NYTimes Draws Connection Between Beastie Boys Lawsuit & Patent Trolls, Realizes IP Hinders Innovation

No, Writing A Song With The Lyric 'Let's Go Thunder' Doesn't Entitle You To 30% Of The Oklahoma City Thunder's Profits

from the ownership-society dept

Wed, May 30th 2012 11:48am — Mike Masnick

A guy named Charles Syrus apparently wrote a song that had the phrases "Go Thunder" and "Let's Go Thunder" in it, cheering on the Oklahoma City Thunder NBA team. Syrus then got a copyright on the song. And then... he claimed that the copyright for the song gave him the copyright in those two phrases, and demanded 20 to 30% of the teams' "net gross" (um...) for using those phrases in promotional campaigns. Not surprisingly, the district court and the appeals court rejected his lawsuit, noting that "we easily conclude that the phrases ‘Go Thunder’ and ‘Let’s Go Thunder’ do not reflect the minimal creativity required for copyright protection." And, finally (though to the surprise of pretty much no one, Syrus excepted), the Supreme Court has said it has no interest in hearing his appeal. Some will claim that this is no big deal, since the courts got it right and this clear overreach of copyright law went nowhere legally. However, it does seem like yet another sign of the insanity of our culture today and the suggestion that everything and every phrase is "ownable" thanks to modern IP laws. You wouldn't even have a case like this if people didn't think it was possible to abuse copyright in this manner -- and given the headlines we see of crazy sounding copyright cases all the time, it shouldn't be any surprise at all that people are tying up courts with ridiculous claims like this one.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: charles syrus, oklahoma city thunder, ownership mentality
Companies: nba

42 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 11:51am

OMG, IP abuse! IP abuse! Thank God for Michael Masnick, our Internet Savior.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 11:57am

Re:
You forgot your '/bob' tag.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
lucidrenegade (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:00pm

Re:
OMG, sheep abuse! Sheep abuse! Thank god for Anonymous Coward, our Bestiality Savior!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:01pm

This is probably an anomaly but I do think people have a ridiculous notion about the ownership of ideas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Glen, 30 May 2012 @ 12:08pm

Re:
Seriously, you have GOT to try harder that this. You are just going through the motions. If you are gonna troll, then dammint, toll!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Glen, 30 May 2012 @ 12:08pm

Re:
Seriously, you have GOT to try harder that this. You are just going through the motions. If you are gonna troll, then dammit, toll!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MrWilson, 30 May 2012 @ 12:09pm

Re:
Not even their own ideas. People have been trying to claim ownership of simple words and phrases for a while. It doesn't usually go over well unless you're a deep-pocketed corporation.

Just ask Leo Stoller.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:10pm

Seriously, it's no big deal.

WHY EVEN WRITE ABOUT IT?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:15pm

Message to so-called "Americans"
Good. Eat each other and leave the rest of the fucking world alone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Katos, 30 May 2012 @ 12:16pm

How about "threepeat" and "one for the thumb" for silly copyrights.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chosen Reject (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:16pm

Re:
I'd agree with you about it being an anomaly, if it was, but it isn't. We have chefs claiming IP being stolen when someone takes a picture of their food and a CEO claiming their logo stolen and tagline misappropriated when someone makes a parody website of their company, and that's just today. In the past Burberry was threatened by Humphrey Bogart's estate for showing an image of Mr Bogart wearing a Burberry coat, trademark applications for Linsanity, Seal 6 (not by the Navy Seals), Occupy Wall St, Justice for Trayvon, and I won't even begin with the Olympics. There's more, but I don't have the time to remember them all.

It's not an anomaly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:17pm

the only problem with this lawsuit was that it was brought by an individual. had it been a major label belonging to RIAA, the court would have fallen over itself to rule in it's favour and award astronomical damages. no bias, of course! (sarc)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Machin Shin (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:27pm

Re:
No big deal other than the amount of time this wasted in the courts. Do you really think these fools paid everyone for the time they wasted? Who pays the judges, stenographers, and everyone else involved in making the court run?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:27pm

Being a fan: you're doing it wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
khory, 30 May 2012 @ 12:27pm

If they had stayed in Seattle they wouldn't have this problem:)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ima Fish (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:29pm

"Some will claim that this is no big deal, since the courts got it right and this clear overreach of copyright law went nowhere legally."

Anyone who claims that is an idiot. The expense of taking a case all the way to the supreme court is outrageous. My guess would be at least a half million in attorney fees alone. That is not a system that works for a frivolous case.

And even if the court does make the loser pay, where is that money coming from? It's not like that song writer has a half a million dollars lying around.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Machin Shin (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:30pm

What gets me is how stupid the guy was to go for 30%. There was never any hope of getting that. He probably could have trolled very well though by just asking for much lower amount and hope they pay to get rid of him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gwiz (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:38pm

Re:
Thank God for Michael Masnick, our Internet Savior.

