HADOPI May Be Succeeding -- In Driving French Customers To Dotcom's Mega
from the don't-say-we-didn't-warn-you dept
Last week, Techdirt reported on the news that falling numbers of P2P users are being trumpeted as a victory for HADOPI's "three strikes" approach in France, but that it is a hollow victory, since sales of recorded music are still dropping in that country. The French site Numerama points out something else interesting happening there (in French), as revealed by the following tweet from Kim Dotcom:
#Mega Top 5 premium membership countries: 1. France 2. Spain 3. Belgium 4. United States 5. Germany - Thanks a lot for buying!
Now, of course, as Techdirt always emphasizes, correlation is not causation, but it's pretty suggestive that at precisely the same time that P2P use is dropping in France, its citizens should turn out to be the biggest premium users of Dotcom's Mega service. This is, after all, precisely what we and everyone else have been predicting: that people would simply move from P2P services where they can be observed, to others -- like Mega's file-hosting site -- where they cannot.
This interpretation is supported by the other notable fact to emerge from Dotcom's tweet: that after French users, it is Spaniards who are signing up for Mega's premium membership in droves -- another group who have had a punitive copyright infringement law imposed on them recently. This means that in about a year's time, we can probably expect the Spanish department tasked with implementing Ley Sinde to publish figures showing that the number of P2P users is falling -- omitting to note, of course that they, like their French counterparts, have simply moved to alternatives instead.
Now, some will doubtless use these trends to argue that Mega should be shut down just as Megaupload was. But the correct inferences to draw are that HADOPI and Ley Sinde are just an expensive waste of time, and that people don't expect to get everything for free, as the popularity in France and Spain of Dotcom's paid-for Mega service shows. It's just a matter of the recording and film industries offering the public what they want, in a form they want, at a reasonable price. Is that really too much to ask?
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Next up, France and Spain will probably try to go after payment processors for usenet and vpn providers. That would be a big win for Bitcoin and credit card systems based out of tiny Caribbean countries with dodgy banking laws.
There probably is a negative side in all of this. With all of these moles being whacked by the media syndicates, exterminators and lawn service companies are probably losing a lot of business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One can only hope they spend all their freaking money this way and die a blazing death with lots of financial pain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They managed to turn TPB, Dotcom into martyrs and symbols to an entire new generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If they spent even a 1/4 of the money they spend tilting at windmills on providing a service instead they'd be a lot more effective against "piracy" and make money at the same time.
Instead they go for the "throw money at the problem with no return" route every time... *le sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Plus they have stood up and survived the MAFIAA's attempt to destroy them via corrupt and dishonest tactics. So I ask you: do we really care about the service they provide anymore? Or have they become legends, symbols of this fight?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
\whistles nonchalantly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Populations:
France 52 million internet users
Spain 32 million internet users
Belgium 8,5 million internet users!!!
USA about 245 million internet users
Germany 68 million internet users
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
France is an obvious number one because of laws, same somewhat goes for Spain, while USA and Germany are there because of mahney and population.
Why is Belgium ahead of the last 2? UK should be able to blow them out of the water with 53 million internet users and even the neighbors in Netherlands with 16 million internet users where the culture, economy and laws should be about the same, is lower!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Maybe you should ask someone from the entertainment industry about the Netherlands. We're the banana republic of Europe, privately downloading infringing stuff is almost legal here (technically it's illegal, but nobody is getting prosecuted).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The only real differences are in politicians being far more clear about their intentions in Netherlands. Unless you are implying that Belgium is particularly nasty against copyright infringement (which would proove the point of the article pretty well) it is not that much of a stretch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
of course it is! to do so would mean that those industries having to admit that what they have been doing for decades was/is wrong! it would mean those industries having to relinquish the control they have had for decades and cannot bear the thought of losing! it would mean those industries having to admit that customers are right! it would mean those industries having to listen, instead of dictating continuously, so that more protectionist laws were introduced and more lives ruined over a 2bit film!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One could argue that at least sales aren't dropping as much as before, which could be a sign that HADOPI is, in fact, working...except that, if you factor in what HADOPI has already cost, that argument becomes irrelevant.
No matter how you look at it, HADOPI has been a failed experiment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wouldn't say COMPLETELY failed...
After all, it's given proof that this doesn't work, so...
As an experiment to prove that it can stop piracy, yes, it failed, as an experiment to prove that people will go back to the labels in droves, it also failed...
But as an experiment showing that the government is wasting its time fighting piracy? It succeeded tremendously.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fine. So if it has no effect, why are you obsessed over it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you are asking why it's newsworthy, well that's pretty obvious to even a moron in a hurry. When a country passes draconian legislation based on lobbying and not research, and that legislation is costing millions in taxpayer's dollars, and the legislation is shown to not have the effect that it was intended for, this is newsworthy... period. French citizens should be interested in this article as it shows a complete waste of their tax dollars in addition to a curtailment of their rights at the expense of a dying industry, and the rest of the world should be interested as well before they decide to waste the tax dollars of their citizens on a similar proposal equally destined for failure.
Hopefully that clears it up for you, but if even those words were too large for you to comprehend, next time I can try explaining it with a popup book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
He never said the law has no effect. He's saying the law has failed to accomplish its goal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hell, piracy has close to no effect - you can't even argue about "lost sales" - so why are you obsessed over it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Big win for the industry any way you look at it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Before HADOPI sales were actually increasing (albeit slowly than they wanted) if memory serves. No really, it's a complete and utter success. For us the pirates =D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unless it serves your purpose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All one needs to do is take a quick History Lesson of MAFIAA Copyright Laws through the 20TH Century to Present Day.
The MAFIAA is the Disease and Knowledge is the Cure !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm of mixed sympathies here. Yeah, a whole lot of that money goes to ginormous corporate profits, executive bonuses, and similar crap (those Gulfstream IVs don't pay for themselves you know). A whole lot gets raked off in big money deals for marquee actors, directors, singers, whatever. And don't forget all the cash scumbags like Ari Emmanuel suck off.
But go look at the credits for, say, Game of Thrones. Ignore the big names. You're going to see hundreds of names. Each of those people is usually a skilled pro who expects to (and I would argue, normatively should) make a decent living. That ads up to a shit ton of money.
I just don't see the business model coming together that will allow productions like that to be made if people want to spend the kind of money they give Kim Dotcom every month versus the kind of money they give HBO every month.
Production is getting cheaper in a lot of ways, but it'll always take a lot of people to put together stuff like GOT or Breaking Bad or whatever. I can live without 'em, and if that's the price for a society that's dramatically freer to be both technological and cultural innovation, I'll take it and smile. But I don't think we should delude ourselves about what we'll be giving up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The revenue brought back from GoT might affect whether the next season is made, or whether such lavish productions are made by HBO again, but it doesn't affect the current paycheck of those people - they're already working on something else if their skills are in demand, and getting paid for it.
"I just don't see the business model coming together that will allow productions like that to be made if people want to spend the kind of money they give Kim Dotcom every month versus the kind of money they give HBO every month."
HBO have the choice to take that money instead, as do Netflix (who are currently blocked from offering their service to people in France and Spain by the content licence holders), and every other service out there whose current setup means that they refuse it. Don't feel sorry for them just because they've decided to stick with a business model that doesn't allow them to take the money being offered..
As for business model - there's many of them out there. Netflix produced House Of Cards for similar money without any problems, for example. Don't fall into the trap of believing that the legacy business models are the only ones that work - that's the whining of people who don't want to see their traditional cash cows disappearing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]