Mocking Blackout Reactions Is Too Easy: Let's Learn From Them Instead

from the stupidity-online?-well-I-never! dept

Thu, Jan 19th 2012 10:24pm — Marcus Carab

Unsurprisingly, yesterday's Wikipedia blackout caused a lot of reaction on Twitter. The whole point of a move like this is to shock people, get their attention, and make them start asking questions—and the primary target is those who don't already know about the issue at hand. So it's also unsurprising that some of the reactions were pretty damn stupid. And since there's nothing the internet likes more than making fun of stupid people, it's once again unsurprising that a few different sources decided to catalogue and mock them.

@herpderpedia sprung up to retweet the various freak-outs and desperate pleas of stymied users—mostly students. There's a lot of misdirected anger, with people blaming Obama or denouncing Wikipedia, and a lot of general ignorance: many thought the site had already been shuttered forever, or that the blackout itself was mandated by congress. And since memes are always in their fifth stage of irony for some people while others have yet discover them, there are also quite a few tweets that look like parodies.

But what I see most of all are questions. People are asking why? in huge numbers, and that's fantastic. Granted, a lot of them are directing their questions to the wrong people, and it's not as if all of them are going to use this as a starting point to genuinely learn more about these issues. But some will. And you can bet they'll all be paying more attention to SOPA/PIPA now—not to mention any future legislation that sparks chatter about Wikipedia's Black Wednesday.

Some will say they shouldn't be asking when the blackout page provides plenty of information, but when you look closer you see that several tweets complain about complicated language and unclear explanations, and most are just shouts of extreme frustration (remember, these are all people with a looming deadline on some other project). More importantly, this speaks of broader themes online: people have two primary means of finding information now—search and social—and when one fails, they go to the other. When you want fast facts you Google something then click through to Wikipedia, but when you have a more immediate human need borne of panic—OMG OMG OMG OMG WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO WIKIPEDIA? CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME? Omg [actual tweet]—you turn to your social circles.

But it's the internet, and there will be mockery, and that's fine. I just hope the mockers realize that this isn't like when Kim Jong Il died and some Twitter users thought it was Lil Kim (that was both less excusable and more hilarious). Beneath the surface idiocy, most of these people have been nudged in the right direction by Wikipedia's blackout, even if only slightly—and their reactions provide a lot of insight if you can resist taking the potshots, most of which are too easy anyway.

Now that's out of the way, here are some easy potshots at tweets:

fuck jimmy wales. fuck him and fuck wikipedia. dickhead my works taking ages to do now cos i goota go on so many wesbits.wt a prick.'protest [What sort of company employs a quasi-illiterate to surf Wikipedia all day? I'm genuinely curious]

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? WHY AM I THE LAST TO KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS BLOCKED! I BE ON THERE DAILY!!! [I like that she is less annoyed about losing Wikipedia than she is about the fact nobody told her. I've often thought SOPA/PIPA supporters are just mad because they were the last to find out about free movies.]

I will cry if they shut down Wikipedia forever.. :'( [Why, because you won't be able to look up "sissy"?]

WHY THE FUCK IS MY WIKIPEDIA BEING A BLACK ONE I DIDNT WANT THAT OH GOD IM SO MAD [Swap "Wikipedia" with "President" and this would be the perfect redneck tweet]

I think Wikipedia planned this shit. [Really? I figured it was a typo.]

Gay no Wikipedia!? I was about to search something fucking bitch.. ["The page 'Something fucking bitch' does not exist. You can ask for it to be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered." Incidentally, the first result is "Flavor of Love (season 1)"]

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blackouts, informed, learning, mocking, pipa, protect ip, protests, sopa, twitter users
Companies: twitter, wikipedia

51 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 10:45pm

Cheap Shot
After reading these tweets its no wonder our country is in such a sad state :)

I've gotten so used to reading comments from people on Techdirt who are either

A: Intelligent

B: Shills who are paid to act stupid.

I can't imagine there are so many non-shills that act so much like Techdirt shills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:29pm
  
  Re: Cheap Shot
  The blackout was nothing but the biggest con ever pulled on the internet.
  
