The Unintended Consequences Of The Copyright Alerts System

from the creating-more-problems-then-you-solve dept

Tue, Jan 29th 2013 8:30am — Timothy Geigner

Since we've learned of the plan for so-called Six Strikes programs by ISPs, there has been protest and warnings from multiple sources about multiple issues. Accordingly, Daily Dot has a nice little piece about what sort of unintended consequences we can expect to come out of this plan. A couple of them are well-traveled ground here at Techdirt, including whether businesses will still offer WiFi when "pirates" naturally flock there to carry out their piratey actions. Likewise, we've discussed the importance of the Open Wireless movement, which will certainly take a massive hit if and when these ISP plans are spun up. All that being said, the third unintended consequence mentioned in the article is probably the most important, since it will render all of this an exercise in futility: greater adoption of privacy tools by the masses.

According to comments Lesser made at an Internet Society meeting in November 2012, the definition of who the CAS is after is extremely narrow, at least for its planned first iteration. It only tracks those who upload the most-popular copyrighted content, like blockbuster movies and best-selling albums, via the peer-to-peer service BitTorrent, and it only identifies them by their Internet protocol (IP) addresses. That's it. So pirates who can avoid BitTorrent, or peer-to-peer altogether, or download without uploading (a major faux pas on some torrent sites), or hide their IP addresses, will avoid detection.

Learning to conceal one’s IP address is already a major point of Internet activism, for reasons that have nothing to do with piracy. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, for instance, suggests bloggers in dangerous parts of the world hide their IP addresses to ensure their anonymity from authoritarian governments.

In other words, these plans will spark an interest in privacy tools designed to get around the "strikes". It's an arms race that essentially cannot be won, because every new tactic simply spurs the growth of interest in counter-tactics and probably leaves the average computer user even more prepared for the next attempt than they would have been otherwise. This type of thing likely creates tech-saavy people where there previously would have been none. Meanwhile, businesses and WiFi device owners will close off access out of fear.

Torrent Freak backs this key point up, noting how few bittorrent users are currently masking their IP addresses and making the case that that number is going to jump after Six Strikes begins.

BitTorrent proxies and VPN services are the preferred way for people to remain anonymous while downloading. These services replace a user’s home IP-address with one provided by the proxy service, making it impossible for tracking companies to identify who is doing the file-sharing. In the U.S. 16% of all file-sharers already hide their IP-address, and this is likely to increase when the copyright alert system goes live.

What's missing from all of this is exactly how any of these plans are going to get previous "pirates" to turn into paying customers for media companies. History suggests they will not do so, will not curb piracy, and will in fact only annoy people who like open WiFi connections and prepare users for the next round of the race all the more. If there were a more perfect definition of a plan that achieves nothing except collateral damage than 6 strikes legislation, I cannot imagine what it'd be.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, copyright alerts, unintended consequences

30 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Hephaestus (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:20am

Not learning from past mistakes
Any rational person would look at the failure of French 3 strikes plan and say, this is a bad idea to implement elsewhere. I am convinced that the MPAA and RIAA are pushing this forward so they can say "look we are doing something" to maintain their funding.

The companies funding these groups (MPAA, RIAA, etc) should begin taking a results based funding approach. Or perhaps they should just look at the past 100 years of results, and determine if they should continue funding them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MikeW (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:42am
  
  Re: Not learning from past mistakes
  "The companies funding these groups (MPAA, RIAA, etc) should begin taking a results based funding approach. Or perhaps they should just look at the past 100 years of results, and determine if they should continue funding them."
  
  AAACK! Someone is using common sense! They must be a pirate and a pirate sympathizer! Burn them!
  
  Seriously, though. Results based approach? Who needs that when you can ruin innocent people's lives just fine the old way?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 30 Jan 2013 @ 3:19am
    
    Re: Re: Not learning from past mistakes
    Don Quixote must be proud of the MAFIAA!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:34am

What's to stop them from tallying a 'strike' regardless of whether a proxy us used or not. Isn't it still a guilty till proven innocent system?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:44am
  
  Re:
  They still have to know who to tally the strike against. A proxy hides the endpoint, making such identification very difficult.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:22am
    
    Re: Re:
    I was more concerned on whether they are simply going to just just use a shotgun approach. There is no negative sequences of false accusation. Why not do it that way?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:53am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Well, yes, you're right. They certainly are.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:42am

Not unintended
A couple of [the unintended consequences] are well-traveled ground here at Techdirt, including whether businesses will still offer WiFi when "pirates" naturally flock there to carry out their piratey actions. Likewise, we've discussed the importance of the Open Wireless movement, which will certainly take a massive hit if and when these ISP plans are spun up.

I don't think these are unintended at all. I think they're part of an intentional effort to reduce the usefulness of the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:58am
  
  Re: Not unintended
  No, they're part of keeping the uppity masses down. Look st the education system, deliberately removing people from the usefulness of the Internet by claiming it's a Wild West when it really isn't. The Internet is ethic-neutral.
  
