What exactly are they even talking about encrypting? When I am using SSH all the data between my client and the server is encrypted. Are we talking about making that encryption stronger?
Right now I could get PGP and hook it up to a email client and hook it up to a friend's client and share our public keys and we can send completely private emails. Are we talking about having that built into gmail?
Is the idea that there be a law that you always have a backdoor to any encryption software implementation?
It is like they are talking about some hypothetical universal encryption thing that doesn't even exist./div>
They're genuinely, really robbing our future for some temporary cash.
Yeah, these guys are the real terrorists, using legal trickery to stop innovators from building the future. Tap their phones and rattle their bones!/div>
By keeping everything secret, the enemy doesn't know what the real secrets are. If we were to make less things secret the enemy would know exactly what secrets to go after. What the real secrets are needs to be kept secret./div>
Ironically, Manning probably did do it in a large part "for the children". Whereas others just give lip service to the children to push their own agendas. Interesting how the idiom "give lip service to the children" sounds a lot like child abuse./div>
This shows how much attention these bought and paid for representatives are paying in the hearing. Just read the talking points on the page. A monkey could do it./div>
I sometimes get boxes of model airplane parts directly from China. This probably means I am on a watch list as a potential international terrrist. Ridiculous!
On the other hand, it is a good idea to watch me if you actually are a corrupt govt. Because I only respect authority that respects my rights./div>
Stewart Baker should be given a dictatorship on a small desolate island with a population of 1. There he can bask in wonderful laws he can keep secret to himself and there won't be any pesky civil liberties to get in the way of his safety./div>
Re: The fastest way
(untitled comment)
Right now I could get PGP and hook it up to a email client and hook it up to a friend's client and share our public keys and we can send completely private emails. Are we talking about having that built into gmail?
Is the idea that there be a law that you always have a backdoor to any encryption software implementation?
It is like they are talking about some hypothetical universal encryption thing that doesn't even exist./div>
Re:
Re: first steps
Yeah, these guys are the real terrorists, using legal trickery to stop innovators from building the future. Tap their phones and rattle their bones!/div>
"Flying Pig"
Security through Obscurity
Re:
Re: Alexander must be a charisma king
Re:
Re: It's obvious
Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm suprised the whitehouse didn't delete this one.
However, everybody already knew Nixon did something wrong even before a trial./div>
sleeping on the job
Re:
Re: Re: I'm suprised the whitehouse didn't delete this one.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/edward-snowden-is-a-hero/div>
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Even if...
On the other hand, it is a good idea to watch me if you actually are a corrupt govt. Because I only respect authority that respects my rights./div>
Re: Re: Re: Even if...
Re: duh
Re:
Re:
(untitled comment)
I don't need your permission to innovate, bitch!/div>
More comments from Simple Mind >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Simple Mind.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt