Draconian Downloading Law In Japan Goes Into Effect... Music Sales Drop
from the what-a-non-surprise dept
For years, we've pointed out that some in the music industry get so obsessed with "stopping piracy" that they miss the fact that their main job should be to increase revenue. They make the huge mistake of assuming that the two things are the same -- and that "stopping piracy" automatically leads to "increased revenue." Yet, almost every time that issue is explored empirically (over time), it doesn't seem to hold up. The latest example was sent in by Techdirt reader edinjapan, and it concerns the new draconian anti-piracy laws that recently went into effect there. If you believed the basic theory behind this law, this would mean that greater enforcement by police would mean less piracy... and a massive influx in revenue.Except, the reality is that consumers are spending less on music than they were before the bill became law. The article actually posits that the government has made some people so fearful of being arrested that they won't do any downloading from legitimate sources any more -- just in case it's tainted. So even if they can cut out piracy (doubtful) there's little evidence to suggest much increase in commerce as a result.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
The First Word
“When radio first was released, the masses were able to hear and buy music for the first time.
When white kids started listening to black music on powerful AM stations in the 50, the birth of rock and roll led to decades of sales.
When college kids started listening to experimental rock on FM radio in the late 60s and 70s, sales increased until the end of the 70s. (And of course the higher quality of FM led to a broad range of music being exposed.)
MTV started playing new music in the 80s and sales increased until they stopped playing videos in the mid 90s. MTV exposed kids to metal, new wave, and rap. And made Micheal Jackson a mega star.
CD actually increased with Napster giving exposure to new music, but it was fleeting.
Since then any new technology which is released to give exposure to new artists is immediately killed. And yet they wonder why sales aren't what they used to be.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I truly believe they will eventually learn the lesson, but will it be too late for them? That is the real question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What concerns me is, will it be too late for us? Can we undo the damage done to the society? Can we get our rights back? Can we get our privacy back? Can we get due process back?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you're waiting for the politicians who are in the corporates' back pockets to suddenly reform and work in favor of the public (y'know, like they're supposed to, being public servants and all), don't hold your breath.
The stupid thing here is that even if they squeezed every last drop of profit out of the consumers, they'd have nothing to take it and spend it on without the working class providing them with the labor necessary to keep the country afloat, keep their mouths fed, manufacture their products, provide necessary services, etc.
That said, I'm not all that informed about Japan's current political situation, but birds of a feather flock together and Japan has a history of following in our footsteps where it concerns things like ratching up copyright/IP laws. There can be little question that corporate influences here in the US helped influence the end result.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Either way, I'll be happy to see that it was too late for the record labels. Make room for some innovation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Normally, if a new album came out, I'd have to wait until I got home, look for a legitimate torrent, make sure it's the right format for my phone (it won't play FLAC), hope it downloads quickly, and then fix all the shitty misspelled metadata. More often than not there wouldn't even be a torrent available for new albums or less popular artists.
With this music pass, I can just immediately download (or stream) the album to my phone/desktop/tablet/xbox. Downloads quick, metadata is correct. No fuss, no bullshit.
Basically, piracy doesn't offer the same level of convenience & ease of use, so I switched. Ten bucks a month is not bad at all IMO.
I have similar opinions with pirating games, and online providers like Steam. Convenience outweighs the cost, so I gladly give them my money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I agree with you. The problem is that, according to David Lowery (remember that letter?), paying less than the rightsholder prefers is theft.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Republicans deceived themselves. They were listening to each other talk while denying what was apparent to everyone else. Any news media that did not agree with their view of the election was just displaying "Liberal Bias." When the data didn't agree with their worldview they simply commissioned their own data to be collected. On election night Karl Rove became the poster child of this phenomenon, and that may be his single greatest contribution to the Republican Party as a whole if Fox news and others take the lesson to heart.
The RIAA and MPAA have been talking only among themselves and cooking their own data for years. All critics are denounced as pirates or pirate sympathizers. However, there might be some hope for them. The RIAA did give up the litigation strategy when it became apparent that it was not working. I wonder how long it will take before they realize that the legislation strategy is even more damaging to their companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's your kind of statements that keep America divided because you throw out the word Republican and think that every single person that identifies themselves as a Republican agrees with Fox News or people like Karl Rove. Unfortunately the talking heads of the Republican party are pretty far out there but they don't represent what Republicans feel. There are a lot of moderates, both in the Democrats and Republicans, that don't like what either side is doing but we've let the party leaders become the true rulers of the country instead of our representatives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
partys are the only winning srat in "first pass the post" voting, meaning the winner will always be a party member making the already lieing cheating dirty rats even worse
election 2016, cthulhu or the head of the mpaa
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You know, corruption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Citation, please?
