Paypal Pressured To Play Morality Cop And Forces Smashwords To Censor Authors

from the censorship-is-obscene dept

Mon, Mar 5th 2012 8:21am — Zachary Knight

We have become quite accustomed to Paypal arbitrarily deciding to shut down the payment services for a website with no warning and little recourse. Usually when it does so, it acts through its own volition. However, Paypal also has to deal with the whims of the credit card companies with which it is partnered. With that business arrangement, when a credit card company says to jump, Paypal must comply. When it does so, it effects all its own customers as well. Ebook publisher Smashwords reports that it has become one of the latest recipients of one such action. Under pressure from credit card providers, Paypal has put in place a policy that it would no longer process payments for ebooks that contained themes of rape, incest, beastiality and underage sexual content. It then decided to give Smashwords less than a week to remove all books that fit those criteria.

On Saturday, February 18, PayPal’s enforcement division contacted Smashwords with an ultimatum. As with the other ebook retailers affected by this enforcement, PayPal gave us only a few days to achieve compliance otherwise they threatened to deactivate our PayPal services. I've had multiple conversations with PayPal over the last several days to better understand their requirements. Their team has been helpful, forthcoming and supportive of the Smashwords mission. I appreciate their willingness to engage in dialogue. Although they have tried their best to delineate their policies, gray areas remain.

Their hot buttons are bestiality, rape-for-titillation, incest and underage erotica.

This has put tremendous pressure on Smashwords to comply as it claims that it would be near impossible to change payment processors as Paypal is a major part in not only how it processes transactions but also how it pays its authors. So it has made several changes to its terms of service to account for the types of books that Paypal and its credit card partners are not happy about. Keep in mind, this is hard for Smashwords as it feels that authors of erotica are being unfairly targeted by this move.

We do not want to see PayPal clamp down further against erotica. We think our authors should be allowed to publish erotica. Erotica, despite the attacks it faces from moralists, is a category worthy of protection. Erotica allows readers to safely explore aspects of sexuality that they might never want to explore in the real world.

The moralists forget that we humans are all sexual creatures, and the biggest sex organ is the brain. If it were not the case, none of us would be here. Erotica authors are facing discrimination, plain and simple. Topics that are perfectly acceptable in mainstream fiction are verboten in erotica. That’s not fair.

This is an unfortunate set back for Smashwords as well as for indie authors. While the government in the US is not able to censor speech in this manner, there is little preventing a private company like Paypal or its credit card partners from taking these actions. Yet, Smashwords is not giving up hope. In its latest update, Smashwords notes that it had managed to get the deadline extended as well as the definitions of prohibited content relaxed. It also wants to clarify that neither it nor Paypal are the real villians in this issue.

A lot of people have been attacking Smashwords for my decision to comply with PayPal's requirements. They're pointing their arrows at the wrong target, and they're not helping their cause. We're working to effect positive long term change for the entire Smashwords community, and that includes all our erotica authors and readers.

Over the weekend, many Smashwords authors and publishers demanded we abandon PayPal and find a new payment processor. It's not so simple, and it doesn't solve the greater problem hanging over everyone's head. PayPal is trying to implement the requirements of credit card companies, banks and credit unions. This is where it's all originating. These same requirements will eventually rain down upon every other payment processor. PayPal is trying to maintain their relationships with the credit card companies and banks, just as we want to maintain our relationship with PayPal. People who argue PayPal is the evil villain and we should drop them are missing the bigger picture. Should we give up on accepting credit cards forever? The answer is no. This goes beyond PayPal. Imagine the implications if credit card companies start going after the major ebook retailers who sell erotica?

Smashwords then continues by expressing its goal of pulling the credit card companies out into the open to discuss these issues. The behavior of the credit card companies shown here is exactly the type of behavior we advocated against when fighting SOPA/PIPA. Those bills would have given credit card processors the abiltity to kill payment services to companies alledged to be illegal. We warned that such behavior would result in additional harm as legal speech would be swept up along with the potentially illegal speech. Here we see just that. These credit card companies are using their position to censor speech -- some of which may violate obscenity laws, but much of which is likely perfectly legal, protected speech. This is a no win situation for Smashwords. By complying, it must censor the speech of its authors. By not complying, it would lose the ability to serve all its authors.

Finally, Smashwords suggests a plan of action. It wants everyone to work together to put public pressure on the credit card companies in order to get them to change their stance. We saw how effective such efforts were with SOPA/PIPA. We managed to pressure Godaddy and the ESA to drop their support. We can do the same for these credit card companies and their policies that result in censorship.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, ebooks, morality, payments
Companies: mastercard, paypal, smashwords, visa

151 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:27am

So, no more bible distribution via Paypal?

Not surprising, given the company's unfortunate history. By the way, Mike, you forgot the big brouhaha between Minecraft and PayPal, wherein PayPal cut off legitimate payments to Notch in 2010.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Machin Shin (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:43am
  
  Re:
  Well I guess the sale of bibles is out along with a large part of greek and roman mythology. It also puts into question a lot of history books. You could argue the history books that contain information about roman society to have "themes of rape, incest, beastiality and underage sexual content". All of that was fairly common before the fall of Rome.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:54am
    
    Re: Re:
    Not to mention a variety of other history books - rape and underage sex seems to pop up in one or two other places across human history, as I recall.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:13am
    
    Re: Re:
    "themes of rape, incest, beastiality and underage sexual content"
    
    Guess Game of Thrones and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo series are out, too.
    
    Is Paypal going to cut Amazon off for selling printed books, e-books, and DVDs with the same criteria? If not, seems pretty hypocritical since I'm sure Paypal makes a lot more from Amazon than Smashwords.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:23am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      http://www.amazon.com/Lolita-50th-Anniversary-Vladimir-Nabokov/dp/0679723161
      
      Shut um down boys!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - jsf (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 7:23am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313&_nkw=bible&_sacat=See- All-Categories
        
        They also need to cut off eBay. ;-)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - TtfnJohn (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:55am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "themes of rape, incest, bestiality and underage sexual content"
      
      As we add up the potential victims let's not forget Shakespeare's "A Midsummer's Night's Dream" as well as a number of his other plays and sonnets.
      
      As well as, yes, works by established authors of historical fiction set in ancient or dark ages times. In fact, just about any time prior to the Victorian age.
      
      Just who appointed Credit Card companies as the morality police? I seem to recall it being one of the side effects of the DCMA and part of the moral crusade of the first term Bush II presidency.
      
      Such fun.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 1:37pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Not to mention Disney's Princess and the Frog.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 2:11pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      This sucks that such great literature and history books will have to go. On the bright side, we'll finally be rid of Twilight.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - a, 6 Mar 2012 @ 12:40am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Spoiler Alert ;)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Spidersilk (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 11:50am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Amazon doesn't take PayPal, at least not as of last I used it. They're big enough to dictate their own payment terms and ignore users who don't have credit cards. PayPal's main user base tends to be smaller businesses, who are likely to care more about accommodating everyone since each sale counts for more with them than it does with a giant like Amazon.
      
