Dutch Research Reveals Wide Scope For Copyright Flexibilities In EU Laws
from the didn't-know-you-could-do-that dept
A couple of weeks ago, Techdirt wrote about a surprising initiative by the Netherlands to introduce new flexibilities into its copyright law. Given that leadership from the Dutch government, it's probably no surprise that a few days later, the Dutch Parliament also showed itself in the political vanguard by voting not to ratify ACTA for the time being.
The full text of the Dutch minister's speech is now available, and it's well worth reading for its clear analysis of the problem facing European copyright, and its suggested solution:
The big question, however, is whether copyright law currently provides enough opportunities to allow an effective response to these technological changes and other developments in the future. In my view, this is particularly relevant in the case of the closed list of exceptions to copyright in the European Information Society Directive. These exceptions are designed to allow new products and services to be developed through creative or transformative use of copyrighted work. They also allow copyright to be restricted in the case of work used for educational purposes, in academic research or in news reporting, as well as work used for libraries and archives.
As the minister mentioned in his talk, those exceptions are explored in some depth in a report by Professors Hugenholtz and Senftleben, entitled 'Fair Use in Europe. In Search of Flexibilities.' The conclusion gives an idea of just how much scope there is within existing European law to introduce a wide range of copyright exceptions:
As our analysis has demonstrated, the EU copyright acquis [body of law] leaves considerably more room for
flexibilities than its closed list of permitted limitations and exceptions prima facie suggests. In the first place, the enumerated provisions are in many cases categorically worded prototypes rather than precisely circumscribed exceptions, thus leaving the Member States broad margins of implementation, as is confirmed by actual legislative practice in various Member States. In the second place, the EU acquis leaves ample unregulated space with regard to the right of adaptation that has so far remained largely unharmonized.
The ability to add all kinds of flexibilities to copyright law without breaching the Information Society Directive is clearly a real boon for EU governments who want to update their legislation for the digital age. But there is another notable advantage to taking this approach, as the authors note:
A Member State desiring to take full advantage of all policy space available under the Information Society Directive, and thus maximize flexibilities available at the EU level, might achieve this by literal transposition of the Directive’s entire catalogue of exception prototypes into national law. In combination with the [Information Society Directive's] three-step test, this would effectively lead to a semi-open norm almost as flexible as the fair use rule of the United States. For less ambitious Member States seeking to enhance flexibility while keeping its existing structure of limitations and exceptions largely intact, we recommend exploring the policy space left by distinct exception prototypes.Member States aspiring to introduce flexible copyright norms are advised to take advantage of the policy space that presently exists in EU law, and not wait until initiatives to introduce flexibilities at the EU level materialize -- a process that could easily take ten years. In this way, national models can be developed and tested in practice that may serve as a basis for more flexible future law making at EU level.
The hope there seems to be that forward-thinking countries like the Netherlands might be able to set an example for Europe's future copyright legislation, and move it towards greater flexibility. A good place to start in that respect would be for the European Parliament to emulate the Dutch politicians and to ditch ACTA, one of whose pernicious effects is to limit the freedom of signatories to modify their own national copyright laws.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright exceptions, eu, fair use, flexibilities, netherlands, research
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Filthy pirates.
[1] I don't know of any $100M Hollywood movie from the Netherlands. QED; they have no culture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it my imagination?
chubby, pirate, theft and so forth? apparently the mindset of copywrong asshats is that of 'if your not for us, your a paedophile'.
every time I read one of these mindless dribbles, I mentally read them in Cartman's voice from South Park, with everything ending with respect my authority!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is it my imagination?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is it my imagination?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Is it my imagination?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it my imagination?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't be so disdainful of countries and cultures far older than yours. Try to be open-minded. Legalizing prostitution and soft drugs: it works. Legalizing personal movie and music downloads: it works. They don't even need more flexible laws to download; it's already legal there. The Dutch people don't want to readily give up these acquired freedoms just because some foreign lobby tells them to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...Wait. This lists every country other than America.
...fuck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Might I politely suggest you go ram your head up your.... nevermind...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You mean the thing that nobody's willing to risk a court loss to stand up for anymore?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But, point taken...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dutch Oven?
And, of course, with the enormous lobbying budgets of Big Content (hereafter referred to as The Evil Empire), I foresee us on a collision course with complete lockdown.
Where pirates are no longer those who copy or download songs, but are deemed those who lend a book, or let a friend listen to a song on their iPod, or even have the audacity to have people over to their house to watch a TV show on a premium channel.
It's sad world we're headed towards.
I'd like to believe that if our founding fathers were alive today, they'd be dumping iPods and DVDs into the bay instead of tea.
But alas, men of good conscious and lovers of freedom no longer hold office. Like the Dodo bird, they are long gone... replaced by men of no conscious and lovers of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it is the latter.
Copyright is becoming a class warfare issue, where the have nots are busy trying to plunder what the haves created, with little concern for the long term costs because, well, they want it now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Dutch are such crookd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Voice of america: was voice of holland thought up by john the mol, dutch media magnate.
Nova zembla and sonny boy, zwart boek(black book), the sint all by dutch directors and all sold to the us.
Yes we dont make �100 millon movies cause there are only 17 million people in the netherlands, so our movies most expensive one was 25 million(nova zembla,3dz) and i believe made a 4x profit in the netherlands alone in a month, yes it might not be as massive as the us , but relatively, its good sales, cause the dutch _are_ pirates by origin, we pretty much plundered afrika, india, new zealand, south america in the 17th century for all they were worth:) including slave trade and resources.
Might i add btw the dutch have the most shitty digital content of all eu countries?If i had services such as netflix, spotify, itunes, crunchyroll, hulu etc the same as the us, piracy would drop hard. Hbo recently startes with a cable company last month, the company has 7 million members, 3 million people have signed up for hbo, so 50%~ signed up.
That being said i have hbo, and i like it but, i guesss compared to us censored tv, it doesnr have the nude/violence advantage as much here.
Considering moch cannabalism and organ sale progams and sex education for teens get showed around 8 pm here, please try to shock us^^
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]