  And the fact that it's neutral means that the uppity masses can use it as well as the Old Guard.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Fenderson (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:52am
    
    Re: Re: Not unintended
    Yes, I believe we're saying the same thing, just using different words.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Machin Shin (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:08am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Not unintended
      See, this is exactly the kind of thing that has to be stopped. People going all crazy and thinking for themselves, coming up with different ways to say the same thing.... Its madness, it must be stopped!
      
      /sarc
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:32pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Not unintended
      In America, there seems to be a concerted effort to remove all forms of actual information from the general public. From Telcos who charge exorbitant prices for less service than places like Nigeria, to "news" outlets that are the least honest things in the world, to a "transparent government" that is a thousand times more opaque than gunmetal-black painted windows.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:59am

I'm betting most copyright maximalists don't even bother with these things. They probably think ah we will stop it by just making it a bit more annoying. And yes if anything ISP's won't be able to do anything after a few people get some strikes. I can tell you if I happen to get one which I shouldn't but if I somehow do I for sure am going to get far more involved in hiding my IP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jameshogg (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:02am

The next logical step by the government is to attack the VPNs. And any such attack could put dissidents across the world in great danger.

But anything is justified in the name of copyright law, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jay (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:06am
  
  Re:
  That's just the excuse given. The real issue here is creating an American firewall that puts the Chinese firewall to shame.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:17am

EA Board of Directors
Since EA customer service and EA management aren't interested in customer satisfaction, why not look further up the chain of command. Perhaps the EA Board of Directors might be interested in an issue that affects their long-term ability attract returning customers. http://investor.ea.com/contactBoard.cfm

On second thought, I see that the EA Board chairman, Lawrence Probst is also Chairman of the Board of the US Olympic Committee - another organization that doesn't really care what their fans think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:31am
  
  Re: EA Board of Directors
  Uh... wrong article dude.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:40am
    
    Re: Re: EA Board of Directors
    Oops.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lowestofthekeys (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:34am

"It only tracks those who upload the most-popular copyrighted content, like blockbuster movies and best-selling albums,"

I thought this was interesting. I've seen a few indie artist voice their support of this system, yet it won't prevent people from downloading their music.

Oh, Hollywood will you ever stop being so seedy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:38am

Wasnt this whole agreement set up when sopa looked like a sure thing? I doubt they really want to go thro with it for fear of the customers. Just have to see how it all plays out
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
robin, 29 Jan 2013 @ 12:33pm

It's Already Begun
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/01/28/1645252/how-proxied-torrents-could-end-isp-subpoenas

While still theory at this point, my bet is with some very clever developers. The Comcasts and Warner Bros. of the world have yet to out-manoeuvre them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
robin, 29 Jan 2013 @ 12:34pm

It's Already Begun
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/01/28/1645252/how-proxied-torrents-could-end-isp-subpoenas

While still theory at this point, my bet is with some very clever developers. The Comcasts and Warner Bros. of the world have yet to out-manoeuvre them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- you don't need my name, 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:19pm
  
  Re: It's Already Begun
  No need "clever".
  
  All you need is one usb drive and a social life.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ahow628 (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 1:05pm

Bad, but good...
I've been saying this for a while that I consider this to be a somewhat good thing. There are many things that we do on the internet that are just plain unsecure (email, http browsing, bit torrent) and I see this as a good thing as it will push us to create more secure protocols and procedures.

It is really unfortunate that this has to be the impetus for introducing more secure measures, but these tribulations will lead to a stronger internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:18pm
  
  Re: Bad, but good...
  Unfortunately using encryption on public torrents is less effective than its use as DRM. The decryption key has to be made available to all down-loaders. A VPN would work, so long as it is in a jurisdiction where the MAFIAA can't serve notices and get ISPs to throttle connections.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ahow628 (profile), 30 Jan 2013 @ 6:06am
    
    Re: Re: Bad, but good...
    I understand what you are saying, but you are talking about combining technology we currently have. What I was getting at was that at some point, new technology will be developed that will cure the current ills in the system.
    
    It may be awhile, but it will happen.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rikuo (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 1:41pm

Where's AJ (or the guy who walks like AJ, quacks like AJ, but is sooo not a duck...I mean AJ) saying that this is all right, that no-one's being accused of breaking the law, that its the ISPs contracting out the accusations to outside companies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
charliebrown (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 1:51pm

Fourth Unintended Consequence
If someone gets cut off the internet, or severely throttled, they might decide "Oh, well, I better stop pirating so I can get my internet access back. Now, let's see, I can't buy any music because it's all online and I have no internet. Oh, and I can't rent a movie because it's all done on the internet. I'd buy a book but...."

So, how does this actually help the big entertainment industries again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 5:07pm

I'll just leave this here...
http://dietrolldie.com/2013/01/28/lipscomb-fishing-co-or-exculpatory-evidence-request/

I call your attention to number 10 on the list of troll demands.
Funny how corporate law is going to be jumping into real law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
babafet, 31 Jan 2013 @ 11:03am

Death to STarbucks
This move will kill Starbucks as we know it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]