      And unfortunately, they've pretty much cornered the market there, because there aren't really any other payment processors - that I've been able to find, anyway - that are available internationally and don't require credit cards.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Torg (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:13am
    
    Re: Re:
    Norse mythology more often than not has rape, incest and bestiality at the same time. Clearly the Poetic Edda is subversive and shouldn't be allowed in our pure society.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Designerfx (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:57am
  
  bingo, simple solution
  the answer is simple: stop working with paypal, work with someone else.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Me, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:07am
    
    Re: bingo, simple solution
    Use bitcoins?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:11am
      
      Re: Re: bingo, simple solution
      lolcoins are lol
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ryan, 5 Mar 2012 @ 2:08pm
      
      Re: Re: bingo, simple solution
      Bitcoins are a really nice idea. Definitely not ready yet. But there always have to be early adopters to get it rolling. The real problem right now, I think, is the difficulty in getting BTC to USD and back again. (Well, that and the relatively instability of the BTC market compared to other currencies) You can't just use your credit or debit card like you can for the vast majority of internet transactions. Right now you have to work with some sort of payment site like Dwolla and have that hook up to your bank account (or use slower or more troublesome methods) and use that to pay a BTC exchange site so you can purchase some and then you can finally use the bitcoins. People are used to and prefer two or less steps to pay for things online.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:15am
    
    Re: bingo, simple solution
    I don't work with PayPal. The problem is when an online vendor whom accepts payment through an alternate method is forced to block access to all users to continue using PayPal for the site. Amazon has already purged a number of books from its site.
    
    Also, the existence of PayPal's patent portfolio - along with parent company eBay's portfolio - limits competition in the realm of e-commerce payment handling.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - DOlz (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:30pm
    
    Re: bingo, simple solution
    Did you read the entire article? Paypal acts as a middle man for credit card companies, banks, ect., they are the ones putting pressure on Paypal to do this. If Paypal says no, there goes their business. When your alternative says no, there goes their business. You need to direct your ire to the ones at the top.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - CHC, 6 Mar 2012 @ 6:02am
    
    Re: bingo, simple solution
    The problem is not PayPal (for once). The big credit card consortia (Visa, Mastercard) are pressuring them to do this. And they, I'm sure, are doing this under pressure from the so-called Christian fundamentalists (the Christofascists) who see Santorums's popularity (?) as a sign the time is right for them to pursue their agenda.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Spidersilk (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 11:54am
    
    Re: bingo, simple solution
    Not that simple. The vast majority of the PayPal alternatives out there right now are US-only, so any business that's either outside the US or has any customers who are is pretty much stuck with PayPal - or with direct credit card processors that cost a lot more and don't allow customers to pay by any means other than credit card.
    
    I'd love it if there was an alternative that was available internationally, not credit-card-dependent, and was as easy for customers to use as PayPal, but I haven't found one yet.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Josef Anvil (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:53am
  
  Re:
  Good call. As I remember it, the Bible does contain acts of rape, incest, beastiality and underage sex.
  
  Children should not be exposed to such smut.
  
  Although, the zombie diety thing is kinda cool.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PRMan, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:09am
    
    Re: Re:
    The Bible contains rape (Shechem's rape of Dinah in Genesis, for one) and what modern people might consider incest (Abraham was married to his half-sister, but our genes weren't as messed up back then). It warns against bestiality, but never depicts any instances of it. And I can't recall an instance of sex under the age of 18 anywhere, although it may be implied in some cases.
    
    I know that Mohammed married Aisha at 9 years of age. I don't know what holy book of Islam that is in (it's not in the Koran), but I'm sure very religious people who cover their women from head to toe would be sad to see that go, which illustrates the problems with this sort of thing.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - TtfnJohn (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 12:01pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      If there is a depiction of sex under 18 it's found in the Song of Solomon or Song of Songs. A book often reinterpreted as a love song to the church/synagogue etc. Soft core porn is more like it, really.
      
      Given that Hebrew/Jewish children of the period the book was written were married not much later than 14 and often well before then it's fair to say that book also depicts what we now consider as underage sex. Certainly both partners were beyond the age of puberty which is anything from 10-14, even back then.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - DannyB (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 1:48pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Does anyone know how old Lot's daughters were when they got their father drunk and then, um, nevermind.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Zenstrive (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 5:45pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Lots of people married under 10 back then. Heck, even when in 18th and 19th centuries, Kings and Queens married under 10.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 5:49pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "what modern people might consider incest"
      
      Might consider?
      
      See: Adam and Eve
      See: Noah and family post flood.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 2:18pm
  
  Re:
  Mike didn't even write the article.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:55am
    
    Re: Re:
    Ah, my bad. Forgot they aren't all Mike again - Zachary's style here is a lot closer to Mike's than some of the other regulars here tend to be.
    
    Thanks for catching me on that. I hate it when people misattribute.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:37am

While I do find some erotica disturbing, I feel that it is protected speech. I think Smashwords is on the right track.

Is there some legal recourse when companies as large as Visa force their views on others? Perhaps a lawyer may want to chime in on this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- jesse, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:24am
  
  Response to: Pixelation on Mar 5th, 2012 @ 8:37am
  A handmaid's tail
  
  House of spirits
  
  100 years of solitude
  
  Just a few great works depicting such things. How do we decide what is erotica?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jen, 6 Mar 2012 @ 3:28am
    
    Re: Response to: Pixelation on Mar 5th, 2012 @ 8:37am
    And pretty much every book Virginia Andrews ever wrote - bet many millions of those were purchased with credit cards!
    I've read some truly dreadful titles - some by Smashwords and some not - and while I don't think some of the content is appropriate or tasteful, I also don't see how it us the responsibility of credit card companies to 'protect' us from it. If it's so bad then just open it up to public scrutiny and legislate. Next time I try to pay for fast food with a credit card I don't want it to be rejected because Visa/Amex/MasterCard have decided my health needs protecting!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Fake Visa Corp., 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:29am
  
  Re: Forcing our views...
  Ahem. I reject your character assassination regarding us "forcing our views" on others. These are not "our" views, but the views of our society, who have determined that rape, incest, beastiality and underage sex are ILLEGAL. We are simply making sure that we are not part of promoting illegal activities. This is our right, and our duty to the society of which we are part.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Visa
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:38am
    
    Re: Re: Forcing our views...
    Hello Visa
    
    Its nice of you to drop by and join our conversation, although im mystified by the contradition here, WHICH society, do you speak of?
    
    Sincerely,
    
    Rebel Sheep
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Angi C, 6 Mar 2012 @ 6:57am
    
    Re: Re: Forcing our views...
    AHEM.... murder and torture are also ILLEGAL. But I don't see you going after Stephen King or other such authors. Heck almost EVERYTHING written in a book is ILLEGAL. WRITING it is NOT the same as DOING IT. Nor is it the same as PROMOTING it.
    
    And you wanna take a good look at THE BIBLE? Rape, incest, murder ... all pretty common themes in that one.
    
