Out With The Old... In With The Older At The RIAA

from the facepalm dept

Tue, Aug 9th 2011 6:03am — Mike Masnick

There were rumors about this last week, but now it's been confirmed that RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol has left to head up the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?

Mitch: "Rather than help a legacy industry adapt to changing times, I focused on a self-destructive legal campaign against fans, got Congress to pass bad laws that made things worse, made the companies I represent more hated than before (and we already started super low!) and, on top of all that, failed to do anything to help the record labels improve their bottom lines."

Detroit: "Wow, you sound like our kind of guy... Sign here!"

Honestly, Bainwol's biggest accomplishment may have been making his predecessor, Hilary Rosen, look insightful and progressive in her views on the recording industry.

So, with Bainwol out, did the RIAA find someone who actually is willing to help the RIAA and the record labels adapt to these changing times a decade and a half too late? Did it hire someone who won't fall for the same old traps again, but who might actually embrace the modern world in a way that helps the record labels earn more money?

Nope. It just promoted President Cary Sherman, who has probably been a lot more public and vocal than Bainwol anyway. Oh, and they also promoted Mitch Glazier to take on more responsibilities as well. If you want any more evidence as to just how anti-artist the RIAA is, all you have to do is look at Glazier's most famous moment, allegedly sneaking in a few words into an unrelated bill to take away the ability of musicians to take back their copyrights from record labels, when he was a nobody Congressional staffer. A few months later, he was pulling down a half million dollar salary from the RIAA. Convenient. This created such a scandal among musicians that it's one of the few major policy issues in which Congress eventually rolled back his changes. I don't see how the RIAA presents itself as "pro-artist," when this is the guy they have as second in charge.

As for Sherman, not only is he one of the highest paid lobbyists out there (making even more than Bainwol), but among his greatest hits are his desire to roll back the DMCA's safe harbors (the one good part of the DMCA), his explanation for why suing college kids is good for business and his lovely attempts to get federal financial aid pulled from universities that don't act as copyright cops.

This is not how you drag the recording industry into this century. It's how you drag it down.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cary sherman, lobbyists, mitch bainwol, mitch glazier
Companies: riaa

76 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

John Doe, 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:15am

These moves are a good thing...
The sooner the new/old bosses get in there and mess things up even further, the sooner the RIAA will implode and we can get on with real innovation in the industry.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
E. Zachary Knight (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:16am

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mike allen (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:20am

Anti artist not trusted most hated and treats customers of being criminals, not the best way to run a organisation can it get worse? It just did. If they want the recording industry to survive they should appoint er someone like Mike Masnick maybe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The eejit (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:34am

I'd sort it for 100k/year in three, maybe four years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
gorehound (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:46am

All I can say is two things:

1.Fuck Off RIAA !!! I dumped you and your shitty lables back in 1976 and never came back and never will.Any Artist who sings with these bastards are a traitor to the rst of us starving musicians.Go pull yer Wanker fools.

2. I n 2012 I will be stopping my practice of always voting for the lesser evil and choosing a Democrat to stop a Republican.I will now be voting for another Party like The Green Party maybe or INDIE Politicians.
No more asshole Dems and Reps and all their legal corrupt money payoffs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:52am

Re:
No you wouldn't, because as RIAA boss you would have to do what the member companies tell you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
out_of_the_blue, 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:55am

"I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?"
He's been through management classes at a college. He knows all about widgets and maybe a little about "managing", but nothing about any actual hardware. He's an organization man, a manipulator of people, not of the physical. One of the worst changes since the 60's is disappearance of the hard-science, empirical, scientific, "geeky" types who were into manufacturing, and who regarded the rest of the business, including profits, as almost incidental.

Even worse are the abstract types who in their ivory towers study vague "economics" without even grasping where their daily food comes from, who can blithely make up examples that totally disregard "sunk (or fixed) costs" so that they can "prove" that marginal costs are the only relevant consideration.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:55am

Think of the RIAA as Faux News.

They look at everything going on in the world, then throw tiny bits of truth together to support their goals, and then report that to their "followers" as the gospel truth.

Your busy running a record label, blaming everything going wrong on those damn pirates, you watch the Faux News report that they got this law fixed, changed that, and screwed over your workforce.