If you add in middle managers, it's possibly true, but I'd bet upper management is mostly Republican.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Here's a clue: If, when you say something without hard fact behind it, you get the feeling "See? It all fits together!", then your "logic" has as much value as that of Moon Hoaxers, Bilderberger Conspiracy Theorists and Mayan Calendar Catastrophists, all of whom elevate speculation to fact if it "all fits together".
Thus it is with your "feeling" (not "fact") that all the corporate bad guys are Republicans. Facing the fact that the truth is otherwise would cause shakiness in your whole easy explanation of how things work, therefore it MUST be true, right?
IF you do a little research and find the facts are clearly otherwise (most people with power, the people who RUN THIS COUNTRY, are actually "liberal"), an easy out is the explanation that this disturbing unanimity is not from self-serving self-interest, but because they are smart people whose opinions naturally align with yours, you being right and all.
I point this out not to defend the Republicans, who are useless and repulsive, but to hopefully help someone escape the poisonous delusion that one political side or the other is "good" because they pander in a particular way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
First, most of the moderates you refer to have left the parties, and we now call ourselves Independents. Neither the Dems nor the GOP were representing us, so we stopped calling ourselves Democrats or Republicans. It may be true that there are some moderates who, through sheer inertia and laziness, still are registered in one party or the other, I suppose, but they wouldn't say "I'm a Republican" if you asked them and we shouldn't be counting them here.
Second, the leaders and talking heads of the GOP *DO* represent what Republican voters feel and believe. This is the whole principle of a political party -- to come together to choose candidates or make statements that represent the views of the party members. It's called a representative democracy precisely because the candidates and officials represent the views of their constituents! If someone doesn't agree with Fox News or Karl Rove, they are free to not call themselves Republican. Nobody is forcing anybody to call themselves a Republican, so if they choose to say "I'm Republican" instead of "I'm independent," then they are explicitly indicating their agreement with the Republican party platform, and they should be judged and treated accordingly.
The same goes for anyone who says "I'm a Democrat." Groupthink isn't limited to any one party or group.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:moderates in the republican party
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Transparent as a glass fish.
Out,
smak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Reps,Dems,Independents, ETC are Americans and many different Americans own MAFIAA Businesses.
As far as this News on Japan goes.I personally would be very happy to see a real Japanese Boycott of all MAFIAA.The less they buy the happier MAFIAA Haters and myself will feel.Love to see them have weeks with No Sales at all.
And as far as MAFIAA goes a Big Fuck You from me !You are forever Censored from my Wallet.You won't ever be seeing a dime out of me.
Buy and Support Local and Indie Art
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
BOTH sides are delusional, not just one, right now there are articles all over the place about the "landslide victory" and yet Look at the election results, ~2% of the popular vote isn't a mandate, especially considering the lame duck candidate the Republicans fronted and all of the gaffes during the campaign. All of the politicians are pretty much as out of touch as the RIAA and MPAA are. The President had people on the ground in the swing states for the last year and a half and he still couldn't top ~2% against the hated uber-rich?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: fogbugzd on Nov 12th, 2012 @ 7:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: fogbugzd on Nov 12th, 2012 @ 7:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: fogbugzd on Nov 12th, 2012 @ 7:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: fogbugzd on Nov 12th, 2012 @ 7:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: fogbugzd on Nov 12th, 2012 @ 7:13am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bullet to the head
Mao was a great believer in the freedom of choice�you were free to choose his way or a casket.
But, enough about Dead Great Leaders. Instead let's talk about dead great bands like the Grateful Dead. I'm sure everyone remembers them and how Jerry would let people tape, photograph and film live concerts. In fact people were even allowed to hook their equipment up to the mixing board.
"During the early 1980s, the number of Deadheads taping shows increased, and the band created a special section for fans who wished to record the show. These tapes are still shared and circulated today via websites such as the Live Music Archive and bt.etree.org. In the earlier days of the Grateful Dead, there was question as to whether or not allowing concert-taping was in the best interest of the band, to which Garcia replied something similar to, "When we are done with it [the concerts] � they can have it."