    New answer please.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Peter Bond, 6 Mar 2012 @ 8:25am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Forcing our views...
      Now, the Bible, the most violent, pornographic fiction of all times. It definitely should be banned!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Fake Visa Corp., 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:29am
  
  Re: Forcing our views...
  Ahem. I reject your character assassination regarding us "forcing our views" on others. These are not "our" views, but the views of our society, who have determined that rape, incest, beastiality and underage sex are ILLEGAL. We are simply making sure that we are not part of promoting illegal activities. This is our right, and our duty to the society of which we are part.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Visa
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - rowena cherry (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 11:43am
    
    Re: Re: Forcing our views...
    http://marriage.about.com/cs/marriagelicenses/a/cousin.htm
    
    Cousin marriage is not illegal in many States, yet it is on the banned list.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Fake Visa Corp., 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:29am
  
  Re: Forcing our views...
  Ahem. I reject your character assassination regarding us "forcing our views" on others. These are not "our" views, but the views of our society, who have determined that rape, incest, beastiality and underage sex are ILLEGAL. We are simply making sure that we are not part of promoting illegal activities. This is our right, and our duty to the society of which we are part.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  Visa
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Citizen, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:31am
    
    Re: Re: Forcing our views...
    Hmm... What about murder? That's illegal, right?
    
    Are you going to pull all financial support for books which portray murder? Or what about speeding? How many books promote that by depicting it in words? Bank robbery is illegal too. Are we going to ban all books which include bank jobs?
    
    Just askin'
    
    PS: you are repeating yourself.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Fake Visa Corp, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:32am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Forcing our views...
      Fuck you. We will kill you. Shut up or someone's going to get their ass beat.
      
      Sincerely,
      
      Visa
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The Fake Bank of America, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:36am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Forcing our views...
      I for one would support any ban of books which promote bank robbery. But let's go easy on the underage sex, huh? A man's gotta unwind after all....
      
      BoA
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - MPHinPgh (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:38am
    
    Re: Re: Forcing our views...
    Yeah, we get it. The actual acts are illegal, so writing about it must be illegal too.
    
    Oh wait...except it's (generally) not. So much for your brilliant theory.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:05am
  
  Re:
  Yes, Smashwords has the right to publish their legal rape and child abuse erotica if that is their desire.
  
  Paypal has the equal right to NOT process for people who are selling material they are not comfortable with.
  
  Smashwords can keep their content, but they cannot force Paypal to process for them.
  
  End of story. it's that simple.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:35am
    
    Re: Re:
    I bet you're one of the same ACs who was saying people boycotting GoDaddy were taking away their right to free speech and were acting in a manner similar to the actual mafia of past days.
    
    I'm basing this off your current comment. I also bet if others banded together with SmashWords, you'd say they were colluding to destroy PayPal and strong arming it into changing it's views.
    
    Don't you get tired of painting the world as simply as you do? Black and white. Right and wrong. Nothing else. No shades or degrees or anything.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:42am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      WTF? Are you on crack?
      
      What happened with Godaddy was pure an simple intimidation, right from the Stalinist handbook. It wasn't anything else other than direct intimidation to force a company to change a political stand. It showed a total lack of respect for their rights to express the opinion.
      
      For Smashwords, the law is simple - if Paypal applies restrictions of content evenly for all websites, and does not specifically discriminate against them, there is little that they can do. Paypal can say "either the content goes or we go", and be entirely within their rights.
      
      You understand that Paypal also does not process for completely legal adult porn material. They did for a while, and then got entirely out of that end of the processing business. In a similar manner, American Express also does not process for adult material. With Paypal accepting American Express, they are very likely also tied by American Express's rules regarding this sort of content.
      
      It's not black and white, just sometimes it's pretty freaking easy to see the reasons why. If you ever had a business, if you ever accepted credit cards, if you ever had a merchant account, then you know all that goes into it. It's straight forward and simple, and the card companies, the clearing houses, the IPSP style third party sub-account processors... they all face the same issues regarding what is being sold. It's the real world, amazing as it seems!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:56am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        So if Paypal says "If you don't agree with my policy then take your business elsewhere," they are "entirely within their rights."
        
        But if a consumer says "If you don't agree with my policy then I'll take my business elsewhere," then it's "direct intimidation."
        
        Good to know which side you're on.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Colin, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:57am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        What happened with Godaddy was pure an simple intimidation, right from the Stalinist handbook. It wasn't anything else other than direct intimidation to force a company to change a political stand. It showed a total lack of respect for their rights to express the opinion.
        
        LOL.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:34pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        "WTF? Are you on crack?
        
        What happened with Godaddy was pure an simple intimidation, right from the Stalinist handbook. It wasn't anything else other than direct intimidation to force a company to change a political stand. It showed a total lack of respect for their rights to express the opinion."
        
        Sir, let me just say, the one apparently on crack here is yourself. Then again, doubtful. I've met people on crack, none of them thought like you did. They were all more grounded in reality than you appear to be in regards to pretty much everything.
        
        What happened with GoDaddy was in no way intimidation. Glad I had you figured out from the get go. It was both sides exercising their rights. GoDaddy exercised their right to free speech in support of SOPA. The customers exercised their right to take their business to whomever they pleased.
        
        That GoDaddy changed their statements after the fact is NOT them being forced to do so. It is them seeing that their words have consequences, which is something worth pondering before exercising free speech. What you say may offend someone. They might tell you to "f*ck off", punch you, completely agree with you, etc. But at no point, without actual force, can they prevent you from stating whatever they you want. As such, GoDaddy was anything but intimidated.
        
        "For Smashwords, the law is simple - if Paypal applies restrictions of content evenly for all websites, and does not specifically discriminate against them, there is little that they can do. Paypal can say "either the content goes or we go", and be entirely within their rights."
        
        Also, I did not say, that the law wasn't simple for SmashWords. Read what I wrote. I clearly said if SmashWords got others to band together with them in face of what's taking place, you'd be jumping on the "intimidation" bandwagon, as you already are doing. And have done, by your own admission just now.
        
        If however, PayPal does this across the board, that is perfectly within their rights, as they are a private entity. But again, you're talking about something different than what I originally said.
        
        "It's not black and white, just sometimes it's pretty freaking easy to see the reasons why. If you ever had a business, if you ever accepted credit cards, if you ever had a merchant account, then you know all that goes into it. It's straight forward and simple, and the card companies, the clearing houses, the IPSP style third party sub-account processors... they all face the same issues regarding what is being sold. It's the real world, amazing as it seems!"
        
        Also, I wasn't saying that this one specific event was or wasn't entirely black and white. I said that YOU, specifically, focus on the world and all events within it as such. For YOU, things are very much indeed black and white, simple, etc.
        
        Do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Or do you just generally misread people's comments and then respond to things they DID NOT say? I'm thinking it's a little of both, if you'd like, I'm willing to donate some money for you and Darryl to both take some English classes somewhere. But only if you both promise to try extra hard to actually pay attention and learn something.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Mar 2012 @ 8:08am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      so you support child rape, abuse, beastiallity , your cool with it?? good to know what side your on
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Torg (profile), 9 Mar 2012 @ 8:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I support being allowed to depict those things in books, and bestiality isn't really hurting anyone, so why should I care?
        
