Apple Store Refuses To Sell To American Citizens Speaking Farsi In Case They Might Send iPhone To Iran
from the policy-is-policy dept
This is just bizarre. Apparently, an Iranian-born American citizen who was speaking Farsi was denied the ability to buy an iPad and an iPhone because store employees cited an Apple policy barring the export of Apple products to Iran.Jafarzadeh, who is from Virginia, said no one asked him where the phone was going. The employee only questioned his ethnicity.It certainly sounds like Apple might want to train some of its employees a bit better in understanding what "export" means. And maybe Apple employees should also be made aware of the fact that American citizens can speak Farsi.
"I feel like this is a bit of racial profiling against Iranians and I'm appalled," Jafarzadeh said.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: apple store, farsi, ipad, iphone, iranian-american, virginia
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dress "Muslim" and get extra looks at security, and stares from people on the plane.
Speak "Muslim" with your travel companions and get people to panic as they assume your talking about overthrowing the government or downing the plane.
Say the same phrases as other people but look "Muslim" and suddenly everything is much more sinister.
That being said, FTFA they admit they were buying the iPad to send to Iran. So they were just following the "law" and policy... but that starts to fall apart when you meet the other people denied purchase because they were speaking Farsi. People who said nothing about Iran but spoke a language and an employee made the decision they would refuse the sale because they might sneak it out of the country to Iran where it could be used to do all sorts of evil.
I can support them when they hear about it being shipped to Iran, the Feds say no to that. But when they decide your the right color and speaking Farsi so no phone for you, we should have problems.
Also WTF is it Apple's job to stop these things from being exported? Apple salespeople are now are front line of defense to keep Iranians from getting Apple products?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
ITAR is taken VERY SERIOUSLY. First story I found Googling about the WELL known story from Tenn about ITAR violations
Perhaps you've never had to worry about this law, and great for you if you haven't. But for those of use who do... This is a well known topic.
TRUST ME... ITAR is not something you want to mess with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Only by appallingly ignorant morons.
For example: let's suppose that the evil wicked mean nasty terrorist bogeymen (I mean the real ones, not the ones created by the FBI as a substitute for doing sound police work) want to get their hands on a case of iPhone and iPads because they too want to be locked into Apple's increasingly-proprietary and unmaintainable and overpriced products.
Does anyone really think that they can't make that happen? REALLY? Do you REALLY think that people who are putatively smart enough to construct elaborate conspiracies and execute complex plots can't figure out how to shop Walmart or Craigslist or eBay and come up with as many as they want?
Pretending that widespread technology will somehow magically be confined to a limited space via regulatory fiat is stupid on a grand scale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Have another drink of the Kool Aid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The employee in the story is at best stupid and most likely racist. But if he had asked "is this going out of the country?" and the guy said "No, I'm using it in the USA you dumb ****" then the Apple employee has done more than enough regarding ITAR since he has no other capabilities to perform this rather meaningless part of the job.
If a government auditor decided to test the said employee and clearly state "I plan to give this to my friend who lives in Iran" while buying the phone and the employee sold it anyways, Apple could suffer greatly. On paper anyways. Doubtful they would care much about individual stores.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Muslim"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "Muslim"
There are followers of the Sikh faith who are harassed for being terrorists and America hating, because of nothing they have done but for looking like the stereotype they teach everyone to fear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If my manager had come up to me and said "Alright lads, Ireland now doesn't sell to "Insert Random Country", because of an embargo. If someone you think comes from that country or you think is going there, refuse service to them", I'd have laughed at him/her.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: To Rikuo, #71,
Here is a famous poem which explains something of the probably mentality of the store clerk. The clerk probably chose, more or less at random, to find a Non-White to pick on, to express his self-hood. Nowadays, that usually does not mean attacking Blacks-- they have consolidated their position sufficiently to be able to protect themselves against that kind of thing. It is likely to mean attacking Hispanics, or Asian-Americans, or whatever.
W.E.B. Du Bois, On Being Crazy
http://mca.nmcougars.org/USH/CR/EarlyCR/WEBDuBois.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._E ._B._Du_Bois
Du Bois was a charter member of the first group of Black intellectuals after the Civil War. In contrast to his peer, Booker T. Washington, founder of Tuskegee Institute, Du Bois tended to focus on psychological grievances, ie. the condition of constantly being insulted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: To Rikuo, #71,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Btw. although the situation is different the total lack of common sense here kind of reminds me of when the U.S. denied an iranian human rigths activist and receiver of the Nobel Peace Prize her right to publish her memoirs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITARded
Basically Apple is being over zealous of ITAR regulations, and not taking the time to identify proper persons of who can/can not purchase "dual use" technology(What an Ipad would count as).