All that recording and video taping of their concerts never seemed to hurt sales of their albums or Grateful Dead memorabilia. In fact it was the opposite!
So, if an old stoner could make it work by encouraging piracy why can't all these genius level RIAA executives do the same? Could it be that they don't care about the music, don't care about the consumer and don't give a shit about the people who make the music? It's all about the cash that lines their pockets and if you don't like it you can choke on it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When radio first was released, the masses were able to hear and buy music for the first time.
When white kids started listening to black music on powerful AM stations in the 50, the birth of rock and roll led to decades of sales.
When college kids started listening to experimental rock on FM radio in the late 60s and 70s, sales increased until the end of the 70s. (And of course the higher quality of FM led to a broad range of music being exposed.)
MTV started playing new music in the 80s and sales increased until they stopped playing videos in the mid 90s. MTV exposed kids to metal, new wave, and rap. And made Micheal Jackson a mega star.
CD actually increased with Napster giving exposure to new music, but it was fleeting.
Since then any new technology which is released to give exposure to new artists is immediately killed. And yet they wonder why sales aren't what they used to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If anythign the industry should be clmabering for more and more fan sites giving them free music for there sites to sell or just give away free. They should be promoting sharing of music supplied by themnot others in high quality and with extras if they are going to charge for it.
What this points to is that the music industry is so full of themselves and they only want to hold onto the power they have over others and the power to write themselves blank cheques, remember it is them not the artists that make the larger part of the profit by a factor of 20-30 to one in favour of the label. so where you see someone has made a million dollars the label will have probably grossed over 20 -30 million if not more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Excuse my username, this is a serious request.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The only technological jump I'd have to add was that when records were invented and you could buy and listen to actual music (rather than just buying the sheet music after you heard a song on the vaudeville stage and taking it home and having someone play the song on the piano), people who wrote music suddenly got a lot richer... but that, I was not around for. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hopefully the bigwigs will learn something this time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor sales
If this doesn't work and your shareholders are still mailing you bullets, you will take the next step which is to jump off a high building or step in front of the Chuo Line Express.
Your successor will then quietly pay off the police to start making mass arrests. After 21 days of no sleep, little food and water and being subjected to other nastiness there will be lots of confessions and your company will make up the shortfall.
Right now, in Japan, this is the closest thing to a mass boycott you will ever see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poor sales
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Poor sales
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
BOLD in original:
"It�s interesting to see that, although one or two people suggest that the tough new law has put them off buying new music, the vast majority of responses suggest that� just maybe� the reason music sales have fallen so much recently is due to a general lack of interest and that new albums are simply not particularly good value for money."
See that last sentence there? LIKELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LAW!
So as usual Mike RUNS WILD the way his notions take him, while the source doesn't say that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Guess they lack confidence in themselves.
That said, if Japan's economy tanks again like it did in the 80's, we'll likely see another bubble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Quote:
Maybe just maybe people are not interested because they didn't create a bond with the media. They have no good experiences to associate that thing to and so it becomes irrelevant, the more you control the distribution the less it is freely available the less it is to be seen or heard the less relevant it becomes to people, the less experiences people have the less they will waste money on that crap.
Only a pirate would pay for something because they are the only ones linking their lives with such content and creating "memories" the other people are not going to pay for something they have no "memories" to recall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Ignoring the things they can control while focusing on the things they cannot control, sounds like it would turn out badly for a business. Oh, look at that....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
But the law was supposed to fix that problem wasn't it?
In practice it has either had no impact or made things worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
From that statement it would also appear that sales loss is LIKELY NOTHING TO DO WITH 'PIRACY' EITHER. This is completely consistent to what this site ( and others like it ) have been saying since Napster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Interesting one-sided take on things, Blue.
Did you even stop to think that the "general lack of interest" and the feeling that albums aren't worth the money may be because the law has made it taboo to sample new music?
I know that if I can't sample first, I most likely won't purchase. Remember, buying a CD isn't like buying anything else - no returns allowed on CD purchases for any reason.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
All that music out there that I can't hear? I have no idea what it is like(lack of interest) nor will I if I have to buy an album in order to decide(not particularly good value for money). My interest may pick up if I have no fear of any laws regarding downloading in order to discover this unheard music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Ah, good, then we are agreed that a correlation (millions of people file sharing) does not equate to causation (sales of recorded music are declining.)
