Copyright Dispute Over Tanning Lotion From Jersey Shore's 'JWOWW'
from the j-what? dept
We've actually written about a copyright dispute involving a shampoo bottle in the past. And now we've got a copyright dispute involving a tanning lotion bottle. Honestly, though, it appears to be more of a stupid contractual dispute with the plaintiffs throwing in a copyright claim just for the hell of it. The details, at THREsq, talk about how Jersey Shore's Jenni "JWOWW" Farley is being sued for offering up a tanning lotion in the bottle seen here:Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, jenni farley, jersey shore, jwoww, tanning lotion
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.flickr.com/photos/halytech/51896751/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/attempting%20to%20give%20a%20damn%20gif%20animation%20 funny/xGeegx/attemptingtogiveadamn.gif?o=1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Diamonds on tissue paper ring a bell?
Sounds like since it seems to be more linked to a lovers spat and custody rights (of the copyright, before someone misunderstands and tells me no children were hurt in the making of this), seems like she should just buy said tissue paper and leave the lawyers out of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A: People who read People.
What's the tech tie-in here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We discuss copyright here... and this is a...
*throws hands up*
Nope still can't do it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.paleisthenewtan.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm having a really, really hard time
Dermatologists will love this stuff, however, since somewhere down the line it will generate more business income for them, cutting and freezing off the various growths that will manifest years later on the people who think spending a lot of time frying in the solar glare is a good thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm having a really, really hard time
This topic is like a car wreck... can't ... look .... away...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You didn't explain WHY this is only a contract dispute and not a copyright one as well. Do you actually have an argument? This appears to be another desperate attempt by you to diss copyright law--and of course, you give no basis or argument for your position.
Here's the complaint for reference: http://ia700707.us.archive.org/8/items/gov.uscourts.okwd.81394/gov.uscourts.okwd.81394.1.0.pdf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
copyright?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bottle copyright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: bottle copyright
Because if JWOWW is intrinsic to the overall copyright on the design, then without her approval they can not market it without another lawsuit. Unless of course the contract states otherwise, and I am sure her former manager/boyfriend was very knowledgeable about these sorts of things when they signed the contract.
And of course them going to another production firm, I am willing to bet they disclosed they had a prior contract on the item in question.
My one hope in all of this is they sue until she vanishes.
Then we can hope other lawsuits will then remove the orange tint from the tv screens 1 at a time.
It will not be fast enough, but hopefully the world can recover from the idea that being a loudmouthed shallow ass makes you important.
*leans head to side listening off camera*
This just in... we're screwed still.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]