Another Error By US Officials May Kill Megaupload Prosecution
from the another-error dept
The number of significant mistakes by law enforcement in the Megaupload case continues to grow, with the latest one being a big one. Apparently, the US judge on the domestic part of this trial has noted that a pretty big problem with the case may mean the trial never actually moves forward at all. You see, you have to actually serve criminal charges, but US officials never served Megaupload -- and due to some specifics, the concern is that Megaupload can't actually be served as a foreign company. So, due to procedural rules, the judge in the case is warning US officials that they may have a significant (to insurmountable) hurdle in actually bringing any case forward. Oops. This is becoming a huge comedy of errors.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: criminal charges, procedural error
Companies: megaupload
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*Mission Accomplished*
And it worked. The climate of fear has pervaded the varied file lockers which remain; all of them scared they'll be raided by 'special forces' (or some such) and shot with beanbags rounds, dragged out of their house and shipped to the US just so they can not answer to farcical charges.
I do not believe "justice" was ever the point of the MegaUpload raid, it was terror.
Personally, I don't negotiate with terrorists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Mission Accomplished*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: *Mission Accomplished*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: *Mission Accomplished*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: *Mission Accomplished*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Mission Accomplished*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Mission Accomplished*
I agree.
After reading Dotcom's response and this article I am beginning to wonder if the US Government might have accidentally created their very own "SOPA moment" concerning asset forfeiture laws.
Widespread public awareness is a powerful thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: *Mission Accomplished*
situation if the process was actually in motion.
Ah he was considering the US market with an IPO, this whole situation starts making more sense now. I wonder if the "Big Four� auditors and several of the world�s largest investments banks" he was talking too talked to some of their friends in either Hollywood or the US Capital. Only speculation mind you, though we are talking about Banks and auditors that the USG just gave billions of dollars too. Conflicts anyone???
Next time Kim, go to the other markets.. Australia could be good. we even have Brothels (the NYSE & USG hates that).
And in regards to if the trial is never going to happen and they are acquitted. If I was one of the lawyers I would go for 'with prejudice" to recoup all losses, or if not then counter with malicious prosecution charges. Especially within NZ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Mission Accomplished*
Doing just enough to keep the site down for long enough that money doesn't come in until finally sometime far into the future when the lack of real facts or laws supporting the charges are finally admitted, and they've stalled for as long as they could (just like Dajaz1) so that it doesn't matter if the defendant was innocent to begin with, now they are buried in debt and bad press, that their chances of recovery are slim to none. Too bad there isn't repercussions for the DoJ doing their jobs unfaithfully.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Mission Accomplished*
hummm...
*evil pondering*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Serving
Which just made me think of something. 5 years in jail needed for extradition from NZ. Hmmm. Is that typical? Wasn't that part of SOPA - raise the criminal penalty to 5 years for streaming? They must have probably chose 5 years so they could make it an extraditable offense under extradition treaties?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Serving
Mega let them kill 2 birds with 1 stone.
- Scare the cyberlockers, because their super secret we know your a thief tech can't track those users. 6 Strikes wasn't easy to get into place, and cyberlockers undermine it completely.
- Stop Dotcom from opening the music selling service. Taking a flat 10% from each sale and not having a voodoo laden contract to get money for years and years afterwards is a huge threat to the entrenched music dinosaurs. Given the brand recognition Mega had it could have drawn new artists there rather than letting them slave away for the labels.
Several of the more hysterical charges that would be impossible to prove from the indictment all had 5 year possibilities to make sure they had covered their bases with the NZ extradition treaty.
7 individuals do not "own" the servers, Mega does.
The majority of the assets seized are property of the corporation, who can't be served it appears. It appears to be a foolish attempt to endrun not being able to serve a foriegn corporation by claiming Mega itself was the conspiracy...
The "criminal conspiracy" includes charges of "laundering money"... they took in subscription fees and advertising payments and did the most horrible thing... they paid their server bills. This was called laundering money.
The "criminal conspiracy" is accused of causing billions of dollars of losses to the **AA's membership, except there is no actual proof of these losses and if they used any previous published study showing losses they will be laughed out of court as every study so far with these huge numbers has been shown to be a comical farce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Serving
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You two were meant for each other. True love.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
LAWL LAWL LAWL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I can't even believe I'm questioning this, but there's no point to having this bukkake-face around...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
For example(and just to make it clear, these aren't aimed at anyone):
"You're a crap filled flesh-sack." is offensive, but ultimately harmless.
