PayPal Acts As Grinch Over Money Raised For Charity Using 'Wrong Button'; Finally Bows To Internet Pressure
from the does-anyone-like-paypal? dept
PayPal is pretty famous for the fact that almost no one likes it. It's why we're finally starting to see some alternatives springing up (or getting ready to spring up). And yet, it still seems to go out of its way to make bad decisions. The latest, via Consumerist, is that it completely shut down a charitable "secret santa" program that regretsy set up, all because the site used the "donate" button, rather than one of its other buttons. According to PayPal, only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button. Of course, rather than point this out to regretsy, it let a bunch of transactions go through, and was requiring that they all be reversed... though PayPal would keep the transaction fees (of course). Apparently, in the mind of PayPal, no one but a non-profit ever asked for donations for anything. Seriously, though, if PayPal has such strict rules for using the donation button, why not, um, make companies prove their status before they can set up a site using the donate button?Either way, as can happen when someone in PR finally wakes up to what's happening online, the public response to this Grinch-like effort is that PayPal has agreed to back down. Of course, it shouldn't have taken a flood of negative publicity for PayPal to realize that it screwed up here.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bad pr, button, charity
Companies: paypal, regretsy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Mike, have you never heard of PayPal before?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They are the 1000 lb gorilla for online payments, and we keep waiting and hoping for something better.
A new reason to hate them is they helped develop the tech for Palantir to link random events to stop terrorists. This could explain the overhyped worldwide manhunt for the people who DDOS'd a website while real crime was left uninvestigated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They claim to have resolved the issue
http://www.regretsy.com/2011/12/06/breaking-news/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They claim to have resolved the issue
Why bother talking to the actually involved parties.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button"
Because its just some little stupid website they had never heard of, no one will care or notice. And then surprise surprise people noticed and were vocal, and suddenly their heart grew 10 times in size that day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button"
We need something ready to pounce on all of the evils of PayPal and make it simple to migrate to the new platform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "only registered non-profits are supposed to use the donate button"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
THOSE FIENDS! OVERNIGHT CORRECTION! It's INHUMAN!
This is yet another of the pieces that make me wonder if you aren't actually in the advertising business and promoting the exact reverse of what you appear to be. Of course, you COULD just be desperate for material. It's intriguing enough to make me hang around...
But at best, it's another problem already solved by the time it comes to the attention of Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
But no one would miss you if you were gone either.
AND if it was an avarage person trying to do good that didnt have an internet following they would have been screwed.
They made them give back the money, but still wanted their fees.
Ya know asshole if Mike said the sky was blue you would say it is black.
What an asshole you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
People don't want to look for alternatives because its just "easier" to deal with the PayPal nightmares.
You would think we could get someone to pass some rules for PayPal to have to follow, but they are busy passing important bills like National Vanilla and Chocolate Cupcake days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
Or solved because the representative was a complete dick first but they "made" up for it solved?
I just figured out how you could solve piracy. Yes, you. Turn off your computer and get a magazine subscription.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the hell is your point, here? To make Paypal look good?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PayPay - bah-humbug!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The more I see it happen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cats are okay
words escape me.
http://www.regretsy.com/2011/12/05/cats-1-kids-0/
There are also instances where paypal's own site offers conflicting rules:
http://thegreengeeks.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/why-paypal-is-wrong-regarding-regretsy-accordi ng-to-their-own-policies/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cats are okay
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
paypal alternatives?
Any urls?
Are they wikileaks friendly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Donate
Perhaps its just me, but I would prefer to see donate used in a narrower sense. I have always thought of a donation as something given for charity. That certainly doesn't restrict it to non-profits, but it is clearly associated with them.
When giving a voluntary payment for a service already rendered, it is more of a tip or bonus or even an actual payment where the asking price was "pay what you want". When contributing to something from which several people including me will benefit, it is a contribution or informally "chipping in." I know it is just a pet peeve, but it annoys me when donate is used for things other than charity.
With that rant out of the way, PayPal handled this badly. If it wanted to enforce its rules on the use of "Donate" (which is probably reasonable in my opinion), then it should have done its checks before taking the first payment to be processed. It is completely unreasonable to try to enforce that rule after payments have been made by people who were not decieved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paypal alternative
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good for new blogger
informative post to share, even paypal button help those who don't want to monetize their blog. In fact they have not made it for money.
thanks
kumar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]