Internet Poker Company May Attempt A Comeback By Buying An Atlantic City Casino
from the hacking-IRL dept
While it's lost steam, you likely recall what is commonly referred to as the "poker boom" of the 2000s. Due in large part to the sudden interest in the game resulting from ESPN's coverage of the World Series of Poker, it seemed like everyone was playing. This took the form not only of a massive uptake in friendly neighborhood games, but also in the emergence of online poker as a serious force in the internet world. That is, of course, until the United States government, conversely beholden to a largely religious lobbying effort coupled with an inability to collect taxes on the gaming, decided to shut down most of the popular poker sites. The result of the efforts by these anti-freedom groups was the crafting of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which then led to the takedowns of all kinds of poker sites. Predictably, this simply caused those sites to relocate domains and move their money processing facilities offshore, further depriving the government of both oversight and any chance at revenue. Recently, Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey, has sought to expand legalizing online gambling in his state, and is currently working through the legislative/vetoing process to do so as he sees fit.Which brings us to today, where a company called the Rational Group, owners of the previously popular PokerStars and Full Tilt sites, is looking into buying a distressed Atlantic City casino, giving them a legitimate home-base of operations within America, allowing them to reopen their online poker doors, and providing a massive revenue opportunity to the state of New Jersey.
Rational is taking its own gamble (sorry) in trying to develop a US base within the Atlantic Club, which lost $13.6 million during the first three quarters of last year amid declining revenue. The problem for Rational, however, is that its crown jewels are still on shaky footing with US regulators. In July, PokerStars paid $547 million to the DoJ and $184 million to foreign players in a bid to settle charges. The question now is whether or not the slate has been wiped clean.
"Both companies had issues with U.S. law when, in 2011, the Department of Justice closed down [PokerStars's and Full Tilt's] websites after they continued accepting U.S. bets," attorney Jason Gross told Press of Atlantic City. "Here you have these two companies, both owned by Rational Group, that went farther than most companies, and it may create further issues."Let's avoid mincing words here: the idea that legal complications stemming from a what was essentially a religious lobbying effort (with some help from the pro and college sports leagues) could prevent a now legitimate business from operating and generating state revenue would be a travesty. A tyranny of the minority serves nobody in this instance. The people want online gambling, the state wants online gambling. Holding Rational's feet to a fire sparked by bad legislation is wrong, particularly when that company wants to invest into a distressed NJ business and help turn it around.
With that said, the broader point appears to be that online gaming is going to come back, whether Rational succeeds in this endeavor or not. As the article notes:
By legally forcing online gaming to have a home casino in the States, it could both reopen the online market while also capitalizing on that sweet tax revenue. Rational and its all-powerful brands might not bring online poker back, but it does look increasingly likely that online gaming is coming back.And, in my opinion, not a moment too soon. I'm all for religious freedom and belief, but those stop where my freedom begins. The sooner the government gets out of the business of enforcing morality on the internet, the better.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: casino, chris christie, internet gambling, new jersey
Companies: full tilt, pokerstars, rational group
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Politicians Sure Can Pick Winners
Chris Christie said "I think that one of the things that Revel will be is a catalyst for additional modernization and investment by the other casinos to say, listen, if we grow more people here coming to the region and we're offering something that looks nice further down the boardwalk, maybe people will want to look there as well."
Fat fuck must have been thinking about cheesburgers (horse) at the time.
And people think he is a good govenor and would make a good president...
jobs, jobs, jobs... we do not need more jobs. What the fuck has all this "progress" been for over the last century. All this technology and we are still slaves to needing a job? Mis-guided tech if you ask me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Politicians Sure Can Pick Winners
Then we won't have jobs anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Politicians Sure Can Pick Winners
When the promoted mentality is to accumulate more and more to accomodate us on our short stay on this planet then anyone who falls into this paradigm is misguided (myself included). The need for more jobs is a fallacy. Production without demand is detrimental to people, animals and the planet. Everybody dies but not everybody lives.
Is the purpose in life to have a job so that you can pay taxes to fund wars and the overclass while having a little left over to buy things you think you need?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are you an anarchist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oooh, let me try!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oooh, let me try!
The thing is that the regulation came because of veiled interests, not to benefit society and economy as a whole. Or rather they wanted to benefit the economy but it backfired.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Are you an anarchist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Are you an anarchist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Are you an anarchist?
So, probably about 75%-90% of the population care.
May as well let 'em have what they want. They want to trust in "luck" more than math, they'll get what they deserve, and they'll have only themselves to blame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Are you an anarchist?
The majority.. This is the fundamental rule of any democracy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's not even all of it. By making it illegal and difficult to get money into and out of the sites, the whole thing became more risky, culminating in lots of people losing money.
This is similar to piracy, with media companies thinking piracy is a lost sale, when in fact it keeps people engaged with media they otherwise couldn't afford. Playstation and XBOX are going to learn this soon when they announce their expensive new systems with download-only games and locked down ecosystems. These next gen consoles are going to be disappointed in sales.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get your Pirate Flag Waving High !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sigh... Guess I was misled...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, you were. This was a combination of the religious right and the taxation left getting together to keep people from playing a game they wanted, in ever-growing numbers, to play....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't think it is possible to make money regularly at the casino. There are lucky ones who are lucky, but most players lose. Therefore, it is better to choose large and reliable casinos in order to enjoy the game without thinking too much about money. I often play at RajBet online casino and can say that it suits my style of play.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Je passe toujours un bon moment à jouer car cela me calme. Rendez-vous sur CasinoOnlineCa https://fr.casinoonlineca.ca/casino-en-ligne/depot-minimum/ pour me rejoindre et jouer dans un casino en ligne.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gamgling
I like the online casino. I didn't think it was that interesting. I will not call myself a professional, so I select games for amateurs with the help of Internet resources such as https://oneangrygamer.net/2021/08/top-5-video-games-for-gambling-fans/ . I myself do not really understand where the best gaming platforms are, and what is better to skip. I confess that I myself would never have found 5 gambling video games that have become my favorites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]