Porn Giant Vivid to Take Legal Action Over HTC Vivid Name

from the there's-a-fap-for-that dept

Tue, Dec 6th 2011 11:13am — Timothy Geigner

Trademark... *sigh*. Such a decent idea twisted horribly, horribly wrong at times. I'll try to keep this one simple for fear of flying off into some kind of puntastic boondoggle.

Reader sinsi sent in the Tom's Guide story about Vivid, best known for pumping out pornography, sending a cease and desist notice to HTC, best known for pumping out phones. The issue, apparently, is that HTC's latest smart phone is called "The Vivid," a word fairly commonplace in the English language. Now, Vivid Entertainment has crossed paths with the technology sector in the past, when they sued the enigmatically-named PornoTube website (I wonder what they have to offer), or when their executives decided that it was Google and Yahoo's fault that kids were seeing the fine cinematography Vivid produces.

Still, I find myself asking the same questions about many of these Trademark suits lately: doesn't there have to be some kind of industry crossover for this to be valid? And at what point are moron-sturbators in a hurry going to confuse a smart phone for a the latest Superhero porno parody? Seriously...how does this happen? Did someone at Vivid overhear an HTC customer say, "This phone blows," and get confused?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: phones, trademark, vivid
Companies: htc, vivid entertainment

36 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:18am

Vivid films
You scoff but lots of others think it is fine cinematography.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Kevin H (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:32am
  
  Re: Vivid films
  That is some high quality mattress acting.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:59am
  
  Re: Vivid films
  The actors are so lazy. One of them is always lying down while the other one does all the work.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Francisco, 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:47am

You bastard!
I was drinking a glass of water when I read this:

"And at what point are moron-sturbators in a hurry going to confuse a smart phone for a the latest Superhero porno parody? Seriously...how does this happen? Did someone at Vivid overhear an HTC customer say, "This phone blows," and get confused?"

Brilliant sir! Brilliant.

I guess that Vivid's lawyers were having a boring day at work so they decided to sue. What I can not understan is how can you be bored if one of your clients is a porn company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:53am
  
  Re: You bastard!
  "What I can not understan is how can you be bored if one of your clients is a porn company."
  
  No, no, sir. I really think we need to discuss this in person, preferably at one of your sets. I'll bring the blow....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chris Rhodes (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 1:15pm
    
    Re: Re: You bastard!
    I'll bring the blow
    Be careful with that quote around porn sets . . .
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Kevin H (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:57am
  
  Re: You bastard!
  easy, you can only watch someone get drilled 3 ways so much before its like getting a cup of coffee. Like anything you just get used to it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - weneedhelp (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 1:39pm
    
    Re: Re: You bastard!
    But you still get a cup of coffee 2 to maybe 3 times a day every day.
    
    Love PPPPPorn!!!! Thats right I said it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 11:59am

You'll love the new variety of vibrate settings on the Vivid!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gorehound (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 12:04pm

Is it not time for us to all start "Copyrighting" words out of the Dictionary ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Machin Shin, 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:19am
  
  Re:
  Who owns the copyright on the word copyright? I think I need to go ahead and stake my claim on this. So from now on I will claim infringement anytime anyone has a copyright case without licensing the term from me first.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Dan (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 12:04pm

Blame Apple
You remember how Apple was able to settle by assuring Apple Records they would never go into the music business? Remember how they later did?

"As a condition of the settlement, Apple Computer agreed not to enter the music business, and Apple Corps agreed not to enter the computer business."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer

These trademark things of "not in the same industry" cause problems later when the upstart spreads into the industry they initially weren't encroaching on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MAC, 6 Dec 2011 @ 12:15pm
  
  Re: Blame Apple
  Apple Computer lied.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe Perry (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 1:10pm
  
  Re: Blame Apple
  I agree with your point, but that case is different in that it was about the company name, and this case is about a company name vs the name of a product. even if htc went into the music business for w/e reason, they would presumably not use vivid in the name, as that's just one of many phones they offer.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 2:39pm
  
  Re: Blame Apple
  Well high res shots of the phones in glamor poses could be considered nerd porn... you win this round...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
aikiwolfie (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 12:05pm

IPMAX In Thunderdrome!
LOL! This whole IP ownership nonsense gets more ridiculous by the day. Before you know it every human on the planet will have to devise his/her/it's own language and totally unique name just to live without being sued. Of course we'll all have to pay each other royalties every time we talk to one another using the other's language.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 6 Dec 2011 @ 12:10pm
  
  Re: IPMAX In Thunderdrome!
  That won't fix the problem. English may as well be open source (technically it's public domain). It's corporations paying government for the right to abuse the commons via what's supposed to be a consumer protection device.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 6 Dec 2011 @ 6:11pm

Wait, so you're telling me that every use of the word "Vivid" isn't related to the porn company of the same name?

I was wondering why enabling PowerDVD's Vivid mode didn't make everyone naked, like I expected...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 7:23pm

Damn, I'm going to cancel my order for the Vivid phone... I thought it was going to come preloaded with some Porn!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 7:58pm

Well, this is one of those cases where on the surface it looks silly, but in reality it's a very good case.

First off, Vivid needs to zealously protect it's trademarks. That is sort of a requirement. Second, Vivid does offer online porn via smart phones / mobile phones. So there is potential at least to some extent for some marginal confusion. Thirdly, the name might suggest to some that Vivid has partnered with HTC on a phone, which is just not the case.

