Emory University's Dishonest Data Reminds Us That Ethics Don't Come From A 'Policy'
from the ethics-policy dept
I know that for many universities, where they end up in the various "rankings" lists can make a big difference in terms of the type of students they attract, the money they can bring in and the professors they can get. So it's almost surprising to me to find out that Emory University's admission that it effectively fudged the numbers it sent to US News & World Report (the pre-eminent listmaker of university rankings) was really the first of its kind. The article does note a few other questionable uses of data by some universities -- such as Baylor paying already admitted students to retake the SATs, hoping they'll score higher and boost the rankings -- but Emory went a bit further. It didn't quite make up the numbers, but chose to send in the data for all the students they admitted, rather than the students who enrolled. And, of course, many students with higher GPAs and SAT scores may have been admitted to Emory, but chose to go elsewhere.Of course, what struck me as extra interesting about this, is that we always hear about universities disciplining students based on an "ethics" code or something like that. So I figured Emory probably had something like that as well... and it did. There's the Emory University Undergraduate Code of Conduct, which includes lines like:
Emory University expects that all students act honorably, demonstrating a keen sense of ethical conduct. The University expects that its students behave respectfully, providing particular consideration for other people and for property. As members of a community, Emory University expects that students act responsibly, being accountable for the safety and wellbeing of themselves and others. University students are expected to be trustworthy, demonstrating honest character upon which others may rely with confidence.That same policy also forbids "intentional misrepresentation," including "providing false or misleading information to a University official" or "filing a false or misleading report."
I also found that the school has a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for employees, which includes this tidbit:
Emory University has adopted an overarching Statement of Guiding Ethical Principles that applies to Emory employees and all other members of the Emory Community. Emory employees should strive to adhere to these principles in carrying out their job responsibilities, and in particular any responsibilities they have in connection with Federal Research/Contract Activities.That pointed me to the Statement of Guiding Ethical Principles (pdf) which, among many other things has lines like the following:
Members of Emory are expected to strive for the highest degree of integrity.All of this has me wondering about these kinds of "ethics" policies and "honor codes" and the like. So many universities have them, but I'm curious if they actually do any good at all. Most of them say things that are basically common sense, and I have trouble believing anyone actually considers "oh, but the ethics policy!" before violating them. So what is the purpose of such policies? It seems that ethics aren't the kind of thing that you write down in a policy, but that you demonstrate by how you act and what you do.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data, ethics, falsifying, rankings, universities
Companies: emory university
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bring back the apprenticeships so people can actually learn something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have been saying that for many years. Degrees are worthless bits of paper and employers are starting to see that because they are forever complaining about University leavers who lack the skills they want to see. With apprenticeships, employers can give people the skills they need in their employees and employees get valuable experience that will help their careers develop. Everyone's a winner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
student debt will help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What happened to the Next story/Previous story links at the top of the page (used to be right over the title of the article, to the right and to the left, respectively).
Those were useful...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's either the lack of coffee or Mike is trolling me.
Either way, disregard this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not all ACs are douchebags, you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The same mindset can be found in most other hierarchies, from corporate to government. One might expect academia to hold themselves to a higher standard and maybe some do but I am not surprised at this. It is interesting to note who in society is, by choice, more ethical - not because of laws or threats of punishment but because that is they way they like it. Honestly, I don't know how some of the ethically challenged sleep at night.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This.
We have a President who has absolutely no qualms about disclosing national security information for the sake of politics who in turn is allowing his administration to prosecute people who have legitimate complaints about fraud, waste, and abuse within the government and report it through their chain of command and get threatened for whistle-blowing. We have companies who participate in schemes to defraud their customers and their producers alike (copyright infringement) while complaining that the pirates are ruining their business, even when that does not appear to be the case.
Honestly, I don't know how some of the ethically challenged sleep at night.
Very easily, apparently. What keeps us awake at night doesn't seem to effect their sleep at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WHY YOU NEVER ANSWER MY QUESTION ON HOW USEFUL YOUU THINK ETHICS POLICIES ARE?! ATTACK DOGS AND DEFLECTION
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Disclaimer: I did notice he's just making fun of our usual shills. Ahem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...demonstrate by how you act...
And you don't even have to do THAT by yourself, a secretary with basic internet access and copy/paste qualification is more than capable to write it down for you...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To give managers/HR an excuse to blame or terminate people they don't like. They are to be used as a weapon, not a vehicle to improve behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The obvious reason for a written policy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The obvious reason for a written policy...
However, I suspect you mean something entirely differently when you use "trouble maker".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The obvious reason for a written policy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It appears that the more socially conscious a country is the more repressive it it. Wittiness Stalinist Russia, Mow's China, Pole Pot's Cambodia and others including the US which has a higher rate of people in jail than the rest of the world. Based on those examples it would appear that socialism is a euphemism for repression.
This raises the question "Does this apply to socialist too?"
We know it applies to the right. The left is always telling us this. But does it apply to the left. The left never admits their part in any of the financial scams, especially the housing collapse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Actually I don't get what he tried to say, I'm just taking that out of thin air.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There are plenty of examples on both sides. In this day and age, in order to attain a position where one has power and authority, one has to be unethical. You either lie to the people who vote OR you lie to the people who give you money to run. Either way, you're unethical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Such policies are like mission statements
Of course, rules and policies only apply if you get caught. I don't imagine that those people who even read these things stop for a moments reflection and think about behaving more ethically in the future, or examine their behavior and ethics to make sure that they are actually behaving as they believe they should behave.
certainly, someone who may have actually believed these things, or believed them in a certain context, may have written policies like Emory's. But this hardly means that everyone involved gives a crap, or isn't hypocritical. They probably mostly exist in the structure for convenience when someone feels like selectively enforcing the rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Such policies are like mission statements
FAP FAP FAP
FAP FAP FAP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Managers
The problem was that the university was overtaken by managers, MBA's, lawyers and such. For every member of the teaching staff there was three or four managers, HR's, accountants, lawyers etc. Naturally, when UK government found out about it, they demanded the money back (in UK, universities are partially funded by government for UK citizens), and this resulted in a lot of teaching and IT staff being fired, but not a single manager or exec has lost his job. In fact, the number of them increased.
Why does this happen? Pretty simple. The government is pushing for everyone having a degree. Aside from the fact that this doesn't make sense in the first place, there are two ways of doing that - either find good teaching staff, pay them properly and make students attend or be kicked out; or try to pass everyone so that every idiot will have a degree.
Naturally, everyone chooses the latter. This results in atmosphere with extremely lax rules. A student can come once a month, don't study shit, watch youtube throughout the whole lecture, talk, eat and listen to music in class, et cetera. They can't kick them out because this will affect the numbers, and the numbers determine the amount of funding.
Now, the big question is, who's dumb idea it was that everyone has to have a degree?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Managers
The result is everybody is going for a degree and degrees are losing their face values. It's not uncommon to see companies requiring post-graduation or even masters degree from their new entrants as if it would change a thing. If anything these "degrees" will also get devalued as our overall professional quality plunge into record lows. Mais c'est la vie capitaliste qui fonctionne très bien, oui?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Honor codes oddly enough work
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I came through this program and would highly recommend it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Your search on Business Ethics returned no results.
/joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'So what is the purpose of such policies?'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm sure cheating still happened, but it had to be much more covert as nearly all students were looking for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]