London Police Want To Crowdsource Guilt-Free Surveillance

from the watching-over-you dept

Thu, Jun 28th 2012 1:47pm — Glyn Moody

One of the earliest proposals for mass surveillance was the Panopticon:

a type of institutional building designed by English philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the late eighteenth century. The concept of the design is to allow an observer to observe (-opticon) all (pan-) inmates of an institution without them being able to tell whether or not they are being watched.

The design consists of a circular structure with an "inspection house" at its centre, from which the managers or staff of the institution are able to watch the inmates, who are stationed around the perimeter. Bentham conceived the basic plan as being equally applicable to hospitals, schools, poorhouses, daycares, and madhouses, but he devoted most of his efforts to developing a design for a Panopticon prison, and it is his prison which is most widely understood by the term.

As the rest of the fascinating Wikipedia entry on the subject explains, Bentham never managed to build his Panopticon prison, despite being given relatively large sums of public money to do so. But his idea not only lives on, it has come ever closer to realization thanks to new technologies. Boing Boing points us to this latest approach, based around smartphones and crowdsourcing: The Metropolitan Police is hoping to use crowd-sourcing to identify people suspected of committing crimes in last year's riots in London.

Officers are to upload up to 2,800 CCTV images taken during the disorder in August on to its smartphone app.
What's particularly striking about this scheme is the scale: "My hope is that the two-thirds of Londoners who own smartphones will download this app, and help us identify people we still need to speak to.

We need Londoners to browse through the app every week or so as new images will appear regularly. This is a fantastic way for Londoners to help us to fight crime."
In the case of the London riots, the CCTV images may be relatively unequivocal about crimes being committed; but the new scheme is already being extended beyond those exceptional events: The app will also include a further 2,000 images of people wanted by the police for offences not connected to the riots.
That's worrying because there is no way of knowing what these people are accused of -- they might, for example, be involved in legitimate street protests against the UK government, or against multinational corporations in the UK, both of which have been subject to controversial policing in the capital. That seems a real possibility, given what Facewatch, the company behind the scheme's technology, says about its service: An online crime reporting system for businesses to report crime providing the full evidential package required by the police

A way for businesses to deter crime by instantly sharing images of suspects between group members
In addition: All images from reported crimes are viewed by the police who will try to identify and match suspects using the information provided.
This raises the prospect not only of deterring crime, but of deterring protests, since participating companies will be able to pass photos of protesters who are alleged to have committed criminal acts to the police, who can then add the faces to all the others on their smartphone app. Londoners can then help identify them without concerning themselves about the legitimacy of the requests, since they will just be part of the constantly-updated stream of alleged criminals. Jeremy Bentham would have been proud of such an efficient, anonymous system of control.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cctv, london, panopticon, police, surveillance, uk

87 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jacob Blaustein, 28 Jun 2012 @ 1:52pm

Well there are some ways that this can be mitigated. for example, make it mandatory to see what the person is accused of. Besides crowd sourcing can make checking the facts eaiser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:51pm
  
  Re:
  I had the exact same thought and honestly I think it is positive to see the police interacting more with people. The need for seeing what the person is accused of is essential for the public trust and I would guess that it could be rather easy to add that information.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - FuzzyDuck, 1 Jul 2012 @ 3:45pm
    
    Re: Re:
    ....there's of course a reason they leave that information out. If they ever had to add it, it would be trumped up charges.
    
