iNanny: Apple Takes Down Popular Photo Apps Because They Made Searching For Nude Photos 'Too Easy'
from the paying-for-the-privilege-of-being-treated-like-a-child dept
We've written here before about Apple's autocratic control of its app store, which has resulted in many questionable removals. To date, Apple has blocked a dictionary (because it contained profanity), a Project Gutenberg scan of The Kama Sutra (ancient sexytime), any app that connects to Dropbox (because... Dropbox?), an educational game based on the current war in Syria (too topical?), a DUI checkpoint location app (political pressure), an app that allowed a mute 4-year-old girl to communicate with her parents (patents!), as well as many apps that were potentially competitive with its home-grown software.Now, Apple has pulled apps related to the 500px photography network, citing the "easy" availability of nude photos.
Apple has pulled the apps from photography network 500px from its App Store because, after 16 months of use, their clearly marked nude photo galleries suddenly became intolerable.500px was notified by Apple that its software update made it "too easy" to find nude images via the integrated search. Initially, Apple said the app wouldn't be pulled but reverted to an earlier version. An hour later, it apparently decided that potentially searchable nudes was too much of a threat to its walled ecosystem and yanked the apps entirely. This seems a little harsh, considering the precautions taken by the software.
In addition for 500px's own app, the third-party 500px app ISO500, whose parent company 500px acquired because of ISO500's excellent integration, has also received notice that its app will be removed from the App Store shortly - for the same reason.
Just as it has the whole time, the app defaults to a Safe Search mode that excludes nudity, and you have to log in on the desktop version to change that.Apple has responded to the strange and sudden removal of 500px's software with the following statement:
The app was removed from the App Store for featuring pornographic images and material, a clear violation of our guidelines. We also received customer complaints about possible child pornography. We've asked the developer to put safeguards in place to prevent pornographic images and material in their app.Child pornography accusations notwithstanding (back to that in a moment), Apple's stance on nudity (or "pornography," as it prefers to term it) in its "curated" apps is ridiculous. 500px took steps to prevent just anybody from picking up the app and loading up on explicit images. But whether or not 500px made access to explicit images easier ultimately makes no difference. If it's nudity Apple wants to be rid of, it's going to need to shut down a whole lot of software.
But here's the thing: Flipboard integrates completely with 500px as well. Everything you can do on 500px's app, you can do on Flipboard. Is Apple going to pull Flipboard as well? What about Tumblr, Instagram and all browsers - including Apple's own Safari? You can get to nude images with them pretty easily, too.And the child pornography concerns? 500px claims it was never informed about any alleged child porn -- not by Apple and not by its users.
Tchebotarev has responded to us, saying that 500px was not told about the child pornography complaints and that Apple had not mentioned any issues around nudity until a phone call yesterday. "We've never ever, since the beginning of the company, received a single complaint about child pornography. If something like that ever happened, it would be reported right away to enforcement agencies."Apple is prone to overreaction when apps are criticized or accused of possible moral/legal issues (see opening paragraph). Rather than contact 500px and have them investigate the offending account(s)/images, it simply dumped the app. On top of that, it didn't even bother to tell the involved parties about this accusation. Apparently, developers should just find articles involving their embattled software and hit F5 until Apple's official explanation is appended to the post.
Yes, child pornography is serious and should be dealt with expediently, but knocking apps out of the market without verified claims is ridiculous. As was pointed out, if a user wants to access child porn, he's got plenty of options, all contained within Apple's approved apps, including its own software. It's a shoot-first approach that does a lot of damage to its relationships with its developers -- but the collateral damage is apparently acceptable.
Apple's arbitrary decisions on apps like this and the ones listed above make it harder and harder to respect its position as a self-appointed moral guardian of all things i-related. Its lack of communication and questionable tactics seem to be the unfortunate byproduct of its position as the most desirable market.
Personally, I'm glad I have an Android. As an adult, I prefer to be given the options befitting an adult, rather than have my software choices limited by a corporation's belief that I shouldn't be trusted with anything "mature" on the off chance that a child might access it. The Android marketplace is full of questionable apps, malware and outright sleaze, but at least it assumes I can make my own decisions on what sort of content I want to view or interact with, rather than pre-screen everything like a helicopter parent rummaging through the Halloween "take," looking for anything with loose wrappers or heavily processed sugars.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: app store, pornography, walled garden
Companies: 500px, apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
People are slowly turning away from the overpriced apple hype. Which is a good thing. Google won't be the only player in the market simply because the system is open and the mods and 3rd party apps are all over the place. Win.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, right, the PC, and any other device with a connection to the Internet!