Glad we have that worked out. Now, why is the *IAA suing individual downloaders again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Ah, good, then we are agreed that a correlation (millions of people file sharing) does not equate to causation (sales of recorded music are declining.)
I didn't write an article making any such claims. Therefore, there's no need to address that issue. Mike did write this article, which we're now commenting on. So, can you admit that he was wrong to imply causation here, and that it is hypocritical for him to do so?
Now, why is the *IAA suing individual downloaders again?
Must. focus. on. topic. at. hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
No, cause you'Re claiming causation where Mike was talking correlation at best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
And you're spot on as regards the quality of the music. I doubt any American or European performer would work for the wages a Japanese musician makes. And that's reflected in the quality of the music they put out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
So, boy, you're acknowledging that the current output by the industry is crap, and that the older, out-of-print material (not currently available on cd or "legal" download) is what people want!
So, why doesn't the industry reissue the older material in affordable formats and rake in the dough?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
"the reason music sales have fallen so much recently is due to a general lack of interest and that new albums are simply not particularly good value for money."
When the guys come out puffing out their chest saying "look how much piracy is down in Japan" We can respond with....
"the reason music piracy have fallen so much recently is due to a general lack of interest and that new albums are simply not particularly good downloads."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
Ah good, so we are agreed then: Piracy is NOT THE PROBLEM. Even YOU agree that the main problem with the falloff in sales is that the PRODUCT SUCKS and people arent buying as much of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
On the rare times you make a good point like this, you immediately shoot them down in flames faster than an **AA exec at a tech show with your vacuous, vicious stupidity.
Are you really trying as hard to be seen as irrelevant as the organisations you appear to be shilling for?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
For me the way to sample usually is piracy and I doubt I'm the only one to do so.
Therefor, anyone who has that habit will only buy if pirating is possible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You'd have nothing to whine about IF YOU READ ALL:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Independant artists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Independant artists
The indies can totally make their work available for download, they control the rights. If people can download and try before they buy each sale you get is from someone who enjoys your work.
Look at 'The Promo Bay' project. A simple 1 off project from the minds of TPB giving advertising to people who make content available on TPB. There is a huge influx of artists signing up to get the attention of the audience. The project is now spinning off with another person running it full time because its to damn large.
I expect to see a spike in indie artists sales in Japan, as they embrace the system the labels are terrified of.
Time and time again we keep seeing ways that those "evil pirate filesharing bastards" actually pay for the content they like. An indie movie maker politely points out he hopes you like his flick and if you do he is still paying off his maxed out credit cards and could use a few bucks. He gets income from those evil "pirates" who just want it all for free.
And that story repeats for authors, musicians, programmers, etc. over and over.
The big labels are so deluded that the old way is the only way to make money they are basically walking away from the market now. Seems like a great time to be indie and connect with the fans...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Independant artists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
Smart artists will be putting links on their pages clearly marked that these are free downloads of their music.
It might take a little effort but it could be a gold mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
You still have to rely upon the artist actually being the rights holder, and not someone who, for example, mistakenly used an old folk song which he thought was in the public domain, but it wasn't. Etc., etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
The old folk song is the artist violating copyright, attaching liability to someone who downloaded a freely offered song might be a stretch even for this law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
Subject Seven is already ahead of you.
http://subjectseven.co.uk/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
With that said, they're not one of my favorite bands either, but I respect what they're doing. As for the female singer in that video, she's not a member of the band. She was just a guest for that one song, which makes half your comment worthless, and makes a poor basis for an opinion if that's all you checked out. Their first 2 cds are sold out (so somebody likes them) and out of print and for them to now give them away as free downloads is admirable to say the least. Most bands would charge either directly or though iTunes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
But the pirate sites are free downloads too. To someone who isn't sure and just doesn't want to take a risk, it could be safer to just not download any music. I have no idea about numbers of course, but I'm sure that is happening to some degree. Hard to say which effect is stronger.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Independant artists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
GEMA is a cancer that is doing much more harm than people sharing music ever could have caused. Eventually the German artists will be making a point of doing work outside of Germany and focus on the global market just to avoid the nightmare that is GEMA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Independant artists
Now, a good question might be is what is the size of the indie music scene in Japan, and how is IT doing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Independant artists
The Governor of Tokyo Blinkyhara (Ishihara) has a long term vendetta going on with any business which plays live music or promotes dancing to mixed or sampled music. Hopefully this will change now that he's resigned in favour of national politics and the possibility of an actual conflict with China.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If your stop making music, no one can copy it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More than just discouraging sharing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More than just discouraging sharing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: More than just discouraging sharing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: More than just discouraging sharing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All I can say is ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The biggest concern was streaming, which created a cache now illegal under this new law (though some say provisions would be "excluded" despite the letter of the law).