Faux gets a couple talking heads offering commentary, people that will be recognized by their demographic as being important (but not so relevant any more). So Bono and Prince give their editorial commentary, it has to be editorial because they can't support what they say in with facts. When you attack what they say with facts they use other distraction methods about how you hate music.

They report how the record labels are loosing trillions, and can't afford to pay artists like they should. The poor artists are being screwed by the pirates! (not the evil contracts) When stories about the labels stealing from the artists get any coverage they are discredited and called an "oversight". (They were on the hook for 6 Billion in Canada for not paying artists when they used their work commercially... which is actual piracy of music.)

While the tactics are sleazy and totally unrelated to the point, a certain demographic falls into lockstep with the ideals. They support every idea, not ever thinking that it might affect them because they do nothing wrong it doesn't affect them.

And slowly little frog, the pot gets a little warmer... and warmer... and then you can't DVR your favorite show... then you can't have surround sound because they turned off that port with a law.... then you find ICE storming your house to verify all of the music on your iPod is legally purchased...

It might be a little hyperbole, but is it that far removed from what they already have done?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:16am

Re:
@Gorehound

Please. You and every other failed musician would sell their soul to sign a contract with a major record company. Maybe it's not the record companies fault you are starving, perhaps you just stink.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:17am

I really laughed warmly at those news. The image of jews voting for Hitler if he tried to be their leader comes to mind. And please, see the analogy and keep hate and moralist comments to yourself ;)

RIAA, representing the artists? Wonder where this folk tale was first told.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nicedoggy, 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:24am

I sincerely whish them all the best.
I hope they can pass all those absurd laws they are so fond of and hope congress gives them everything an then some.

Because then I can laugh harder.

I still won't be buying anything or spending money on them, I found free(as in freedom) music and I ain't going back.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:30am

Note to self: Sell auto industry stocks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ASTROBOI, 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:30am

Only ever been like this.
Oddly, this article brought back memories of the 1979 movie "Over the Edge". It begins as the class misfit shoots out the window of the villages most hated cop. The school retaliates with an "assembly" where new, strict rules of behavior are announced. "Smoking, on or off school property will result in immediate suspension!" warns the principal. Then they show a silly movie meant to curb vandalism. Naturally, the audience mocks the film and the speaker. Jonathon Kaplan certainly had his finger on the pulse of the kids and their minders, way back then. And today it is business as usual with OUR minders, making it clear that misbehavior will be punished any way possible even if that punishment bears no relation to the alleged infraction. We are all still in high school as far as the business people are concerned. And why not? They aim most of their music and movies at kids and young adults. And they will never stop punishing us for doing stuff they would very much rather we didn't do, whether it works or not. Because it worked so well in 1979.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:38am

Re: These moves are a good thing...
Agreed. The sooner the RIAA hits bottom the better.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:41am

Re:
I couldn't help myself...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKDk-mg1J9Q
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kaden (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:42am

Re: Re:
Start the day with dated, condescending generalizations and a few gratuitous insults. It's the breakfast of champions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CommonSense (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:43am

Re: These moves are a good thing...
That's what I was thinking too... They must not have felt that their demise was coming fast enough, so they're doing what they hope will help bring it along sooner.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fogbugzd (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:50am

Re:
>>I still won't be buying anything or spending money on them, I found free(as in freedom) music and I ain't going back.

Don't be too content about keeping that type of music site if Protect IP passes. The list of banned sites will probably be based on the RIAA's list of "pirate" sites. We have already seen those lists, and a lot of the sites promote the type of free music you enjoy. Once they get the full weight of law enforcement behind them, the definition of pirated music will be any site that promotes non-RIAA music.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
weneedhelp (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:50am

it's been confirmed that RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol has left to head up the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
There goes the automobile aftermarket. Sorry Summit you infringe on our IP. That goes for you too Jegs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ltlw0lf (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 7:53am

Re:
If they want the recording industry to survive they should appoint er someone like Mike Masnick maybe.

