Universities Buying Up .xxx Domains To Stop Porn Sites Showing, Once Again, That .xxx Is A Pure Money Grab
from the .xxx dept
For many years, we've pointed out that the introduction of new top level domains (TLDs) has always been more about the cash grab than anything reasonable. The whole point is to get a bunch of companies to pay up to buy theirdomain.tld, just to prevent others from squatting. And now that .xxx is around, the same thing is happening... even to the point that Universities and colleges are buying up .xxx domains to keep them away from porn sites. Of course, this is a total waste of money, but various schools feel they need to do it. In the end, it seems like these new TLDs come across more as a protection racket than anything else. You feel the need to buy them... or run the risk of someone else "doing something bad" with them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: .xxx, tlds, universities
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why should anyone give a fuck at all about what it is called?
If I want to find harvard university, I wont try out every possible combination of names involving harvard in my address bar. I'll just search for "harvard university" with Google, or Bing, or Yahoo, Or DuckDuckGo, or... and once I find it, I bookmark it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
harvard sluts.xxx
harvard big dicks.xxx
harvard sissies.xxx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
.xxx
Regardless, I agree with fellow anonymous cowards--if you go to a .xxx site, you aren't doing it because you want to view information about the campus.
Well, maybe you do want information, but not the kind you get at a .edu...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .xxx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .xxx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .xxx
After all, the internet is for porn, not just that little area of it with all the red lights and friendly women.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .xxx
The simple elegant solution would have been to offer the early access to established domains/corps/etc and only charge them $1 a year to lock their xxx domain. But there was a way to make money, so instead we have all of this fear that web users are so stupid they will believe a .xxx domain might be legit for Harvard so Harvard spends a bunch of cash to make sure the domain is theirs forever.
Scared of being associated with porn, why are we still in the Victorian Age pretending no one looks at porn? Its a huge industry in this country and we all pretend no one would look at it.
Viva la PORN!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: .xxx
We used to have the perfect filter for .xxx, no DNS would ever resolve it. How much porn did that block? Unless you mandate that porn must be on .xxx domains, and manage to make that stick worldwide, blocking .xxx simply becomes one more thing to add to internet censor/black/block lists.
Good luck with any such mandate. It might have been possible 30 years ago, but not today
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why would freetards be against this?
Isn't it good for the economy? Think of all the money changing hands in exchange for nothing physical and for no real significant benefit other than to prevent damage to your brand?
I guess I must be a freetard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, it's all on-location filming so it's not like there is any overhead either....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They would charge more by offering a "be a media darling" studies course.
They could put cameras in all the rooms, and let life play out.
I mean... watching grungy looking burned out kids during finals is still better than Jersey Shore right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about actual child abuse on campus?
Ah, if only defensive co-ordinators were allowed to marry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When your name is more important than whats right, your doing it wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm totally confused
WTF?!?!
The porn people feel their content will be filtered from their consumers. I don't get that. Are they afraid that kids will no longer reach them at school or that adults at work won't be able to view their content??? Why are they not more concerned about a competitor using their URL with the new tld, as that seems to be the more reasonable fear.
As for the schools being worried about porn people using their URL, WTF??? Anyone typing in harvarduniversity.xxx is almost certainly looking for porn in the form of ivy league co-eds and is not confusing it with the actual university.
I just don't get it. Why is it that so many people want to act like porn doesn't exist? The movie industry does roughly $11 billion in ticket sales while the porn industry does roughly $11 billion annually. Sounds to me like Star Wars and Star Whores are doing equally well and might even share the same audience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> will pass because because as long as it is still accessible
> and not modified there is no free speech issue.
Except for the fact that Congress doesn't have authority over the whole planet. How are they going to force a German or Russian or Brazilian web site to abide by the XXX domain law they pass?
And who gets to decide what's sexual enough to qualify? Some people don't think anything short of full penetration shots qualifies as porn. Others think the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue or the Victoria's Secret Lingerie Show or major network TV shows are porn. Some ultra-religious people believe anytime a woman is shown with *any* part of her body uncovered, it's porn.
Whose values is Congress going to codify into the law in the US? And won't those people whose values don't make the cut have a 1st Amendment claim?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Their only real function is to make idiots and corporations waste money buying the same URL multiple times and of course produce work for lawyers when someone inevitably manages to claim one first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Surely everyone would think it was the college/university/business itself posting porn of their employees! Why else would the URL before the .XXX be the same?!? Do you know the irreparable damage that could be done to their reputations from false slanderous attacks being reported in the media! Look at that poor lady who's reputation was ruined by highly doctored videos saying she didn't help a poor white couple save their farm because she was racist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Has techdirt taken steps to protect itself?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
xxx domains
That being said, cyber-squatting is cyber-squatting regardless of whether the tld is .com or .xxx. The reality is that ICANN has made it very clear, that just because you own the domain doesn't mean you own the copyright/trademark..etc etc. You can still be sued in the court of law if you own a .xxx domain that infringes on the copyrights or trademarks of others.
In fact, ICANN have it in writing "the applicant will be deemed on notice of the intellectual property claims submitted by the other Sunrise applicant(s) and may not claim lack of notice with regard to such applicant(s) in any subsequent dispute proceeding" which is legal-jargon for don't say we didn't warn you...
Now I doubt anyone would be stupid enough to go for something like cocacola.xxx, that's a bankruptcy case waiting to happen, similarly I doubt cocacola isn't snapping up those domains as we speak, what's a couple of thousand dollars in domains anyway.
It's going to be the little guys who suffer, the 'slightly' influential bloggers, who get anywhere from 300,000 to 1 million blog hits a month, and who are 'may' have their hard-earned brand names dragged through the mud with porn site or be extorted for cyber-squatting........in a sense I understand the frustration behind the case and to me at least, the xxx domain isn't going to be accomplishing what it set out to accomplish.
For more, please visit my post on the subject:
http://www.keithrozario.com/2011/10/xxx-domain-names-and-what-you-should-know.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The solution is to open the name space
Allow all entities to register any domain below a TLD of 3 to 8 (or maybe more) characters. But not own the TLD, of course. And explicitly make clear that a TLD is a place, not a Trademark, and that nobody may bring in lawsuits regarding them, or have any rights (apart from the first-come first-serve rights stemming from the registration) to them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money? Not unless you're selling photos of nude sorority girls, and doing that without permission is pretty illegal as far as I'm aware. Because they'll look up porn in class? Okay, *I* am a college student, and I have yet to see one bored student do anything other than play WoW during class while my Anthropology professor was talking about the Rwandan Genocide. In fact, most professors now don't even allow computers in their lecture rooms because it distracts both the student and students around said student.
Furthermore, these students are more often than not legal adults, or at least 18 or older. For further emphasis, you only need to be 18 to rent a porno from video retailer chain Family Video's Adult section! Other students are legally old enough to drink, they sure as Hell don't need protection from porn when half of them are already shagging at all-night pre-Midterm parties when they should be studying.
... I don't get it. Punchline is where?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bokep asia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]