Of course, the public was not satisfied by this answer, especially since it's a felony conviction, not a civil one. Every day, people are being arrested in Japan for doing things that shouldn't be illegal, such as modifying a One Piece figure (to make it more sexy) and reselling it. Not a counterfeit, but actual modifications to the purchased good.
I feel sorry for people in Japan. Their entertainment is so expensive, I'm wondering just how in the hell anyone can afford it. Sales aren't just down because of the law, but prices are going up there.
It'll just be a matter of time before we're under the same umbrella.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"People are afraid to buy music. We're dying, we need a special music tax."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Man with hand in pocket feel cocky all day
Google
For shame, Mike, for shame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man with hand in pocket feel cocky all day
but your getting there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Man with hand in pocket feel cocky all day
Dude... it's called Big Search.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Man with hand in pocket feel cocky all day
Hey, I'm viewing this in the UK. Could 'big search' sue him for libel here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1. Most indie artists, like me, allow full length free streaming on sites like Bandcamp, Facebook, our own sites. There's no need to d/l stuff from dodgy Russian mafia hoodlum (and line his pockets rather than mine) just to hear music. Of course you can hear it, legally, for free, you're just not looking.
2. Expecting the majors to make 'good' music is like asking McDonald's to serve you a really good steak. They need really high numbers to make a buck= lowest common denominator rubbish.
3. Expecting the 'music industry', which included indie artists like me, to offer you a model equivalent to pirates is impossible. They're not the ones paying out thousands to find the time to write, record, and promote the music. They're the parasites who can just nick our files then invest the sub fees and ad revenue in porn sites, malware, and trafficking sex slaves. We don't really have that option. We have to PAY to make the music. OK ?
4. More and more of us are finding it really tough to even break even. Whatever your studies may say, there's little sign of any downloading related increase in paid sales at this end, I can tell you. My 'art' music output is way down these days. I have mouths to feed and bills to pay, so it's TV commissions and library music that gets made. That pays- not a lot- but it pays. Art music just doesn't. So it's not getting made. Even though 10k people a week stream for free off my site every week. These are my facts. Others may do better, but it ain't working out round here.
That is all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No offense towards you or your plight, but I just want to point out that having to work a 9 to 5 job to pay the bills instead of doing what you love 100% of the time is pretty much the norm for everyone else in this world.
I would certainly love to quit my job so I could spend all of my time programming the game I am attempting to create, but the mortgage and utilities need to be paid and I am kind of partial to eating at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I wasn't (not sure what you mean by "bag on someone") disrespecting Mr. Green at all. I was just pointing out that if you are actually making living from your passion, then you should really count yourself among the lucky ones.
This world if chocked full of people who can't realize their dreams because the necessities of life and providing for your family come first. Heck, how many college graduates out there are working in fields other that their chosen majors?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What does any of this have to do with downloading being made a felony in Japan, and the sales dropping as people are scared that even legal sites might actually be illegal?
While your making this nice plea about life is hard and you can't compete, your totally missing the point of the story your commenting on so one has to wonder if maybe your decision making process is flawed and this might explain why you find your profession so hard.
While I've never heard of you, your complete ignoring of the subject at hand means that the trendy link back to your site isn't going to be clicked by me or more people.
But good luck on your SEO placement, hopefully other people won't look at your post and wonder what you were blathering about trying to keep the image of the evil pirates alive and well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That was unnecessarily harsh. I understood his post without a whole lot of strain. When I see posts like his ( a working artists ) I like to take the time to find some of their work, and give it a listen. In most cases, it turns out to be pretty obvious why they can't make a buck .. it's crap. That's not the case for Mr. Green. It's VERY good. Just a limited market. It's possible to make a constructive observation without including a 'bitchslap' ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If your going to post self serving tripe that has nothing to do with the actual topic expect harsh responses.
