to "take steps" to prevent Steele from continuing this copying. Now wouldn't that be an interesting lawsuit to follow?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copying, copyright, john steele
Companies: copyright enforcement group

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

The eejit (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 3:38am

Remember, Mike, the Golden Rule: good artists copy, great artists steal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Devil's Coachman (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 4:24am

John Steele must die
Not that I actually wish him harm, but sooner or later he will die, and will only be remembered as a money-grubbing POS whose remains will be at the bottom of a three-holer, getting all the respect due.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fickelbra (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 4:43am

Re: John Steele must die
As well as John Barleycorn. (Had to)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
abc gum, 29 Jul 2011 @ 4:51am

Irony

- Copytard stealing the work of other copytard.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Prisoner 201, 29 Jul 2011 @ 5:10am

Re:
The biggest question is whether he is a freecopytard or copyfreetard?

I mean he is obviously pro IP, but also obviously a thief (by his own definition, no less).

And dear god, what brand of apologists do we call people who defend him?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 5:17am

Re: John Steele must die
three-holer?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 5:35am

what an idiot!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 5:45am

Its only breaking the law when we have tenuous proof you did it.
When we do it, we do it in a huge obvious way and its totally okay.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 6:02am

It's like a perpetual motion machine lawyers.
Positive feedback at its best.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 6:52am

Re: Re:
Hypocritard
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gabriel Tane (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 6:54am

News Story
Top story today� a black hole has appeared in a local courtroom. Scientists are still working to determine the exact cause of the phenomenon. They believe that this all started over an �intellectual property� lawsuit. For those of you who don�t know, �intellectual property� is the artificial term applied to an idea for the sole purpose of keeping anyone else from benefiting for that idea. Let�s go to Tom in the field for more details. Tom?

Thanks Sue� I�m standing (well!) outside a local courtroom where a miniature black hole has appeared. No one is sure exactly how this happened, but checking the videos stored electronically off-site has helped scientists form a hypothesis on how this happened.

John Steele, a lawyer known for suing over �copyright theft� and other IP-related �piracy� had copied a Q&A section from a website for the Copyright Enforcement Group, or CEG, regarding copyright infringement. CEG had taken John Steele to court over the matter. It appears that CEG�s legal filing was actually mostly copied from some of Mr. Steele�s own filings. When Mr. Steele noticed this in the courtroom, he hurled insults at CEG�s lawyer� and these insults were apparently "stolen" from CEG's lawyer from another lawsuit involving CEG. The resultant vortex of copy stupidity collapsed into a singularity.

One of the local scientists comments: "the space-time continuum was not meant to handle this level of concentrated stupid and just broke under the strain". Back to you, Sue.

Thanks Tom. And in related news, advocacy groups known for speaking out against IP-extremism are petitioning to have all current patent lawsuits moved from east Texas to this courtroom. More on that story at 11.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The eejit (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:02am

Re: News Story
Now, if only this would happen....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
HothMonster, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:06am

"TorrentFreak asked CEG about this and it claimed that this was not authorized and that it might have to "take steps" to prevent Steele from continuing this copying. Now wouldn't that be an interesting lawsuit to follow? "

Please Daddy! Its all I want for Christmas
[ link to this | view in thread ]
someone (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:24am

Re:
Those with the gold make the rules
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RD, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:29am

Re: Re: Re:
"Hypocritard"

Stop stealing my phrases!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rekrul, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:32am

Re: Re: John Steele must die
three-holer?

From the context, I'm guessing that they're referring to an outhouse/latrine.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:37am

Do as I say, not as I do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:42am

Johnny Boy....Care to comment on this one? Or, are you too busy in the steam room at The East Bank Club, getting rubbed out by some dude?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:46am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
I didn't steal it. I'm actually you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The eejit (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 10:06am

Re: Re:
NonononononoNO. That's the Rule of Gold, silly!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2011 @ 10:42am

Re: Copytard
"Copytard stealing the work of other copytard."

Actually, ANTI-copytard stealing the work of other ANTI-copytard!

Which makes him a hypocrite as well!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
alaskaguy (profile), 29 Jul 2011 @ 11:29am

and another thing...
the copyrightsettlements.com (aka 'trolls') website very proudly displays the authorize.net logo, in order to assure their victims that their payments will go to the right pockets (any of those on the jeans of the copyright holders?) Note that authorize.net (not a company that means anything to me, even after reading the wiki on it) cannot and will not verify the trolls. :-) too funny.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Zot-Sindi, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:12pm

Re: Re: Copytard
Hee! it's copytard simply because they copy just as much as anyone else does, and that's okay, they are being creative/innovative, but when someone else copies (god forbid copies THEM) they are suddenly the most sorry worthless scum of the earth with no creativity to speak of...

so, they are a retarded copier, since they can't decide if copying is good or not
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Zot-Sindi, 29 Jul 2011 @ 8:13pm

Re: Re: Re: Copytard
also, i think it was actually short for "copyrightard", IIRC, but either way works
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jul 2011 @ 6:23am

You are such a buffoon, Masnick. That language is standard boilerplate used by ISPs and other copyright law firms.

Google it, you fucking idiot.

And why aren't you screaming "fair use" like you usually do for all your freetard buddies?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
abc gum, 30 Jul 2011 @ 7:41am

Re:
What is it about hypocrisy that you do not understand?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jul 2011 @ 9:00am

Re: Re:
What hypocrisy? It isn't copyrighted content. It's legal boilerplate. Lawyers use the same legal language all the time.

It's funny how you tards feel the need to defend even the stupidest of Masnick's posts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jul 2011 @ 7:39pm

"Anti-Piracy Lawyer John Steele Caught Stealing Content From Other Anti-Piracy Lawyer"

fixed for you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
abc gum, 31 Jul 2011 @ 7:18am

Re: Re: Re:
"What hypocrisy? It isn't copyrighted content. It's legal boilerplate. Lawyers use the same legal language all the time."

I was unaware of this exclusion to the copyright clause you refer to as "boilerplate". Let's see if I can summarize it. After something has been stolen multiple times by multiple people it becomes known as "boilerplate" and is no longer subject to copyright, or alternatively it automatically becomes a CC licensed item. Is this correct?

"It's funny how you tards feel the need to defend even the stupidest of Masnick's posts."

Pointing out hypocrisy does not imply the taking of one side of a debate over the other, not sure why this is misunderstood.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 12:27am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
There's no hypocrisy, you hopeless box of rocks.

Masnick might as well complain about Steele speaking words that someone else already spoke.

The post was yet more evidence that Masnick's a joke and so are you.

Thanks to both of you for willingly providing daily evidence of that. The bait was set a year ago and you all have obliged flawlessly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 May 2012 @ 2:08am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What Mike posted, or the fact that Mike posted, is of no relevance.

The fact is that CEG has now declared that John Steele was not authorised to copy that paragraph and considered taking action, fair use or otherwise.

So why aren't you supporting CEG and attacking Mike instead? Aren't you always supporting the rightsholders?

Douchenozzle.
[ link to this | view in thread ]