Elected Officials Asked To Return Hollywood Money Following Dodd's Threats
from the avoid-corruption dept
Late last week, we wrote about the ridiculous situation in which MPAA boss Chris Dodd publicly threatened elected officials who take Hollywood money, but who don't pass the laws that the MPAA wants. Of course, most people assume that everyone expects a quid pro quo, but actually stating it out loud and on television is really remarkable, and has resulted in calls for an investigation into Dodd. I'd argue that the focus should really be on the politicians. In fact, the folks over at Free Press are now calling on those in Congress to return campaign donations from Hollywood to show that Congress is not for sale:"The MPAA is so brazen in its efforts to buy legislation with campaign cash that its leader, himself a former senator, sees nothing wrong with threatening legislators on national TV. We think it's time that Congress showed that its votes are no longer for sale. The first thing Congress must do is give back the MPAA's tainted campaign cash or give it to charity. Congress must make it clear to the world that it won’t be bullied into supporting censorship."Of course, it's unlikely that anyone in Congress will actually do this, but it certainly would make a pretty loud and clear statement.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: campaign finance, chris dodd, congress, corruption, donations, pipa, protect ip, sopa
Companies: mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LOL
It is Free Press asking for congress to give the money back, not the entertainment industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And even if they do show some bite, so long as Democrats and Republican keep getting replaced by other Democrats and Republican, the basic status quo is still maintained. Not until Congress or the White House start being replaced by independents or independent parties I doubt they are going to be too concerned with what the public thinks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Arizona
California
Colorado
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Kansas
Louisiana
New Jersey
Nevada
North Dakota
Michigan
Minnesota
Montana
Oregon
Rhode Island
Washington
Wisconsin
http://www.ncsl.org/legislatures-elections/elections-campaigns/reca ll-of-state-officials.aspx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I dislike "party" politics but the system is so tilted toward them at this point breaking in a 3rd or independent party is difficult at best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What they didn't had was a law prepared for those they voted in, that is the problem with them right now, they don't have a clear vision of what they want yet.
Now if you take their example and do it yourself surely one can create their own root movement, the thing is people need to start thinking in terms of laws and not "directions", they need to get into the dirty stuff and start reading the laws they have and use those as templates for the laws they want and then voting people in to pass those laws, repealed the ones the people don't like reform something, but people need to agree on a plan since the idiots in congress apparently can't hold off their addiction to campaign money is up to the public to take them out and do something about the laws themselves instead of asking politicians to do it for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Investment
Invest heavily in congress critters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Investment
Mike covered that in December. Jack Abramoff thinks that number is too low.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111224/01031317187/jack-abramoff-explains-return-investme nt-lobbying-22000-is-surprisingly-low.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Investment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They could use it to pay the artists.
Nah, just kidding! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't know about you but there should be a lot more average citizens than Chris Dodds to vote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It would only take one and there would be a stampede to get rid of the tainted funds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more chance of landing a man on the Sun and him surviving!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No
That's the thing, votes are for sale, have been for a loooong time and it's gonna stay that way until we start putting them in prison for life for the shit. Senators and congress critters suffer no real consequences for these things.
We need to set an example. We need to string one up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE
The time is ripe, OWS, tea party, Pirates, Freetards, Unite.
Show the world what we really think of SOPA/PIPA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: REally...?
So long as the wolves are pretending to be shepherds, all the sheep are in danger.
BAAAH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: REally...?
I predict a Riot
I Predict a Riot
I predict a Riot
And if there's anybody else in here
That doesn't want ot be out there
I predict a Riot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe they are confusing their "donations" with "piracy losses".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's a structural instability in our system of auctioning off laws to the highest bidder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well Dodd was supposed to be their best boy, he was going to have a tight grip ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I owe you nothing
1. Returning the money is tantamount to saying "your legislation enacted or your money back!" To keep the money and not vote for these bills is a much more effective way to discourage future bribery.
2. Returning the money is almost an admission that it was accepted as a bribe, with the understanding that it would buy a vote that would otherwise go the other way. I would stand my ground and say "I vote as I think best, that's what you get when you elect me, that's what you pay for when you support my campaigns; if they thought they were buying my vote they were wrong, and if you think so you're wrong too, either way I will not give back the money". (Of course, that attitude is exactly why I will never be elected to any kind of high office.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I owe you nothing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I owe you nothing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I owe you nothing
In that case they should donate it to charity. Or maybe even the pirate party or the EFF.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why return?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why return?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh wait. There hasn't *been* any Google-written legislation, my bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE Google
Besides, isn't Google the net anyways?? (now)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RE Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WH Petition 2 Investigate Dodd/MPAA
https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/investigate-chris-dodd-and-mpaa-bribery-af ter-he-publicly-admited-bribing-politicans-pass/DffX0YQv
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MPAA bribes
http://influenceexplorer.com/organization/motion-picture-assn-of-america/90b570b10c2b4483a1 af69149521324a
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alas, one can only dream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]