I doubt Mike would want the job. The money is great, but having to sell your soul to get it just isn't worth it. The folks in charge of the RIAA, and the RIAA itself, have to tow the party line given to them by the majors...as they are in business to support the majors. If the majors don't like who they have in the chair, the majors will change it. We are thinking of RIAA as a separate and powerful organization, but really what they are now is just the lobbying arm of the majors. To make changes, you need to get rid of the CEOs of Warner, Sony, etc., and replace them with folks that are interested in modernizing the business.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The eejit (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:14am

Re: Re:
Says the AC who can't be reasonable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:18am

Re: Re: Re:
Leave him alone. I'm the AC that won't be reasonable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Robert Doyle (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:20am

It's funny to me...
I always think back to my younger years (high school, university) when I would get a song from a buddy on a tape of some garage band (like the Barenaked Ladies - a local crop) or some other group. I would play it, and if I liked it, I would start hunting for their actual tapes (and CD's when they came out too...) and spending my hard-earned money on those things. It didn't even occur to me that the 'free' copy I had (but it isn't, is it? They get a cut from every disc sold, but the artists I was recording on it didn't see that money as they weren't part of the industry yet) was good enough.

'Free' got me to spend money. Without the 'free,' none of those artists would have seen a dime from me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:21am

Re:
What is it with you freetards trying to equate your 'plight' with the holocaust? The moment the first one of you gets put in a death camp for copyright infringement is the moment I join your cause.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:30am

Re:
Meet the new boss, worse than the old boss.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:32am

Re: "I'm sort of curious what his job qualifications were?"
I love it when individuals with no background in economics what-so-ever make grandiose statements demonstrating such as if they're profound truths others are missing and not just demonstrations of their own abject ignorance.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
herbert, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:45am

let's face it. these industries are not in the least bit interested in being brought into the digital age. they are only interested in being in control of the people and the internet and making sure everyone is ripped off as many times as possible for getting the same thing, but in different formats. what does truly amaze me is that there has never been a list of the dinosaurs that are keeping these industries in the dark ages. surely someone knows who they all are? surely those artists that are supposed to be represented know what is going on and how important it is that the digital age is embraced, not continuously fought against? why don't any of those artists say something? are they so gutless or simply so brainwashed? after all, it's them that are losing the most, both in money and respect!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:45am

Re: Re:
There is no cause. It's just the steady march of progress, same as it's always been.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:49am

Re: Re:
Artists are freetards too?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:58am

Re: Re:
Your late.

https://torrentfreak.com/and-when-even-the-death-penalty-doesnt-deter-copying-what-then-110 807/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 8:59am

Re: Re: Re:
I'm confused. A steady march to death camps? What am I missing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:01am

Re: Re: Re:
Some of them are. If they didn't like the terms, they shouldn't have signed with the label. They should go off and live the magical dream of Jonathan Coulton or Amanda Palmer or honor the contract they signed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:05am

Re: Re: Re:
If you have to go back a few centuries to find that reference then you have no argument. There are no death camps for copyright infringers.

Interesting link though. People think corporations take copying seriously these days? Breaking the wheel sounds downright nasty, even as torture goes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:13am

Re:
how long until the bailout..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nicedoggy, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:14am

Re: Re:
What are they going to do?
Ban proxies?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nicedoggy, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:16am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
It was a capital crime to listen to American music in the USRR is that not good enough?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:19am

Re: Re:
What is it with you freetards trying to equate your 'plight' with the holocaust? The moment the first one of you gets put in a death camp for copyright infringement is the moment I join your cause.

Please remember your statement. Then refresh the main page in about 10 minutes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:20am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh, I get it. You just hate everyone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:21am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Were they infringing on copyright to do it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:22am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
The obvious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:24am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually I'm a big fan of both Coulton and Palmer. I admire that they didn't like (for different reasons) labels and didn't want to be a part of that. I admire the fact that they went out to make their fortune without labels at some point. I'm glad they're both doing well. However, if you sign a contract you should either honor the contract or do what Amanda Palmer did and get them to agree to drop you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nicedoggy, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:25am

Re: Re:
The hippie-mobile is still charming after all these years LoL

Twisted Sister - Were Not Gona Take It
Starship - We Built This City (Maybe should change the lyrics to "We built this city on freedom")

The new version is not that cool though.
Quote:
Volkswagen has unveiled an electric concept vehicle based on the classic VW bus. The Bulli has a driving range of 184 miles, so if it goes into production, it could get you and your friends to Bonnaroo from as far away as Atlanta. It's smaller than the original bus, but it still seats five -- room for Shaggy, Velma, Fred, Daphne, and Scooby.