Iran is one of the nations that are on the _strictest_ export level ... basically you can't export ANYTHING to Iran.
US Permanent Residents (no matter their national heritage) don't fall into this category because they count as a "U.S. Person"[list below]. And if they do take it to IRAN, it is that person's own fault, not Apple's. (dual citizenship/etc is another thing... but w/e)
A "U.S. person" can be
a U.S. citizen;
a permanent resident who does not work for a foreign company, a foreign government, or a foreign governmental agency/organization;
a political asylee;
a part of the U.S. government, or
a corporation, business, organization, or group that is incorporated in the United States under U.S. law.[20]
Hope this adds some clarity to the discussion. This is not an "Anti-Muslim" policy. It is the law to stop our national enemies from benefiting from our science/technology. N.Korea, Cuba, Iran, Syria (and a few others that I can't think of off the top of my head are on that list, some are coincidentally Islamic, some aren't, that isn't a deciding factor at all, their relationship with the US is what puts you on the ITAR banned list.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ITARded
The Apple employee did the right thing here legally. Perhaps the clerk was overzealous, and possibly outside the words of the law (and I don't think they were...) but... they were definitely doing the right thing in the spirit of the law. Preventing Iran from obtaining American Technology that has a "dual use"(this is a key word) as a military object.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ITARded
I mentioned the one that was to be a gift should have been stopped in my comment... maybe you missed that.
Stating our countries have bad relations is not the proper way to handle this situation. You mentioned shipping this product to Iran, I'm sorry but that is banned by Federal Law. You can try to get permission to do so, here is a handy Apple pamphlet on the subject.
Listening to someone speaking a foriegn language and then deciding they should be barred from purchasing with no evidence they were going to break the law is dumb.
Having someone working in a mall having to make these calls is bad policy. I'm sure there is lots of stuff sold at Best Buy and other places that are on the list and there isn't the same sort of checks being done...
There might be a reason for the law, but can we agree the implementation of the law at the retailer level needs work?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ITARded
One of the research directors at a national lab. was in violation of ITAR, and was working to correct it. So... it is VERY hard to be in full compliance.
However, that doesn't mean Apple doesn't have to follow that law as it is now. Perhaps to be more fair about it, they should require every person to fill out an e-form stating that they will not export this item to the . This might work for CYA legally, but I don't know on how effective it would be overall. But... it's a start. Also, another idea would be to train every employee to ask where the phone is headed to every customer, same basic idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Apple needs to cover their butts and could do so with a sign posted in the store explaining the law. Add it to the receipt etc...
The problem happens when someone is "given" power over other people and can make the call without needing anything factual to backup the decision. Having not seen the Apple employee guide one is unable to decide if these were the actions of an employee being overzealous or not. As they were able to find another person denied a purchase without the announced intention of shipping it to Iran, it brings into question what is happening at that store.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ITARded
And I thought science/technology belongs to the entire human race, silly me. I guess when they find cure for cancer, it'll be under ITAR as well, cos it can be developed into bio weapon. Humanity can go to hell.
Just like the US, champion of freedom and privacy banned export of encryption technology, so they can read what others wrote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ITARded
But to explain why this is important:
Two words: Manhattan Project
Think about what would have happened if that information had been given to Germany in 1944.
The idea of giving either science/technology/goods to nations that are hostile towards you is not a good idea. The level of threat an ipad has is much lower than the secrets of the a-bomb... but still, you don't purposely allow your enemy nations to get your goods/knowledge.
There are exceptions for NGO humanitarian organizations to give them basic medical services, such as the Red Cross (Red Crescent in Islamic nations)... But the only people who know/care about that are the NGOs and medical manfs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Think about what would have happened if that information had been given to Germany in 1944.
Nothing. The Germans already had most of the knowledge. Their attempts to make a bomb were hampered by infrastructure problems not lack of information.
And as far as the iPad is concerned the only conceivable military use it has is if you hit someone with it!
Plus if the Iranian govt really wanted iPads do you no think they could get them direct from China - where they are actually made?
ITAR is based on a long outdated illusion that the US actually has any control over this technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
That was in the middle of an all-out war though. I'm sure export controls like this totally stop anyone going out and buying/reverse engineering these. Totally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Nuclear Energy and the concepts behind it especially radium etc were nothing that Americans actually discovered.
