Is A Petition Calling For A Pardon Of The Pirate Bay's Peter Sunde 'Offensive'?
from the really-now? dept
This is a little strange. We recently wrote about Peter Sunde's request for a pardon in which he lays out a fairly compelling argument for how the Swedish judicial system was railroaded into convicting him. Soon after that, a petition appeared on the site Avaaz in support of Sunde's request, with the idea being that if it obtained enough signatures, it would be delivered to the Swedish government. Avaaz was actually a very big player in the fight against SOPA, helping to stir up international interest against the bill late last year. But in a somewhat surprising move, as pointed out by TorrentFreak, the site has emailed users asking them if they find the Sunde petition "offensive, inflammatory or otherwise objectionable," in which case they may pull it down.As TorrentFreak notes, this is odd for a variety of reasons. Beyond it being strange that anyone would think that a plea for a pardon is "offensive, inflammatory or otherwise objectionable," the petition site on Avaaz appears to have plenty of things that would be much more likely to cause offense to some people. TorrentFreak reasonably wonders why, of all the petitions on Avaaz, did it happen to pick out the Sunde one?
But I'd argue it goes even further than that. Why should Avaaz even be asking if petitions are "offensive, inflammatory or otherwise objectionable"? If someone posts such a petition, wouldn't it take care of itself by the fact that people won't sign it? Trying to pre-determine if a petition is acceptable seems to go against the very setup of an open petition site like Avaaz's.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: pardon, peter sunde, petition, sweden
Companies: avaaz, the pirate bay
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In that case let the petition go forward. Why add the first step of asking whether they should have the petition? How is adding that first step doing the right thing? If people thought the petition was somehow "offensive, inflammatory or otherwise objectionable," they would simply not sign the petition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Who here would sign it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know what's offensive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You know what's offensive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Offensive to corporate cunts everywhere.
Avaaz, stand your ground !
These complaints are from greedy Corporate Government parasites that feed of humanity, leaving death, destruction and poverty in their wake (aka... The "good" guys ).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Report this as inappropriate"
I'm assuming enough people clicked that link that their system automatically sent out questions regarding it. Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if Big Content whipped something up to spam that button to try to get Avaaz to shut the petition down automatically.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it automated?
It could be that some number of people found it "wrong" and clicked the link. It could also be that the "number of people" in question happen to be affiliated with the MAFIAA and are attempting to silence this dissent to their favorable ruling -- but I can't possibly imagine they would stoop to something so petty and childish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is it automated?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is it automated?
I can. And they would. Takes a few minutes of browsing MAFIAA and Copyright related news to get a grasp of how low the MAFIAA can go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Which admittedly lets out most politicians, including the popular ones. You can call my votes "wasted" if you like, but it's better than knowing about the problem and continuing to contribute to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thankfully, the feeling's mutual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I especially find Mitt Romney very offensive and inflammable and otherwise objectionable for running against the president.
Can we pull his website, and websites supporting him under such a standard?
I also find it very offensive, inflammable, and otherwise objectionable whenever people disagree with me for saying the sky is purple, especially when people point at the sky to try to prove me wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's the problem with you closed-minded idiots: you're not even willing to understand, let alone try.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Follow the money.
Follow the money and I guarantee you that you will find out why the world of so fucked-up and on a path to destruction (this goes FAR, FAR beyond file-sharing and into enslavement and even worse), exactly who is trying to ruin the world and profit in the doing and who are the enemies of humankind that must be killed. They are beyond redemption and killing them is the only solution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Avaaz offends me in other ways
This latest strangeness of asking people about a particular petition seems to solidify my concerns about Avaaz as an organization.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Avaaz offends me in other ways
I'm always amazed at the lengths people will go to in order to complain about a company, when the tools to do what they want the company to do are already at their disposal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clearly, the public at large knows what Sunde was up to, too bad he doesn't seem to be man enough to admit it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Avaaz has been going down the drain for a long time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Agree that what happened next was very similar, but it was an attempt to protect the people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I tend to agree with TorrentFreak on this, something that's offensive for you, morally or religiously, is not for others. The keyword here is tolerance. People have trouble to live with different ideas and morals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]