Out With The Old... In With The Older At The RIAA
from the facepalm dept
There were rumors about this last week, but now it's been confirmed that RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol has left to head up the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?Mitch: "Rather than help a legacy industry adapt to changing times, I focused on a self-destructive legal campaign against fans, got Congress to pass bad laws that made things worse, made the companies I represent more hated than before (and we already started super low!) and, on top of all that, failed to do anything to help the record labels improve their bottom lines."Honestly, Bainwol's biggest accomplishment may have been making his predecessor, Hilary Rosen, look insightful and progressive in her views on the recording industry.
Detroit: "Wow, you sound like our kind of guy... Sign here!"
So, with Bainwol out, did the RIAA find someone who actually is willing to help the RIAA and the record labels adapt to these changing times a decade and a half too late? Did it hire someone who won't fall for the same old traps again, but who might actually embrace the modern world in a way that helps the record labels earn more money?
Nope. It just promoted President Cary Sherman, who has probably been a lot more public and vocal than Bainwol anyway. Oh, and they also promoted Mitch Glazier to take on more responsibilities as well. If you want any more evidence as to just how anti-artist the RIAA is, all you have to do is look at Glazier's most famous moment, allegedly sneaking in a few words into an unrelated bill to take away the ability of musicians to take back their copyrights from record labels, when he was a nobody Congressional staffer. A few months later, he was pulling down a half million dollar salary from the RIAA. Convenient. This created such a scandal among musicians that it's one of the few major policy issues in which Congress eventually rolled back his changes. I don't see how the RIAA presents itself as "pro-artist," when this is the guy they have as second in charge.
As for Sherman, not only is he one of the highest paid lobbyists out there (making even more than Bainwol), but among his greatest hits are his desire to roll back the DMCA's safe harbors (the one good part of the DMCA), his explanation for why suing college kids is good for business and his lovely attempts to get federal financial aid pulled from universities that don't act as copyright cops.
This is not how you drag the recording industry into this century. It's how you drag it down.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cary sherman, lobbyists, mitch bainwol, mitch glazier
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
These moves are a good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: These moves are a good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: These moves are a good thing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I doubt Mike would want the job. The money is great, but having to sell your soul to get it just isn't worth it. The folks in charge of the RIAA, and the RIAA itself, have to tow the party line given to them by the majors...as they are in business to support the majors. If the majors don't like who they have in the chair, the majors will change it. We are thinking of RIAA as a separate and powerful organization, but really what they are now is just the lobbying arm of the majors. To make changes, you need to get rid of the CEOs of Warner, Sony, etc., and replace them with folks that are interested in modernizing the business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
1 agree with your analysis
2 I was joking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's actually toe the line. Sorry, that one always bugs me. ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line
I agree with you post though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1.Fuck Off RIAA !!! I dumped you and your shitty lables back in 1976 and never came back and never will.Any Artist who sings with these bastards are a traitor to the rst of us starving musicians.Go pull yer Wanker fools.
2. I n 2012 I will be stopping my practice of always voting for the lesser evil and choosing a Democrat to stop a Republican.I will now be voting for another Party like The Green Party maybe or INDIE Politicians.
No more asshole Dems and Reps and all their legal corrupt money payoffs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Please. You and every other failed musician would sell their soul to sign a contract with a major record company. Maybe it's not the record companies fault you are starving, perhaps you just stink.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm with him, actually.
And "dumped your shitty labels" doesn't just mean not trying to get signed to one; it also means not listening to music on a major label.
At least it does in my case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Why are you so sure they'd go out of their way to do one of the stupidest things a musician can do? There are literally NO benefits to signing to a major record label.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> always voting for the lesser evil and
> choosing a Democrat to stop a Republican
Vote Cthulhu!
Why choose the lesser evil?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?"
Even worse are the abstract types who in their ivory towers study vague "economics" without even grasping where their daily food comes from, who can blithely make up examples that totally disregard "sunk (or fixed) costs" so that they can "prove" that marginal costs are the only relevant consideration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They look at everything going on in the world, then throw tiny bits of truth together to support their goals, and then report that to their "followers" as the gospel truth.
Your busy running a record label, blaming everything going wrong on those damn pirates, you watch the Faux News report that they got this law fixed, changed that, and screwed over your workforce.
Faux gets a couple talking heads offering commentary, people that will be recognized by their demographic as being important (but not so relevant any more). So Bono and Prince give their editorial commentary, it has to be editorial because they can't support what they say in with facts. When you attack what they say with facts they use other distraction methods about how you hate music.
They report how the record labels are loosing trillions, and can't afford to pay artists like they should. The poor artists are being screwed by the pirates! (not the evil contracts) When stories about the labels stealing from the artists get any coverage they are discredited and called an "oversight". (They were on the hook for 6 Billion in Canada for not paying artists when they used their work commercially... which is actual piracy of music.)
While the tactics are sleazy and totally unrelated to the point, a certain demographic falls into lockstep with the ideals. They support every idea, not ever thinking that it might affect them because they do nothing wrong it doesn't affect them.
And slowly little frog, the pot gets a little warmer... and warmer... and then you can't DVR your favorite show... then you can't have surround sound because they turned off that port with a law.... then you find ICE storming your house to verify all of the music on your iPod is legally purchased...