You mad you didn't get a medal dude?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Brent (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:42pm

Re:
agreed! when i started reading the article, i actually thought it was going to do that sort of comparison.. I don't think its right to 'abuse' the system but honestly, if more individuals tried to do this kind of thing, maybe it would be more abundantly clear to law-makers and/or regular citizens the system is completely screwed up and change would happen. Not to mention there would be more comparisons of cases brought by individuals getting rejected vs similar cases brought by RIAA/MPAA that are awarded damages.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:45pm

Re: Re:
Dude, very nice!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Mighty Buzzard (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:46pm

Re:
And I wouldn't have to deal with people suddenly giving a shit about basketball in OK.

Seriously, how did a football state end up with a pro basketball team?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
gorehound (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 12:50pm

Re:
+1
Hope I live long enough to watch their big ass greedy World fall apart.
And that is how much I hate these bigwigs.No Sympathy one bit in my heart for any of them.
Just keep it in our Nation so we don't mess with other Nations.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 12:54pm

Re: Re:
Don't forget the IOC suing anybody daring to use the word "OLYMPIC" or "THE GAMES"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 1:09pm

Re:
Seriously, it's just an article.

WHY EVEN READ IT AND COMMENT ON IT?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Russ (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 1:11pm

Originality
Let's Go XXXX has been around for decades. For that matter, Let's go Thunder has been around for about 20 years for my local AA baseball team the Trenton Thunder. I think there is prior art.

what a greedy little idiot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DS, 30 May 2012 @ 1:14pm

Re:
Actually, it is IP abuse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 1:15pm

Re: Re:
I agree - worst attempt at trolling ever.

flagged it as "funny", because it wasn't even worth reporting...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 1:23pm

Re: Re:
She's cute. Now I want to be given a medal as well!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 1:28pm

Re:
I wonder if your examples are okay because they were coined by someone who then got the copyright on it versus something they did not create but put into a song?

Besides, any sports team called Thunder would have fans yelling Go Thunder or Let's go Thunder. Probably have been doing it long before this guy's song was even created.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
illuminaut (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 1:41pm

Can't blame him for trying to game a broken system for his advantage. Had it worked, him and his children and grandchildren never would have to work another day in their lives. If he seriously thought he was in the RIGHT however then he's a complete idiot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
moronnorom (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 1:44pm

Re: Re:
Let's Go Thunder!

Heck, I yell that every time I go to the bathroom.

You do not want to be there for the lightning. ;)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WDS (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 1:46pm

2 wrongs = 1 right?
Well he copied "Thunder" from the name of the team, and he copied "Let's go" from the chant of every other team in America (or is that Amercia). It makes perfect sense to me that he should get wealth from then combining the two. If he had added two claps between every time the line was repeated it would of been worth 50% of the teams gross.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wallow-T, 30 May 2012 @ 1:52pm

It would seem to me that the sports team should have a claim against the songwriter, as the concept of "Thunder", as the name of the sports franchise, must be protect by trademark or copyright or something. :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Almost Anonymous (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 1:58pm

Re: Originality
I dunno, he's no worse than your typical patent troll, and in many ways better since his actions largely will not hamper basketball or song-writing innovation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 2:10pm

Re: Re:
The state with Bedlam (the awesomest name for a rivalry I've ever heard) doesn't even get a pro football team. Guess we'll just have to hope OSU (sorry sooners) rises to the challenge again this year.
That is, if the coaches on the poll don't have their head stuck up their collective asses.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Luc Boardwalk, 30 May 2012 @ 2:18pm

um...
He wants 30 percent of the "net gross"? Throw in a couple of dozen jumbo shrimp while you're at it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 2:21pm

Re:
I love it when I read an article and find that the first comment has been flagged! It generally means I am in for a good laugh!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 2:42pm

Re: Re: Re:
Oh, that might be a great battle to watch on Pay-Per-View.

This Sunday we have a cage match between the lawyers from the OIC vs the lawyers from Lionsgate Studios (The Hunger Games).

FIGHT!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 May 2012 @ 2:43pm

Re: um...
And a pony! Don't forget the pony!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John Fenderson (profile), 30 May 2012 @ 3:54pm

Re:
Can't blame him for trying to game a broken system for his advantage.

Of course I can. What's wrong with blaming someone for their unethical acts?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Digitari, 30 May 2012 @ 5:21pm

Re: Re: um...
.... ride the pony....

Wait, sorry that's a different song
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rose M. Welch (profile), 31 May 2012 @ 7:14am

Re: Re:
We're just greedy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]