Spanish Recording Industry Lobbyists Sue Professor For Highlighting Its Monopolistic Practices
from the how-do-you-say-streisand-in-spanish? dept
Yet again, we're left scratching our heads at the basic failure of recording industry lobbyists to think about the consequences of their actions. The latest is that Promusicae, the Spanish recording industry lobbying group that is associated with the IFPI (which, itself is associated with the RIAA) has sued Spanish professor Enrique Dans for daring to state, in his opinion, that Promusicae violated Spanish antitrust laws. The blog post in question (Google translation) is actually mostly about the legal troubles of SGAE, the Spanish collection society which was accused of being involved in a massive criminal fraud operation. In the post, he also mentioned Promusicae and how it set up a system that he believes violated antitrust laws in effectively limiting access to radio airtime to members of Promusicae.In response, Promusicae sued him for "violating their honor," demanding either 20,000 or 50,000 euros. Professor Dans explains the details on his own site (Google translation).
It seems pretty clear that this is nothing more than a SLAPP-style lawsuit -- with the recording industry lobbyists suing Dans to shut him up and to create chilling effects to silence other critics. It's a shameful way of dealing with critics, and, as Rick Falkvinge notes in his story (the first link up top), even if Dans is legally in the right, a court battle is very costly. Again as Falkvinge notes, perhaps it's time for the EU to start setting up anti-SLAPP laws to avoid these kinds of lawsuits as well.
But, more to the point, all this really does is call much more attention to Dans' original blog post from July, and the accusations he made about Promusicae. In what world does an industry lobbyist think that it's a smart move to call attention to a respected professor's blog post that describes some of their questionable behavior? A normal, thinking, individual would either respond directly to the charges with a detailed explanation for why it's wrong, or just let it go away. Suing only makes it worse in almost every way. Not only does it call worldwide attention to this blog post and the claims against Promusicae, but it also will likely make more people look more closely at Promusicae and what it's done... all the while showing off Promusicae lobbyists for the obnoxious bullies that they are. It's really quite incredible. As Falkvinge notes:
Perhaps what amazes me most is that the public backlash to this kind of behavior is as predictable as a grandfather clock. How can the copyright monopoly lobby’s lawyers live in so completely disconnected an ivory tower, that they thought it was a good idea to file lawsuit against a reputable professor for claiming they’re a monopoly, using monopolistic practices – when this fact is not only well-established to the point of being in dictionaries, but even legislated? What kind of survivability would such a parasitic misantropic business have in the wild, if it were not protected by obsolete laws?Of course, I guess they're thinking that the resulting chilling effects scaring away others from commenting might be worth any backlash. Or they're so focused on protecting "their honor" that they never bothered to think at all. I am curious, of course, how "honorable" it is to sue a respected professor for expressing his opinion? How can you sue someone for violating your honor when you have no honor at all?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, enrique dans, free speech, spain, violating honor
Companies: ifpi, promusicae
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
violating their honor?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: violating their honor?
(Live on Pay-per-View?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: violating their honor?
The Misanthropic Misadventures of Don Promusicae?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's personnal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's personnal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti-trust
By charging one price for all music (the blanket license), why would broadcasters mess with people trying to break into the market? It all cost the same.
It appears as if Spain has some sort of developed anti-trust laws. Let's hope they have anti-slapp motions as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freudian SLAPP
On second thought, I must have had it right, because it appears that they like fucking a lot of people.
COMBB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Say what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Say what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It might put an end to all the dueling going on...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re.
/gets out the popcorn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monopoly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lou Nisbet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]