Brandon Boyd Of Incubus On The Future Of Music And Life Without A Label: 'It's A Really Cool Thing Because It Keeps Everyone On Their Toes'
from the it's-easier-to-move-forward-when-you're-already-looking-that-direction dept
Brandon Boyd has seen both ends of the music industry. With his band Incubus, Boyd rode possibly the last big wave (nu-metal) crafted by the labels. Now, faced with heading out label-less for the first time, Boyd has a refreshingly realistic outlook on the challenges he and his band face in the future.We are, for the first time since 1996, we are free agents again. We're without a record label. So what we're kind of doing is trying to get our bearings as to what we should do next, just as a band but also as a band that is kind of off in new territory again.Fortunately for Boyd, he's not completely unprepared for life without a label. During the shakeup at Epic Records and Sony's restructuring, Incubus sort of fell between the cracks and dealt with "a real lack of direction and leadership just when we needed it most." Surprisingly, Boyd isn't bitter about the experience and notes that it left the band free to start exploring other options, including put more effort towards connecting directly with their fans:
So it was hard and it was frustrating but it was also very telling for us and perhaps educational. Because what we were forced to do was we were forced into ingenuity. And so we came up with this idea to set up shop in this art gallery in Los Angeles and do the Incubus HQ and fly listeners in from different corners of the world and do these live broadcasts on the Internet. And so we started getting these ideas about subscription-based live concerts online and it ended up being a really scary and stressful project, but the fruits of it are still kind of revealing themselves.Living through massive disruption turns some artists into doomsayers who demand the world repent of its "sins" and return to the "Old Way." Boyd lived through the so-called Napster years and came up with a completely different conclusion: adapt or be left behind. The upside of the old way was nice:
We have this HQ box set that we're putting out and the DVD set comes out I think August 14 is the release date. There's like the superfan all six nights on DVD mixed in 5.1 with the CDs and pieces of canvases that people were drawing on in the room while we were playing music. Like I said, it's forced us to think outside of that normal music industry paradigm that we had gotten so accustomed to. And so in that sense the lack of attention from our record label and the end days of our record label relationship were really good and very beneficial for us as a band because it gave us a sense of what we might be doing in the coming years.
Linkin Park and Incubus were two of the very few bands who kind of like got a gust of wind out of the old paradigm of the music industry. But like survived out of it. There are so many bands that, bands in a traditional sense, bands who write their own music, and perform their music, that didn't survive that transition. That fell by the wayside with the industry. So it’s been frightening to watch something that you for a very brief moment almost learned to rely on, because we learned the ins and outs of how the industry worked, you know you poured your heart out into making an album and then the label puts the record out and you go out on tour in support of the album, and we even started doing it in the van and trailer. We'd make a record and get in the van with our gear and the trailer and we'd drive ourselves around the country and sell albums and T-shirts out of the back of the trailer. That was sort of our education and then once things started going really well, thankfully, we got a sense of what it looks like when all of the, when the engine is nicely greased and things are working the way they're supposed to.But when that way was no longer viable, Incubus moved on, rather than hold on to the way it used to be:
And then it's like the millennium turns and the technology changed. And all of that became old. It became an antiquated model. And it was frightening at first but I actually have come to appreciate it. I'm going to actually use the pun, a living thing. It's a living system. Our technologies are a living system just like we are and our communities as human beings, and for us to expect them to remain constant is really just quite foolish. I mean anybody that's going to come to rely on the way that our music consumption is looking now is going to have the same hard lesson in less time than you think. I think that the technology is going to shift probably sooner than any of us really realize. And that's a really cool thing, because it keeps everyone on their toes. It levels the playing field, too. It's allowing for a really wonderful democratization of the music writing process and the music presenting and performing process. So what it's doing is it's making us try harder and it's making us expect the best of ourselves and the people that we work with. You know, do more with less.That's the way it works now if you're going to succeed. It's artists vs. limited attention and limited entertainment budgets. A connection is vital and a willingness to explore every option is nearly mandatory if you're going to get anywhere.