"I'm going to come to your house and..." on the other hand is something that shouldn't be allowed, as it implies actual harm.
Now that said, they may have their free speech, but everyone else also has the right to just click 'report' and block anything that's too offensive, which seems like a good compromise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Especially so since it's not really blocked. It's just hidden. Click on it, and it un-hides. Very civilized, I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
While I applaud you on finding your way out of Narnia and that deep closet Mr. Santorum, this really is the wrong way and the wrong forum for you to act on your confusing feelings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
U jelly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I CAN"T DECIDE!!!!
*breaks down in manly tears*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You two were meant for each other. True love."
Meant for each other??? Masnick's a couple of donuts and a crewcut from being his twin. Perhaps a bit overstated as I find Dotcom marginally less obnoxious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't be jealous. Try to be less of a dickhead and maybe it'll happen some day to you to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They don't want to go to trial
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They don't want to go to trial
FTFY
;-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will they keep the servers?
Would that be legal?
I would assume MegaUpload will petition the courts to make the Feds return the servers and domain names in that case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Will they keep the servers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Will they keep the servers?
Whatever they've got they'll keep, including money, until they've convinced Carpathia to delete everything they haven't directly seized. Then they'll give it all back after wiping any drives and data in their possession.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Will they keep the servers?
More likely that they will just permanently keep everything they seized, including MU's money.
Would that be legal?
Unfortunately, it probably would be. Asset seizure and forfeiture in the US has a very low standard and it's basically guilty until proven innocent. That's for the seized property, not the people involved. You have to go to court and convince a judge that whatever was seized is absolutely, positively, 100% legal. From the stories on the net, that happens about 10% of the time...
Keeping seized property is so common that police departments count on it as part of their budget.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Will they keep the servers?
If they US do not have their dirty hands on it, it most likely would be returned by people just acting on the bad information provided.
Dotcom owns several things he could use to finance but "purchase" of the Carpathia servers to get them up long enough to have them moved well outside of the borders of the US.
Mega was a multimillion corporation, they started small and I have no doubt that when this ill conceived case finally blows over they will be back with a vengeance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And this was what the scientists feared all along.
When they discovered that the lead we were adding to paint, could have long lasting detrimental effects on children.
And how those effects have come home to roost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
the talking sphincter of Dodd
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The NZ High Court has already weighed in on this issue with Dotcom et.al already, believe me this is not a fait accompli for the US prosecutors.. Far from it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the "criminal conspiracy" was the mega corporation, and if mega can't be charged as a foreign company, then where is the criminal conspiracy? How is something "criminal" when it is deemed untouchable by US law?
(not a law expert, and no sarcasm in those questions. Seriously wondering that, if anyone cares to explain)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at the DMCA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Look at the DMCA
http://toronto.openfile.ca/toronto/text/miles-go-byron-sonne-trial-continues
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Notice the information that has "leaked" in the past few days. Megaupload was planning an IPO. Megaupload employed 220 people. Megaupload had multiple divisions, including a clothing division. These facts support the argument that Megauplaod was an actual bone fide corporation and not just the shell of a conspiracy. These facts were probably already briefed and submitted to the court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Also, I think I'm wrong when I said above that "these facts were probably already briefed and submitted to the court."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminal Conspiracy - maybe not.
The US will argue that the Megaupload corporation was a shell to further the conspiracy, not a real corporate entity. Megaupload with argue otherwise, which may explain why we are seeing facts about their corporate existence (number of employees, IPO planned, etc.).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Criminal Conspiracy - maybe not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and now we know...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: and now we know...
- It allowed the 47(?) GB of data they extracted be the only "evidence" of what was in the 25 PB of data on the servers.
- It destroyed peoples trust in cyberlockers. People would be less likely to use them knowing they could be wiped clean, and a court wouldn't care.
- Even when they wheels came off, it meant the recovery of Mega as a brand would be made that much more difficult.
- It kept people focused on how much was there, instead of questioning how the US obtained internal email and calls from the foriegn corporation.
The downsides included...
- DoJ looking like morons after claiming Child Porn on the servers and not wanting to investigate.
- The look of the Government willing to violate an accused right to a fair trial.
- Removed the contents of the server from being used in a civil lawsuit brought by the **AA's, which I am sure was a consideration in this case being started.