        Actual child rape and abuse are obviously very wrong, but we're talking about books here.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 12:06pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Thank the one true God that we have patents to stop anyone that doesn't want to do business with Paypal from coming up with their own solution to online payment processing! Otherwise any old heathen could just, you know, not do business with them and thus not be beholden to their morality.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 12:28pm
    
    Re: Re:
    I think the problem here is that PayPal would be cutting of ALL of Smashwords, not just sales of the content they aren't cool with.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 1:07pm
  
  Re:
  Is there any link with the government?
  Because if this has any at all and that can be shown first amendments would apply else I don't believe what they are doing anything illegal, but I'm not sure about the law, I'm not familiar with all the federal and states laws governing financial institutions and other related laws so at first glance, this seems like individual private entities colluding to displace somebody else from the market, which could be an antitrust issue other than that I can't see anything that could possibly help in this case.
  
  With that said, I believe a better solution is for the market to create new options so when this type of things happen people can just move on and let the colluding people behind, and I want to thank Techdirt for being the beacon of light to put a spot on those issues showing the need for people to do something about it on their own, I shudder to think what government intervention legally or legislatively would be like.
  
  One potential hitch is patents, IP law is becoming a problem for free market and business.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:46pm
  
  Re: Pizelation
  I suggest if you find erotica disturbing, stop reading it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jafafa Hots, 6 Mar 2012 @ 1:50am
    
    Re: Re: Pizelation
    What if being getting disturbed is your kink?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:38am

Old Hat
...bankers still run the world, you say?

[yawn] Old news, very old news actually.

Thanks for the modern update on it though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beta (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:42am

balance of power
I wonder when Paypal will get big enough to say "all right you credit card companies, we're going to keep doing business with the smutty bookstore, so raise your hand if you want us not to accept your card any more".

...And I wonder how we'll route around it when it's that big.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Machin Shin (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:48am
  
  Re: balance of power
  I think Paypal is already big enough to do that. The trouble is that Paypal would have to be willing to bet their entire business that the card companies would cave. The credit card companies feel confident that Paypal is not willing to kill themselves to hurt the credit cards.
  
  Paypal cannot exist with out credit cards but credit cards can survive without Paypal. Although I bet if Paypal stood their ground they would find a lot of backing from all corners of the net. There are a lot of sites that rely on Paypal.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
awbMaven (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:44am

Alternative to US-centric e-commerce financial services disparately needed.
I've written about this morality cop and these US-centric e-commerce financial services before from an EU perspective on my blog: http://tinyurl.com/7bbuhf7 and https://awbmaven.wordpress.com/?s=paypal

It is really not on that companies (Paypal, VISA, Mastercard, etc) can have a strangle-hold on other companies when the services they provide have become near monopolies.

From an EU perspective, the EU needs to create it's own versions of these companies, subjected to EU law and not extra-EU laws & whims.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yogi, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:48am

Explain please
Can someone please explain how this is any business of the credit card companies and banks? Have they become the new moral guardians of America? Since when, and since when are they qualified, not to mention authorized to censor our culture? and if this goes down, where will it stop?

Talking about slippery slopes! How long before Techdirt is censored too and oput on trial for, let's say, "corrupting the youth"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:56am
  
  Re: Explain please
  The hemlock's brewing in India, should be ready by December.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ec_1, 7 Mar 2012 @ 5:21am
  
  Re: Explain please
  It's simple
  
  Payment service providers and card companies wants their name and logo to be shown on the e-commerce sites and on all the receipts in order to market their services but they don't want to be associated with all the things their customers uses their services for. ;)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pink floyd, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:48am

tear down the censorship wall
well i'd like that to happen but it wont so finish this wall in the usa and let the rest of us ban all US traffic.

OH and congrats to putin on his democratic win in russia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:06am
  
  Re: tear down the censorship wall
  On that note, how do you all feel about the use of webcams to oversee voting in the recent Russian election? It's an interesting solution to some of the perceived electoral fraud problems, but has obvious implications if used in the context of private voting.
  
  Also, while Putin was leading by such large margins that his win isn't really disputable, there are indications that some fraud still took place (the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported that roughly one third of polls they monitored encountered "ballot stuffing and other irregularities". Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/05/world/europe/russia-election/index.html?hpt=hp_t1).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:28am
    
    Re: Re: tear down the censorship wall
    "Also, while Putin was leading by such large margins that his win isn't really disputable"
    
    IDK if he is proven to have been cheating, even if he would have won without cheating, he should still not be allowed to win. "Yeah, I committed fraud but I would have won without it," is not really a great argument.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:32am
      
      Re: Re: Re: tear down the censorship wall
      As I understand it, the process of choosing who can run is an even bigger problem than any recent vote fraud in Russia. In the past, as well as in the most recent election, numerous potential candidates were denied a place on the ballot.
      
      I'm not defending the practice of vote fraud, by the way; if you are already winning by such wide margins, rigging the election is pointless, and a sign of a thoughtless and wasteful administration.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Mar 2012 @ 8:11am
      
      Re: Re: Re: tear down the censorship wall
      bush and the electoral college committed fraud
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Torg (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:53am

Any company deemed "too big to fail" should also be prohibited from this kind of thing. If the loss of an organization's support would seriously damage any company, then that organization should be held to the standards of the Bill of Rights at least as thoroughly as Congress is supposed to be, or all it'll be good for is stopping a single avenue of tyranny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chargone (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:16am
  
  Re:
  any company that is 'too big to fail' should immediately be broken up into component parts that are NOT.
  
  at that point it's very existence is a danger to the public good. (not to mention they usually reach that state near the end of their lifetime: ie, when they're about to fail. or are already failing.)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nellius (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:07am

Incest is legal and accepted in many non-USA countries, surely? Is this yet another case of the USA forcing its own moralities and laws on the rest of the world?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jake, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:39am
  
  Re:
  There's rarely a specific law one way or the other, as far as I know Accepted, however? Well, so far as I'm concerned, what two or more consenting adults do in private is nobody's business but theirs, but I'm probably a minority there.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David Muir (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:08am
  
  Re:
  The legality or illegality of the act itself is not what should be at issue. We should be considering the free speech and freedom of expression issue: Is the depiction of vile and reprehensible things in written words, moreover the fictionalized depiction of such things, something that one party should be allowed to force another party to "censor"?
  
  We'll hear the argument that censorship only happens by the government. So maybe this is technically not censorship. But we've seen how little distinction there is between big corporate interests and the government. We've also seen how a government-supported monopoly supports a lot of these big corporations (like the patents held by PayPal). So one way or another, this is very much like censorship, if not actually censorship.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chargone (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:18am
    
    Re: Re:
    ... 'censorship only happens by the government' is a bullshit argument anyway. (it's also a grammatically weird sentence)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- rowena cherry (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 11:36am
  
  Re: Incest Is Legal (except in works of fiction sold via PayPal)
  I thought that it was legal for cousins to marry in certain American States... but not in works of fiction.
  
  First cousins allegedly may marry in:
  Alabama
  Alaska
  Arizona (but not if they intend to procreate)
  California
  Colorado
  Connecticut
  District of Columbia
  Florida
  Georgia
  Hawaii
  and the list goes on.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
MRK, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:08am

The story of it being the bank's pressure does not add up.

