You Can Take The Company Out Of The DRM Business, But You Can't Take The DRM Business Out Of The Company
from the but-of-course dept
Rovi is the company that used to be called Macrovision. It got its start as the annoying DRM for VCRs and expanded into all kinds of DRM over the years. In 2008, it bought GemStar-TV Guide and was then in the TV Guide producing business as well. While it eventually sold off the DRM/software parts of its business, apparently it just can't help doing what DRM companies know how to do best: breaking other technology. As reported on Slashdot, Rovi has announced that it's shutting off its TV Guide OnScreen service between now and April 13 of the next year. Apparently a number of devices, including two key Sony DVRs, will no longer work once the service is shut off. Not surprisingly, this is upsetting many owners of those devices:When other companies decide to stop supporting something, they don't make older systems useless. Worse, Sony never came out with another DVR in the U.S. market. Why do we have to rent them? How do we get Sony or Rovi to provide at least a software patch to set the clock so the DVR can at least retain 1980s VCR functionality? Sony admits there is no fix. A thread on AVS forums has a bunch of information on TV Guide OnScreen. The TV stations who broadcast the data have been ordered by Rovi to disconnect the data inserters and ship them back.Quite a legacy MacROVIsion has, huh?
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's a badly worded sentence. When I read it I thought you met you were temporarily turning it off from now UNTIL April 13th, then turning it back on, which made even less sense. It wasn't until I clicked on the link and read the original story that I got what you met by this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Macrovision isn't *technically* DRM...
That said, it was clearly in the spirit of modern day DRM, and thus unacceptable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
You could at least set this in a "framework" of how high-tech gadgets requiring external data connections are inherently flawed. But no, Little Picture Mike just ends on a lame rhetorical question.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But this is not really a DRM issue, just an issue that involves a DRM encrusted dinosaur.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
> high-tech gadgets requiring external data connections
> are inherently flawed.
You mean like Blu-Ray?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
Hasn't got a clue
out_of_the_blue
looks like a fool
out_of_the_blue
spouts off to you
out_of_the_blue
is nothing but a tool
Do I need to keep going?
You wonder why your comments are always buried.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is we learning yet?
Zune music licensing servers
Plays For Sure music licensing servers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The stuff you do not find in this here home.
Industry............Take your DRM and shove it up your Anus !
I do all I can to avoid anything that is DRM including any kind of Hardware you might need to purchase.
My Gear will always work.My 1500 plus piece Library is mine and owned by me.
My Music is all physical and owned by me.
So are the films of MAFIAA I buy all physical and all bought Used.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TiVo did this in the UK
For those of us in the UK who were early adopters of TiVo, this is nothing new. The Series 1 TiVo programme guide got withdrawn in June 2011, turning our perfectly working boxes into expensive paperweights. Fortunately a group of enthusiasts who so loved their TiVos got together and created an alternative EPG.
So, for those of you in the US where I believe TiVo has a much bigger market: beware. They could do it to you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Macrovision isn't *technically* DRM...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
Sad, but true.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You know what they say!
You know what they say: "If you can't dazzle them with diamonds, baffle them with bullshit!"
Well you take BS to a new level. Now let's see if you can dazzle us, just once.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Business opertunity
Someone could build a small transmitter that could be used to inject the needed data into the box, it would not be particularly challenging to do this on a technical level.
Of course there are three major problems that come to light, at least if done in a 'for profit' way.
1. RIVO will claim that the new device violates their IP and will sue you out of existence. Despite the fact that they 'turned off the service'.
2. What ever source was used to scrape the data from would also claim infringement and sue you out of existence.
3. Unless the device sits in between the antenna and DVR to prevent 'transmitting over the air' it would likely require an FCC license.
Oh wait there is the big fat government in the way to make sure that we have to fill the landfills with more electronics sooner, otherwise they can't keep the consumer economy going. (If you can call it going, it certainly isn't growing.)
IP laws are so outdated that they actually impede innovation. Of course big business and government both know this already, which is why they fight so hard to keep it in place, and increase it's footprint.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Suddenly you're for preserving old tech?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ROVI STINKS!
[ link to this | view in thread ]