Mocking Blackout Reactions Is Too Easy: Let's Learn From Them Instead
from the stupidity-online?-well-I-never! dept
Unsurprisingly, yesterday's Wikipedia blackout caused a lot of reaction on Twitter. The whole point of a move like this is to shock people, get their attention, and make them start asking questions—and the primary target is those who don't already know about the issue at hand. So it's also unsurprising that some of the reactions were pretty damn stupid. And since there's nothing the internet likes more than making fun of stupid people, it's once again unsurprising that a few different sources decided to catalogue and mock them.
@herpderpedia sprung up to retweet the various freak-outs and desperate pleas of stymied users—mostly students. There's a lot of misdirected anger, with people blaming Obama or denouncing Wikipedia, and a lot of general ignorance: many thought the site had already been shuttered forever, or that the blackout itself was mandated by congress. And since memes are always in their fifth stage of irony for some people while others have yet discover them, there are also quite a few tweets that look like parodies.
But what I see most of all are questions. People are asking why? in huge numbers, and that's fantastic. Granted, a lot of them are directing their questions to the wrong people, and it's not as if all of them are going to use this as a starting point to genuinely learn more about these issues. But some will. And you can bet they'll all be paying more attention to SOPA/PIPA now—not to mention any future legislation that sparks chatter about Wikipedia's Black Wednesday.
Some will say they shouldn't be asking when the blackout page provides plenty of information, but when you look closer you see that several tweets complain about complicated language and unclear explanations, and most are just shouts of extreme frustration (remember, these are all people with a looming deadline on some other project). More importantly, this speaks of broader themes online: people have two primary means of finding information now—search and social—and when one fails, they go to the other. When you want fast facts you Google something then click through to Wikipedia, but when you have a more immediate human need borne of panic—OMG OMG OMG OMG WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO WIKIPEDIA? CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME? Omg [actual tweet]—you turn to your social circles.
But it's the internet, and there will be mockery, and that's fine. I just hope the mockers realize that this isn't like when Kim Jong Il died and some Twitter users thought it was Lil Kim (that was both less excusable and more hilarious). Beneath the surface idiocy, most of these people have been nudged in the right direction by Wikipedia's blackout, even if only slightly—and their reactions provide a lot of insight if you can resist taking the potshots, most of which are too easy anyway.
Now that's out of the way, here are some easy potshots at tweets:
fuck jimmy wales. fuck him and fuck wikipedia. dickhead my works taking ages to do now cos i goota go on so many wesbits.wt a prick.'protest [What sort of company employs a quasi-illiterate to surf Wikipedia all day? I'm genuinely curious]
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? WHY AM I THE LAST TO KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS BLOCKED! I BE ON THERE DAILY!!! [I like that she is less annoyed about losing Wikipedia than she is about the fact nobody told her. I've often thought SOPA/PIPA supporters are just mad because they were the last to find out about free movies.]
I will cry if they shut down Wikipedia forever.. :'( [Why, because you won't be able to look up "sissy"?]
WHY THE FUCK IS MY WIKIPEDIA BEING A BLACK ONE I DIDNT WANT THAT OH GOD IM SO MAD [Swap "Wikipedia" with "President" and this would be the perfect redneck tweet]
I think Wikipedia planned this shit. [Really? I figured it was a typo.]
Gay no Wikipedia!? I was about to search something fucking bitch.. ["The page 'Something fucking bitch' does not exist. You can ask for it to be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered." Incidentally, the first result is "Flavor of Love (season 1)"]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackouts, informed, learning, mocking, pipa, protect ip, protests, sopa, twitter users
Companies: twitter, wikipedia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Cheap Shot
I've gotten so used to reading comments from people on Techdirt who are either
A: Intelligent
B: Shills who are paid to act stupid.
I can't imagine there are so many non-shills that act so much like Techdirt shills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cheap Shot
The bill had absolutely zero to do with sites like Facebook and Wikipedia, yet there were all these dumb lemmings talking about how the bills would end the internet.
The propaganda was all based on lies, and you know it. People are indeed stupid.
But I don't think the "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" angle is going to work again when the legislation is redrafted.
You only get to play that card once, and you've used it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2012/01/hollywood-unions-google-sop a-pipa.html
"The Protect IP Act does nothing more than make it possible for the U.S. government to handle illegal foreign websites in the same manner it can already do -- and has been doing -- with illegal sites."