Adult bookstores, porn websites, etc. all accept credit cards.

If banks really were pressuring card processors to drop adult content businesses, wouldn't these be the first to be cut off?

Since when did banks start policing what its customers purchase?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- E. Zachary Knight (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:20am
  
  Re:
  They are not forcing them to drop all adult content, just certain kinds that depict possibly illegal activities. They are fine with erotica as long as it stays away from bestiality, incest, rape and under-age.
  
  While the whole thing is horrible, there is still some leeway.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Nellius (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:32am
    
    Re: Re:
    The main issue for me is that "illegal" only refers to, I imagine, the USA's laws. Age of consent differs wildly from country to country. In Spain, for example, the age of sexual consent is 13. In large numbers of countries, such as Japan and France, incest is completely legal between consenting adults.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Mar 2012 @ 8:13am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      and you sound like a pedophile, mad that American laws follow you to the philipines??
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Andrew (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:30am
  
  Re:
  There's a linked post from Selena Kitt which argues that the card companies are trying to force erotic publishers to pay higher rates.
  
  What I discovered was that most merchant-services (i.e. companies that allow you to use Visa and MasterCard on their site) which allow adult products charge a $5000 up-front fee to use their service. Then, they take exorbitant percentages from each transaction. Some 5%, some 14%, some as high as 25%.
  
  Now it was starting to make more sense. The credit card companies charge higher fees for these �high-risk� accounts because there is a higher rate of what they call �chargebacks.� You know that protection on your credit card, where if you dispute the charge, you don�t have to pay for it? Well they�ve determined that happens more with porn and gambling and other �high-risk� sites than others, so they�re justified in charging more money to process payment for those sites.
  
  Paypal doesn�t want to have to pay Visa and MC for carrying �high risk� accounts on their books. You have to remember that Paypal is a middleman. Sites that carry high-risk material have to pay the high-risk costs of doing business. If you�re going through Paypal, you don�t have to pay that. Until Paypal catches you. And then they insist you take down your high-risk content or lose your account.
  
  The post also discusses the types of material being censored further. While this appears to be somewhat fluid (see linked Smashwords posts), some publishers have gone beyond banning titles that feature descriptions of illegal acts (rape, paedophilia, incest) and have banned books including themes of "pseudo-incest", "barely legal" (their terms) and BDSM.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Call me Al, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:13am

This story seems to be missing something
This is an odd story and there seems to be a gaping hole where the "why?" of the credit card companies' actions should be explained.

I really don't see what business it is of theirs but also why they would bother to put this kind of pressure on Paypal. Is there anything about some other groups putting pressure on the card companies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Torg (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:23am
  
  Re: This story seems to be missing something
  The "why" is simple. The banks are run by old socially conservative men who have somehow gotten it into their heads that it's bad for their service to be associated with [depictions of] rape and incest. They don't understand why people would object to getting rid of it, because everyone knows rape and incest are bad.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - illuminaut (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:15am
    
    Re: Re: This story seems to be missing something
    You're right, that was a simple explanation. Not the right one, but at least simple.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Torg (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:17am
      
      Re: Re: Re: This story seems to be missing something
      What would you suggest the right one is, then?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Chargone (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: This story seems to be missing something
        the comment a little bit further back up the thread which explains how the credit card companies were trying to get higher fees out of it, i suspect.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Torg (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:55am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This story seems to be missing something
        Ah, there it is. Very well, I admit wrongness.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Reverend Mik, 6 Mar 2012 @ 1:04pm
    
    Re: Re: This story seems to be missing something
    This rule was forced on banks during the bush administration, during the 2257 fracas.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Baldaur Regis (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:53am
  
  Re: This story seems to be missing something
  Following the story links back provides one possible answer: CC companies experience more chargebacks from "high-risk" sites involving porn, gambling &tc. and consequently want more money from the middle-men (i.e., PayPal). PayPal doesn't want to pay so.....
  
  The problem is that PayPal is big enough, not hungry enough, to reject entire categories of content, not because of morality, but because it's a hassle for them. What's needed is a globally accepted, pre-paid card NOT tied to any one CC service.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:19am

What speech?
So... Money equals speech. Those that control the flow of the former have de facto control over the latter. An example playing out right here, in bold-face, for anyone to see, should they care to but look. Might be an interesting spot to spend a moment considering the (potential?) impact of the Citizens United (SCOTUS) case, and what could happen if certain financial entities that we depend upon were to decide to add some friction to the flow of revenue in the direction of causes of which their masters disapprove.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bengie, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:29am

Monopoly?
Could someone claim a monopoly/anti-trust/conspiracy issue?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:30am

Bitcoins
Here I go!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gorehound (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:33am

Can they sue Paypal over this ?
Are we not protected by Laws on Freedom of the Press or Arts ?
If so I would sue Paypal for the maximum amount possible to send them a message they will understand
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:39am

and the next bit of censorship will be against??????????????

this has to stem from one person, so who is it? has that person got the balls to stand up and admit who it is or will they, like with the entertainment industries, just keep loading the gun, letting someone else pull the trigger and perhaps got shot? if that's the case, i call that person a gutless bastard who should stop forcing their will on to everyone else. if you dont like the erotica stuff, keep away from it but leave other people to make up their own minds on things!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:46am

Hmmm
This story makes me want to buy a Henry Miller novel online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 9:52am

Now, on to financial fraud
Buoyed by this success, the credit card companies will next force booksellers to discontinue sales of books which paint a dark picture or disparaging descriptions of bankers and financial companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pjerky (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:22am

WHAT GIVES THEM THE RIGHT???
Awesome, so now banks and credit card companies are trying to censor speech. I would really like to know the names of these banks and credit card companies. They have no right to censor people. I think we should really put a lot of pressure on them to back off and respect the rights of others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dave Zan, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:11pm
  
  Re: WHAT GIVES THEM THE RIGHT???
  Can they sue Paypal over this ?
  Are we not protected by Laws on Freedom of the Press or Arts ?
  
  Sure you can, but what can you - successfully at that - sue them for? The U.S. Constitution guarantees that the government won't necessarily censor one's right to free speech and all, but does it impose the same standard on, say, a private citizen towards another private citizen?
  
  Can someone please explain how this is any business of the credit card companies and banks? Have they become the new moral guardians of America? Since when, and since when are they qualified, not to mention authorized to censor our culture? and if this goes down, where will it stop?
  
  We should be considering the free speech and freedom of expression issue: Is the depiction of vile and reprehensible things in written words, moreover the fictionalized depiction of such things, something that one party should be allowed to force another party to "censor"?
  
  Awesome, so now banks and credit card companies are trying to censor speech. I would really like to know the names of these banks and credit card companies. They have no right to censor people.
  
  Believe it or not, folks, but you too have that same right to censor anyone who uses your stuff, just as PayPal can only censor those who use THEIR stuff. Goodness, we censor what web sites our kids can visit using the Internet WE'RE paying for, we censor potential customers who swear at us within OUR store's premises, we censor what our friends can do when invited into OUR homes, etc.
  
  It may feel like PayPal's censoring one's ability to buy or read whatever erotica they want. Go ahead and try buying or reading one from, say, an offline bookstore or another online store and see if PayPal can stop you from doing that still.
  