Next you will state that Americans invented jet engines, radar, Television etc. The only real inventor that came from America was Nikola Tesla (and he was originally Serbian) and we all know how the USA Govt treated him.
(PS: this is an Off topic reminder that July 10 is Tesla day)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Farnsworth got the inspiration for how to make the image display properly from ploughing fields, and the basic concept he invented based on it (a grid of pixels) is still the fundamental principle behind all image display devices today.
Next?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Proper innovation requires a working system out there in the world - and that honour belongs to the Marconi-EMI team and the BBC.
None of the preceding systems (including Farnsworth's) was sufficiently robust and reliable to run a proper service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ITARded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ITARded
Dual use? Many technologies has more than that, and sciences have even much more. Standard atomic model, for instance, has many uses, one of them is the basis of nuclear energy/weapons. Should only US have that knowledge?
3D modeling and rendering capabilities is a threat to US? That's new.
I do get it, the necessity of ensuring one's nation security. However, like war on drugs and/or piracy, I don't think that approach (ITAR) is effective, other than ensuring US hegemony and involving it in a perpetual war.
One reason why seemingly many groups and/or country hostile toward US is the perceived self-righteousness and double standard in it's foreign policy, while flaunting it's wealth flamboyantly all the while effectively prohibiting others to reach such wealth independently. This is the perception of others, some then justify their hate with religion. Laws like ITAR doesn't help US image in that front, and then there are guys like that Apple employee.
I think Mike's CwF+RtB approach is more appropriate in the matter with slight modification: Connect with Rival (CwF) and giving them Reasons to Cooperate (RtC). Continuing to dig the hole named "National Security" won't do anyone good, and don't I get the gist that even US citizen have their movement more and more constrained everyday at an accelerating pace in the name of "Security".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't swim in the kool-aid
If you are really worried, it's the expensive high end graphics cards you have to worry about. Now THOSE are actually used in serious computational work.
iThings are just cheap toys.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ITARded
Your ITAR law is based on the premise that only the USA has this sort of technology or could design/invent this sort of thing, not unlike your "encryption" export laws that were based on the assumption, falsely, that only America had the intelligence to create encryption algorithms.
It's another example of the USA being a highly parochial entity where anyone who has the audacity to be different is treated as an 'enemy' to control the ineptitude and corrupt practices within your own country.
Interestingly this doesn't apply to someone in another country where Apple (or any other USA corporation) sells their 'technological marvel' from purchasing it legally and sending it via external mail to friends and family elsewhere in the world. Otherwise maybe Apple and other companies should just:
1. Invent things in the USA only
2. Only manufacture in the USA these products (and no where else.. like say China)
3. Only sell within the borders of the USA to US citizens only
4. Let the rest of the world carry on with the cultural magnitude that is the other 95% of the worlds human intellect that invents, transforms, and adapts to whatever they want.
Luckily it seems that Apple's days are numbered as the number 1 provider of communications devices anywhere in the world other than the USA. Samsung (who is now number 1 worldwide) and HTC have better technology, better R&D, and aren't a closed parochial (in the economical sense of the word) than Apple now.
I agree with your last statement absolutely that this isn't an Anti-Muslim policy per say instead it is an "Anti anyone who doesn't kowtow to American interests" instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ITARded
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bull
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bull
It is nice that you have faith in other humans, but then we have police officers who tased a cuffed and hogtied woman in the back seat of a cruiser to keep her from leaping out and attacking nearby children. And this was accepted as a reasonable and truthful answer.
There is plenty of stupid out there, lots of it wears suits and lobbys.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Couple of things...
Second, there's a weird grey bar in my Techdirt browser window, taking up my valuable screen real-estate, and it doesn't have a "Go the fuck away and leave me the fuck alone" button on it.
I came here from the RSS feed, Mike. I've already got all of the headlines visible in the feed. I don't need your app making random guesses about other stories I've probably already decided to read (or not) based on some terrible keyword search algorithm thing. I especially don't need it lying to me about fake "notifications".
Make it go away and make it stay away, please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
At the top of the page click "Preferences"
There's a radio button to toggle the toolbar.
Hope that helps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
Learned that from Bob's rambling. At least there's something positive came out from that guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
Of course, if the Firefox people were actually paying attention instead of trying to dumb the browser down to the point where any imbecile can use it, these wouldn't be extensions: they'd be part of the core browser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Couple of things...