If your going to use terms -
"dodgy Russian mafia hoodlum"
"offer you a model equivalent to pirates is impossible"
"They're the parasites who can just nick our files then invest the sub fees and ad revenue in porn sites, malware, and trafficking sex slaves"
"We have to PAY to make the music"
Expect harsh.
Didn't bother to register, showing no interest in the site beyond getting his message out... a message that still doesn't relate to the topic.
Made sure to link his website and talk about how hard he has to work.
Ignored the basic facts of the website easily presented on the right hand side of the screen that explains core concepts of the site.
So its wonderful you love his work, what is it like to be led around by the nose that way?
So did you have anything to add about the law in Japan and how overreaching it is, or are you just here to stroke the ego of someone using a popular website to SEO themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Tom Green
That nofollow thing (which gets tacked on to every link you post) means search engines won't consider it.
Google: https://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=96569
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Tom Green
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
rel="nofollow" href="http://www.anotherfineday.co.uk"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Listening to 'Another Fine Day' ...
It's stirring, relaxing, quite beautiful I'd say. But the 'Market' for that is likely to be 'niche' . I can appreciate it, and I KNOW others here would as well, but I CAN see why it wouldn't necessarily be a big seller in mainstream markets.
It's obvious you do what you love, and do it well, but as some others posted, that won't necessarily pay the bills and it's NOT just because of freeloading. You're work is excellent, just not 'generally' marketable. Don't stop. please, but understand what you do is not going to be widely appreciated in a world focused on physical beauty and hooked up hits designed for those with the attention span of fleas. Very respectfully, my two cents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
T he blame is not ENTIRELY in their hands though...a part is also in the hands of we the fans. It is both a wonderful AND terrible thing that fans are now the artist's employer. Wonderful because nobody has to deal with label bullshit anymore, but terrible because you can't expect most of your customers to pay you on a name your price album when that price can include 0. If we want to keep getting actual GOOD music, then we the fans need to STEP UP and give our favorite artists a good enough living to where they have an incentive to keep creating instead of composing for movies/games/tv or becoming teachers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Samsung was able to compete successfully with Apple by offering a compelling product at a competitive price-point. If Apple were to raise the retail price on their own line of phones, it would be equivalent to handing over market share to Samsung ...and they know it. Any smart business would know not to do that, except for -- you guessed it -- the labels.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wame
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exposure, not enforcement.
Worried about music pirates? That's them, right there, big music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As Mike so eloquently stated earlier today in another article:
I guess that logic only applies when Mike disagrees with the conclusions reached by the speaker?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nope. Not new here at all.
"So its wonderful you love his work, what is it like to be led around by the nose that way? "
I don't really know. No one has actually been able to do that to me. I was curious, listened, expressed my opinion on not only his music, but why it probably isn't selling the way he'd like it to. I'm not quite sure how that is being 'led around by the nose', but, that is YOUR opinion, and not less or more valid than mine, regardless of how long I've been here compared to you.
"So did you have anything to add about the law in Japan and how overreaching it is, or are you just here to stroke the ego of someone using a popular website to SEO themselves. "
I don't disagree with the premise of the article at all. Tom seemed to feel the premise of the article wasn't quite correct, based on his personal experiences, I chose to suggest alternate theories as to why he's not doing as well as he liked ( this is the 'comments' section, after all ) and I chose to not frame it as an asshole :). You choose an ... alternate .. approach, which I expressed MY opinion about, nice and civil. That's all. You don't care for my approach, and have made it known. I don't care for your approach, and I have made it known. Since neither of us is likely to change the way we respond to those that disagree with opinions, I suggest we both 'get over it' and move on. That shouldn't be too difficult, should it ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why don't you play with idne for a while. It's clear that he's not here for the content of the article and that's obviously a large concern of yours ; 'THAT anonymouse coward' :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And it becomes clear neither are you.
You really need to work on your Google footprint if your going to play these games.
umad bro?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't really know. No one has actually been able to do that to me."