    Besides this also smacks of the makings of a fear campaign: look at all the "bad" people that are out there.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess corporations really are "people" nowadays, 28 Jun 2012 @ 1:56pm

An online crime reporting system for businesses to report crime providing the full evidential package required by the police

A way for businesses to deter crime by instantly sharing images of suspects between group members

Why is Facewatch about "businesses" reporting crime and not "people" reporting crime? The language here seems a little to laser-focused towards easily justifying protectionism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anonymous, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:20pm
  
  Re:
  or deter potential competition.it is not beyond the bounds of possibility that once such a system becomes commonplace the rules of evidence will most likely be modified to reduce the potential of a successful legal challenge to any prossecution based on the crowd sourcing app.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 1:58pm

the whole idea of all the surveillance laws being introduced is so that every government, whether in a democratic society or not, can identify, then intimidate whoever they want with the ultimate aim of threatening them with prosecution if they dare to protest against the government again. the ultimate deterrent from dictatorships is in the offing, wiping out any remnants of democracies. the price of fear on the part of governments and politicians that just take payments from those that want special favours. what a society we are very fast heading towards!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:20pm
  
  Re: Time ♫ Is on my Side
  If any society ever managed to complete subdue the human quality of being decidedly indomitable, I would be impressed.
  
  Humans never take to being suppressed, regardless of the odds against them.
  
  Doesn't matter the odds or tech, doesn't matter how many of "them" there is, really--NOTHING matters except the very simple fact that humans, when suppressed, will rebel.
  
  So, I look forward to the eventual end of this shit, right after the most amazing and possibly violent revolution the world has ever seen.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - weneedhelp (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:54pm
    
    Re: Re: Time ♫ Is on my Side
    "So, I look forward to the eventual end of this shit, right after the most amazing and possibly violent revolution the world has ever seen."
    
    You mean the bloodiest massacre the world has ever seen. Our pitiful little guns will be nothing compared to what is used against us.
    
    LRAD's, drones, X-ray trucks, ya know, all those fun little toys our tax dollars paid for.
    
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-06-19/drone-backlash/55682654/1
    
    http:/ /www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/White-House-OKs-broader-access-to-spy-satellite-1831291.php
    
    the ability to view data obtained from satellite and aircraft sensors that can see through cloud cover and even penetrate buildings and underground bunkers.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - That One Guy (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 8:51pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Time ♫ Is on my Side
      I'm not sure any rational military would be willing to turn those on citizens though, for purely practical/tactical reasons if nothing else.
      
      Think about it, as long as they stuck to the 'normal' low-grade weapons, then there would still be plenty of people who would sit on the sidelines, not really willing to join either group. Soon as they whip out the big guns though... suddenly it would be much more likely that those that were neutral beforehand would be willing to join the fighting, which would drastically change the odds.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 9:00am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Time ♫ Is on my Side
        I'm not sure any rational military would be willing to turn those on citizens though, for purely practical/tactical reasons if nothing else
        
        History disagrees with you. The military does not decide who the enemy is, politicians do.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        That One Guy (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 2:35pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time ♫ Is on my Side
        Right, silly me I forgot who actually decides where the guns get pointed at, and it's not the people who actually know anything about strategy...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
sehlat (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:07pm

Ahhh. Guilty Until Proven Innocent
After all, if your image is up there, you MUST be guilty of SOMETHING.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark Helmet (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:28pm

English eyes....
I see you, you see me
Watch you blowin traffic lights and makin' a scene
Boys and girls, you've got to know,
The senses will show to our jails
When it's nothing but offers to further our coffers,

You can't escape our
English Eyes (clap clap), we're waaaaatching you,
We see your everyyyyy mooooove,
English Eyes (clap clap), we're waaaaatching you,
Watching you, watching you, watching you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:29pm

reporting
nice move by your coding staff, changing your policy so that you have to be logged in to the site in order to 'vote', aka, click on the insightful, funny, and report buttons. earlier it was tied to logged in membership cookies, but that's ok, there is a way around that too. but I am impressed by the implementation of such a change so quickly.

for those not following along at home. A/C or any viewer could click on the insightful, funny, or report buttons without having to be logged in. i took it upon myself to begin flyswatting the greedtards here and their litany of idiodic arguments that weren't even arguments in order to hide their posts. and in one day it was changed.

i am probably giving your IT staff too much credit, being as techdirt is based on wordpress, and not real code, or the ability of your IT to actually code for themselves. so, instead of using Zeus on your wordpress, I followed your restrictions and used vpn to vote multiple times. but that's ok too, I can understand why you changed the rules. easily enough circumvented, but i get it.

after posting under probably 23 different IPs here, I can easily increase that by 3,000 different IPs. but I have a better idea and you should probably expect new and inventive ways of censoring the idiots here, it's a good taste of their own medicine. one thing you should always remember, there is always someone out there that is incredibly smarter than you are, this is the way of the internet. I respect you Mr. Masnick, and your blog, but you really shouldn't fuck with ppl smarter than you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:33pm
  
  Re: reporting
  eh I can click on them just fine.
  