I'm sure if you look hard enough you can find a nice elitist browser that requires 6 years IT experience and a certification course. The other 6.5 billion people on the planet can keep slowly moving over to mozilla from ie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Couple of things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
greybar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couple of things...
thanks for pointing out what i was going to, HATE these kind of widgets: GET OFF MY SCREEN!
...and to the grumpy anon below: i have chrome with adblock+ and the graybar of dearth is still there, only the icons are blocked... the 'preferences' button is ghosted, but maybe because i wasn't logged in at the time (what? anonymous browsers aren't allowed to have preferences ?)
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
citizenship
Granted, a few of the people who went to buy phones were actually Americans, but they identified themselves as "from Iran" instead of just saying that they were American and spoke Farsi.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: citizenship
Apple sells hundreds of items online via their own website and other retailers, I've never seen a confirmation box pop up asking if you plan to ship it to Iran or another restricted country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A bigger issue here is Apple believing the bullshit US government propaganda that all Iranians are evil and want to destroy western society. Now, this may come as a shock, but this is untrue as the majority of Iranians simply want to live, work and practice their faith in peace and have zero interest in violence against the west.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There is a Federal Law blocking certain things from going to Iran, while 1 of the 2 cases in the linked story actually involved that law it seems the people were picked out for their nationality is.
2 separate issues, and it could just be a douchey apple employee.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
But, from my reading of the link, the Apple employee did not know that - so the decision to refuse sale was based on appearance and speech alone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
People speaking a "foriegn" language and that alone lead to a decision to not sell to them.
Both cases were handled poorly by the Apple employee(s), and showed they were blind to how this might appear to someone looking from the outside in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
China is the new Belgium.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
While there might have been basis for the denial in 1 sale, the other sale raises questions of is someone just using it as a justification for their bad behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Persian-speaking_population
Being worried about secondary liability is one thing, but the least Apple can do is get their facts straight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Since when does Apple get to rewrite the rules regarding ITAR? I suspect that Apple is going to get embroiled in a very expensive lawsuit for discriminating against this customer just because the customer was speaking Farsi.
What if I walked into an Apple store. I'm white, born here, I'm descended from Native Americans and I have Polish Ancestry, Austrian and European descent and if I happened to be speaking Farsi, would Apple refuse to sell me an iPhone?
Apple should be ashamed of themselves for refusing to sell their products to someone who's actually an American. They had no justification to refuse to sell the item to this customer and it's clearly a case of discrimination and racial profiling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
apple pie
Don't need no apple products nohow.
Incidentally, sony products get the same treatment.
People want to be free, not locked into your small minded little fiefdom of micromanagement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: apple pie
Seconded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right result, unsettling reason
Second we come to the next guy being denied purchase because he was an Iranian speaking Farsi, coupled with an Apple employee misquoting the Apple policy. "He reiterated (the policy) always will be to not sell to anyone from Iran." That is not exactly the Apple policy, but the employee did make the lawfully correct decision. Again the reason for questioning the origin of the consumer is discriminatory.
While it may be lawful and even prudent to not sell Apple products to Iranian citizens in the US, that does not mean that American citizens of Iranian descent are to be discriminated against unless they intend to export those products. That means that most Americans of Middle-Eastern descent face a lot of invasive questions when simply trying to purchase from Apple.
Personally I do not have faith that the average Apple employee knows the difference between Farsi, Urdu, or any other Arabic or Indo-Persian dialect. That would imply that quite a lot of Americans of Middle-Eastern descent face unwarranted discrimination when shopping in an Apple store.
The two cases cited in the original article were not discriminatory, but they do imply that there is a lot of discrimination that goes on in Apple stores before a purchase is allowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
It is so annoying when bitches cry racism whenever they don't get their way.
It's about the goods going back to Iran. Let's face it, if you are a Iranian student in America, you're lucky to even be able to study there given the sanctions and you're likely returning to Iran, so NO-people won't trust you to say 'it's not going back to Iran with me' and they won't take a risk for your extra-special person.
The article is very one-sided and cries racism, so immediately conclusions can be drawn about its mysterious author and what they would expect everyone to just eat up and believe like sheep. Very patronizing.
'Hey kids! You like foreign people, right? Don't be a douche like Apple, agree with me that selling electronic goods to Iran through visitors & family members in America doesn't interfere with sanctions and it's outright RACIST to deny it!' Um...right.