  It does suck when someone else is in a stronger position than you, and you can't seemingly have your way with them. While it does feel good to express moral outrage against somebody you don't agree with, are you sure you want someone to censor YOUR ability to censor anybody you find disagreeable?
  
  The door swings both ways. Probably whether something is good or not depends which side one happens to be on.
  
  If anything, though, PayPal ought to have at least released a statement explaining why, albeit they'll still get flagged by many people for it anyway. Heh.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nd, 6 Mar 2012 @ 4:43pm
  
  Re: WHAT GIVES THEM THE RIGHT???
  What gives them the right? Are you serious? They are PRIVATE companies. They have every right. And what's your right? Not to use them. And they are not censoring people. Private companies cannot censor - only the government can. Your post is completely foolish and without merit.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Dyer, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:26am

Dark Days
I�m a Smashwords author and I think what these self-appointed morality police are targeting are works specifically written to titillate. Anyway you cut it, however, it�s still censorship, and it stinks�and we need to combat it�but I think they�re attacking Erotica as a genre, and the abuse of these themes within the genre, rather than the depiction of these themes themselves. Remember, back in the Seventies and Eighties, when all of these themes were woven into mainstream works, and nobody cared; and some of us only read the dirty bits? Maybe we�re still stuck back there, when you have to splash something with the veneer of art�or literariness�for it to fly. I�m so tempted to write a �literary� novel involving all these themes, explicitly described. I may yet do that. Or a �mystery.� Or a �historical romance� (set in 1982). We have entered the era of coy quotation marks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Becka, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:54am
  
  Re: Dark Days
  One of my writer aquaintances has taken all her books down from smashwords after they censored three of her transgressive non-erotica books that deal with issues like these. So no it's not just erotica.
  
  http://zoewhitten.com/2012/03/03/bye-smashwords/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:31pm
    
    Re: Re: Dark Days
    sigh, such middle ages are we living in.
    
    Instead of progressing, we've begun moving backwards.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Becka, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:29am

Smashwords can say it's not that simple all they want, but apparently it is.

Or at least one other vendor has extricated itself from paypal and opened its doors to the books that have been banned. Sure they had to work out a workaround with the credit card companies but they've done it.

http://noboundariespress.com/2012/02/25/a-note-from-kaleigha-what-to-do-with-your-removed-boo ks/

Which of course is great business sense - they've cornered a sudden gap in the market and gained a lot of good will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:29am

"underage sexual content"

Well there goes Romeo and Juliet... My high school english teacher should be fired for distributing such intolerable smut.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MahaliaShere (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:43am
  
  Re:
  Seriously. But you know they'll just say "but...but...it's not classified as erotica!"
  
  So what, it's still fiction.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:43am

Affects vs Effects
When it does so, it effects all its own customers as well.

The verb you are looking for is AFFECTS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Pied Piper, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:55am

Emotional response
No doubt this all started when someone, say a higher up at a credit card company, read something posted from, say, the Smashwords site, something purchased by, say an adolescent child of said higher up, and was so turned off by it that, instead of punishing the child who made the purchase, decided he/she needed to punish anyone associated with the site and moved his/her company (and their associates, all aligned under whatever all those credit card CEOs align themselves with, same private golf club/church/cult) to put pressure on Paypal to 'make it so.'

Actions like this are not based on 'money' but on emotion, someone's emotional response to the content provided. This is where ALL censorship comes from. The risk assessment of porn is not the issue - porn is big business and has been for decades. It isn't going anywhere. Someone was shocked pornographic/erotic material could be found on a 'mainstream' site and the morality gang found a cause.

Notice how this is happening an awful lot lately, across all sorts of varied social groups: the attack on Planned Parenthood via a now former higher up at Susan Komen, the outrageous attacks from the right on the inclusion of gays into marriage laws, the semi-organized actions of the religious Right to counter the language and action of scientists and even atheists, their calls of discrimination now that they are being challenged in the rule-making industry, Limbaugh calling people names, it speaks of a larger desperation out there, a need for control that, yes, evokes Atwood, but also smells of total failure. A great beast is on its side, heaving its last.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BuckRogers1965 (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 12:40pm

Muder is illegal
But there are all kinds of books about people murdering other people. If it is only in writing, then it didn't actually happen and it 100% legal, according to the Constitution of the United States.

You can argue otherwise, but then you are going against everyone who ever died protecting the inalienable rights enumerated by the Constitution. While you are at it you can go take a piss on the graves of the founding fathers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 12:56pm

This is a cautionary tale, don't be at the mercy of only one merchant, find alternatives now or cry later.

Duckduckgo search: Paypal Alternatives

Dwolla charges 25 cents for any transaction $10 or above that, which is less than PayPal $0.030 + 1.9�2.9%.

BitCoin

Wikipedia: Alternative online payment service providers

Wikipedia: Micropayments
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brandy Rozzen, 5 Mar 2012 @ 2:00pm

I find it disturbing that these same credit card companies that PayPal claims are the ones calling for these changes don't have any problems working on pornographic websites and sex toy sites and the like. Something smells fishy to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Charles, 5 Mar 2012 @ 2:02pm

Paypal
Well no more writing about slavery in America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RMimms, 5 Mar 2012 @ 3:14pm

PayPal Petition on Change.org
Someone has already started a petition on Change.org but it only has a few signatures so far. I already signed it: http://www.change.org/petitions/paypal-and-the-credit-card-companies-stop-telling-authors-what-they- can-and-cannot-write
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dave Zan, 5 Mar 2012 @ 4:46pm
  
  Re: PayPal Petition on Change.org
  Personally, I don't know what that will accomplish other than making one feel personally better. But...we do what we please, just as PayPal et al can do what they please as well.
  
  An arguably good thing is no one's necessarily bound to one another, especially if/when options DO exist.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Philip Cohen, 5 Mar 2012 @ 4:19pm

PreyPal
"When Do We Start Calling eBay A Payments Company?"

A tale of two clunky, unprofessional and utterly unscrupulous commercial entities: eBay and PayPal

http://bit.ly/wpl5DT

eBay / PayPal / Donahoe: Dead Men Walking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michelle Steiner, 5 Mar 2012 @ 5:13pm

Personally, I think that PayPal is not telling the truth about it being forced by the credit card companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BPD, 5 Mar 2012 @ 8:51pm

Free of Paypal
I only signed on to Paypal because Smashwords gave me no choice. It was the only way to get paid unless I wait until my account reaches $75. Amazon will direct deposit to my bank account. Smashwords could do this and be free of Paypal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Verywierd, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:27pm
  
  Re: Free of Paypal
  What a lot of this discussion is missing is that what Paypal is banning includes descriptions of completely legal actions.
  
  - sex with 18-19 year olds
  - sex with totally imaginary creatures such as werewolves
  - sex between people not actually related by blood
  
  So we are talking about banning things that someone doesn't like, but is NOT illegal, or in the case of shape-shifters, not even possible.
  
  Are we going back to banning Fanny Hill again?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sassy001 (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 4:22pm
    
    Re: Re: Free of Paypal
    Thanks Very, I was about to go there.
    
