Easy Come, Easy Go: EMI Pulls Video Of Drunk Guy Singing Bohemian Rhapsody, Reinstates It After Backlash

from the can't-do-this-to-me-baby dept

Tue, Apr 3rd 2012 10:33am — Mike Masnick

You may have heard the story in the last few days about the really drunk guy, Robert Wilkinson, who was arrested and put in a police car up in Canada, and responded by breaking into song with a complete rendition of Bohemian Rhapsody. If you haven't seen it yet, you're one of just a few people:
So what happened? You guessed it. EMI, in its ultimate ridiculousness, issued a takedown for violating its publishing copyright. The immediate outcry actually made EMI back down, with the company saying:

"It seems like a mistake has been made."

That's a fun way of indirectly saying "hey, we made a mistake." Suggesting "a mistake has been made" leaves open the possibility that someone else made that mistake. But, in this day and age where the major labels are so quick to shut down anything that doesn't involve them first getting a huge check, perhaps the "mistake" is with the way the law works.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: bohemian rhapsody, drunk, queen, youtube
Companies: emi

40 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jay (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:10am

All that singing...
And he didn't break into dance.

I like how right at the end he states "physical violence is the least of my priorities." Carry on with the protests good sir, carry on...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
saulgoode (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:44am

He did not seem especially intoxicated -- just an extremely untalented singer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:44pm
  
  Re:
  You must be a lush if you think this guy "did not seem especially intoxicated". If I was this guy I would be pissed that the video went public can you imagine the backlash this will have on his job opportunities. Who is going to want to hire a drunk dumbass.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Indy, 3 Apr 2012 @ 4:32pm
    
    Re: Re:
    An employer that recognizes that his skills are valuable and that he can do the job sober during company time?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:46am

I think he does a pretty good job. I'd jam with that guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris Rhodes (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:46am

Passive Tone
A "mistake was made" in the exact same sense that "the homeowner was impacted by a bullet discharged from the firearm held by a SWAT team member".

Why do videos get pulled? Why do homeowners get shot? It's a complete mystery!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:54am
  
  Re: Passive Tone
  I here blaming science has come into vogue once again.
  
  Try this one on for size:
  "Why do homeowners get shot?"
  "Science!"
  
  Pretty good, eh?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:59am
    
    Re: Re: Passive Tone
    Weapons are a product of science, so yes, it's true. Science is to blame.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 4 Apr 2012 @ 6:28am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Passive Tone
      also, without science, no homes, so no homeowners.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:19am
    
    Re: Re: Passive Tone
    "Science!"
    
    Thomas Dolby on line three for you.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ltlw0lf (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:02pm
    
    Re: Re: Passive Tone
    Try this one on for size:
    "Why do homeowners get shot?"
    "Science!"
    
    I like this response better... "ballistics". Newtonian physics would also work.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike C. (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:27pm
  
  Re: Passive Tone
  It's no mystery. It's God. Don't you listen to Bill O'Reilly? If you can't explain it, it must be God's hand at work!!
  
  Oh wait... Can I even mention his name? I mean, that might infringe on his publicity rights or something? And didn't he come up with the idea about explaining the unexplainable? Oh crap, now I probably have to pay a license fee as well...
  
  /some kind of mark goes here... or something
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:58am

"perhaps the "mistake" is with the way the law works."

Exactly, the law shouldn't leave it up to some random entity to determine if their own takedown request is valid, the law should require a neutral third party (ie: due process, via a judge) make that determination and it should severely punish those who make bogus takedown requests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Machin Shin (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 10:58am

A mistake was made.
"It seems like a mistake has been made." We did not want to take the video down we were just looking for criminals name and address so we can sue him for his public performance of our copyrighted work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Noah Callaway, 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:00am

Passive Voice
Using the passive voice -- making the subject of the sentence the noun acted upon (rather than the actor) -- is a classic PR trick to minimize blame and/or fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:08am

I am suspecting the video was taken down by name (it's a pretty exceptional name) without serious review, and when the yelling started, they actually reviewed it.

The takedown is valid (not nice, but valid), but leaving it up is the right choice here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:17am
  
  Re:
  I am suspecting the video was taken down by name
  
  Probably - and that's a violation of the DMCA takedown requirements. You can't make a sworn legal statement in "good faith" that a YouTube video is infringing without actually watching the video.
  