  If true however, fuck you, I don't want to make yet another account but I do like to participate (and don't care enough to try to rig the system, it's just comments for crying out loud)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:41pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    refresh the page, and see if your vote stuck.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:52pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: reporting
      refresh the page, and see if your vote stuck.
      
      If there is indeed a problem with retaining votes, it's a bug -- we are working on some new comment features and it's possible something got broken. I've passed this along and I'll let you know what happens. Sorry to disappoint you, but there's no great conspiracy to exclude the non-logged-in votes here.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:54pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        thank you Leigh, I never mentioned some conspiracy, however, I can see your code (for the website) and it was obviously changed, again, stating fact.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:34pm
  
  Re: reporting
  Huh, you're pretty upset about this, aren't you?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:39pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    oh, not at all, if you read my post, i commended the staff
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:41pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: reporting
      sorry, doing some testing, the above A/C is me
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:50pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    and hijacked IPs in Hong Kong take a minute to process :)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:47pm
  
  Re: reporting
  nice move by your coding staff, changing your policy so that you have to be logged in to the site in order to 'vote', aka, click on the insightful, funny, and report buttons. earlier it was tied to logged in membership cookies, but that's ok, there is a way around that too. but I am impressed by the implementation of such a change so quickly.
  
  for those not following along at home. A/C or any viewer could click on the insightful, funny, or report buttons without having to be logged in. i took it upon myself to begin flyswatting the greedtards here and their litany of idiodic arguments that weren't even arguments in order to hide their posts. and in one day it was changed.
  
  To my knowledge, we made no such change. And indeed I just logged out to check, and I can vote just fine... It is likely that you simply were here during a moment of high traffic when the server was lagging, which can on occasion interferes with the script that manages comment voting.
  
  i am probably giving your IT staff too much credit, being as techdirt is based on wordpress, and not real code, or the ability of your IT to actually code for themselves. so, instead of using Zeus on your wordpress, I followed your restrictions and used vpn to vote multiple times. but that's ok too, I can understand why you changed the rules. easily enough circumvented, but i get it.
  
  Not only have we not changed any rules but we are not, in fact, based on Wordpress either - so before you start flinging thinly veiled insults you might want to make sure you're not making obvious errors in your own analysis.
  
  after posting under probably 23 different IPs here, I can easily increase that by 3,000 different IPs. but I have a better idea and you should probably expect new and inventive ways of censoring the idiots here, it's a good taste of their own medicine. one thing you should always remember, there is always someone out there that is incredibly smarter than you are, this is the way of the internet. I respect you Mr. Masnick, and your blog, but you really shouldn't fuck with ppl smarter than you are.
  
  Umm... go for it? There are certainly a lot of smart people out there - not entirely sure that you're one of them based on your incorrect diagnosis here, but who knows. Definitely not sure what Mike or anyone did to "fuck" with anyone.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:52pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    I was not thinly veiling anything, merely stating fact. as for your 'perceived' threat, this is nothing of the sort. it is again merely stating fact. I respect Masnick, and you as well, this is a very informative blog, i would never affect it in a black hat manner, I am only stating fact.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:56pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: reporting
      I am only stating fact.
      