    One additional point though. From speaking to various authors, the only fiction being affected at this time is GLBT oriented...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
arf, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:51pm

Never mind the Bible, what about a Song of Ice and Fire?

Watch out Amazon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gayl (profile), 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:54pm

Smell a rat
What about non-fiction books discussing rape, bestiality, under-age sexual activity or incest? What about books on the psychology behind all these behaviours? Self-help books to facilitate survivors healing from these experiences? Guidebooks for parents trying to teach their kids how to identify and avoid predators?

Something just doesn't add up here -- it's not about illegal activity or they'd be insisting Smashwords remove ALL crime dramas, regardless of sexual content, or all love stories, regardless of the ages of the characters, or all... you get the picture.

Methinks the poster reporting on the premiums demanded by CC companies dealing directly with sellers has it right. CC companies have no problem processing fees for strip clubs, pornography, etc., but if an end user complains the charges are false, somebody has to eat them.

Is the real reason behind this "threat" -- that PayPal is trying to pass along this premium to Smashwords? Or is it the CC companies doing this directly? Personally, I'd like Smashwords to come clean on this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2012 @ 10:59pm

Oh, such unnecessary complication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
smashman42, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:01pm

CC company double standards
Kinda ironic that the CC companies have this stance when EVERY commercial porn site in the internets takes Visa & Mastercard...

Fictional erotica in text form VS porn made with actual people... #LogicFail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
brett, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:03pm

The few ruling the many.
First, as an artist and writer I am solidly against censorship. I have heard all the arguments and find them to be NOT valid.

The it is a sad state of things when the Few are allowed to rule the Many. When a large and influential company is allowed to dictate how another company and it's customers think, act and live, this country and the freedoms we are guaranteed get tossed out the window.

This is the Moral Majority all over again and remember how embarrassingly idiotic they turned out to be? Especially with their name. They were only a majority in their minds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wolfie Rankin, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:09pm

What is bestiality?
In fiction, Bestiality could be anything which simply couldn't happen in real life.
Let's take an example of the old Beauty and the Beast series on TV (The 80's one with Vincent, the lion guy) now He and his Lady friend, Catherine, never had sex in the series, however if they did, would it be bestiality?

There could be themes where a woman is in love with a centaur, and have an affair... or it could be a dragon or something.

Should this be banned, in case, you know, people start raping dragons?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lauren, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:21pm

Americans have the right of free speech, which could also apply to the written word?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
kid, 5 Mar 2012 @ 11:40pm

This smells. It was Paypal who years ago decided not to allow the use of their service for adult products. I don't know if/when that changed, but it came with a lame excuse about fraud to justify a blanket prohibition on the use of their service to pay for legal goods.

At the time they were just as hardball about it while blaming someone else.

There's already been one court case confirming that written works of fiction depicting otherwise illegal sex is not illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ak, 6 Mar 2012 @ 1:31am

Smashwords points
Do like Microsoft, you buy points, they are charged as points to credit card. How those points are spent is nothing to do with any cc company. What's offensive about points?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ak, 6 Mar 2012 @ 1:31am

Smashwords points
Do like Microsoft, you buy points, they are charged as points to credit card. How those points are spent is nothing to do with any cc company. What's offensive about points?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Becka, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:59am
  
  Re: Smashwords points
  That's how no boundaries press are doing it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
sandy, 6 Mar 2012 @ 1:48am

PayPal censorship
Has PayPal produced a copy of the so-called communication from a bank, credit card processer or credit union stating that PayPal can't continue to do business with them if PayPal deals in "dirty" books? I think PayPal is flat out lying about any restriction on purchases of anything, anywhere. If you can use a credit card to pay a hooker, I suspect you can use a credit card to pay for anything... as long as you don't use PayPal. Ditch PayPal - they are the problem.

Does PayPal read the material that is purchased? Think about it. How could they? If they have the time to inspect all purchases to see if they approve of the content, they need to get a life and spend it providing better service. Any transaction I have had them insert themselves into has been a hassle but the credit card always accepted the charge and never questioned or chastised me about what was purchased. Credit card companies want the money. Period. PayPal is making this up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sxswann, 6 Mar 2012 @ 7:40pm
  
  Re: PayPal censorship
  I'm with you Sandy - I'd like to see this "so-called" evidence that it's the credit card company and banks making this call. EVERY porn site on the planet seems to be paid for with these same credit cards. Have they seen some of the stuff on those hardcore sites??? Those same booksellers are still taking credit cards. And if the credit card companies were so worried about content, why are they still acceptable methods of payment on those same bookseller sites?
  
  I find it particularly ironic - if it's true - that the same companies that "rape" consumers every month and "raped" the American public for billions of dollars to bail their asses out are worried about what adults are reading. Perhaps that is why the entire economy went to hell in a hand basket. Maybe they should have been more concerned about inflated mortgages and bad credit risks and paying themselves huge bonuses. Talk about obscene!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Peter Bond, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:02am

One of two sacred rights
In my view, there are only two things sacred in the world: Freedom of Expression and human life.

What Paypal is asking amounts to censorship. That is simply not acceptable.

My solution to Smashwords, let us find another way of paying royalties, e.g. direct deposit to bank accounts. This is what other royalty services do. This way you do to things: You get rid of Paypal, and will never again be blackmailed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Yeoman, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:08am

PayPal Censorship
The essence of this debate is that PayPal is a public utility, a financial company merely - as are the banks and credit card companies. They have no mandate to assume the role of Oliver Cromwell and enter the arena of public taste. (They should remember, Cromwell's head ended up on a stake.)

Moreover, PayPal is a world-wide utility. The definition of offensiveness varies from culture to culture. If PayPal's owners operated from Islamabad, would web site owners - whipped to obedience by the culture of Islam - have to visit Mecca before they qualified for a merchant account?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amie Warren, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:10am

Why Smashwords?
Are other booksellers having to do this as well? Since when do banks have the right to violate the first amendments? While I do not read erotica, I feel that if gangsta rap is allowed to be sold online through credit card companies, then erotica should be as well. I would agree if it were violent erotica, or erotica that promotes underage sex, but all erotica does not fall under those subjects. This REEKS of an attempt to circumvent the first amendment by the corporate religious right. They've taken our homes, our jobs, and our futures. Now they want to tell us what to read? What's next? We need to fight this with everything we have. There are more of us than them. Smashwords should find another pay service that doesn't censor its business and we should all boycott PayPal until they relent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Sassy001 (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 4:34pm
  
  Re: Why Smashwords?
  Smashwords was simply the first to cave in to the pressure.
  
  AllRomance has changed their guildlines as to what is acceptable to be published. They claim the new guidelines only affect .002 percent of the books they carry so "very few are really being effected".
  
  On a positive note, No Boundries Press, has kicked PayPal to the curb and is currently offering a home to all books orphaned by this situation.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Magess, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:16am

Proof?
Is there anything other than Paypal's utterly untrustworthy word that Visa/MC/Disc have anything at all to do with this? A memo? A public statement? Anything? Has anyone in the press asked them for one? Because if it's the policy of the largest payment processors in the world to censor these things, why is it only being applied to small indie publishers? And not, say, the porn industry.

