The Inevitable Post-Tragedy Witch Hunt: 'Mass Effect' Facebook Page Attacked Because Of Link To Misidentified Shooting Suspect
from the a-whole-bunch-of-'wrongs'-in-search-of-a-'right' dept
Whenever something truly horrific happens, there's a good chance that people will find someone or something to hold at least partially responsible for the atrocity. The most immediate reactions are often the worst... and the most misplaced.The recent school shooting in Connecticut led to just such a reaction. As news began to spread about the tragedy, some Facebook users began lashing out at a couple of targets. One, a user named Ryan Lanza, felt some immediate heat and hatred soon after police mistakenly named him, rather than his younger brother Adam, as the shooter.
Soon after discovering the wrong Lanza's profile, the attack moved on to Mass Effect's Facebook page. According to commenters, Ryan had "Liked" this page at some point and to many of those looking to blame someone, anyone, it was all the justification they needed. A game with guns had to be partially responsible for the horrific event.
Here's a sampling of the first post-tragedy comments, where you can see the tide change from Mass Effect fans to misdirected anger:
It's ugly and inevitable. Any sizable tragedy usually results in some form of backlash or witch hunt. Social networks and forums where reactions can be instantaneous and numerous lend themselves to this sort of unfortunate behavior.
And as ugly and inevitable as it is, it's also understandable. Situations like these tend to make people feel both helpless and angry, a combination that lends itself to taking it out on the nearest proxy as the perpetrator is dead or in custody and thus, unreachable.
Bioware, to its credit, has made the wisest choice. It has not responded to any of the comments blaming its game for supposedly developing a killer. It has also allowed the comments to remain posted on its page, where they can speak for themselves.
As for Ryan Lanza, things went considerably worse. Fortunately, most Facebook users were unable to do more than send him messages and Friendship requests, thanks to his privacy settings. But even with these limits curbing the collateral damage, Ryan ended up deleting his Facebook account. The hate that was directed towards him was slightly more "justified," as law enforcement had named him as the gunman before issuing a correction. Unfortunately, since the crowd was unable to attack Ryan directly, it turned on his "Friends" list, sending completely uninvolved people "hundreds (literally) of hate-filled messages."
This won't be the last large-scale tragedy we see, or even the last misguided witch hunt. We can only hope that it will be very long time until see either again, although I'd rather see a million misguided torch-carriers burn half the internet to the ground than see a repeat of the Connecticut tragedy. But, despite that fact, I would sincerely hope that those who harassed innocent people in response to this horrific event choose not to repeat their mistakes when the next tragedy inevitably strikes.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: mass effect, newtown, sandy hook, tragedy, video games, witch hunt
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That wouldn't much of a problem. We can make restore the Internet from backups.
Sadly, we can't do the same with people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: typo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: typo
+1 Funny for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even after they were talking about there might have been mental health issues, they still were trying to keep the video game narrative alive.
Its the fault of violent video games!
Pay no attention to all of the coverage we give them.
Pay no attention to the availability of high powered multiple shot weapons.
Pay no attention to the stigma society still places on people with mental health issues, how the support system was gutted and never rebuild to be what it needed to be.
We are now so focused on assigning blame, we ignore the actual problems.
Burn the video game it had to be responsible!
He was named, go after everyone who knows him it must be their fault!
So few of them want to look in the mirror and accept their role in being at fault in this. Society failed, not one single point caused this... but we need to blame something and then focus on that and nothing else.
Facebook - where people are STILL threatening to burn the Abortionplex to the ground.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm just glad my kids were able to handle a rational discussion of what happened and aren't falling into the general atmosphere of panic that seems to be surrounding the area. Heck, just this morning schools in another town were put on lockdown because of a "stranger walking with a rifle". Turned out to be an umbrella. Imagine that - a guy carrying an umbrella on a rainy day...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My current favorite was Faux News using this shooting to remind everyone how the head of FRC was almost killed by a crazed shooter in their building and so he had some sort of special understanding.
Stranger with a rifle is going to be the new "anthrax on the counter" flip out.
Something horrible happened, but we've been trained to respond by assuming it will happen again and again unless we stay vigilant. We have to suspect everyone and everything... its working so well for air travel now. I think our time would be better spent dealing with the multiple things that combined to allow this to happen, and looking for actual solutions rather than short term fixes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Got a recorded message from our kids' school this morning notifying us that they will have police stationed at all schools in our area (middle-of-nowhere California), and all I can do is shake my head.