      Except when you state that we have made some sort of policy change to combat anonymous votes (not a fact) and when you state that we run on wordpress (not a fact) and when you state that our site is not built on "real code" (it's hugely customized) and the guy who runs our site doesn't know how to code (again not a fact) and that Mike is trying to "fuck with ppl smarter" than him (once more, not a fact)
      
      So sorry, you're short on facts today.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:03pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        true, I know not your staff, but can see your code, this is my basis for conjecture, but the facts remain =]
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:06pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        fair enough, I have a 162 IQ, what does Mr. Masnick have? I do not see him in the MENSA alumni meetings..
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:07pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        Now you're just trolling. I hope.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:11pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        unfortunately, no, I am not a troll, just someone that doesn't like capitalization. but seriously, you are not taking me serious, so, I therefore do not take your's either.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        Of course I'm not taking you seriously. You can't even correctly recognize a Wordpress-generated site.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:29pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        word against word, sigh, you are bad as the trolls here. if i post the entire code that is techdirt would you believe me then?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:35pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        uh-oh, someone found the Save Page function in Internet Explorer! Import that shit to a word document bro
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:46pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        now who is extending their abilities?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:46pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        btw, im on macs =]
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:49pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        again, i revert to my initial post, Marcus, when motivated, you can be great, but your still an underachiever, subverting my frond is simply trolling.
        
        sucks to be stupid, eh?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        Marcus, relax, go get some air, Toronto is nice this time of year.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:15pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        I'm perfectly relaxed, and becoming increasingly amused.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:22pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        fantastic, i amused an admin. i feel so much better, well, not.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2012 @ 4:06am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        For a IQ of 162 you're pretty fucking stupid.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:01pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    not entirely sure that you're one of them based on your incorrect diagnosis here
    
    and you base this assumption on your immense knowledge of..?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:04pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: reporting
      and you base this assumption on your immense knowledge of..?
      
      of the fact that i work here, I know firsthand what framework the site runs on, I talk to the guy who maintains it every single day, and I have access to see the comment votes - which include several anonymous votes on comments on this very post, that are being tracked no problem and which I can clearly see.
      
      If some votes are not being tracked, there is some sort of glitch. We'll get it fixed.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        then you are absolutely right, and I have brought an issue to your attention, my goal met.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:12pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        then you are absolutely right, and I have brought an issue to your attention, my goal met.
        
        Except we just checked, and there is no glitch. Everything as far as we can tell is operating exactly as it always has, since the feature launched in fact. So - really no idea what you're talking about, I'm afraid. What code is it that you claim has changed?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:16pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        sadly, I admit, my analysis is prob beyond you, i could post a white paper, but that defeats my purpose, why? because i don't work for you. you are arguing a point of contention that is already past, and proven, i am not trying to discredit you, just your ability to swim with the big fish.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:18pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        I apologize - I didn't realize you were a self-proclaimed genius or I wouldn't have said anything
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:19pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        would you like references?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:17pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        lets start small einstien, post the lorenz transformation.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:20pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        lets start small einstien, post the lorenz transformation.
        
        I have a better challenge: SPELL the Lorentz Transformation :P
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:24pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        Lorenz Transformation
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:33pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        oh, lets quibble about punctuation and grammar and avoid the subject at hand.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:34pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        kind of like randomly bringing up the Lorentz Transformation to avoid the subject at hand?
        
        (btw, you spelled Einstein wrong too)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:39pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        sorry, i mispelled einstein, thats your arguement? let me mispel other wrds, that shld gve you compuction.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael Costanza (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:21pm
  
  Re: reporting
  Nothing has changed and your votes are being registered. If you vote on a comment and you're not signed in, then you reload the page, of course the button doesn't stick. You're not signed in. We can't assume you're the same person. The behavior you're seeing is expected, correct, and has been exactly the same since the day we launched comment ratings. Feel free to vote as often as you'd like.
  