  The bill had absolutely zero to do with sites like Facebook and Wikipedia, yet there were all these dumb lemmings talking about how the bills would end the internet.
  
  The propaganda was all based on lies, and you know it. People are indeed stupid.
  
  But I don't think the "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" angle is going to work again when the legislation is redrafted.
  
  You only get to play that card once, and you've used it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Just John (profile), 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:35pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    Couldn't resist, could you?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:44pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2012/01/hollywood-unions-google-sopa-pipa.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Floppy Copy, 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:53am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
      If you truly want an example of stupid, read the article that was linked:
      
      http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2012/01/hollywood-unions-google-sop a-pipa.html
      
      "The Protect IP Act does nothing more than make it possible for the U.S. government to handle illegal foreign websites in the same manner it can already do -- and has been doing -- with illegal sites."
      
      That gem is from the page you linked to, Anonymous Coward. So here is the obvious question in reply to that statement; if all PIPA will do is give the U.S. government the ability to do something they already have the ability to do, why the hell is PIPA needed?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 2:29am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        Because he's got to whore himself out SOMEHOW.
        
        Gawd, if he stopped blatantly lying and bullshitting about these bills, he might have to actually do some honest work!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Hephaestus (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:29am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        He and people like him are the reason why no one believes anything the MPAA, and RIAA say. This sort of spin, is self defeating on the internet, it forces people to think things through. Let him keep posting.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:52pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    I think the "buy legislation" card has a limited number of uses too, and it seems that one's nearly used up.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:53pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    The written law in SOPA says otherwise.
    
    A 100 professors of law say otherwise, analysts say otherwise and any person who actually read it knows it would harm everybody.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:57pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    The biggest con in history was the enactment of a monopoly(copyright) under the disguise of protection for the little people.
    
    That is the biggest con of all times, nobody deserves a granted monopoly enforced by any government period.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 2:29am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
      No, that's not the biggest con; it's only medium-sized in the grand scheme of things.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:02am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    Odd. The "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" angle works for the RIAA/MPAA. Every time.
    
    Explain why we can't use it, if at all?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Jaerys, 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:52am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
      It's under copyright, obviously.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:29am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    "I don't think the "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" angle is going to work again"
    
    Me neither. Hopefully this will lead to congress and your masters to stop lying about people who oppose the bill and start real debatel. Maybe you will actually accept input from people who understand the technology, people who have ideas on how to reduce piracy without destroying free speech, and maybe even input on how to reduce it without needing any new laws whatsoever.
    
    Perhaps this is what was needed to get you people to stop attacking and lying about the opposition, and actually get workable solutions in place. We shall see...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:39am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
      I very much doubt that those people see it that way, those idiots from the industry don't know what "no" means, it never happened to them in their life times, they are not used to see people say no.
      
      They will try everything they can to continue this futile enterprise and will be hammered down like a nail sticking out into compliance, but not without a fight and that is good, that means popcorn and soda time.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 1:37am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    "The bill had absolutely zero to do with sites like Facebook and Wikipedia, yet there were all these dumb lemmings talking about how the bills would end the internet."
    
    Speaking of liars...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:07am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
      Obviously you're one of the dumb fools that bought Google and Masnick's lies.
      
      Chump.
      
      Copyright isn't going to be repealed. Infringement isn't going to be legalized. And there *will* be piracy legislation enacted; enacted because of greedy, selfish, lawbreaking douchebags like yourself.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Digitari, 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:33am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        "because we are greedy, selfish lawbreaking douchbags"
        
        Fix it for ya
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - E. Zachary Knight (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:54am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        And there *will* be piracy legislation enacted; enacted because of greedy, selfish, lawbreaking douchebags like yourself
        
        I think you are pointing the finger at the wrong person. The only greed, selfishness and lawbreaking (more like law bending) that is happening is coming from the side of SOPA supporters.
        
        You claim that the people protesting SOPA were doing so based on lies, but the only lies I have ever seen are those coming from the mouths of SOPA supporters.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Nastybutler77 (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:22am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        And there *will* be piracy legislation enacted; enacted because of greedy, selfish, lawbreaking douchebags like yourself.
        