What a fucking waste of resources... they're also talking about putting up a perimeter fence around the entire school now. It's ludicrous what a single incident does to people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If it's not barbed wire it won't keep out an attacker (maybe not even if it is). If it is barbed wire I'd be much more concerned about a kid getting hurt trying to climb it than someone attacking the school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I suppose this has always been a long standing culture war.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Which is useful for the media by creating more stories as people overreact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Aaaahhh....because there now are only five corporations, highly financially interlocked, which control the bulk of the so-called media in America, whereas back in the early 1960s there were over 1,000?
The herd concensus movement really became apparent around 1990, when douchetards began wearing casual corporate shirts to announce who they worked for.
I certainly don't take the blame for problems foisted upon myself or others, FR, so I'm not sure about the logic of such a remark?
Back in the 1960s, before the absolute consolidation of the media (for which we have to thank Presidents Reagan and Clinton et al.), publications as disparate as Vogue, Ladies Home Journal and Reader's Digest would run highly analytical and questioning stories about the super-flaky Warren Commission Report, and murders surround the Kennedy assassination.
Today, all the Corporate McNews religiously covers only those stooges illiterately referring to all facts as "conspiracy theory."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But, of course
Would outlawing all types of "assault" weapons actually prevent crazy people or criminals from getting ahold of one?
Also, fully automatic weapons already are generally illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But, of course
I am not advocating a blanket ban, just tighter restrictions on what type of people should be able to have a firearm. Sensible gun laws are not incompatible with the 'right to bear arms'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
Similar to your argument, the only people who will bring a gun into a gun-free zone are those intent on breaking the law. They go in, then, confident that they won't have to deal with armed defense. If you remove that false 'haven' label from schools/churches/etc, then suddenly an unstable gunman won't have any obvious signs telling them where there aren't any guard dogs amongst the sheep. The prospect looks less appealing, and that in and of itself could (I have no idea if it would) have a chilling effect on this shit.
I'm not a huge fan of high-capacity magazines, myself. I'm a firm believer in retaining my right to own guns, but I'd personally be ok if 30-round magazines went away. Of course, they can't just go away now...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: But, of course
In my country, you have to jump through all sorts of hoops to be allowed to purchase a gun.
And guess what? You still get nutcases that waste their own family + themselves with a shotgun.
Your only solution to gun violence is to reduce the number of nutcases.
Judging by the picture above, you still have a long way to go to get that done...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But, of course
First, Iran (North Korea apparently already has a couple), next Bahrain, so they can stop the Saudi Arabian army the next time it enteres their country to kill protesters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But, of course
And why does anyone ever need a weapon like this? seriously, if you feel so threatened that you have to have an automatic weapon you need to either move somewhere you feel safer or become involved in some form of crime prevention move in your area.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
Remember this: MLK Jr. was considered a terrorist. Would a drone attack killing him have been a net good? Remember that the Founding Fathers committed High Treason when they signed the Declaration of Independence. Should their lives have been taken by drones, had the technology existed?
There is a debate to be had over guns in the US, but idiots on both sides of the debate keep trying to polarize it. I think that the question needed to be asked, and the fact that Obama has asked it at this point in time is interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
Oh if you pay for things in cash, you might be a terrorist.
If you refuse to have a Facebook, you might be a terrorist.
If you don't let people shoulder surf you while using free wifi you might be a terrorist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
I hate credit cards.
Fuck Facebook!
FFS stop standing behind me it's annoying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: But, of course
https://twitter.com/dronestream
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But, of course
Inanimate objects are not at fault here. Also approximately 80 million legal gun owners didn't shoot anyone this weekend.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But, of course
The 2nd amendment was written so that citizens would have the tools they needed to fight off government intrusion (foreign or domestic), and as such included any and all arms normally carried by an infantry soldier.
So if we want to keep up with technological progress, we need to re-legalize the production and sale of automatic weapons in order to comply with the spirit of the 2nd.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: But, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When someone kills enough people They get facebook campaigns, National Media coverage, people who were there are interviewed on the TODAY show, there are special interruptions into primetime TV, and the president will make a heart-felt announcement about the event.
Now Re-read that paragraph starting from "They get".... I cannot think of how we could reward bad behavior anymore than we already do. This is like giving your dog a slab of bacon for pooping on your floor. I just do not get it. You want to stop horrible mass shootings, stop rewarding them. Lock them away (if they survive) and never speak about them again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Of course, we should be trying to help these people so even that last option is removed, but when, in the current environment of placing "Healthcare" and "Government spending" in the same paragraph gets you labelled as a communist, good luck getting that sort of thing done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Less media attention and better mental care/less stigma against mental care would go a long way to stopping these events.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Far too easy to get labelled mentally disabled these days...