  Just in case you're interested, Techdirt is not on Wordpress (though perhaps it will be someday). It is run on custom code loosely based on the old slashcode, which we ditched almost a decade ago.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:26pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    highly loosly, and your point?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Michael Costanza (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:34pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: reporting
      My point? You said that Techdirt is "not real code" because it's Wordpress. It's not. Never was. I thought that, you being a genius and all, it might satisfy your intellectual curiosity to know something about the actual origins of the code. So my point was to add a spark to your already brilliant light. But, um, never mind.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:37pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        good, very good, but for the dupes in the world, impelling, for others, not so much. u know, rooting your site was easy, and yes, it is based on a bastdardized version of wordpress, hence the slight to your IT krew, but absconding me of being ill-informed is outright funny.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Leigh Beadon (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:43pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        good, very good, but for the dupes in the world, impelling, for others, not so much. u know, rooting your site was easy, and yes, it is based on a bastdardized version of wordpress, hence the slight to your IT krew, but absconding me of being ill-informed is outright funny.
        
        holy shit i've been arguing with one of those random-word spambots this whole time...
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:50pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        satisfy your vanity how you must. =]
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:43pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: reporting
        i think it recalcitrant of you to attack my authenticity, thats fine, small minds do not understand much.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:34pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    tell you what, get you IT staff, or someone with intelligence involved first, then we can discuss your interests..
    
    switching to German IP...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:30pm
  
  Re: reporting
  your the problem, not the answer
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:44pm
    
    Re: Re: reporting
    this started as an expression of personal beliefs, not a problem or an answer, both of which seem to emanate from here.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:31pm

George Orwell was British in the year is 1984.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:47pm
  
  Re:
  No, he died in 1950 so that is not true!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
anonymous dutch coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:34pm

riot scum or tv shack students
"and help us identify people we still need to speak to." define "need to speak" please. is this a photo gallery of convicted or suspected criminals? are these crimewatch uk like pics of people photographed while kicking someones head in? riot scum or tv shack students? i doubt that the general public has a problem with turning in the asshole category.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 2:39pm
  
  Re: riot scum or tv shack students
  Easy solution: present video of what they're accused of doing.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:05pm

Whats to stop a supposedly reputable party from falsly incriminating someone for personal gain

Where's the fucking safeguards, you dont talk about things on this scale without expressly metioning the safequards first and foremost, and then, and only then, when the safeguards have been accepted by the general public on matters concerning the public, should "negotiations" go on

These, aswell as *many* other things are what law should address.
Governments want to regulate us, and its becoming quite clear that we have been forced to regulate them......since it doesnt look like anyone else is fucking doing it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vidiot (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:13pm

Point your mobile the other way 'round
Wouldn't it be funny if all the citizen-submitted images showed the police beating the living bejeezus out of people? (Not that the Metropolitan Police would ever do that.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 3:53pm

ran out of arguments?
well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 4:27pm
  
  Re: ran out of arguments?
  I got a lot of laughs out of your previous thread with Leigh and Michael. Thanks!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - surfer (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 12:08am
    
    Re: Re: ran out of arguments?
    welcome :)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 4:01pm

aww, how cute, he pretends to be the anti establishment type, but then wants to censor anyone who says something he doesn't agree with
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- surfer (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 12:30am
  
  Re:
  pretending is like, an opinion, and opinions are like assholes, you have one, and really don't need another one.
  
  as for censorship, isn't that the same thing you want in ACTA/SOPA/NDAA/PIPA/Patriot Act? and i think there is a very long thread here somewhere about the difference between 'this post was flagged by the community..' and censorship, you should read it, i did...ich sch�tze, der ist von den dummen Amerikanern zu erwarten was,
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
surfer (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 4:08pm

honestly
Mr. Masnick, your do-boys are boring me, marcus can post as Leigh why? and your other tools? not sure I understand the motivation here, perhaps your on tour and you leave these monkeys in charge, its possible. ive written for many blogs over the years, long before your time, but that is irrelevant, some of your trained monkeys seem to think i am some threat to them, well the truth hurts sometimes.

honestly, I think they are out of their league to deal with an asshole like myself, but that's ok too. you can't blame stupid for being stupid, so i can understand. you have a rose colored view of the internet, and try as you might, it will never expand beyond that..like i said, stop trying to disprove the intelligence of those you don't understand. the 'net is something you don't understand yet. someday, but not this day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ian (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 4:11pm

I'm downloading the app today
I don't know about you, but I think this app is going to be awesome. I've got a few thousand cute cat pictures that are just begging for an audience, and now the London police have volunteered. Each and every picture of my wuggums is going to have to be personally enjoyed by some nice policeman, to be sure he's not a riotous thug (my wuggums would never do anything like that).