Without taking this action, Vivid would leave themselves open for others to use their tradename is other ways that the company might get involved in, say like "Vivid Blu Ray Discs" (blanks).

Mike, you need to think past your nose, you are so in a rush to slam things that sometimes you just don't think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 6 Dec 2011 @ 8:18pm
  
  Re:
  Hi. I wrote this article, not mike, so it is my rather copious nose we'll be discussing, not his. That said, I'll be thumbing said nose at the sheer nonsense of your comment.
  
  Zealously protecting trademarks is fine, if there's a chance of market confusion. In this case, there isn't. Morons in all kinds of hurries wouldn't think HTC was partnering with Vivid. The very idea of a technology firm like HTC snuggling up with a bunch of cum-dumpsters like Vivid is silly. The fact that you try to pawn it off as some kind of confusion makes you silly too.
  
  I suggest being less silly. Perhaps there's a class somewhere....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 4:58am
    
    Re: Re:
    Nice dismissive comment, too bad you don't address the material.
    
    Carry on. Ignorance is bliss, and you are proving to be a pretty happy helmet today.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Marcus Carab (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:11am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Nice dismissive comment, too bad you don't address the material.
      
      Uh, yeah he did. You claim there is a genuine chance of market confusion - he claims you're an idiot if you actually believe that. And I hate to break it to you, but I think he's right.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:21am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Marcus, there is a chance of market confusion between Vivid's "smartphone" services as this phone. It's not a HUGE chance of confusion, but in the world of trademarks, any potential for confusion should be addressed, otherwise you allow your trademark to narrow.
        
        He entirely ignored the fact that Vivid does play in the online marketplace, and that their content is delivered by smart phone, and they have potential to actually have a named phone or service in the future (not unlike ESPN's phone service, example).
        
        Of course, I wouldn't expect you to ever side with a rights holder on any issue.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Dark Helmet (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:52am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'm sorry, but just to clarify, you're saying there's an actual legimtate chance that Vivid becomes a partner for an actual phone named after them? A company is going to tie themselves to Vivid Entertainment?
        
        Dude....lay off the drugs....
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        hmm (profile), 8 Dec 2011 @ 6:29am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yes, if the phone was pink, had a rubber case (sorry) and could only be used for 10mins before having to rest for 30mins or so
        
        Also there would be some sort of blue pill-shaped addon that would give you 4hours battery life......
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Marcus Carab (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 8:47am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        So you think that you should be able to trademark a dictionary word, then prevent anyone from using that word in any markets you might potentially enter? I'm sorry, but that's insane. They are a company that produces digital video, which is ubiquitous, so under your model they could potentially extend their trademark into virtually every single sector of consumer tech. Owning the trademark on "Vivid" as a video production studio does not mean they can control use of the word in any class of device that plays video.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        B Pickel (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Vivid may play in the online entertainment marketplace, under the name �Vivid Entertainment�
        Espn also plays in the online entertainment marketplace, under the name �ESPN�
        The difference with Espn is that;
        one, the name is made up,
        two, it�s the name they trade with,
        three, they use a �name� not an adjective
        
        If your point was the case, I fail to see why Vivid entertainment has not gone after the following companies/people for also using �vivid� in some of there names:
        vivid Sydney - vividsydney.com
        vividwireless - www.vividwireless.com.au (maybe vivid did branch out into this )
        vivid group - www.vividgroup.com.au
        Vivid publishing - www.vividpublishing.com.au/
        vivid � the Japanese band
        vivid � the album by living colour
        Vivid imaginations - a uk toy company (not those kind of toys ;) )
        Vivid � a centre for the production and exhibition of media art
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ethorad (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:48am
    
    Re: Re:
    He kind of does have a point, after all HTC named all of their other phones after partnerships.
    
    - For the Mozart and Schubert they travelled back in time to collaborate with classical composers. And of course the Mondrian was styled by the painter himself
    
    - They got movie tie ins for the (I am) Legend, the Incredible(s) and the Buzz (Lightyear).
    
    - They even dabbled with making phones out of alternative materials for the Gold and the Sapphire, although the Espresso was not well received. And that's before we even get onto the Stallion, that was messy.
    
    How were we to know that for this phone HTC had instead just picked a random word, just like how every other company names every other product in the world.
    
    [sent from my Motorola RAZR. Ow]
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2011 @ 9:57pm

That phone doesn't blow, it sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ethorad (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 7:35am
  
  Re:
  It keeps going down on me!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmm (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 1:48am

waiting
I'm just waiting until Vivid try to claim they have copyright/trademark/patents (take your pick) on human genitalia and sue everyone doin' the nasty........
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmm (profile), 7 Dec 2011 @ 1:49am

no confusion
Also theres no confusion here about products, unless for the HTC Vivid maybe you have to turn the phone on by stroking its screen faster and faster for 10-15mins and then it 'comes on'.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Cowheard, 7 Dec 2011 @ 2:12am

nice
"Did someone at Vivid overhear an HTC customer say, "This phone blows," and get confused?"

You win the internets until something else grabs my atten..... ooh, squirrels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 11:51am

. . . . Seriously...how does this happen? Did someone at Vivid overhear an HTC customer say, "This phone blows," and get confused?

Actually it was when the phone did NOT blow, that the confusion was caused, the reputations were damamged, and the trademark claim filed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- known coward, 7 Dec 2011 @ 11:54am
  
  Re:
  the linked post was by known coward. and should have had the title "it is the other way around"
  
  what can i say, i saw the topic and got a little ummm over excited.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]