The Government has been caught lying in these types of cases before - DaJaz1 and the Spanish site they took down as being infringing then refused to release information to the lawyers for the accused, and lied to the Judge and media about the owners actually trying to reclaim their property.
Many of the people in DoJ are former **AA or similar special interest group employees. They have thrown the law out the window to pursue vendettas against those these organizations claim are robbing them blind based on evidence of questionable nature.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: and now we know...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
---
Lawyers acting for the US have said they will argue Dotcom should be extradited because he was a member of an organised criminal group, which carries a sentence of five years.
The US Government needs to get over the hurdle of a five-year jail sentence to meet the criteria for extradition. Copyright charges in NZ carry a maximum of four years
----
So I'm guessing that means there's going to be a huge amount of pressure on NZ to ratchet up the copyright sentencing guidelines to make things easier for the US in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
love it
Just wondering if the US government will still support the RIAA and cohorts if they have to pay a few billion in loses to mega. Damn good news this. Well not for the American taxpayer , but for the rest of us , very very good news.
And if anything this should encourage cloud services to move out of America and into safe havens where they might also make a few billion if the RIAA comes after them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great...
I really, really hope that this whole thing falls over. It would be even better if some action could be taken against the NZ government for being a party to this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Great...
they were pretty much going to lose the last election but somehow Earthquake = incumbents have advantage despite not doing a damn thing beyond stripping the inhabitants of the affected area of a number of rights and democratic processes for the duration (non-specified). add in incredibly corrupt reporting and/or opinion polls and they SHOULD have been out on their ears last election.
I'd like to think that such a blatant waste of resources and corrupt action against private citizens in the name of foreign interests would do them in. i'm probably dreaming though.
(I'd LOVE a Green/NZ First/Conservative coalition. never going to happen, but when you get the pro-freedoms, pro-citizens and 'change only stuff that would actually HELP' parties all lined up, and they happen to be (in spite of the name of the last one) the ones with the most radical economic policies (necessary at this point) that aren't suicidal AND they've all picked up a middling-strong nationalist vibe (as opposed to Labour's globalist or National's Pro-USA and China angles, not racists/anti-regionalist/anti-imigration nationalism) ... let's just say that it'd be as close to perfect as we could get here without a monarch actually willing to do their damn job and , figeratively speaking, sit on the idiots who keep selling out the country and it's citizens in favour of stupid ideology or pure greed and keep the whole lot in line...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Reading.. It's hard isn't it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Reading.. It's hard isn't it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good little doggie, Obidenama!
Making shitloads of monet without working is fun.
The check's in the mail.
Love, the mafiaa dinosaurs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
correction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: correction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well
Rapidshare and a host of other lockers went "user only" and removed sharing from their systems, so now the competition to Megaupload has been pretty much killed stone dead...
Now he just needs to get the data back, run an IPO and make 10's of billions pure profit.
(I believe the estimates for the value of publicity for all this runs into hundreds of millions of dollars of free advertising for Megaupload).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: well
The Hotfile case is going to put a gaping wound into WB. They committed copyfraud and keep doubling down claiming Hotfile didn't do enough under the law, when it is clear they went well above and beyond to appease them... and it still wasn't enough and WB abused those powers.
The cyberlockers based in the US are going to die off. Others will be moving their servers well outside of the US, and looking at rebranding themselves as something other than .com .net or any other TLD the US claims to have special rights to allow them to go after.
Mega needs to come back and launch the music platform, that will cause sheer panic. The success of that is where their future lies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once again, Techdirt trying to overstate things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sure, go ahead and do it all again, because it makes you look all that much better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They cannot EVER serve them since Foreign corporations cannot be served with criminal charges outside the USofA under US law.
The only way MegaUpload could be charged is if the NZ government charged them criminally. Which if they would (that's something the USA cannot control) would then be fully tried and processed within the NZ Criminal Court system (where the US Prosecutors cannot even do anything other than sit in the gallery like the plebs they would be)
If the US tried to change it's laws to enable it to charge Foreign Corporations, every other country would then change its laws to charge US companies.
See this is how the rest of teh world that is actually democratic and fair works, not just in the interests of the USofA. Don't like it? well suck it up you better get used to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The company, well... it's only part of the conspiracy. Plus I doubt there was a true arms length relationship between kim and his companies (he has been nailed on that before), so in the end, where does Kim stop and the company start? (Hint, it's all Kim).
Demoncratic and fair doesn't mean "you can get away with anything". Sorry to burst your bubble of innocence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
*"your" referring to the US
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]