Source: http://www.grist.org/list/2011-04-18-the-ultimate-hippie-mobile-an-electric-vw-bus
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:26am

Yup, what the RIAA needs is to have TPB guys come over and take over. Within months, I am sure they can turn a billion dollar industry into "the last 5 bucks", and they can trade that for a coffee on the way out as they turn off the lights.

Yup, new business models will really help keep the recording industry going. Yeah, right!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:27am

Re: Re: Re:
Are you talking about the Dilbert story, the Wil Wheaton story, the Real Estate story, the Web 2.0 story, Advertising, or Skilled Immigrants?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:36am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, yes, you're being persecuted and your right to infringe on someone else's work is being taken from you, then you are being tattooed with the dollar amount that your infringement allegedly cost the industry. After that, you folks are being taken to camps where they test out the effects of frostbite and joining you with others who infringed on the same songs as you to see if your bodies are compatible. We get it.

Seriously, give more information. Spouting off slogans and insisting that your point of view should be obvious to everyone is no way to debate someone. All it does it show how ignorant you are and how you just want stuff for free. You aren't showing otherwise.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:37am

Re:
Well the RIAA does not actually run the music industry.
So you fail on that point.

What the RIAA does is create studies, of questionable merit, making claims that the interests they represent are under attack. They then run to the lawmakers and demand that society be altered to support their business model.

I think the music industry would do much better with the RIAA gone. They might finally have to accept that the market has changed, and embrace it.

It seems like new business models have helped them. While CD sales are down/dead, the digital sales have gone up. While they do not make as much from each digital sale as they did on a physical object they do not have to pay as many costs, despite the contracts extracting those payments from artists still.

Napster made music easy to get, and then iTunes helped rocket legal digital sales. It sort of proved the idea, if you make it available at a good price... people will buy.

So maybe removing the dinosaur demanding the industry be protected at the cost of everyone else would be a good thing.

But nice try... go back to your talking points email and pick another couple to try and sell on the board.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:41am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually the civil liberties of people, the right to privacy, the rule of law are all being taken away from people - freetard or not, all in the vain hope that a single industry can continue in the fashion they have operated for a very long time.

Now you can make the claim that if your innocent you have nothing to fear, but we have seen time and time again in the history of the world that this is not true. As more and more is taken away, you are left with nothing.

What we have here is a lobbyist group who on multiple occasions have lied, made it clear they hold all fans in contempt (paying or not), and want the entire world altered for a small group of businesses.

BTW you way better at this than the other shill.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:51am

Re:
> In 2012 I will be stopping my practice of
> always voting for the lesser evil and
> choosing a Democrat to stop a Republican

Vote Cthulhu!

Why choose the lesser evil?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:56am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
> If they didn't like the terms, they shouldn't
> have signed with the label.

But that same sentiment never applies to the industry, right? That's why it's okay to sneak in a repeal of copyright reclamation into an unrelated bill at the eleventh hour.

Right?

After all, using your standard, if the record labels didn't like the law, they should have found another industry in which to do business.

Right?

Let me guess... it's 'different' when they do it.

Right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 9:57am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
> Were they infringing on copyright to do it?

Most likely, yes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mike allen (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:03am

Re: Re:
I doubt mike would want the job
1 agree with your analysis
2 I was joking.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:06am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nope, if they don't like the terms then they should have changed the contract. If the sauce is good for the goose, it is good for the gander, as they say.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:12am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hell, I'm not a shill. I'm a troll. I like being a troll for a variety of reasons. I do this on purpose. I get a kick out of it. Once I've scooted in the word 'freetard' (to ensure I keep getting fed) and try to correct my personal hangups with people comparing whatever retardation they stand for to the holocaust (in any forum I visit...you'd be amazed how often people think what they went through is the same thing) I use words like 'infringement' to describe what is going on instead of the usual rhetoric.

Truthfully I think both sides of this have it wrong. I think that the government is an over-reaching monstrosity, but I think that the people who run around bitching that they're going to be taken, tattooed, beaten, and have horrible experiments on them are just making most of you guys look like a stupid bunch of kids that just want free stuff. I know better, but those few are so much fun to troll.

Now please get out of my thread so I can keep destroying the retards instead of people who are attempting to be reasonable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:13am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Were they being punished by the people who were enforcing those copyrights?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike Masnick (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:18am

Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are you talking about the Dilbert story, the Wil Wheaton story, the Real Estate story, the Web 2.0 story, Advertising, or Skilled Immigrants?