I must apologize, that's not entirely true. I'm married, and thus strongly acquainted with being led around by the nose. Sorry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting position to take. I read the article and that's not what I took from it at all. The article seems to be suggesting that since consumer spending on music was down even before the law was passed, that it was unnecessary, the wrong tool for the job, as it were. Different people, different interpretations .. go figure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better watch yourself. you are . " using a popular website to SEO themselves. " , or a service, it seems. Your going to make 'someone' upset ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I seem to have touched a nerve as you have lost the ability to even reply to people in the correct spots. Maybe if you could remember your login id.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
" I seem to have touched a nerve as you have lost the ability to even reply to people in the correct spots. "
You clearly are much more upset than I :).
Sometimes I forget to switch between Chrono and thread mode.
Sue me ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Especially since you can't get your money back if it sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Starve the beast!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You want Sources? Here ya go
First thing's first, the entries on the official Forbes 400 list have switched around a little. Basically Christ Walton has fallen from #4 to #6, but this doesn't change the list.
Now, I have verified that entries 4-10 are correct. I mean, nobody is going to dispute that the Koch Brothers (5 & 6) are Republicans (or at least Tea Party-iers, which all run as Republicans) and considering as how Michael Bloomberg is a sitting Republican mayor at this very moment, we can't debate that either. The Walton family (of Wal-Mart fame) occupies all the remaining seats, and have both overwhelmingly supported republicans in elections, and also in several situations given political speeches on their behalf.
I haven't checked 11-20 and don't intend to, however I do want to note that, although Bill Gates funnels most of his money into charities that would seem to support the Democrats, most of his donations directly to either candidates or PACs are to Republicans by a margin of almost 2-to-1, so we can assume that he is one of those "Reagan Democrats" that agrees with the Democrats socially but the Republicans on economics, so he's really split.
In addition, Larry Ellison is also debatable. Whilst he has made scarce few political contributions at all, he has almost singlehandedly funded at least 2 senate races in 2010, both for Republicans. The one of the two that won then authored a bill, literally on his third day in office, WHILE THE PAINT IN HIS OFFICE WAS LITERALLY STILL DRYING, trying to push Oracle hardware in a new database system being used by the Border Patrol. This despite the fact that the existing system at the time was only 2 years old and had complaints from a total of only 2 actual Border Patrol agents, total. Whilst this shows no real political allegiance towards the Republican party, it does show at least that Mr. Ellison has some preference for buying Repiblicans over buying Democrats, heh.
So yeah, there ya go. Out of the top ten richest people in America, somewhere between 7 to 9 of them are Republicans.
But really, when you have one party building its entire economic platform on the idea of "trickle-down economics" and the other pushing "trickle-up economics" it's no wonder that the people from whom the money would be trickling down (or not) support the Republican party. It just makes common sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2 facts and 3 theories...
A. People buy music that they've heard (or at least heard of) more frequently than they buy music that they haven't previously heard. It's nearly a 100% to 0% ratio.
B. Studies show that music sharing (i.e. piracy) actually increases music sales.
That said, I have three theories as to why the RIAA might be fighting online piracy.
1. It's not about the piracy as such. It's really about controlling the distribution channels of access to free music. The RIAA and their parent companies have invested countless fortunes in their networks of radio stations and cable TV channels in order to advertise their products, i.e. music. If some uncontrollable P2P network were to supplant radio stations in this role, the RIAA stand to lose their existing dominance over the marketing channel. Indie bands which actually have talent might no longer need the RIAA. A successful cartel defends it's turf.
2. (A variant of point 1.) The sonic flatulence which the RIAA publish under the guise of pop music is so completely devoid of creative content, that they need to maintain dominance over the marketing channel not only to foist their own garbage upon the marketplace, but to keep listeners from discovering how superior indie bands actually can be.
3. The RIAA are really stupid and don't "get" the digital age at all. They actually believe their own PR that every free download equates to a lost sale. In effect, they are an obsolete business model willing to try anything to survive - including believing their own lies.
All three of these theories may be true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They just want to control everything.
They will fail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-- grover
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't download anymore SUPER AWESOME JPOPs!?
That means... only lame Engrish and Kpops around?
NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
WHERE"S THE POWER OF ROCK(Read: JAM Project) TO SAVE US ALL!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's a freaking clue for you: the government is "big business." Look who was in the lead:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilary_Rosen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Encrypted tunnels and VPN
If users can download invisibly and anonymously, even DPI (deep packet inspection) will not help to determine and classify the traffic that goes from users' PC to another port in an encrypted way packet in packet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Encrypted tunnels and VPN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Word
“