Apparently, Congress Isn't Actually Interested In Requiring A Warrant For Law Enforcement To Read Your Email
from the it-was-all-a-charade dept
Yes, we've already covered the rejection of key amendments in the FISA Amendments Act renewal, but that wasn't the only case of Congress ignoring the public's privacy concerns as they close out this session.Back in September, we noted that Senator Patrick Leahy, who has been working on much needed reforms for ECPA (the Electronic Communications Privacy Act) -- such as requiring law enforcement get a warrant to read your email -- had attached his ECPA reform plan to an update of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). While I know some privacy folks were worried about this update to the VPPA, I don't have much of a problem with it. The original VPPA, written as a quick response to a video store revealing Robert Bork's (somewhat boring) video rental history during his Supreme Court nomination hearings, did seem a bit limiting -- especially for online video sites such as Netflix that wanted to add some useful social features. However, it was the ECPA reform part that was more important. Attaching ECPA reform to VPPA reform didn't make some privacy folks happy, but they seemed willing to go along with the VPPA changes if it really meant that we'd get warrant requirements for emails and other digital messages.
There were some attempts to water down that ECPA reform at the end of last month, but the Senate Judiciary Committee kept the warrant requirement in there and rejected various attempts to weaken the bill. As we noted, however, it still was a long way from becoming law, given the need to pass a full Senate vote and to have a companion House bill make the rounds. We assumed that there would be no movement until next year and the new Congress.
But... late last week, the House rubberstamped the VPPA update, and the Senate, almost immediately signed off on the House's version, which the President is expected to sign any moment now. In case you missed it, that means that the ECPA reforms -- which were supposed to be bundled with the VPPA to make the whole thing palatable -- got dropped entirely. And now we get the VPPA reforms and no ECPA reform at all. Neat trick. "Bundle" two things to get support... and then at the last minute drop one part and rush through the other.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, ecpa reform, privacy, vppa, warrant
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They need to be searchable by every citizen, who needs no reason to begin digging.
Its a real spiffy idea to take away the "little peoples" rights up until it effects them. I suggest we remind them they are citizens not kings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is not surprising. -- Techdirt's motto.
Oh, and they raised their own pay, too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
More people vote for "reality" shows picking the next super duper special singer than in elections. No one is helping them find the facts vs the campagin commercial claims.
People want to assume that it will NEVER be used against them because they are "Good People (tm)". Once it is used against them and not the bad guys, they suddenly start to care... but the other "Good People (tm)" just assume they were "Bad People (tm)" who did something deserving of it.
We raise children to respect authority...
They don't question Doctors.
They don't question the police.
They don't question religious leaders.
And even after they are abused by those authorities and you can see video of it... there are still people saying the authorities are always correct and to claim otherwise is unamerican.
Hopefully more of the little frogs notice the pots heating up before it is to late.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Of course they're not kings. Obama is the king. They're the nobles...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They all vow to support and defend the Constitution Of The United States, only about 3 of them really do and one retires after this current congress.
None of these people follow the original intent of the constitution with the exception of the one who showed great fealty to the constitutions intent.
Now you know the reason constitutional law is not taught at law schools any longer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They can stop by and read my email anytime!
Also, it's not terribly difficult to setup your own POP and IMAP server. When they show up at your door to take the server in your basement because they want to read the spammy emails, just tell them how much you want for it.
I say market rate for federal authrorities to take an old server away, without a warrant, is $25,000 for an old Pentium II. Purchasing the system also includes not posting on Techdirt that federal authorities came to your house and offered you the deal of a lifetime.
This type of deal is certainly worth a trade, especially if they like reading spam that is passed along because the email server wasn't setup correctly from the beginning (likely hacked to send spam) anyway.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If he were the king, you think the idiot tea baggers and their suckups would still have their jobs?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This is not surprising. -- Techdirt's motto.
you make no sense - seriously.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yes, we need to show them who's the real boss around here... and it starts with using our votes... and ends with us using our guns, if necessary.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The game works best when you have an "enemy" to place blame on. President Obama is their secret Kenyan Muslim getting ready to hand the keys over to AQ. They are the caricature of everything thats xenophobic, jingoistic, self-centered, and living in their own reality.
Look at any successful group in the US, name their enemy.
You can easily, because we need something to blame the bad on before the good can happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They can stop by and read my email anytime!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: letherial on Dec 29th, 2012 @ 4:31pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: letherial on Dec 29th, 2012 @ 4:31pm
All it takes is demand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]