It might be a little hyperbole, but is it that far removed from what they already have done?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA, representing the artists? Wonder where this folk tale was first told.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Seriously, give more information. Spouting off slogans and insisting that your point of view should be obvious to everyone is no way to debate someone. All it does it show how ignorant you are and how you just want stuff for free. You aren't showing otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Now you can make the claim that if your innocent you have nothing to fear, but we have seen time and time again in the history of the world that this is not true. As more and more is taken away, you are left with nothing.
What we have here is a lobbyist group who on multiple occasions have lied, made it clear they hold all fans in contempt (paying or not), and want the entire world altered for a small group of businesses.
BTW you way better at this than the other shill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Truthfully I think both sides of this have it wrong. I think that the government is an over-reaching monstrosity, but I think that the people who run around bitching that they're going to be taken, tattooed, beaten, and have horrible experiments on them are just making most of you guys look like a stupid bunch of kids that just want free stuff. I know better, but those few are so much fun to troll.
Now please get out of my thread so I can keep destroying the retards instead of people who are attempting to be reasonable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Do I need a code word to keep you guys out of my trolling threads? Something that lets you know that I'm not doing it to counter an argument (except maybe the holocaust one), I'm doing it for the fun?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
that should be safe, it was such a bad movie no one even torrented it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
> have signed with the label.
But that same sentiment never applies to the industry, right? That's why it's okay to sneak in a repeal of copyright reclamation into an unrelated bill at the eleventh hour.
Right?
After all, using your standard, if the record labels didn't like the law, they should have found another industry in which to do business.
Right?
Let me guess... it's 'different' when they do it.
Right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
https://torrentfreak.com/and-when-even-the-death-penalty-doesnt-deter-copying-what-then-110 807/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Interesting link though. People think corporations take copying seriously these days? Breaking the wheel sounds downright nasty, even as torture goes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Most likely, yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I wonder where it's coming from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Please remember your statement. Then refresh the main page in about 10 minutes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you have a crystal ball account just log in.
And he was talking about the death penalty story. Separately, fyi, the list of titles that you see in the crystal ball are not all of the stories that we're working on. Just a selection of five random ones. They only start showing definitely if they're ready to go and set to post. In this case, he was talking about the death penalty one.
Still, it amuses me to no end that someone running around yelling "freetard" appears to have paid us for a crystal ball. Might as well log in and show off your "insider" badge. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
P.S. That's still not a death camp. It's a whole fucking lot of people, and it's downright sick that they did this, but it is still not a camp and it is still centuries ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You'd be surprised. We have a few around who are named.
P.S. That's still not a death camp.
I didn't claim it was. I agree that the death camp claim is silly. But I was just pointing out what that particular comment was about since you seemed to have missed it.
Anyway, still amuses me that a (self-confessed) troll would give us money, but okay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Where would I troll if the places that I troll weren't supported somehow? I know that you don't make all (or even much if memory serves) your money from the blog.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Where would I troll if the places that I troll weren't supported somehow? I know that you don't make all (or even much if memory serves) your money from the blog.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You missed torrent freak the other day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What is it with you copyright maximalists claiming anyone who doesn't agree with you is a "freetard?"
I agree that the whole Holocaust comparison is hyperbole, but using the word "freetard" is just as bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope they can pass all those absurd laws they are so fond of and hope congress gives them everything an then some.
Because then I can laugh harder.
I still won't be buying anything or spending money on them, I found free(as in freedom) music and I ain't going back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKDk-mg1J9Q
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Twisted Sister - Were Not Gona Take It
Starship - We Built This City (Maybe should change the lyrics to "We built this city on freedom")
The new version is not that cool though.
Quote:
Source: http://www.grist.org/list/2011-04-18-the-ultimate-hippie-mobile-an-electric-vw-bus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't be too content about keeping that type of music site if Protect IP passes. The list of banned sites will probably be based on the RIAA's list of "pirate" sites. We have already seen those lists, and a lot of the sites promote the type of free music you enjoy. Once they get the full weight of law enforcement behind them, the definition of pirated music will be any site that promotes non-RIAA music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ban proxies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only ever been like this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's been confirmed that RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol has left to head up the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's funny to me...
'Free' got me to spend money. Without the 'free,' none of those artists would have seen a dime from me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yup, new business models will really help keep the recording industry going. Yeah, right!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So you fail on that point.
What the RIAA does is create studies, of questionable merit, making claims that the interests they represent are under attack. They then run to the lawmakers and demand that society be altered to support their business model.
I think the music industry would do much better with the RIAA gone. They might finally have to accept that the market has changed, and embrace it.
It seems like new business models have helped them. While CD sales are down/dead, the digital sales have gone up. While they do not make as much from each digital sale as they did on a physical object they do not have to pay as many costs, despite the contracts extracting those payments from artists still.
Napster made music easy to get, and then iTunes helped rocket legal digital sales. It sort of proved the idea, if you make it available at a good price... people will buy.
So maybe removing the dinosaur demanding the industry be protected at the cost of everyone else would be a good thing.
But nice try... go back to your talking points email and pick another couple to try and sell on the board.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And how are those old business models working out for you these days?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]