Oh no, if what will happen once Apple realizes the same thing! Will they remove any Internet apps from the iPhone to?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Apple's Safari Pornography browser will find all the nekkid ladies you care to see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Man, I'm surprised Disney's legal office never saw that one before.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&q=snow+white+apple+decal
Now, cry havoc! and let slip the dogs of lawsuits, that this foul deed shall smell above the courtroom with machinations, groaning for out-of-court settlements.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fear not, for only virtuous content can be accessed by Apple's products, and by definition anything access by Apples products is therefore virtuous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Android marketplace is full of questionable apps, malware and outright sleaze
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Android marketplace is full of questionable apps, malware and outright sleaze
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Android marketplace is full of questionable apps, malware and outright sleaze
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 23rd, 2013 @ 10:32am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I grew up in a house that always had a PC. The reason being? Well my father worked as an engineer for a computer company in the 80s. As he put it, "Macintosh assumes you are stupid, sense I'm not stupid I don't like them."
So pretty much this is just continuation of their stand point from the beginning. Apple just assumes their users are brain dead idiots and treats them as such. (And having now spent a couple years working with die hard Apple cultist... I can see why they assume their users are stupid)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That statement would carry a lot more weight if you had used the correct word... ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You say he didn't send this from his phone?
Damn Dragon Naturally speaking!
What? You say he actually typed it out by hand?
Damn auto-correct.
;^)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> as such. (And having now spent a couple years working with die hard
> Apple cultist... I can see why they assume their users are stupid)
You are assuming that Apple is assuming.
During early development of Lisa and Macintosh, Apple would bring people in to observe their interactions with computers to be sure Apple understood their potential customers. For those too young to remember, you can read about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I blame it on all the 1200/75bps naked photos we used to download via xModem.. those were the days.. the anticipation of boobies 1 line at a time..
and ANSI porn... oooooooo ANSI porn!
*hobbles away grumbling about kids and lawns*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
So three lines of text, where the first line had a blank for the CC, and the 2nd two lines had a + for the CC would overstrike the first line before the printer advanced to another row on the paper. Basically, your text file had three times as many lines as the printed output would have. But boy what levels of greyscale could be achieved, with each "pixel" being a character on the 132 column line printer.
Since tractor feed paper went through these line printers (not dot-matrix printers) you could basically print a poster two pages wide and scotch tape them together into a large wall poster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Though I also remember the tiny ascii art that came into vogue with fidonet signatures and then usenet, and even that period when it was freakin all over IRC
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Evil Bunny. Copy and paste evil bunny into
(")_(") your sig to help him gain world domination.
Dude... we're old ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
OH wait....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-22/apple-may-face-first-profit-drop-in-decade-as-i phone-slows-tech.html
Maybe the apple is showing some wormy rot..........
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most likely, someone posted a photo of toddlers in a bathtub, because as we all know, nudity = porn!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think I have come to the conclusion the world would be a much nicer place to live if it wasn't for all these people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Porn
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Are_photos_of_nude_children_illegal_to_have
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Porn
Have you ever seen what people claim as pornography in web-filters? It's insane.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Porn
while there may be a logical if not legal difference, when a high-and-mighty persecutor decides to go after you, you are toast...
IF The They (tm) want your hide nailed to the wall, it don't matter *what* the 'evidence'/pix are, you are going to be screwed... besides, who *EVER* SEES -out of the general public- WHAT 'evidence'/porn pix are being claimed in the media ? ? ? no one, the DA can say ANY-fucking-THING they want, and there is no effective way to fight back or dispute their claims...
in fact, EVERYONE in my family is a potential 'child pornographer': i know they have nekkid baby pictures of my sisters and me ! ! !
surely, that is the cause of the downfall of western civilization...
(pay no attention to that bankster behind the curtain...)
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Porn
"Notwithstanding the popularity of these factors, the U.S. Supreme Court has also stated that even fully clothed images of children may constitute child pornography as well. "
That doesn't necessarily mean fully clothed children doing something sexual. I seem to recall a case where a guy was convicted of creating and possessing child porn because he took his video camera to the park and filmed young children playing. True, he focused on their lower regions a lot, but those kids weren't doing anything sexual, they were just running around playing and the court ruled that it was child pornography.