What's more amazing about these statements is there is no mention of the music industry's favorite villain, piracy. Boyd sees what the real issue is: disruption. And rather than wait for someone to "fix" the "problem," he's moving as fast as he can to stay ahead of the curve. He's not letting his situation be dictated by others and because of that, he's got a good chance to keep his creative career going.
I personally, when all is said and done, I really welcome these changes. And they excite me. And they scare me at the same time, but I'm choosing to focus on the excitement.It is a scary time to be an artist. Nothing'is guaranteed. But it's also a time when the field is wide open and the possibilities nearly unlimited. Focusing on the wrong aspect gets you nowhere, but being willing to look past everything that seems to be going wrong and make the most of what's going right.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: brandon boyd, future, incubus, labels, music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Incubus has understood the realities for a while
The were at the SF MusicTech Summit last year (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUiBb9ZVCTA) and when asked specifically about the leak of their new album they said:
It'll be interesting to see what they do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
incubus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: incubus
The price of something going down, is nothing unusual in economics. The price of hard disk space was $19,000 per gigabyte (approx) in 1984. It is now less than $0.05 per gigabyte. Manufacturers who adapted, are still around today. Those that did not, look them up in Wikipedia.
The record industry is finding out the hard way, that they are not some special little flowers, who get to be exempt from the laws of economics. They should stop whining, stop bribing and get to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: incubus
Rebecca Black
Justin Beiber
and a whole host of interchangeable pop-stars...
The music is all the same, and it is just was easy to imaging the song sung by any of them.
When the "artists" are like lego you just plug in... your doing it wrong.
Dan Bull doesn't have a label, his music keeps the bar high. See because he has fans, so he wants to keep the same high quality, so the fans stay with him.
Britney Spears had a mental breakdown and the label had her churn out an album of the same crap, the only reason people cared was because of the circus her life turned into.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: incubus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: incubus
Beiber is a hysterical example because he is famous for violating copyrights and "stealing" kajillions of dollars by performing others works and posting them on YouTube.
People thought Beiber would never be anything, and his entire point in posting was to get discovered. There wasn't a thought about him crafting a career on his own, it was about getting buzz and hoping the right person saw him, pulled the sword from the stone and knighted him pop star.
Black might be a bad example on my part, but she was big enough for a minute that I am sure someone wanted to sign her up until the "problems". Black has started her own label after fighting with ARK over control, following the typical pattern we have seen over and over. Hoping to generate success and I am sure if they find another act, they will try to sign them to the label and then hope they can get enough buzz to be acquired by one of the cartel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: incubus
Black perhaps, but Beiber is definitely a product of the label system. Yes, he got noticed by doing something outside of labels but before a label employee spotted him and offered him a career, he was just another teenager among many thousands posting videos of himself singing cover versions on YouTube. He didn't really do anything to create his career himself beyond that.
But yes, they aren't necessarily good examples. Pick any of the glorified karaoke singers who get record contracts by "winning" American Idol/X Factor, who just go on to sing the songs written by other people they're told to sing for a better example.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: incubus
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: incubus
But reality, in my experience, disagrees with you. The majority of truly excellent music I have heard over the past 10 years has been from the label-less. And those artists get my money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something something fans, something something benefits.
They are approaching a brave new world, and they are a little afraid. They are experiencing a human emotion, that all of us can relate to. Rather than freak out and demand a law, they are moving forward.
Even if they try something new and it sucks, the fans will stay with them because they will be sharing the journey with them, and most likely will have no problem saying...
"Well shit this idea sucked, We're sorry. This is what we are going to try next."
The freedom to try and fail means they can fine tune the new model to themselves. A failure is not the end, you can learn a lot from it as long as your willing to keep trying rather than throwing your hands up and demanding the world stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looking forward to...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]