Sounds like Paypal blowing smoke after being caught in *another* PR scandal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hal Williams, 6 Mar 2012 @ 6:08am

Censorship is a Government Imposed limitation
First of all - it's only "Censorship" if imposed by the government. In this case it is a private company choosing not to take part in selling what some people consider objectionable. That's called freedom. Smashwords has the freedom to tell PayPal to stuff it and go work with a different credit card merchant service company. If PayPal is willing to lose a HUGE customer by taking this stand, that's their privilege/problem/business.

Come on people--that's how freedom works. Please stop complaining about it or you'll encourage the government to step in and say Everybody has to do business with Everybody whether they like or not. That is NOT freedom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nd, 6 Mar 2012 @ 4:47pm
  
  Re: Censorship is a Government Imposed limitation
  Thanks! There's at least one intelligent person out there (two if you count me) who actually understands the difference between censorship and private companies choosing to deny service.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Sassy001 (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:31pm
    
    Re: Re: Censorship is a Government Imposed limitation
    Wikipedia:
    
    Censorship is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient to the general body of people as determined by a government, MEDIA OUTLET, or OTHER CONTROLLING BODY.(caps mine)
    
    Merriam-Webster:
    Censor - transitive verb
    
    : to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable ; also: to suppress or delete as objectionable
    
    I.E. the radio stationed censored her speech before broadcasting it.
    
    My point: not ONLY governments censor.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Monahan (profile), 6 Mar 2012 @ 6:09am

Paypal Censorship
If the credit card companies via Paypal are going to force e-publishers to delete all mention of topics like rape incest or bestiality doesn't that wipe out most of Greek/Roman mythology, not to mention the Bible?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Peter Bond, 6 Mar 2012 @ 6:18am

Censorship
Furthermore, I don't remember any of my credit cards ever asking me about content of a particular book bought with said credit cards.

Dump Paypal!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nd, 6 Mar 2012 @ 10:32am

this is not censorship
Everyone saying paypal is censoring is making themselves look like an idiot. Paypal is a private company. They CANNOT censor. Only the government can. Paypal is acting within their rights as a private comapny and you have a right not to use them. But to keep claiming that they are censoring is incorrect and making you look foolish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Desert-Brat, 6 Mar 2012 @ 4:52pm

Morality mess
The heck with history, mythology and the Bible ... with today's fast and loose writing styles, just about any book can fall within these so-called "categories" ... including a number of Christian fiction and nonfiction, and self-help or survivor stories.

People can read anything they please into a work of literature. For instance, the '50s cartoon Mighty Mouse was taken off the air because someone decided the magic dust represented cocaine. Are you kidding me? I didn't even know what cocaine was at that age. It was a freakin' cartoon show!

But the same holds true for literature ... hunt for "evil" and you will surely find it. The question is, why are financial institutions trying to control our rights? And why isn't this affecting places like Amazon or Barnes & Noble, who also utilize credit cards and banks ... why is it just the independent publishers and Indie authors?

Since we aren't hearing that the major retailers are facing this same ordeal, could this just be a move on PayPal's part alone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jonnan, 6 Mar 2012 @ 5:31pm

The keyword is, again, neutrality
I am delighted that this is . . . this time . . . gaining mainstream attention, but this is hardly the first time.

They cut off payments to Wikileaks - not because of any legal finding, but because Joe Lieberman made a phone call. Credit card companies have been cutting off payments to what they consider 'unacceptable' erotica providers for years now - nothing illegal, but if Visa and Mastercard won't do business with you, you're just as dead as an internet business as if Google won't list you.

We've had financial firms making decisions about what you can or can't buy for years now, and frankly I was beginning to think they'd have to start explicitly rigging elections with this before people sat up and took notice - I was trying to get the ACLU involved in a similar case two years ago with no response.

So I'm delighted this is finally getting attention
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mimi, 6 Mar 2012 @ 7:20pm

This is just ridiculous! Erotica is perfectly legal and there's nothing whatsoever wrong with it!

And as one of the comments said rightly: the Bible too is full of sex and cruelty - so: no more selling of it?
Romeo and Juliette? No chance. Sex in there as well.
This goes for a LOT of classics and to say, where it is still tasteful and where it is "erotica" is a question of personal opinion. To be safe, Smashwords and other sellers would have to remove every possible contender!

So: only childrens books allowed for sale in the future?!

This is stupid. As long, as something like this exists, credit card companies will always be able to decide what kind of texts are allowed, and which are not - like they were some kind of dictator!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sheski, 7 Mar 2012 @ 5:10am

It's corporate America, but good grief.
After some of the bills that republicans are trying to pass and the hateful speech that their main drug addicted mouthpiece spouts on the air, I find it hard to believe that corporate America has the balls to censor little fictional e-book authors when they won't censor their own political party's misogyny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grumpy Bulldog, 7 Mar 2012 @ 6:30am

This is just ridiculous. Credit cards have been used for pornography for decades. Now they're going to target one erotica publisher? The hypocrisy is overwhelming.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sue Dent, 7 Mar 2012 @ 7:12am

Smashwords to Censor Authors?
Wait a minute. A distributor has that authority? *Sue snickers to self.* Of course they don't. What's that? You didn't know that Smashwords is only a distributor? Well they say so on their site. "We are not a publisher." So if they aren't a publisher and if you think an author's work that they're distributing needs to be censored, you . . . um . . . should contact the publisher or, in the case of self-published material, contact the author. Let's see, Paypal is your one-stop shop for transactions. Smashwords offers anyone who can type something into a computer a way to distribute. Welcome to the mixed-up and whacky world of publishing!Reeeallly paypal? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MadeIn Manhattan, 7 Mar 2012 @ 12:15pm

Why is anyone surprised?
I don't get why anyone would be surprised by this. Paypal has always done stuff like this and then blame it on Visa regulations. LOL How all of a sudden out of all the porno transactions Visa has accepted is it now a violation to accpept payment for the same only on this site??? Paypal's up to it's old tricks again. They almost put me out of business and have suceeded many times at putting others out of business with their practices (http://www.paypalwarning.com) When will we learn????
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tandem, 7 Mar 2012 @ 12:27pm

censorship by papal
Papal tested the same in Germany but was dumped:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Lassen-uns-nicht-erpressen-Rossmann-schmeisst-Paypal -raus-1340041.html

Heise is editing a mayor Computer journal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Greg Turner, 7 Mar 2012 @ 12:40pm

I Smell A Rat
Something does not make sense. If the credit card companies, banks and credit unions, are behind all this, as this article claims, then how in the heck does all the gagillions of $$ worth of online porn business get transacted? John Q. Public pays for his online porn through all the same credit card companies, banks and credit unions!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chastine Perkins, 26 Mar 2012 @ 12:06pm

My book is called 'Battered Butterflies' and there is nothing wrong with it. It is about a girl who is kidnapped and held in uunderground caverns. it is a rape themed book but quite frankly things like this happens every day. They are covering up reality that hides in these book that authors write about and it isnt right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
davidbarcomb, 27 Nov 2014 @ 11:32pm

Just stop working on paypal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]