There was also a case where a mother was charged with creation of child porn and child abuse because she painted a portrait of her young daughter, sitting on a stool, wearing a fancy dress with her hands in her lap. How did this qualify as child porn? Some uptight idiot said that it looked like the girl was masturbating...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Porn
All it needs is if the image(s) taken as a whole appeal to the prurient interest in sex (This comes from the US Supreme Court decision in Miller if anyone is interested).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I know it when I see it"
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description "hard-core pornography"; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But **I know it when I see it**, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.""
�Justice Potter Stewart,�concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers.
[cut and pasted from Wikipedia, emphasis added]
So, if the definition of pornography is "I know it when I see it", then Apple's App Store decisions are always tautologically consistent. Q.E.D.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I know it when I see it"
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description "hard-core pornography"; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But **I know it when I see it**, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.""
�Justice Potter Stewart,�concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers.
[cut and pasted from Wikipedia, emphasis added]
So, if the definition of pornography is "I know it when I see it", then Apple's App Store decisions are always tautologically consistent. Q.E.D.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am not amazed at all when it comes to thinking about the Stupidity of the Masses.All running to buy their Ipoop and paying money to go on their App (CENSORED) Shop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Did you also build your own car because it'd be faster and cheaper than a Ford? Did you build your own house too? Did you build the furniture in it? Did you knock up a big LCD TV from parts bought the local electronics shop? No?! You mean you can't do all things things?
Congrats on being one of a very small percentage of people who can (or even want to) build your own computer. I'm happy for you that you can take advantage of that knowledge to your benefit. However your criticism of Apple is fairly meaningless because you represent such a tiny piece of the home computer market. Most people want something that works straight out of the box and keeps working for a long time. Years of customer satisfaction surveys show Apple (usually) does that better than any other computer manufacturer. Whatever you think of their business practices (and some are pretty crap), the 'I can build a better one' argument is simply irrelevant to most.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
THIS IS NOT TRUE.
Yes, there are some. But the amount is quite limited. Apps that Google is alerted to by users that are malware are quickly removed. In addition to this, Google has created various scans and methods to prevent the installation of malicious applications to Android devices. Of course, it is up to the end user to choose or not choose to make use of some of Google's more prominent safety features.
A notable one being that you are unable to install anything by default, in order to install apps that aren't directly coming from the Play Store, you must first check a setting under Security. At which point it becomes "you're an adult, you have turned on "allow the installation of unknown apps", proceed at your own risk". As for curating the Play Store, they have known malware blacklists and remove apps that confirm to said lists, as well as remove apps that users alert them to as being malware.
Here's a few links that are worth reading on about Android and Malware. I leave them here for the inevitable Wally comment saying, "Android is BAD GUYZ! Apple PROTECTZ US! WALLED GARDEN FTW!" Another person intent on perpetuating already debunked myths and spreading additional falsehoods presented by someone ignorant of the majority of the facts.
http://www.androidcentral.com/fbi-issues-android-malware-warning-forgets-how-apps-work
http://www.androidcentral.com/android-malware-scare-may-have-been-premature
http://www.androidcen tral.com/new-malware-appearing-dodgy-apps-you-shouldnt-be-downloading-anyway
There's a more recent article that I'd love to link to on all this, as soon as I find it I'll post a link.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
THIS IS NOT TRUE."
But. But.. But...
If it isn't true why will people go out and spend all that money on an iPhone? They have to have a reason and the best reason in the world is...
... For the children!
The truth is the Android platform is pretty safe, unless you root your phone or tablet (I have), or turn off the Security features (I have) or download questionable apps from unknown sources (I have not). I have never had a problem and I have hundreds of apps, but I don't download every single thing I see either. In fact I have never seen an Android phone that was infected and I manage around 150 android devices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
/joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The end is nigh
i stayed with Apple thru the dark days and convinced people it was a viable company and to buy their computers. The last few years have made more and more disappointed with Apple and its walled garden it is building. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, Mr. Cook tear down that wall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All it takes is for one malicious app to sneak through to cause serious damage. The right approach therefore is not to build closed platforms, but to build secure ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
overreacting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: overreacting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, wait...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]