That gem is from the page you linked to, Anonymous Coward. So here is the obvious question in reply to that statement; if all PIPA will do is give the U.S. government the ability to do something they already have the ability to do, why the hell is PIPA needed?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Gawd, if he stopped blatantly lying and bullshitting about these bills, he might have to actually do some honest work!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
A 100 professors of law say otherwise, analysts say otherwise and any person who actually read it knows it would harm everybody.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
That is the biggest con of all times, nobody deserves a granted monopoly enforced by any government period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Explain why we can't use it, if at all?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Me neither. Hopefully this will lead to congress and your masters to stop lying about people who oppose the bill and start real debatel. Maybe you will actually accept input from people who understand the technology, people who have ideas on how to reduce piracy without destroying free speech, and maybe even input on how to reduce it without needing any new laws whatsoever.
Perhaps this is what was needed to get you people to stop attacking and lying about the opposition, and actually get workable solutions in place. We shall see...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
They will try everything they can to continue this futile enterprise and will be hammered down like a nail sticking out into compliance, but not without a fight and that is good, that means popcorn and soda time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Speaking of liars...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Chump.
Copyright isn't going to be repealed. Infringement isn't going to be legalized. And there *will* be piracy legislation enacted; enacted because of greedy, selfish, lawbreaking douchebags like yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Fix it for ya
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
I think you are pointing the finger at the wrong person. The only greed, selfishness and lawbreaking (more like law bending) that is happening is coming from the side of SOPA supporters.
You claim that the people protesting SOPA were doing so based on lies, but the only lies I have ever seen are those coming from the mouths of SOPA supporters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Since you've become increasingly childish: I know you are, but what am I?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Really? That's the way it got drafted. Tough luck you got called on it and will be again next time around.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
The only con I see is an industry who's entire business was originally founded on infringement and "theft" trying to buy laws that prevent competition.
And while there are indeed a lot of stupid (or at least ill-informed) people out there, it's exactly those people the entertainment industry relies on to continue perpetrating their fallacies.
The rest of us see you for the shill you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
Of course, if you actually read bills instead of the talking (shilling?) points your employers give youi, you would know what the bills would really do, and why they're such a danger.
First, it allows for private cause of action: with these as law, anyone has the power of government to shut down whatever sites they don't like. It will stay shut down until the courts can work through their backlog and get around to giving the victim his day in court. That is, if the victim hasn't gone bankrupt by then.
Second, the definition of 'foreign' obviously includes actual non-domestic sites, but it also includes any domestic site, like google.com, which has a non-domestic counterpart, like google.nl. Facebook and Wwikipedia, and most everything else, is terminally vulnerable to any bad actor (like the MAFIAA) that comes along.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cheap Shot
"loosing billions to "piracy""
"every download is a lost sale"
"people are loosing jobs to piracy"
common now....shill better next time!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cheap Shot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Notice
AFAIK, 4+ hours before the blackout, the banner of Wikipedia has changed from the usual donation AD to a countdown message. (Not sure exactly how long, but I saw that in that morning when I started working)
I think this user didn't stay with Wikipedia long enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Notice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Notice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Notice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The internet is a big dark scary place, sometimes it'll send you into rage, other times it'll just make you want to curl up in a little ball and make mewing sounds. But, you don't go crazy over it, you suck it up in silence until you've collected yourself enough to post rationally. Employers check this stuff now, have a little forethought. And even without that, losing it just feeds the trolls, which is its own brand of internet sin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Student 2: Yeah ... and Copy/Paste doesn't work on them...
Student 1: Are you sure? Try again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He was obviously referring to school/university work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Humour
Not to overlook that so many were left puzzled why Wikipedia and Google now had a problem with soap.
Yes it was about awareness and for only one day of action it proved very successful. Not many days to go now and more action is needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too Funny!
I don't think I've ever laughed this hard while reading Techdirt. Nice job Mr. Carab.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8
The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.
Hint: can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
llol
This made me literally laugh out loud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, none of those were fake. Not a one.
Hitler Reacts to SOPA is rather humorous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I did mention that :) As the day went on, the balance of the feed seemed to shift from mostly real to mostly parody... All the "Soap" comments, for example, seemed to be jokes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
come on now...
as to twitter, I dont use it because despite my love of trying to pack as much into as little space as possible, i cant stand how bad my grammar/spelling have to become to make anything worth posting on there...
My favorite was the guy who called me (works for charter cable) pissed off wikipedia was blocked as where like other sites he uses daily, and he had no idea why...linked him here and to a few choice articles via email....should have seen his reaction.
later that day a huge 2 page email went out from him to all his work and non-work contacts with a bunch of links(mostly techdirt) telling people about sopa.
he should have listened when i linked the info weeks before i guess...:P
note: I dont strive to perfect grammar or spelling online, but I try not to make things to hard to understand, Its not like I am being graded (collage i always did very good in English!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
economics assignment help
Your blog is very Informative.
Visit :- homework help
[ link to this | view in chronology ]