Move Over 'TacoCopter': Here Comes The 'Internet Of Drones'
from the pity-about-those-regulations dept
As we know, the Internet works by breaking digital information up into IP packets which are then routed independently over the network, and then re-assembled at their destination. Anything made up of 0s and 1s can be sent anywhere with an Internet connection in this way, but that isn't much good for physical objects.
It's true that we are fast approaching the day when we will be able to use a 3D scanner to send a digital file representing an object across the Internet so that it can then be printed at the destination. But that only works for simple, fungible items like cups or replacement parts, and is useless if you want to deliver a particular, personal item rather than just a generic copy.
To do that, we need an Internet of drones:
A short distance drone delivery service built on an open protocol. Think short haul logistics.
If you're still unsure how this would work in practice, the post by John Robb quoted above goes on to spell out the details for a simple example. The bottom line for returning a forgotten smartphone to its owner 30 miles away:
It's a system that will explode in a way that is very similar to the way the Internet grew up -- where connections were bought by individuals and installed one modem and IP address at a time, and where the early providers are local geeks with shelves full of modems and an expensive T-1 lines.
It's an approach that uses "uncontrolled airspace" and incremental purchases of cheap, standards compliant pads/drones to roll itself out (very similar to the way the Internet was able to piggy back on the old telephone system).
As a result of this open approach and decentralization, it's something that could grow VERY fast.Costs? Probably less than $0.25 per 10 mi. or so. So, about $0.75 in this instance. Time? An hour or so.
Of course, this is just a generalization of an idea we discussed back in March of last year, the so-called "TacoCopter", but taken to the next level, modelled on the Internet's IP packets. As we pointed out then, it's a great idea with lots of practical problems, mostly regulatory ones. Arguably the far greater potential of the Internet of drones concept makes the argument for loosening up those restrictions to permit innovation in this area even more compelling.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drones, internet, packages, peer to peer, regulations, shipping
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a chance
Wouldn't be too hard to start shooting them down in hope of a valuable find, or the delivery of less than desirable exploding objects and so on.
It would need to be highly restricted and monitored which defeats the whole purpose, and wouldn't work well with one off items... digitising and reproduction is definitely the way to go
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not a chance
Sure, gunning down a drone is not the same as gunning down a postman - it's only an object, not a human being.
The motivation behind gunning down either of the two would be the same, however (greed and personal defense). And I'm not aware of too many incidents involving gunned down postmen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not a chance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not a chance
By the time you change the concept to match the security protocols of a postal service, it's nothing like the original idea.. so it doesn't work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not a chance
Unless you want to convince me that you're the terminator, that's next to impossible for even a skilled hunter with the proper gear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not a chance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He left out this part;
Of course, those are the actual costs involved to operate the system. The end cost for the user will likely be about $5 per mile. So in this example, the total cost would be $15.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What could possibly go wrong?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Phase 1:
Build Internet of Drones
Phase 2:
Give Drones the ability to self-replicate
Phase 3:
Kneel before PQX-2554, Supreme Overlord of the Squishy Humans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$3 a gallon of gas means you can drive 120 miles a gallon, and no, you can't do that. I've heard of nothing that uses gas getting more then 50 miles a gallon. Some electric cars can go a few hundred miles on electricity, but guess what, that costs money to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/MotorcycleFuelEconomyGuide/best-scooter-MPG.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Physical DoS attacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]