More likely under different circumstances this guy would have been just as normal as anyone, unfortunately life it would seem dealt him a bad hand and he snapped. I'm not saying it's anyone's fault... but everyone has a bad day, or a bad week, or sometimes a series of unfortunate events. This guy lost it in a bad way, but that doesn't mean we can go about labelling these guys as belonging in a mental institute.... All that's likely to do is furthur isolate them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
While no one can know if they were the kind that leads to these things the more important issue to consider is how people who need help get nothing.
Warehousing them wasn't pretty, so they closed the warehouses and promised new better things... we are still waiting for them.
We can't have rationale discussions about mental health issues, because society finds the topic icky and refuses to take action.
Some people have problems, but its better to not take the wider view that society would be better served if there was easy access to help and instead throw it out as a reason bad things happen.
or maybe it was the video games and movies...
or that twinkies are no longer available...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You assume a lot when you jump from me saying he had mental issues to saying he belonged in a mental institute. I only mentioned giving money to a charity for helping people with mental issues, which can encompass a significantly wider set of strategies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
There is nothing wrong with hoping some good can come out of all of this bad.
The problem is we can't even have the discussion because people are no longer allowed to discuss topics. We have to pick our side and stick to it, if anyone says differently call them names and get louder than them.
Could this have been avoided? No idea, but as these events keep happening we eventually need to kill the scared cows and try again.
Somewhere in the guns, mental health, lack of a societal safety net is an answer. It might not be perfect but until we can all be grown up and consider other peoples viewpoints and keep our knees from jerking at the mention of something we hold sacred being altered we are doomed to keep having these tragedies.
Money is going to be wasted turning schools into armed camps more focused on keeping the kids "safe" rather than educating them. Because we have to do something NOW!!!! rather than we need to stop catering to the worst case scenario and turn the dial to 11 to show we care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Motive
Justified? Anyone who believes the coppers, after all the video footage and photos of cops around the country attacking, maiming, pepper spraying the young law-abiding protesters, young women and elderly women, etc., during those "Occupy" protests, must be among the most gullible types in existence?
They most certainly believed every generation of the Bush family, no doubt, especially that last one and his "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq, huh?
The Motive
Today, some highly paid, brainless twit on the Wall Street Journal News Online, reported that police were searching for the motive for the mass murder of children at a Connecticut elementary school.
The motive?
An Afghanistani sheep herder returned to his home and found the scattered body parts of his wife and children. He gathered up their remains and gave them a proper burial, then sat and pondered the motive of the Americans who sent the drone to do that horrible killing.
The motive?
The super-rich laid off workers and offshored their jobs to the cheapest sweatshop in Bangladesh and workers there died horribly due to extremely substandard conditions, and Walmart falsely claims no knowledge of the location of their factories nor origins of the product.
The motive?
A major war occurs among European countries and an extraordinary number of soldiers die a horrible death from mustard gas, while Paul Warburg was the vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank (less publicity at that position, he had been offered the chairmanship) and Paul’s brother, Max Warburg, was the financial advisor to the Kaiser (the German ruler) and director of the German central bank.
The motive?
Many eons ago, in an Asian war, the team I was with was ordered to destroy a village of innocents to cover up a command mistake --- instead, we fragged the brigadier general who was on site and had issued the order, then blamed his death on “the enemy.”
Our motive was clear: murder the guilty to save the innocent.
I make no claim to understand the motives of the mentally ill, the psychopaths and the greedheads, but perhaps the answer lies within reach.
The president of the University of Washington once clerked for Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist when he rendered the decision to empty out mental institutions and set the stage for defunding mental health in America, perhaps that UW president knows the motive?
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pain-continues-after-war-for-american-drone-pil ot-a-872726.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Motive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The half-cocked list
Anyone know any of these vigilantes? Care to ask them how it feels to loudly and publicly blame heinous crimes on the wrong guy? Not that having your brother go horribly insane and murder your mother isn't pretty terrible in itself...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But most of all....
That pretty much sums up their pathetic mental state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In China there is a wave of knife attacks against children.
This is an honest question not a trap or insinuation, could it be that we live in a society that the peer pressure have become unbearable to some?
Laws don't work for suicidal people with a grudge they fear nothing because they are already dead and the only thing that can hold anybody back is themselves and how they were raised most of the time, if the number of suicide shooters increases this is due to environmental factors most probably so what are those?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/X_is_not_your_personal_army
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spiking the ball
[ link to this | view in chronology ]