  The takedown may turn out to be valid, but issuing it based on the title of a video is not.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:26pm
  
  Re:
  Why are people signing statements swearing that they are the owners of content under threat of perjury if they are only looking at a title and not the content?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike Masnick (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 4:03pm
  
  Re:
  I am suspecting the video was taken down by name (it's a pretty exceptional name) without serious review, and when the yelling started, they actually reviewed it.
  
  The takedown is valid (not nice, but valid), but leaving it up is the right choice here.
  
  You appear not to be familiar with the DMCA. If the takedown was, as you say, by name, then it is not "valid." A valid takedown requires the party issuing the takedown to check out the content and swear -- upon penalty of perjury -- that the content itself is infringing.
  
  I would suggest familiarizing yourself with the DMCA before making statements about how "valid" this is.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
GMacGuffin (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:16am

Since when does DMCA have a "Disrespectful" Element?
From the linked article:

�It seems like a mistake has been made,� said Dylan Jones, a spokesman with EMI in New York.

He said the company often requests videos be pulled from the site if they are �disrespectful,� but it did not in this case.

Er, huh? What? Let's hope that was just the writer's error, 'cause otherwise ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:19am
  
  Re: Since when does DMCA have a "Disrespectful" Element?
  Unfortunately it probably wasn't an error at all. A lot of people seem to think copyright is a moral right - and they turn it into one by selectively exercising their copyrights based on their moral preferences. Add that to the list of problems caused by lopsided copyright law.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:28am
    
    Re: Re: Since when does DMCA have a "Disrespectful" Element?
    That is why it needs to end.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:43am

LOL. Now the video is down due to a copyright claim by Robert wilkinson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOKKWtJoDHg&feature=youtu.be
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:16pm
  
  Re:
  Now that's some epic win for comedy. The guy should pursue this career lmao
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Baldaur Regis (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 2:31pm
  
  Re:
  I too look forward to more covers by Mr. Wilkinson. Perhaps he'll become the Canadian Justin Bieber, only more awesome because he's got that whole drunk thing going for him, and he's not a goofy-haired tweener. Hopefully his future releases will also be filmed in police-o-vision - it really adds impact to his vids.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chosen Reject (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:44am

I hope the squad car has paid the appropriate license fees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Andrew (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:19pm
  
  Re:
  Absolutely. In fact I'm sure he isn't the first person to sing in a police car like this. Arguably these performances take place in a "place open to the public" (car parks or the streets) and often, as here, at sufficient volume for those outside the car to enjoy the rendition too, so there's a reasonable case to be made that all police vehicles should have to purchase appropriate public performance licences.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 11:58am

Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me.. For me... FOR MEEEEEEE!

Replace "Beelzebub" with "The public" and "a devil" for "awareness" and keep singing the song...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:01pm

I cant help but wonder if this was their way of easing us in, regulate something THEY think is MINOR, so when they have something they trully want taking down, we've all already become 'accustomed' to it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grammar police, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:03pm

spelling mistake
*cheque
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:35pm
  
  Re: spelling mistake
  "Check" is Americanize for "Cheque". Both legit.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baldaur Regis (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:20pm

pffffft.
Everybody knows that bot scrapers have absolutely no sense of humor. Or satire. Or fair use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark Helmet (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:24pm

Hmmmm
"You may have heard the story in the last few days about the really drunk guy, Robert Wilkinson, who was arrested and put in a police car up in Canada, and responded by breaking into song with a complete rendition of Bohemian Rhapsody."

I think it's a little unfair to change the person's name to Robert Wilkinson when we all know this was Marcus Carab after a night of too many appletinis and Twizzlers....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:29pm
  
  Re: Hmmmm
  Nah, I probably would've sung this
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:28pm

Why are that guys hands not cuffed? Do Canadian cops not cuff everyone who gets in their cars?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 12:29pm
  
  Re:
  Canadian criminals are too polite to run away....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - The Infamous Joe (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 4:33pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Physical violence was the least of his priorities.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
IKnowthisGuy, 3 Apr 2012 @ 5:43pm

Not just drunk
I know this guy i don't know how drunk he was but i do know he is extremely schizophrenic that's why he can sing the whole song as no drunk guy has a memory that good. The cops know him(a small town 8000 people) probably why it was released as he is arrested all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2012 @ 7:21pm

Am I the only one who thinks a duet should have occurred?

Police: We'll not let you go ):
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Infamous Joe (profile), 3 Apr 2012 @ 7:34pm
  
  Re:
  Haha, no, I figured that was the reason for all the hype; that the cops joined in.
  
  Sadly, I was disappointed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]