Google Launches 'Prior Art Finder' For Patents
from the interesting-development dept
Google has announced a new offering called the Prior Art Finder, in which it tries to help anyone find prior art on patents. When you view a patent via Google's patent database, there will now be a button you can click, which tries to take terms from the patent, and displays a variety of related info from the date that the patent was filed:
The Prior Art Finder identifies key phrases from the text of the patent, combines them into a search query, and displays relevant results from Google Patents, Google Scholar, Google Books, and the rest of the web. You’ll start to see the blue “Find prior art” button on individual patent pages starting today.What I find most interesting about this is the fact that they're dating the results of the search to anything existing prior to the date of the filing. One of the big complaints that people make when others discuss how obvious or non-novel a patent is, is that it's impossible to go back to how the world was at the time the patent was filed. This effort seems to take one step in the direction of fixing that, though the quality of the results will matter quite a bit. I do wonder how useful this tool will be in the early days (especially concerning much older patents when there wasn't nearly as much info online), but I could see how it would become much more useful in the future, as Google both improves it and when it's searching a much larger database of knowledge and information.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Assuming Google keeps it up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Assuming Google keeps it up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Patents
I bet they know it's in their own interest to make the poor system we have work as best as we can; and it fits in with their general ideology of organizing the worlds information. They may roll it into another service somewhere down the road, but I doubt we'll lose the functionality without some company-wide catastrophe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crowdsourcing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crowdsourcing
https://www.eff.org/patent-busting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Crowdsourcing
A) Has EFF patented this?
B) If not, would a troll be daring to take on EFF?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crowdsourcing
http://www.groklaw.net/index.php
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Has Google been added to their blacklist yet? If this affects their bottom line, it will be - and I'm sure they will have some bizarro rational for doing so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Of course - if they did search the internet then the number of patents granted would fall to zero.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The score
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
um, so ? ? ?
seems like it is just going to make the frustration of patent applicants more intense when their super-duper-googleized prior art esearch is ignored, just like always...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: um, so ? ? ?
So it's a bit like copyright's "fair use" -- it doesn't count for much until you're actually in court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
At last!
. . . to ensure that patent examiners, patent attorneys, and judges on patent cases are forbidden to use this site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent Owners Despair? Hardly
This is really an Infringement Finder if you know how to cut-and-paste.
http://gametimeip.com/2012/08/14/google-helps-patent-enforcement-companies-with-ne w-infringement-finder/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They can use it in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prior Art Argument
I mean I understand that something do seem and probably are trivial; but this almost seems like attempt to get anything someone comes up with dismissed (or worse, forced to give away ) based upon the assumption of some previous technique.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but even prior art evolves if someone dedicates time and energy to find a better way of doing something. And giving away one's time and effort for the "betterment of society" is nice and all, but it doesn't put food on the table for very long. At worse, it turns on into a worker drone, always trying to stay ahead of some never-ending path.
I guess as I see it, patents serve to allow one to get a breather and possibly enjoy some of the reward of the work they put in. The evolution of technology is inevitable, but going at a break-neck pace is unhealthy.
Jim
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Prior Art Argument
If I develop a better car tire, the fact that car tires already exist does not invalidate the patent. If, however, my improvement already existed prior to my filing or I want to patent the concept of the car tire itself, the patent should not be valid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This might have actually mattered...
As it is it's a cool system, but seems to me to be pretty useless legally, at least with regards to the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good old pirate Mike is still sucking the big search cock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Step 1: make obvious patent with prior art
Step 2: place DMCA takedown notices on old patents, to get them google search engine downgraded.
Step 3: Profit from lack of anyone being able to find prior art
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what do you know about patents?
That's because you cannot invalidate a patent with art dated after the date of filing. Once again, all you know about patents is you don't have any.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It infringes on their right to sue for infringement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]