Why are most statements from Iranian Americans and Iranian interests in America? A heavily biased and unbalanced article. It screams 'Look at how racist America and Apple are!' I would usually ignore this, but just for this article I'm gonna say OPEN YOUR EYES. I think everyone involved understood what this is about and it isn't racism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
Its way more annoying when bigots fall behind "religious freedom" when they are called out on their behavior and don't get their way.
Both of the people in the story are US Citizens, who happen to be of Iranian decent.
Spending the 5 minutes to actually read the comments here before you wound yourself into a tizzy would show that there is a discussion that is not solely focused on race, but raises questions if employee(s) of an Apple store are making decisions based on what they assume and using a law to justify being a racist douche.
You should be more worried than you are as whites are becoming the minority in the US, and you might find yourself trying to play the racism card when things don't go your way.
Thanks for the morning troll, now hush... the grownups are talking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
Laws made by soundbite, not evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sanctions Aren't Discrimination
Says the blond-haired blue-eyed boy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Poor Performance of Excessively Fashionable Apple Computers and Southern Racism.
From the ITAR point of view, an IPad or IPhone is not a very powerful computer-- it is simply a computer which can be carried around in a fashionably small pocket-- everything else has been compromised to that goal. If you want to play a full-motion photo-realistic video game, or do engineering simulations, a desktop computer is much more practical. An IPad or IPhone is not suitable for use as a micro-controller, either. You can buy something like an Arduino, which is designed for the purpose. Desktop computers of roughly comparable performance are often treated as junk, and can be bought for ten dollars or so at yard sales. Of course, Apple really hates having this fact stated in plain language.
The remedy to Apple's discrimination is quite simple. On January 32, 1960, Black students commenced a "sit-in" at a racially-segregated lunch counter in a Woolworth's store in Greensboro, North Carolina. Picketing rapidly spread across the South, and then to the rest of the nation, extending as far as Boston and Chicago. Woolworth's and the other chain stores surrendered at discretion on July 25, not quite six months after the action began. Very well, Apple is not fundamentally different from Woolworth's. When people begin picketing Apple stores in Hollywood and Sweden, Apple will surrender at discretion. And now, of course, we have the internet. Communication is faster. I doubt it need take as long as two weeks to bring Apple to its knees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Poor Performance of Excessively Fashionable Apple Computers and Southern Racism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Poor Performance of Excessively Fashionable Apple Computers and Southern Racism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A better way would be to reduce the factors in our nation which cause others to be hostile to us. Namely, scaling back our military efforts by a large degree and eliminating our espionage programs (such as those responsible for Stuxnet) entirely, as well as the alphabet agencies who sponsor them. And adopt an earthly version of the Prime Directive. No interference in the internal affairs of other nations. As well as abandoning all international treaties which seek to force our laws upon other nations - namely, ACTA and TPP, among others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What a naive rube you are. You be in big trouble if you ever venture into the real world, Goober.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now that you mention it.
Also, not all Persians are Muslims.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Most offensive comment EVER!!!
You are correct, no southern baptist from Georgia has ever crashed a plane into a sky scraper.
How many Iranian-Americans have gone around lynching innocent blacks or donning Klan uniforms and burning crosses on lawns and threatening blacks for no reason other than the color of their skin?
Georgia has one of the worst records of domestic terrorism in US history. Pull your head out of your ass and research the KKK and the amount of "terrorism" that organization has inflicted on US soil.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How many of them are accessories after the fact hiding these bombers from justice because their religion demands it?
If you want to start casting dispersions maybe start in your own backyard?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Representation
Yes, it is unfortunate that it happened at an Apple Store, but you're getting a tad nit picky with the last scentsnce in the article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
birds of a feather
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That will work
Hey Apple here's a test you can use. Have a comedian outside the store telling jokes in Farsi, if you laugh no iToys for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple's in the right
"Note that the release of any item to any party with knowledge a violation is about to occur is prohibited by �736.2(b)(10) of the EAR."
This makes it seem pretty clear that you can't sell to someone that plans on violating the law. (I agree, the law is moronic, etc.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple's in the right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jafarzadeh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tracphone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tracphone
Now there are limits, and if your "brown" and trying to buy more than 1 phone they flip out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And what happens when an Iranian, or Iranian descendant walks into a store and doesn't speak farsi, and doesn't have an Iranian accent...?! how will the US be safe when Iranians don't announce they are Iranian when shopping?!