And I know that they might very much like to meet Wuggums, or his charming owner, but I'm afraid we live too far away for personal visits (or extradition).

Oh, and I've got a really pesky boil on my behind that I've been meaning to get checked out. A doctor's really expensive and you have to make an appointment... a police officer's almost as good, right? Better send them a few hundred pictures to be sure they've got a good angle.

I think it's really sweet of the London police service to volunteer to provide this helpful service. I'd say more, but Wuggums made a sick on the carpet, and I just have to share it with the nice bobbies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dark Helmet (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 5:26pm

My god....
This is the single greatest Techdirt thread of all time....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gwiz (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 8:29pm
  
  Re: My god....
  I agree.
  
  Reading Techdirt comments is like watching NASCAR. Most of the time it cruses right along, but every once in awhile you get a really speculator crash and burn...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Gwiz (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 8:43pm
    
    Re: Re: My god....
    err... *spectacular
    
    (--- some under the breath mumbling about "stupid spell check" here ---)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - surfer (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 12:11am
      
      Re: Re: Re: My god....
      nicht jeder spricht Englisch :)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Gwiz (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 5:54am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: My god....
        nicht jeder spricht Englisch :)
        
        That's true. Personally I only know three languages - English, really bad English and Pig Latin.
        
        Avehay away icenay ayday!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2012 @ 6:14pm

I am very skeptical about systems that put people in the spotlight without giving the public any back ground on the why that person is wanted for.

The public should be asked to help of course, but they also should be given the information to actually decide if they want to help or not, without that the system will eventually suffer loss of credibility when inevitably somebody tries to screw somebody because they just don't like the guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nick Dynice (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 6:36pm

This program and its company sounds like a new hack target for Anonymous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nick Dynice (profile), 28 Jun 2012 @ 6:46pm
  
  Re:
  This comment was regarding Facewatch, the topic of the post. I just read through these other off topic comments, and well, no comment.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2012 @ 4:45am
  
  Re:
  "This program and its company sounds like a new hack target for Anonymous."
  
  lol
  
  How long do you reckon, before we'll be asked to identify leading heads of government establishments?
  
  My warped mind can imagine....
  
  BBC Newsflash
  The manhunt for Barrack Obama intensifies, if you have any information leading up to his location, please do not not hesitate to get in contact with the local autority.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 29 Jun 2012 @ 6:39am

When I saw the scroll bar I thought 'holy shiet, this article was much more commented than I'd expect'..

More than half of the comments is about a non-existent issue with the rating buttons.

Please TD, add a way to rate the comment section as a whole for an article and add the WTF?! button. Thanks ;)

Now on topic: if you tell the population it's for the children, to catch terrorist or any other fearmongering catch phrase of the century they'll blissfully cooperate. Sad but true. Thankfully, with all the awareness being raised on the importance of privacy and free speech these types of excuses for eroding our rights will slowly stop working. But how much damage will have been done by the time we actually start reacting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
relghuar, 29 Jun 2012 @ 7:09am

sweet childhood memories
Such nostalgia! I've been quite young at the time, but I can still remember the good old times behind iron curtain, when each apartment block had its assigned neighbor, designed to report anyone's misbehavior to the secret police. We've all felt so safe and protected back then... I can't wait to have that again, only made even better by all the wonderful new technology!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2012 @ 7:43am

I don't see much difference between this, and the 'top ten most wanted' here. The difference is that there is an app for it. And the people aren't criminals for sure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]