If you have a crystal ball account just log in.

And he was talking about the death penalty story. Separately, fyi, the list of titles that you see in the crystal ball are not all of the stories that we're working on. Just a selection of five random ones. They only start showing definitely if they're ready to go and set to post. In this case, he was talking about the death penalty one.

Still, it amuses me to no end that someone running around yelling "freetard" appears to have paid us for a crystal ball. Might as well log in and show off your "insider" badge. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jay (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:18am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And there's that huge "whoosh" sound...

I wonder where it's coming from.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:18am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Okies... as long as you remember these threads end up way to long to make it onto http://artoftrolling.memebase.com/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:21am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I don't do it for the fame. I do it for the fun.

Do I need a code word to keep you guys out of my trolling threads? Something that lets you know that I'm not doing it to counter an argument (except maybe the holocaust one), I'm doing it for the fun?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:25am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
the password is swordfish.
that should be safe, it was such a bad movie no one even torrented it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:26am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mike, see my above post. I bought a couple of T-shirts and your book a while back. If I wanted my name attached, I'd log in. It's difficult to repeatedly use the same troll methods if I keep my name attached.

P.S. That's still not a death camp. It's a whole fucking lot of people, and it's downright sick that they did this, but it is still not a camp and it is still centuries ago.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:28am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Swordfish it is then. I'll see if I can work in something about food or the movie the next time I do this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btrussell (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:33am

Re: Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110808/12354815439/if-even-death-penalty-wont-stop-infringement-p erhaps-different-approach-is-needed.shtml

You missed torrent freak the other day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:39am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
P.P.S. Do you mind if I refer to you as The Maz?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike Masnick (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:40am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mike, see my above post. I bought a couple of T-shirts and your book a while back. If I wanted my name attached, I'd log in. It's difficult to repeatedly use the same troll methods if I keep my name attached.

You'd be surprised. We have a few around who are named.

P.S. That's still not a death camp.

I didn't claim it was. I agree that the death camp claim is silly. But I was just pointing out what that particular comment was about since you seemed to have missed it.

Anyway, still amuses me that a (self-confessed) troll would give us money, but okay.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:45am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I liked the t-shirts and wanted a copy of the book. Just because I'm a troll doesn't mean I don't support things that I see value in.

Where would I troll if the places that I troll weren't supported somehow? I know that you don't make all (or even much if memory serves) your money from the blog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:45am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I liked the t-shirts and wanted a copy of the book. Just because I'm a troll doesn't mean I don't support things that I see value in.

Where would I troll if the places that I troll weren't supported somehow? I know that you don't make all (or even much if memory serves) your money from the blog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Karl (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 10:50am

Re: Re:
What is it with you freetards trying to equate your 'plight' with the holocaust?

What is it with you copyright maximalists claiming anyone who doesn't agree with you is a "freetard?"

I agree that the whole Holocaust comparison is hyperbole, but using the word "freetard" is just as bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Karl (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 11:02am

Re: Re:
You and every other failed musician would sell their soul to sign a contract with a major record company.

I'm with him, actually.

And "dumped your shitty labels" doesn't just mean not trying to get signed to one; it also means not listening to music on a major label.

At least it does in my case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 11:30am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Sort of like meta, hipster-style trolling?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 12:30pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, of course they were. What are you, stupid?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Aug 2011 @ 1:02pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I know you are but what am I?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
JMT (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 2:21pm

Re: Re:
"The folks in charge of the RIAA, and the RIAA itself, have to tow the party line..."

It's actually toe the line. Sorry, that one always bugs me. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toe_the_line

I agree with you post though.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
JMT (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 2:27pm

Re:
"Yup, new business models will really help keep the recording industry going. Yeah, right!"

And how are those old business models working out for you these days?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lauriel (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 5:59pm

Re: Re: Re:
Although the RIAA towing the party line is a nice visual. Unfortunately they'd probably move it to a worse position, rather than a more beneficial one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btrussell (profile), 9 Aug 2011 @ 6:34pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Short for "The Amazing?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RadialSkid (profile), 11 Aug 2011 @ 11:29am

Re: Re:
You and every other failed musician would sell their soul to sign a contract with a major record company.

Why are you so sure they'd go out of their way to do one of the stupidest things a musician can do? There are literally NO benefits to signing to a major record label.
[ link to this | view in thread ]