Apparently Attacking A Candidate For Being A World Of Warcraft Player Is Not An Effective Campaign Strategy
from the vanquished dept
Last month, we were among those who reported on an absolutely bizarre strategy by a candidate for the Maine state Senate to demonize his opponent, Colleen Lachowicz, by highlighting her enjoyment of World of Warcraft and then taking some of her statements about the game completely out of context, to imply they were political statements that had relevance beyond inside the game. Even after this was widely mocked, the folks behind the mailer defended it.Perhaps, next time, politicians will recognize that mocking a candidate for doing something millions of people enjoy is not a particularly smart campaign strategy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: colleen lachowicz, elections, maine, politics, world of warcraft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Results Cloudy
Despite using it, experiencing the utility, there's a disconnect between "online" and "reality" in their brains. Fairly common with many people (IMHO).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Probably not
That would suggest politicians learn from their mistakes.
Crazy talk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Probably not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FOR THE HORDE!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looking forward to getting rid of hated Paul LePage !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm sorry, DPS = DAMAGE per second, not Deaths per second.
and yes...Fantasy <> Reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So basically...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With friends like these, who needs Leeroy Jenkins...
To Senator Martin’s credit, he refused to touch the low personal attacks and wished to remain strictly on the issues. By sticking on the high road, this enough should have saved him...
Note the "Paid for by the Maine Republican Party, not authorized by any candidate or committee" in the return address in the above mail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: With friends like these, who needs Leeroy Jenkins...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: With friends like these, who needs Leeroy Jenkins...
This candidate wasn't Leeroy Jenkins. He just had the misfortune of having Leeroy Jenkins in his party...
Actually, I was wondering if this mailer had originated from one of those "independent-expenditure only committees" that are not allowed to coordinate with the candidate or party -- you know, a Super-PAC...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So basically...
(and the election)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Even if it is copyright violation, it's preferable that Blizzard doesn't sue. She already won, that's punishment enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would have loved for her to say
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Odds of success
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gamers Unite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Effective Campaign Strategy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't know... how many times have politicians resigned for things like sex scandals?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ITS LIKE RAIN ON YOUR WEDDING DAY!!! lalalala
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Irrelevant to the article
[ link to this | view in chronology ]