Philippine Government Ignores Public Concerns, Continues To Push Extreme 'Cybercrime' Law

from the not-listening dept

Fri, Dec 28th 2012 1:28pm — Glyn Moody

One of the striking -- and depressing -- features of the Internet today is the almost universal desire of governments around the world to rein it in through new laws. We wrote about one such attempt in the Philippines a couple of months ago, where the government is trying to bring in some particularly wide-ranging and troubling legislation. Although the Philippine Supreme Court put a temporary restraining order on the law, the Philippine government is not softening its stance, and has asked the court to lift the order. Its arguments are pretty worrying:

"there is always a presumption of validity that attaches to every legislative act"

Oh, really? It also said the law only "regulates and penalizes" acts defined as cybercrimes like hacking, and does not prevent the petitioners from using the Internet and expressing their thoughts.
Well, that rather depends on how you define cybercrimes, of course. The government said "traffic data" referred to in the Cybercrime Law is "non-content data" that consists of the origin, destination, route, time and date of the communication. It said that unlike content data, which is considered private, traffic data is an "auxiliary to the communication and is necessarily shared with a service provider who is a third party."
That is exactly the same erroneous argument used by the UK government to justify its Snooper's Charter. The problem is that some traffic data -- like destination Web addresses -- give considerable information about the content being viewed. For example, if people are visiting Web sites that are critical of the Philippine government, it's pretty clear what they are reading about.

The GMA News piece quoted above lists many other dubious arguments given by the Philippine government in favor of lifting the ban. Ironically, the way it dismisses or ignores the important issues raised by petitioners to the Supreme Court only serves to confirm the impression that the government is not really interested in achieving a fair and balanced solution here, but intends to push through its plans regardless.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cybercrime, philippines

13 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Jay (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 12:56pm

Why is journalism the first target?
It never fails. Government officials want to hide their own wrong doings so they suppress the people. The first ones targeted are the ones reporting about wrong doing. Once the journalists are gone, then you work to suppress the public.

The very clear message we get is that democracy is destroyed when the public is not informed of the actions of government.

And for what? Are the benefits of suppressing discussion really worth leaving a nation ignorant of their culture and different ideas and arguments that the people want?

Is democracy so evil that we need a government to suppress it?

So disappointed that the public can't have nice things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jameshogg (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 1:42pm

Just what exactly has the internet done to deserve these kinds of beatings?

...oh yeah... provide freedom of communication.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zakida Paul (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 1:43pm

Is this the law that made cybersex illegal? I have never heard anything more stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:03pm
  
  Re:
  naw, they just made wanking illegal
  http://getrealphilippines.com/blog/2012/09/wanking-to-lewd-web-videos-now-a-crime-in-the-ph ilippines/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Zakida Paul (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:21pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Bloody hell, remind me to never go there.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Tex Arcana (profile), 29 Dec 2012 @ 4:11pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Criminey, that means I'll have to get me a "ten-dorral whore"..
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 1:51pm

Politics has similarities with religion, they are both based on belief systems. Both sets of practitioners have limited tolerance for competing ideas, and so wish to control information and so force other people into their belief system. To any politician with strong political beliefs, democracy is like the reformation was to the catholic church, it reduces their power by providing competing beliefs.
The Internet is a powerful enabler of democracy, and so must be controlled to prevent it destroying the beliefs and powers of current politicians. The more repressive a regime, the more dangerous the Internet is to them, so actions like this should not be surprising. Trying to get the politicians to back off is like trying to convince a pope that calvin was right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:21pm

just about every government, worldwide, have the same lack of concern for anything or anyone other than what they want to achieve, ie, control of what people can do both on and off the net (the fear being that any and all wrong doings by governments and big businesses can instantly be transmitted to everywhere) and the ability of watching everyone every minute. basically, the peoples right to privacy and freedom is almost back to the days before emancipation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:30pm

Presumption
"'there is always a presumption of validity that attaches to every legislative act'

Oh, really?"

