IRS Gives $104 Million To UBS Whistleblower... Who The DOJ Put In Jail

from the mixed-messages dept

Tue, Sep 11th 2012 12:35pm — Mike Masnick

Sometimes it seems that the federal government's left hand has no idea what it's right hand is doing. Bradley Birkenfeld, a former banker for Swiss banking giant UBS, blew the whistle on UBS practices of helping Americans hide their money offshore. For his troubles, the Justice Department charged him, leading to a plea deal in which he plead guilty to fraud conspiracy and was put in jail for a few years. He just got out a month ago... and now the IRS has handed him $104 million for the whistleblowing, which resulted in UBS paying $780 million to the government to avoid prosecution itself. The IRS claims they're doing this to encourage others to blow the whistle on tax fraud... though they might want to warn the DOJ not to put their whistleblowers in prison. That said... $104 million seems somewhat insane. I realize that it may have resulted in the US government getting a lot more money, but $104 million still seems like a giant sum of money to give a guy who, as the government's own efforts show, participated in fraud. If the idea is to "get the word out" to whistleblowers, you would think that smaller sums, still in the millions of dollars, would do the trick...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: awards, bradley birkenfeld, conspiracy, doj, irs, jail, whistleblowers
Companies: ubs

24 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Lord Binky, 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:43pm

It normally takes a drug cartel to make life after jail that nice. Well done Mr. Birkenfeld.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Josef Anvil (profile), 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:47pm

Totally worth it
A few years in jail for $104 million. I'll take that deal any day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:26pm
  
  Re: Totally worth it
  A roof over your head, a place to exercise, three square meals a day, and a check for $86,666.67/day for each of 1200 days in incarceration goes a long way to removing the sting of pleading to a felony.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 4:22pm
  
  Re: Totally worth it
  No you wouldn't. I have been to prison, and I assure you, you would not do it for even two million dollars. How is it that you think that it is just a walk in the park. You would probably be the one that is preyed upon. Damn you are stupid.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:37am
    
    Re: Re: Totally worth it
    A doctor can fix your bottoms afterwards, no problem.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 12:11pm
    
    Re: Re: Totally worth it
    No you wouldn't. I have been to prison, and I assure you, you would not do it for even two million dollars.
    
    Well $2 million is a hell of a whole lot less than $104 million...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:50pm

Maybe the left hand DOES know what the left hand did and is trying to compensate for that as well. If you wanted to encourage people to be whistleblowers even in the risk of prosecution then a hefty sum of $100+ million might be worth the risk. Paying someone a few thousand or even tens of thousands might not be enough to encourage anyone in the face of a overactive DOJ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brent (profile), 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:53pm

This seems like the clever ending to a Johnny Depp/Angelina Jolie movie..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zenity (profile), 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:56pm

I think the sum involved can only be explained if you take into account most government departments aversion to decimal points, preferring whole numbers whenever possible.

Compartmentalisation usually explains seemingly obtuse or perverse cases like this, many government departments really are totally unaware of each other, and often work in opposition to each other in some cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 12:59pm

I think the reason for the high amount is that they fixed percentage of money recovered by whistle blowers, which in this case would work out to be 13.3333% of the money the government got back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brandon Pope, 11 Sep 2012 @ 1:01pm

well . . . . .
Actually, the total that was recovered was closer to $5 *billion* when you include the amounts from the various people illegally hiding money. I think this award is something like .02% of what was recovered.

Seems right to me . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yartrebo (profile), 11 Sep 2012 @ 1:01pm

I think it's a fair payment considering he's been jailed for it and it's made him a lot of enemies.

I know I wouldn't do it ... I value my life too dearly for even $100M.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DannyB (profile), 11 Sep 2012 @ 1:04pm

If you only offer whistleblowers a paltry few million to blow the whistle on a scheme that could make vastly more than that, they'll laugh at you rather than blow the whistle. It might be more profitable to participate in the behavior rather than blow the whistle on it.

Furthermore, blowing the whistle is a *lot* more likely to get the DOJ to throw you in jail than to just stay quiet and participate in the crime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 1:29pm

forgetting about the money, i would have thought that immunity to prosecution would have been the clincher for people to help the government. throwing them in jail is really encouraging them, isn't it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 1:39pm

So one guy gets the goodies while all the other whistle blowers get a legal case and a good chance to go to jail for a long time. It's kinda like the lottery and under those odds, not really worth the idea of going to jail for the remote possibility that you could be lucky enough to win the next one compared to all the others that get nada.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:11pm

When it comes to hiding money from the IRS. A whisle blower can receive a reward of up to %15 of the money recovered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:13pm

It seems you should stay away from US authorities if your name is Bradley. Rarely ends well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:33pm

Reporter: Bradley Birkenfeld, now that you are out of jail, would you like to expand on the reasons or divulge any aditional information perhaps produce some evidence involving your case?

Bradley Birkenfeld: (looks at his bank account)..............no, comment!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:42pm

The IRS ought to prosecute the DOJ for facilitating tax evasion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 11 Sep 2012 @ 2:47pm
  
  Re:
  (j/k btw)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:38am
  
  Re:
  That. And for violations of the Constitution.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coyne Tibbets, 11 Sep 2012 @ 4:05pm

It's just the holy grail of tax whistle-blowing: Turn someone in, get a percentage of the recovery. The size of the recovery isn't relevant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 1:22am
  
  Re:
  Same thing happens when you help recover a stolen piece of art or recover the cargo of a sunken ship, the customary amount is 10%. Never a flat fee.
  If this is going to spurr an instant wave of whistleblowing is another thing though, a potential whistleblower might want to wait untill more fraud has been comitted to increase the size of the award money. The DOJ not granting immunity to the whistleblower is another thing that would definately deter many whistleblowers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brian Penny, 11 Sep 2012 @ 5:02pm

Whistleblowing Ain't Easy
The path of a whistleblower is a difficult one. I know this firsthand. For doing the right thing, I ended up losing my car, my home, and my friends. I was forced to sell nearly everything I own and move to the other side of the country, where I'm now broke and sleeping on the floor of a stranger's apartment.

You can read about my struggles as a whistleblower exposing the larges bank fraud in history here: http://thoughtforyourpenny.blogspot.com/2012/03/boy-who-cried-force-placed-insurance_02.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]