I call on the US government to force all Iranians to wear armbands with a crescent moon on them. One way or another, fellow patriots, we will solve the Iranian problem!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To: nospacesorspecialcharacters, #84
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: To: nospacesorspecialcharacters, #84
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__mk7dzow3u0/S9Bz0yYWJAI/AAAAAAAAAXs/DQn0_YURfXo/s1600/go+to.bmp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Denied...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(sarcasm)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dumb apple employee
So to me he is just trying to be an ASS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dumb apple employee
The problem is the woman who wanted to purchase the iPad was totally upfront with the news people that she was going to break the law and ship the iPad to Iran, so it is very possible he heard her planning to break the law and refused the sale.
The law might be stupid, Apple's take on it might be stupid, but this was an employee doing the job not an evil racist plot.
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/12/06/24/2056214/georgia-apple-store-refuses-to-sell-ipad-t o-iranian-american-teen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or a Subordinate Afraid of Being Fired.
Now, in the present case, there were two separate Iran-IPhone incidents, involving different customers, in different stores in the northern suburbs of Atlanta, with different sales people. There were probably additional incidents which did not get reported. However, similar incidents did not appear in the rest of the country, say in California. This suggests that the problem is very likely at Apple's local district office. It has become apparent that Apple decided rather quickly that conducting "ethnicity checks" was no part of its policy. Apple almost immediately referred Ms. Sabet to its own website to buy an IPhone, making clear their position that the clerk was speaking only for himself in respect of ITAR. Further, the official Apple memorandum which was cited referred to the country Iran, and not to American citizens of Iranian origin. That would cover things like the store actually shipping merchandise to Iran. It would also cover Apple making the necessary technical arrangements with Iranian telephone companies to support IPhones in Iran. However, the "ethnicity checks" were probably invented by someone local, someone in a position of local power.
I am doubtful of the claim that the clerk somehow heard something decisive. People don't talk that way. When friends or relatives talk to each other about other friends or relatives, they don't need to mention what state or country these friends or relatives live in, because that is obvious in the context of the relationship, even though it is entirely obscure to an eves-dropping stranger. In such cases, one rarely uses the surname of the person referred to, because it is not necessary. They often use colloquial first names, which do not appear on any official piece of paper. The notion that a clerk could somehow insert himself into family gossip, and make any sense of it is highly suspect.
Going by the usual standard of "constructive dismissal" cases, telling an Iranian-American sales clerk that Iranian-American customers were undesirable as security risks per se, and requiring him to enforce a policy against them, would very likely be taken as legally equivalent to firing the clerk for being Iranian-American. One comparable case involved a Midwestern convenience store owner who sent a memorandum to his employees, along the lines of: "let's take bets about who I'm going to fire next," and was found by the courts to have engaged in constructive dismissal of an employee who walked out in response. The employee was therefore entitled to unemployment insurance. Of course, the problem with constructive dismissal is that while the dismissed employee can eventually get justice, it can take years, and that is not much help for someone with the rent due. We can assume that the Iranian-American clerk in the Sabet case was under duress, afraid of losing his job, and that the real discriminating party was somewhat further up the corporate ladder.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163035/Apple-store-bans-Sahar-Sabet-19-buying-iP ad-speaking-Iranian-language-Farsi.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/apple-clerk-sell -ipad-farsi-chatting-georgia-teen-article-1.1100638
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An Alpharetta woman and one of her friends say the Apple Store turned them away after they heard them speaking Farsi.
One was trying to buy an iPad, the other an iPhone. When they were heard speaking the foreign language, they said the sales representative refused to sell them anything.
Apple says it's simply following U.S. policy.
"Very hurtful, very embarrassing. I actually walked out in tears," Sahar Sabet said about the experience.
Sabet is a U.S. citizen. Like most 19-year-olds, the University of Georgia student is never far from her iPhone.
So she was surprised Thursday when an employee at the Apple Store inside North Pointe Mall in Alpharetta refused to sell an iPad to her and her uncle after overhearing them speaking Farsi. The iPad was to be a gift for her cousin who lives in Iran. That is illegal
"When we said 'Farsi, I'm from Iran,' he said, 'I just can't sell this to you. Our countries have bad relations,'" Sabet said.
"I would say if you're trying to buy an iPhone, don't tell them anything about Iran. That would be your best bet," said Zack Jafarzadeh, who had a similar experience at the Apple Store in Perimeter Mall.
Jafarzadeh said he was helping a friend buy an iPhone. That friend was from Iran, living and studying in the Atlanta area on a visa.
"We never talked about him going back to Iran or anything like that. He was just speaking full-fledged Farsi and the representative came back and denied our sale," Jafarzadeh said.
If he is here on a visa, you must assume, he will go home with that iphone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]