        Since you've become increasingly childish: I know you are, but what am I?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:22am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Cheap Shot
        Copyright is not going to be repealed yet!
        FTFY
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - techflaws.org (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 2:07am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    But I don't think the "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" angle is going to work again when the legislation is redrafted.
    
    Really? That's the way it got drafted. Tough luck you got called on it and will be again next time around.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Loki, 20 Jan 2012 @ 4:22am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    Considering pretty much the entirety of the entertainment industry's arguments are based on disinformation, exaggeration, double standards and outright lies anything their supporters have to say is totally irrelevant.
    
    The only con I see is an industry who's entire business was originally founded on infringement and "theft" trying to buy laws that prevent competition.
    
    And while there are indeed a lot of stupid (or at least ill-informed) people out there, it's exactly those people the entertainment industry relies on to continue perpetrating their fallacies.
    
    The rest of us see you for the shill you are.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:50am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    "Lie, Lie, then Lie Some More" does indeed sound like they're working on the bill.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 11:17am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    Absolutely zero to do with Facebook and Wikipedia other than the provisions on Anti-Circumvention that would require them to massively step up monitoring of all user submitted content and the sweeping immunity for vigilante action without a court order.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Bill Price (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 2:46pm
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    The bill had absolutely zero to do with sites like Facebook and Wikipedia, yet there were all these dumb lemmings talking about how the bills would end the internet.
    
    Of course, if you actually read bills instead of the talking (shilling?) points your employers give youi, you would know what the bills would really do, and why they're such a danger.
    
    First, it allows for private cause of action: with these as law, anyone has the power of government to shut down whatever sites they don't like. It will stay shut down until the courts can work through their backlog and get around to giving the victim his day in court. That is, if the victim hasn't gone bankrupt by then.
    
    Second, the definition of 'foreign' obviously includes actual non-domestic sites, but it also includes any domestic site, like google.com, which has a non-domestic counterpart, like google.nl. Facebook and Wwikipedia, and most everything else, is terminally vulnerable to any bad actor (like the MAFIAA) that comes along.
    
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - AzureSky (profile), 22 Jan 2012 @ 10:23am
    
    Re: Re: Cheap Shot
    you should tell your corporate masters that, they been using that card over and over for decades now...
    
    "loosing billions to "piracy""
    
    "every download is a lost sale"
    
    "people are loosing jobs to piracy"
    
    common now....shill better next time!!!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nastybutler77 (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:23am
  
  Re: Cheap Shot
  Look what you did. You went and summoned a shill.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 10:49pm

Notice
> WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? WHY AM I THE LAST TO KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS BLOCKED! I BE ON THERE DAILY!!!
AFAIK, 4+ hours before the blackout, the banner of Wikipedia has changed from the usual donation AD to a countdown message. (Not sure exactly how long, but I saw that in that morning when I started working)

I think this user didn't stay with Wikipedia long enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- TheNutman69321 (profile), 19 Jan 2012 @ 10:56pm
  
  Re: Notice
  It was well over a day that the banner was up warning of the blackout.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - certainly not anon, too lazy to log in (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 3:17am
    
    Re: Re: Notice
    But people have trained themselves to ignore that banner.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bengie, 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:23am
  
  Re: Notice
  At one point, the banner said something like "8 hours until [whatever]". Pretty sure it was more like 8+ hours.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:27pm

When I read stuff like that my reaction isn't to mock them over the message itself, which is bad enough, its to mock them for freaking out like that on the internet in the first place.

The internet is a big dark scary place, sometimes it'll send you into rage, other times it'll just make you want to curl up in a little ball and make mewing sounds. But, you don't go crazy over it, you suck it up in silence until you've collected yourself enough to post rationally. Employers check this stuff now, have a little forethought. And even without that, losing it just feeds the trolls, which is its own brand of internet sin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:46pm

I disagree with you Mr. Carab, mockery and petty pot shots are how some people wake up to the world, nobody likes to be mocked and when your reaction provokes mockery, people generally go silent or try to learn why are others making fun of them so they try to do something about it, is part of society like air is part of our lifes, for good and bad we all do it, we all done it and we all probably will do it more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcus Carab (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:40am
  
