Chinese Lessons For SOPA/PIPA: The Great Firewall Of China Was Once A Way To Stop Infringement Too
from the well-look-at-that dept
There's an interesting LA Times article looking at the reaction in China to the recent SOPA/PIPA blackouts. While they (quite reasonably) point out that the level of censorship in China is much more extreme, one key point did catch my attention. Apparently, when the Great Firewall of China was first set up... Chinese officials defended it as a way to cut down on infringement:Wen supports U.S. activists challenging the bills, saying it’s a slippery slope to lesser web access. He said China’s so-called Great Firewall, which blocks access to many foreign sites like Facebook and Twitter, was first billed as a strategy to stop piracy and pornography.The slippery slope to censorship starts with the insistence that the mechanism for censorship only has "the best intentions." But the reality is that once you have the infrastructure for censorship, it's only a matter of time until that censorship expands. It's just too powerful for those in control.
“Now it’s being abused and extended to thousands of websites,” he said.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, china, infringement, pipa, protect ip, protests, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Absolute power?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Absolute power?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dont agree with this at all. i think it becomes a tool that is so powerful, those in control cant stop themselves from using to abuse that power!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Finland
http://www.ecyrd.com/ButtUgly/wiki/Main_blogentry_130208_1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Finland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Finland
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Finland
By purposefully drafting legislation which would have a broad impact on things other than child exploitation, but contain child-protection clauses, they give legitimate reasons for people to fight and denounce those laws. It's the inevitable flip-side to the argument that bad laws which include "protect the children" provisions must be passed because who could vote against such laws?
If a legislator endorses or signs a bill purporting to protect children which is not narrowly defined to only protect children, they're supporting child exploitation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting argument
The Chinese Firewall works precisely because they don't target mainstream entertainment piracy - but confine their attentions to (relatively) minority interests like politics.
So the argument coming from the MAFIAA that China proves that the technical aspects of blocking are practicable actually fails.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shill masters whisper: No, the artists, this isn't about child porn. Yet.
Er, I mean the artists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
One of my favorite bits is:
I am 100% opposed to SOPA and PIPA, even though I'm one of the artists they were allegedly written to protect. I've probably lost a few hundred dollars in my life to what the MPAA and RIAA define as piracy, and that sucks, but that doesn't come close to how much money I've lost from a certain studio's creative accounting.
Then there is one of his responses in the comments:
Anecdotally, I've observed that the older a person is, the more likely they are to uncritically buy the MPAA/RIAA party line. The hardest thing in the world, even for me as recently as a couple years ago, is to understand and adapt to the reality that there are people (we call them "freetards") who simply won't ever pay for something, so we have to just let that perceived loss of income go. The way to truly combat piracy, as Gabe Newell said, is to give your customers better service than the pirates: don't use DRM, don't make people sit through endless commercials and bullshit before they can watch the DVD they legally purchased, don't region lock legal purchases, etc.
It isn't easy, at all, to accept the changing world, but speaking as an actor who relies on residuals and merchandise royalties, I can say unequivocally that creative accounting, reality TV, and vertical integration of media companies is more of a threat to my earnings than any kind of piracy.
I haven't had the time to read, or inclination to buy, books the past few years, but as soon as I can I intend to buy both the ebook and audiobook for everything he's written (not just because I agree with his ideas, but because I didn't realize until just recently he was a hard core gamer geek like myself).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Any of us who've ever played in a band for any length of time have accumulated an entire catalog of stories about bar and club owners, managers, promoters, ticket agents, producers, record companies, and everyone else that we've come into contact with. Some of those stories are good. Most of them aren't. Jerry Corbetta and Sugarloaf nailed this in 1975: Don't Call Us, We'll Call You and nothing has changed since.
See also: "Have a Cigar" (Pink Floyd), "Barracuda" (Heart), "Five Percent For Nothing" (Yes), The Stroke (Billy Squire), Workin' for the MCA (Lynyrd Skynyrd), and MANY others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron Paul posted on his facebook and says he'll update soon.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71818.html
Holy Cow!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bribe to Blacklist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For example, here is an excerpt from the federal constitution of another sovereign power:
In accordance with the interests of the people and in order to strengthen and develop (text deleted), citizens of (name deleted) are guaranteed freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly, meetings, street processions and demonstrations.
The excerpt sounds pretty good on its face. Unfortunately, an independent judiciary was not at the core of the country's founding principles, and it is here where the United States parts ways with it and other such governments.
The quote, by the way, is taken from Section 50 of the USSR's 1977 Constitution. Is there any doubt that its "freedom of speech, press, etc." was not quite up to par with ours? Fortunately, Chapter 1, Section 2 of the Russian Federation Constitution of 1993 carries forward these fundamental rights.
It seems my faith in our judicial system is not in vogue to read so many of the comments on this site.
To compare the US and China concerning "censorship" and "slippery slopes" is so inapt I can scarcely believe people dare to do so. Perhaps they should try reading the latter's Constitution at Chapter II, Article 35 before rushing off and drawing comparisons between the US and China.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
1. The executive doesn't have ways of routeing around the judiciary.
2. The judiciary is genuinely independent - that is not only that it is not subject to direct pressure from the government but also that there are not external pressures from corporations etc that impact equally on the judiciary as on the government and that the commonality of the social group from which both politicians and judges are drawn does not influence the judiciary away from the interests of the remainder of the population.
In summary - as you say it is better to have an independent judiciary in theory than not - but having one in practice is better still and we do not always have that.
This is wel exemplified by the UK situation - where politicians are eager to wrest power away from European judges and place it in the hands of UK judges. Both sets of judges are independent - but it seems that some are more independent than others - and the politicians don't like it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This would be the same system that has allowed the warrentless wiretapping of its own citizens to go completely unchecked? and the ICE to seize websites without any adversarial hearing? And the extradition of a British citizen who has never set foot on US soil?
This is the system of checks and balances that you believe makes the US so much better than China?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Does this mean that excesses can occur? Of course, they happen across the broad spectrum of US and state civil and criminal law. But unlike countries such as China, aggrieved persons within the US may not denied the right to challenge such excesses before a judicial tribunal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"He said China�s so-called Great Firewall, which blocks access to many foreign sites like Facebook and Twitter, was first billed as a strategy to stop piracy and pornography."
was obviously not that at all but actually designed to stop social networking and ideas that would threaten the regime the whole premise of this article is based on nonsense.
so what is the point here? why did you write this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My favorite quote form the Chinese on SOPA was
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]