Google Drops 'Bisexual' From Its Taboo Words List

from the might-have-to-replace-it-with-'Santorum' dept

Wed, Sep 12th 2012 2:33pm — Timothy Geigner

While I just wrote about the difficulty Google has put itself in with its selective enforcement of banning autocomplete terms, the search company also recently removed one such term from its oft-referred to "dirty words" list, which de-prioritizes results in its search algorithm.

The Advocate has the story of how, at the urging of bisexual advocacy organization BiNet USA, Google has dropped the word Bisexual from the results-altering list.

At the urging of bisexual advocacy organization BiNet USA, Google unblocked the term “bisexual,” and phrases such as “bisexual quotes,” “bisexual rights,” and “bisexual parenting” are now automatically suggested to Google users as of this month.

According to the article, since 2009, the word "bisexual" has been considered to be of the same ilk for Google search results as such fun terms as: bestiality, baby batter, gang bang, goatse, and many more (hat tip to 2600, and fair warning: if words can be NSFW, some of those are). While not all of those demoted search terms are treated equally, the idea that "bisexual" ranks as a banned word is ridiculous.

No matter what you think of bisexuality, the word "bisexual" is not a "dirty" word. To have "bisexual" on the list when "heterosexual", "homosexual", "trisexual" and "asexual" are not was just stupid. Fortunately, the Goog has reversed policy and dropped the word from the list completely. As BiNet USA notes, it will take some time for the search results to catch up, but at least the bisexual community can begin to be heard.

“It’s not every day one of the biggest companies in the world changes its mind, but we are thankful that Google now sees bisexual people just like everyone else,” said BiNet USA president Faith Cheltenham. “It will take time for bisexual search terms to be ranked as they were before the ban, but now bisexual people and their allies have a fighting chance to be seen, heard, and understood.”

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: autocomplete, banned words, bisexual
Companies: google

23 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

ASTROBOI, 12 Sep 2012 @ 2:42pm

Who cares anyway?
I nver understood the purpose of the auto-complete feature. To me it was as annoying as the person that tries to finish your sentences as you speak. Is being relieved of typing a few letters all that worthwhile? I turned off that annoyance as soon as it appeared. Is there something wrong with me? Obviously others think it is useful. Why?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Mighty Buzzard (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 2:51pm

Well obviously...
Why wouldn't they ban the word? I mean think of the innocent bicycles being exploited for some sick bastards' entertainment. We've got to protect the bicycles!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
droozilla (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 2:52pm

I don't know why anyone would want to block goatse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Jerkoff, 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:00pm

Baby Batter! We need more Baby Batter!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:Lobo Santo (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:34pm

Re: Well then
We'll need some baby powder and water to mix some of that right up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:42pm

Confused
I'm glad they changed it...I think...I just can't make up my mind.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Faith Cheltenham, BiNet USA, 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:44pm

Thanks for spreading the word
Ridiculous that it took so long to change!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Mighty Buzzard (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:47pm

Re: Re: Well then
You know, I can't help think that having powdered babies around as an alternative back when bathing in the blood of virgins was the hot anti-ageing trend might have prevented the waste of lots of perfectly good virgins.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 3:56pm

OMG! Just think, up until now people actually had to type the word in themselves! Well, thank goodness they don't have to do all that hard work now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 4:08pm

"Dirty" is in the eye of the beholder
"... the word "bisexual" is not a "dirty" word."

Technically "penis" isn't a dirty word ether. It's a perfectly accepted medical term.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 4:11pm

Re:
The end justifies the seen
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 4:14pm

Re: Re:
or, rather, that end justifies the unseen
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 4:29pm

bisexuals spreading santorum
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 5:24pm

Re: "Dirty" is in the eye of the beholder
Moron, idiot, and imbecile are actual psychiatric terms.
Faggot is a bundle of sticks.
Damn, ass, hell, piss, and whore are in the Bible. And so is Leviticus.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 5:54pm

Re: Re: "Dirty" is in the eye of the beholder
Oh, and don't forget the lovers that have donkey boners and cum like horses. that's in there too
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Sep 2012 @ 5:57pm

Re: Re: Re: "Dirty" is in the eye of the beholder
and by 'in there", i means in the bible.

also song of solomon/song of songs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 6:18pm

Re: Re: "Dirty" is in the eye of the beholder
A worthwhile quote from memory.
You shouldn't be concerned about the n word, the n word is just a word. What you should be concerned about is the racist screaming it on the corner.

We think if we keep the naughty words naughty we don't have to deal with the real issues that some people are bad people. They say the word to get a reaction, a reaction we reenforce by keeping the word "naughty" and gasping when they say it. They want to provoke a reaction and get really angry when you don't respond like pavlovs dog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TtfnJohn (profile), 12 Sep 2012 @ 10:22pm

What frightens me is that I can see a group of pale puritianical types in a cube farm somewhere on floor B-124 at Google staying up all night thinking this stuff up, deciding which space position the censorship will begin at.

Entirely for our own good, you understand. We need to be protected from perfectly good Anglo-Saxon words while words that originated in French before becoming part of English which every serious perv knows are left completely alone!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 13 Sep 2012 @ 3:37am

Re:
Hilariously I don't know what that means. I'll avoid searching though..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 13 Sep 2012 @ 4:10am

They should drop the moralism and keep the math. If they must, instead of downgrading the results they should emphasize (or upgrade) the definition results so the unsuspecting visitor will first get to know the meaning before clicking the ones with 'content'.

Thinking about it there are 2 things that should be noted: first if the auto-complete list is suggesting the term then there's a social issue there and censoring it will not solve the problem but rather bury it.

Second, if I am looking for the term I'm either complete ignorant on it (hence the benefit of putting the definition results first) or I'm actively looking for material on that term and I probably don't have a problem in going through a few search pages to get the bottom results.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Niall (profile), 13 Sep 2012 @ 4:39am

Re: Re: Re: Well then
I dunno, might that trend not make a lot of virgins eager to be 'cured'? :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
80sRelic (profile), 13 Sep 2012 @ 11:53am

Wanna See A List?
I did... Starting to type in "autocomplete banned w" made "google autocomplete banned words" show up in the search box!

The folks at 2600 came up with a list: http://www.2600.com/googleblacklist/

At The Daily Beast, there's a (humorous) picture gallery of "18 Things Google Does Not Want Us To See": http://www.thedailybeast.com/galleries/2010/10/02/google-blacklist.html#slide1
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mr. Manley Mann, 13 Dec 2013 @ 8:57pm

Re:
I think you mean C-7 :-)

This will probably be my last post until "people" actually pull their heads out of their... which means a long long time

Oh! Does this have anything to do with being "Bi-Sexual"?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131210/07555625519/lawsuit-claims-accidental-google-s earch-led-to-years-government-investigation-harrassment.shtml

buy bye!
[ link to this | view in thread ]