The TSA's True Focus Isn't 'Safety' - It's Self-Preservation
from the give-'em-a-inch-and-they'll-take-a-mile-(and-your-plastic-sword) dept
Despite its own worst efforts, the TSA doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Year after year, horror story after horror story surfaces, detailing abuse of American citizens at the hands (very often literally) of TSA agents. If they're not poking, prodding, fondling or carelessly tossing supposed explosives into a trash can five feet away, they're confiscating harmless plastic swords while allowing loaded handguns on board. If they're not digging around in someone's laptop searching for who knows what, they're "diverting" iPads into their personal collections.A report by the Government Accounting Office (GAO) suggests that the TSA's main focus isn't safety, it's self-preservation. As yearly budget reviews loom, the TSA suddenly needs to "look busy" and justify its continued existence. Anything that might cut back its funding is briefly humored and then discarded. (via Reason 24/7)
Congress in 2002 set up a program giving airports the option of having private employees conduct screening operations. Unfortunately, TSA was put in charge of deciding which locations could participate. A total of 16 out of 440 commercial airports nationwide got into the program before TSA Administrator John S. Pistole slammed the door shut last year.Keeping private companies out of government operations ensures a steady flow of tax dollars. While taxpayers might appreciate the relief, the TSA isn't interested in dividing the pie into more slices that it absolutely has to. While it maintains its (again, very often literal) stranglehold on airport security, the airports it "services" are losing business directly as a result of its frequent bad behavior. As the GAO states, "Passengers who have negative encounters with the screening process generally associate their experiences with the specific airport."
Private companies would be forced to follow the hated TSA procedures, but even with these limitations, the Department of Homeland Security isn't interested in taking on new "partners."
[T]op Democrats want the TSA to continue rejecting applications to the program "until the costs and possible benefits can be accurately assessed," as Rep. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi, the ranking member on the House Homeland Security Committee, urged.Kind of tough to assess costs and benefits if you're unwilling to actually let the program run. This lockout extends further than private companies looking to get into the airport security business. The deck is stacked against private screeners, whose performance is assessed by the one entity that is relying on their failure to stay in the money.
Right now, the performance of private screeners is assessed under a process directed by TSA. It's not particularly surprising that this government agency is going to do everything it can to limit potential competition. Congressional auditors found, "TSA has not conducted regular reviews comparing private and federal screener performance and does not have plans to do so." The agency isn't about to document its own relative failure.In fact, the TSA does all it can to keep from being criticized. Here's how the traveler complaint process "works:"
At Ronald Reagan Airport, for example, angry flyers aren't given a form they can turn in on the spot to document their concerns. Instead, they're handed a tiny, easily lost sliver of paper containing TSA's website and mailing address.Ah, technology... wait... what? A slip of paper that contains the TSA's website URL? If the TSA actually was interested in feedback, it could easily set up a kiosk where travelers could file a complaint electronically with reports that could be viewed and acted on daily. Instead, it justs hands out something of use to nobody and hopes that time and distance either takes the traveler out of the complaining mood or makes the details unreliably fuzzy. The TSA benefits from its neo-Luddite approach which keeps complaints to an absolute minimum, a quasi-fact it frequently references when defending itself against any complaints that somehow make it through.
All of these actions have allowed the TSA to rake in nearly $8 billion a year without having done a single thing to improve its policies, protect travelers or prevent terrorism.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: airports, monopoly, private security, security theater, self-preservation, tsa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Isn't it on par with the US Government Culture of giving taxpayer money to enrich others? I mean, a good chunk of the bailout money from AIG went to pay the insurance Goldman Sachs made against the bad investments themselves spread around.
No really, it's all about distributing the wealth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Self preservation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Self preservation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Self preservation
Ultimately, the existence of government agencies are for the politicians to feel good and not for the common people!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Parasites
For those in charge, budget and number of staff are the measure of status, and weight of paperwork produced the measure of effectiveness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Parasites
To be fair, this is true of all bureaucracies, private and public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Parasites
Government bureaucracies just get the government to increase taxes when they need more money. It is usually very difficult to get rid of them short of a successful revolution, or conquest by a foreign army.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Parasites
Yes, this is just as true with governments as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Difference
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Difference
Most screeners have the common sense and courtesy to make the process painless. I still think most of the regulations are stupid, but having people who are "Human" and polite goes a long way.
This is one of the reasons I love flying out of Huntsville, AL, even if it is one of the most expensive airports in the US. Policies are just words on paper, it's people's actions that matter in the end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All Government agencies, once established..
This is why creating the DHS was absolutely worthless. Their function is entirely redundant with several other agencies, yet now that they exist, they simply fight for their own survival in congress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The USA, home of the brave?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Never Forget, even for an instant, that the one and only reason anybody has for taking your gun away is to make you weaker than he is, so he can do something to you that you wouldn't allow him to do if you were equipped to prevent it. This goes for burglars, muggers, and rapists, and even more so for policemen, bureaucrats, and politicians." ~ Alexander Hope
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So many the same
Humans... Cunning little buggers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not about self-preservation, it's about controlling the public
Some articles that may be of interest:
Just a reminder that the TSA wants us to wear taser/tracking bracelets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2cBSRLrJbGg
How will cops respond to gun confiscation orders?
http://www.naturalnews.com/038391_gun_confiscation_executive_orders_cops.html
Chinese news is demanding that we disarm. Ironic how their media and our own overlaps with the same message. Disturbing.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/12/18/China-Demands-US-Citizens-Be-Disarmed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not about self-preservation, it's about controlling the public
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/12/18/China-Demands-US-Citizens-Be-Disarmed
It will make it a hell of a lot easier to take over the US if they don't have to deal with the guns in the hands of private citizens. Take out the military bases and then they can roll right through without any effort. Hasn't anyone seen Red Dawn (either one?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not about self-preservation, it's about controlling the public
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternatives to the TSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fight back with stickers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and how is this any different from every other government agency?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That is an excellent idea. If I had the means I would set them up myself just past the screening area and in the terminal waiting areas so that people could use them while they waited for to board their flights.
Why don't the airports set them up themselves?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
Regardless of this bit of security theater, I choose to avoid airports whenever possible. I am DRIVING 1600 miles (each way) this holiday to avoid flying. Yes, I would rather spend 4 days on the highway than ANY time in an airport!
The TSA needs to be dissolved, ASAP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
Unfortunately you may be one of the ones the TSA kills due to you choosing the more dangerous auto transport over the safer air transport.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
I told him (in nicer words, of course) to shove it and get groping. Unfortunately, the setup of the checkpoint was not like some others and the inspection was not in full view of the queue; I prefer during these screenings that everyone who is waiting can plainly see the extent to which I am not trusted to be an airline passenger.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Avoiding the TSA as much as humanly possible...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is the tendency of every bureaucracy to self perpetuate. Once entrenched they are nearly impossible to get rid of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]