Apple Still Seems To Think That Only It Could Possibly Have An Apple Shaped Logo
from the uh,-that's-not-how-trademark-law-works... dept
A few years ago, we noted that Apple was threatening the New Zealand supermarket chain Woolworths (not connected to the now defunct US retailer of the same name) for daring to have an apple-shaped W as its logo:And, honestly, as almost everyone notes on seeing the Sichuan Fangguo Food Co. logo, if anyone should be upset, it should be LG, whose logo looks a lot closer:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: apple, logos, trademark
Companies: apple, sichuan fangguo food co, walgreens
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
S t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: S t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: S t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will Apple now sure Kelloggs for stealing their idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Will Apple now sure Kelloggs for stealing their idea
U.S.A.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More infringement
This apple is infringing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More infringement
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Soooo
He really should have been here by now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Soooo
One of my favorite quotes from the 40-Year Old Virgin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This time it's BLATANT plagiarism
As for the Woolworth's logo: There I can agree with you. Highly silly of Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This time it's BLATANT plagiarism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Kellogg's® makes Apple Jacks® too.
(P.S. I know I'm being a pedant again but for the record it's Froot Loops. Also ® of course.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Change the leaf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps both of them should sue each other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple Are Liars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More Sauce
http://www.appleandeve.com/
http://www.appleamerican.com/
http://www.applereiteight.com /
http://www.appleelectric.com/
http://www.appleone.ca/
http://www.applehealthcare.co.uk/
http://www.applesauceinc.com/
http://www.applegatefarms.com/
http://www.applevalleywaste.com /
http://applevalleymedicalcenter.com/
https://www.applebank.com/
http://www.applemetrorest aurants.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks to Techdirt, Life's Good!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not New Zealand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not New Zealand
I used to think it looked stupid when they (Woolworths of Australia) brought it in, it's a deformed W that's green. Then I went "Oh, it's meant to be an apple to represent how fresh they are". I'm not a moron but I was in a hurry that day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not New Zealand
Same as K-Mart in Australia used to be owned by K-Mart in the US before the change in ownership, and same with Target.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wikipedia to the rescue!
"On 22 August 2008, Woolworths announced it was launching a new identity for all its supermarkets.....The logo, which had been in use for 21 years, was replaced with a new brand image, designed by Hans Hulsbosch with a new green tinted icon representing the 'W' in Woolworths with the addition of a stylised leaf to suggest fresh produce. It is also reminiscent of a 1970s Woolworths logo.....In September 2009, this rebranding scheme was extended to New Zealand stores where the new Woolworths symbol is to be used alongside the Countdown brand."
I like this part: "In October 2009, it was reported that Apple Inc. had lodged an objection to Woolworths' trademark application with the Australian Government's intellectual property agency IP Australia, claiming that the logo resembles its own. The reports said that Apple was concerned that Woolworths had applied for a blanket trademark for the design, so it could be placed on any product – even on electrical goods like computers and music players. Woolworths was not selling its own brand electrical goods then, but a spokeswoman for the company said that, 'While we can't rule anything out, we haven't got any plans at the moment'."
That's true: Woolworths sells hardly anything electrical (a couple of kitchen appliences and the occasional TV and DVD player), all of which are branded by someone else. They are usually cheap pieces of crap that we (the Australian public) buy because their cheap and a good temp-job if we need it in a hurry. I don't know anyone here who would willingly buy a Home Brand TV. (Home Brand = Woolworths' Generic "In-Store" brand)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
:))
[ link to this | view in chronology ]