MPAA Pretends Dodd Didn't Say That New SOPA Negotiations Were Underway
from the nice-try-guys dept
So Chris Dodd just said that there were ongoing backroom negotiations for a new SOPA, with some push from the White House. Of course, he did it with a wink and a nod, by saying he was "confident" that such was "the case" but that he wouldn't "go into more detail, because obviously if I do, it becomes counterproductive." When asked to clarify, he made it clear that Obama was pressuring the tech community to agree to a version of SOPA:I'm not going to revisit the events of last winter. I'll only say to you that I'm confident he's using his good relationships in both communities to do exactly what you and I have been talking about.For all the winking and nodding, the meaning of the statement was pretty clear. Of course, now that it's getting plenty of attention and the MPAA is getting slammed from every direction for continuing its braindead backroom strategy, the organization is simply denying Dodd said what he said:
"Sen Dodd did not say SOPA is coming back to life. He said the tech and entertainment industries need to come together to work on a new solution and those conversations are beginning. SOPA is gone. The path forward now is a serious conversation between all involved industries about new solutions, and that was Sen Dodd's point."That's an interesting twist on what he actually said, but even if we take the MPAA at their word, this still shows how out of touch they are. Notice that they say the path forward is not an open conversation with internet users. Nope. It's a backroom negotiation between "all involved industries." It's as if the MPAA can't even get its mind around the fact that the stakeholders here are the internet users -- or that any such discussions should be done in public. Instead, the only thing it can think of is that it has to negotiate in backrooms with industry reps. I don't think I've ever come across an organization so ridiculously tone deaf.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chris dodd, mpaa, sopa, white house
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dodd's days are numbered
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dodd's days are numbered
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please reword this? Please? Remove the first 'clear' maybe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
fixed, thanks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MPAA Chief Christopher Dodd Says SOPA Debate Isn't Over
MPAA Chief Christopher Dodd Says SOPA Debate Isn't Over
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mpaa-christopher-dodd-sopa-bully-harvey-weinstein-rating s-308359#disqus_thread
And the greetards wonder why we have absolutely no respect for this organization. Sheesh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MPAA Chief Christopher Dodd Says SOPA Debate Isn't Over
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: MPAA Chief Christopher Dodd Says SOPA Debate Isn't Over
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can the entertainment industry learn?
It was people. Just regular people that did a little research and decided that they didn't like what the studios and record companies wanted to do.
We as a group protested so loud and so long that even brain dead politicians realized that it wasn't in their best interest to continue on their chosen path. They realized that even grandmothers were opposed to what they were trying to do.
The skids are now greased. We know what to do and how to do it. They just haven't learned that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can the entertainment industry learn?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
See, I'm all about protecting intellectual property, but I don't want the government snooping on me. Here's a suggestion: Get the snooping out of the bill, and I'll reconsider!
Instead of us all complaining, maybe we should offer them suggestions. I just think 'everything on the Internet should be free' is pretty much false. Look at advertising. So what should we propose?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just do it already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SOPA/PIPA 2.0 vs THE ENTIRE INTERNET
If only the bigwigs in Hollywood learned their lesson...
Then again, if they didn't, this wouldn't be as much fun as it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't fool us!
We're not cavemans nor K-9 you can fool by giving us some treat while you plan behind our backs.
You guys we're voted to SEVER the public, not to serve a few selected VIP or the high-class only.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to push back
1. Throw out the DMCA "safe harbor" law. Some short-sighted people claim it's useful or even necessary for helping the Internet work. They say it's what enables systems like YouTube to exist. Well, that's nonsense. The safe harbor protection is redundant, and the baggage it brings along with it--DMCA takedowns--are a serious threat to the open Internet. The same protection for useful sites such as YouTube can be assured by codifying that any site that hosts user-generated content operates under the aegis of pre-existing common carrier law, which states that a service whose function is to transmit other people's work bears no liability for the content of that work.
2. Completely reverse the digital locks and anti-circumvention provisions. DRM is a technology with no moral legitimacy, and it deserves no legal legitimacy either. Our most sacred legal tradition is that a person accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. DRM takes that doctrine and spits in its face. If the DRM software says you're guilty, not only are you not innocent until proven guilty, you're not even guilty until proven innocent. You're simply "guilty because I said so," with no appeal, and (the DRM author's private interpretation of) the penalty for breaking the law is enforced upon you. A private individual taking the law into their own hands is known as vigilantism, and a remote programmer overriding the will of the owner of a computer is known as hacking. Both are quite illegal in any other context, for very good reasons. Why should they be legal in the context of copyright infringement? We need to classify DRM as what it is: a hacking tool whose only use, outside of carefully-controlled security research, is to violate people's rights.
3) Access to the Internet needs to be classified as a basic right of civilization, on the same order as access to electricity and running water, meaning that no provider may be allowed to restrict it in any way unless the customer is unable to pay. The only exception should be for criminals who have had this right specifically limited through judicial action. (Child pornographers come to mind.)
With this, we can turn the piracy debate inside out. Our message needs to be, "piracy is your problem, and you have zero right to make it my problem until and unless you are able to prove in court that I am part of the problem."
The entertainment industry isn't going to stop pushing, so we need to push back, and keep pushing until we enshrine that principle in law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Time to push back
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Troll Prediction
How long do you think it'll be before the usual shills accuse Mike, Leigh or any of the TechDirt community of the same thing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Troll Prediction
"Mike is ridiculously tone deaf to the absurd arguments of the paid shills who work for rich middlemen. And he's a dirty pirate too!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Troll Prediction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Troll Prediction
MIKE IS PIRATE HITLER, KILLS BABIES, KISSES THE ASS OF ALMIGHTY GOOGLE AND IS PRO-LIFE! TRULY HE IS THE DEVIL INCARNATE, DESTROYER OF WORLDS, AND AN ALL TOGETHER -BAD GUY-!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll Prediction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A time to be careful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, if Dodd had his foot any further in his mouth it'd be coming out of his back end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny, isn't it?
...there are no trolls or shills who are willing to stand up for him.
It's as if even they know that Dodd's a lost cause at this point. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]