  Re:
  I had hoped my comic reversal at the end of the post would make it clear that I do acknowledge and appreciate the value of mockery, comedy and even vulgarity to make a point - indeed I have argued in their favour many times in the past. The true intention of this post was simply a reminder: that there is something to be learned alongside the mockery, even if the mockery is admittedly kinda fun... (though, really, most of the herpderpedia retweets are not even that funny)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rekrul, 19 Jan 2012 @ 11:58pm

All the intelligent people have Javascript blocked for every site that doesn't absolutely need it, which also neatly bypassed the Wikipedia blackout.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bongo houzi (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:54am
  
  Re:
  there were so many ways around the blackout I do not understand how so many people were stymied by it, much less surprised by it
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 12:09am

It is too soon to make a Kodak joke?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Jan 2012 @ 1:25am

Student 1: So ... like ... we have to use books...!?
Student 2: Yeah ... and Copy/Paste doesn't work on them...
Student 1: Are you sure? Try again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lachlan Hunt (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 2:56am

> What sort of company employs a quasi-illiterate to surf Wikipedia all day? I'm genuinely curious

He was obviously referring to school/university work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bongo houzi (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:55am
  
  Re:
  that's not the point
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violated (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 3:08am

Humour
The most funny comment I read went like... "OMG Wikipedia is down. Can someone contact that soap guy and tell him to knock it off" LOL

Not to overlook that so many were left puzzled why Wikipedia and Google now had a problem with soap.

Yes it was about awareness and for only one day of action it proved very successful. Not many days to go now and more action is needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cloksin (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 3:36am

Too Funny!
"Gay no Wikipedia!? I was about to search something fucking bitch.. ["The page 'Something fucking bitch' does not exist. You can ask for it to be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered." Incidentally, the first result is "Flavor of Love (season 1)"]"

I don't think I've ever laughed this hard while reading Techdirt. Nice job Mr. Carab.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Luke Witnesser, 20 Jan 2012 @ 4:38am

Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJIuYgIvKsc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8

The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.

Hint: can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mrtraver (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:20am

llol
"I've often thought SOPA/PIPA supporters are just mad because they were the last to find out about free movies."

This made me literally laugh out loud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
abc gum, 20 Jan 2012 @ 5:22am

"@herpderpedia sprung up to retweet the various freak-outs and desperate pleas of stymied users�mostly students. "

Of course, none of those were fake. Not a one.

Hitler Reacts to SOPA is rather humorous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcus Carab (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 6:33am
  
  Re:
  Of course, none of those were fake. Not a one.
  
  I did mention that :) As the day went on, the balance of the feed seemed to shift from mostly real to mostly parody... All the "Soap" comments, for example, seemed to be jokes.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ipgrunt (profile), 20 Jan 2012 @ 9:01am

Scary
OMG!!! Can these ppl vote???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
April (profile), 22 Jan 2012 @ 7:24am

You'd think with all these kids being in high school and with how much homework they're doing they might actually manage to spell correctly or use proper grammar. Apparently not. What with the teachers relying so much on wikipedia I can't say I'm that surprised. Please to the teachers AND students..go away and get a better education.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- AzureSky (profile), 22 Jan 2012 @ 11:00am
  
  Re:
  proper grammar on the internetz?
  
  come on now...
  
  as to twitter, I dont use it because despite my love of trying to pack as much into as little space as possible, i cant stand how bad my grammar/spelling have to become to make anything worth posting on there...
  
  My favorite was the guy who called me (works for charter cable) pissed off wikipedia was blocked as where like other sites he uses daily, and he had no idea why...linked him here and to a few choice articles via email....should have seen his reaction.
  
  later that day a huge 2 page email went out from him to all his work and non-work contacts with a bunch of links(mostly techdirt) telling people about sopa.
  
  he should have listened when i linked the info weeks before i guess...:P
  
  note: I dont strive to perfect grammar or spelling online, but I try not to make things to hard to understand, Its not like I am being graded (collage i always did very good in English!)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
economics assignment help, 23 Jan 2012 @ 12:12am

economics assignment help
Thank you

Your blog is very Informative.

Visit :- homework help
[ link to this | view in chronology ]