YES, really. Courts are not supposed to substitute their judgements for that of the duly elected lawmakers. Laws should not be overturned by courts unless they are clearly unconstitutional. It worries ME that YOU think this is worrying.

Think of it like the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. The presumption doesn't mean that criminals can't be convicted. It just means that the case has to be proven first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:31pm

Should move the nulk of the internet out to space or international waters and declare it a sovereign nation so the world stops trying to wrestle absolute control over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2012 @ 2:31pm
  
  Re:
  Correcting a typo: the 'bulk'
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mega1987 (profile), 28 Dec 2012 @ 6:36pm

DAMN YOU SOTTO!!!!
Damn you and your dumbass allies, Sotto.

I won't vote for you and your allies in this coming 2013 election.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Dec 2012 @ 1:05am

John Fenderson
Can you control this "Govt", Mr. " if we had to choose between those two Bigs (and I don't think we do), then I choose Big Government. It's easier to fix the government (who is us) than major corporations (whose behavior we have little to no say in.)�"??? (Article above is the tip of the iceberg)
Quote reference: John Fenderson "It's easier to fix the government�" http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/13310521223/mmmmm-mmmmm-monopoly-uspto-to-hit-new-record-g ranting-utility-patents.shtml?threaded=true#c404

You are lost in a world of delusion John Fenderson...only GOVT can ISSUE FU laws!!
Not Apple, Not Samsung, Not any Corp on the earth. Only Govts FU what COULD be good.
Only stupid Govt pukes issue Patents that cause harm: Here We Go Again: Apple's Pinch-To-Zoom Patent Rejected On Re-Exam
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121219/17584521445/here-we-go-again-apples-pinch-to-zoom -patent-rejected-re-exam.shtml

List of the "supposed" Good Guys that you say are "easier" to control than Corporations:
UN
EU
UK
USA
Oz
CA

The list is endless, filled with moronic GOVT pukes that FU things that don't need to any interference.

John Fenderson, you are truly lost...do you even read this Blog?? Filled with example after example of BIG GOVT fucking everything up???

EX: LEAKED: White House's Bogus Talking Points On Why Senate Should Trample The 4th Amendment http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/23120421503/leaked-white-houses-bogus-talking-points-why-s enate-should-trample-4th-amendment.shtml
Apparently, Congress Isn't Actually Interested In Requiring

A Warrant For Law Enforcement To Read Your Email
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/02441521496/apparently-congress-isnt-actually-inter ested-requiring-warrant-law-enforcement-to-read-your-email.shtml

EPIC Sues CIA For Release Of Documents Concerning Domestic Spying It Swears's Not Doing http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121225/17035321483/epic-sues-cia-release-documents-concerning-dom estic-spying-it-swears-its-not-doing.shtml

European Union's Data Retention Law Could Breach Citizens' Fundamental Rights
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121221/04453121464/european-unions-data-retention-law-cou ld-breach-citizens-fundamental-rights.shtml

Senate Finally Holds Weak 'Debate' On FISA Amendments Act... But Terrorism!
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121227/11581121501/senate-finally-holds-weak-debate-f isa-amendments-act-terrorrism.shtml

Classic Function Creep As EU Police May Gain Access To Asylum Seekers Fingerprint Database
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121226/07503321487/classic-function-creep-as-eu-police- may-gain-access-to-asylum-seekers-fingerprint-database.shtml

DOJ Taking Down Sites For Infringement... While Infringing Content Is Available Via Its Own Network
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121226/17212521492/doj-taking-down-sites-infringement-wh ile-infringing-content-is-available-via-its-own-network.shtml

Senate Rejects Final FISA Amendment, Lets Spying Program Stay Shrouded In Secrecy
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121228/06554421507/senate-rejects-final-fisa-amendment-l ets-spying-program-stay-shrouded-secrecy.shtml

John Fenderson is lost in BIG Govt lust�and should be treated as "The Notorious B.I.G. Govt Troll" he is�going �post�al on me won�t help�you�re spent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]