'Video Games Do Not Cause Violence,' According To Former FBI Profiler
from the political-ax-grinding-to-continue-unabated dept
The national discussion about links between video games and violence continues. Unfortunately, most of the loudest "discussion" seems to be taking the form of proposed legislation that takes the view that the connection is a foregone conclusion. There's a wealth of misinformation to draw from, especially if one wants to believe that video game violence leads to real life violence, and many of these pundits and politicians have already found all the "evidence" they need to justify their push towards video game regulation or flat out bans.
One of the voices sure to be ignored in this debate is one with actual experience with violent individuals. Former FBI profiler Mary Ellen O'Toole had this to say about the subject during a panel discussion hosted by CBS News.
"It's my experience that video games do not cause violence," O'Toole told CBS News. "However, it is one of the risk variables when we do a threat assessment for the risk to act out violently."O'Toole's statement echoes what many others have noticed while researching video games and violence. Violent video games don't craft new killers. However, they may encourage pre-existing tendencies. The push to censor or punish violent video games in order to prevent violence ignores the source of the problem, opting instead for an easily-accessible scapegoat.
"It's important that I point out that as a threat assessment and as a former FBI profiler, we don't see these as the cause violence," she added. "We see them as sources of fueling ideation that's already there."
As another panelist pointed out, violence statistics simply do not track with the rise of the video game industry.
Texas A&M International University psychology professor Christopher Ferguson pointed out that youth violence had recently declined to the lowest level in 40 years at a time when video games had become more violent.As Ferguson sees it, this backlash against video games is nothing more than another moral panic; a periodic societal reflux that has attempted to lay the blame for societal woes on various handy villains in the past, like rock music, pinball and Dungeons & Dragons (among others). Ferguson point out the "attention" paid to comic books in the 1950s, which Congress and psychiatrists blamed for everything from juvenile delinquency to homosexuality.
Tragedies often lead to instant reactions and moral panic as legislators and special interests alike seize on parts of culture they distrust or misunderstand. This leads to a lot of "working backwards," as we've seen in a number of bills that have been introduced post-Newtown.
"We're in a mode of worry about — or panicking about this type of media. We may do some putting the cart before the horse, and we may see some people sort of starting with a conclusion and trying to assemble data in a very selective way to try to support that conclusion."Fortunately for gamers, the Supreme Court has already taken a firm stance against the government regulation of video games, viewing this as a violation of First Amendment rights. This, combined with studies that have failed to show any direct link between violence and video games, helps keep legislators from doing much more than making a lot of noise about the subject. But they'll still keep trying, at least until the next bit of blamable culture comes along.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fbi profiler, video games, violence, violent video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Don't blame video games....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't blame video games....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Don't blame video games....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't blame video games....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't blame video games....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I pick that they blame Trolls. Patent, Copyright, and Techdirt Trolls!!! I'm not fussy ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
The morality of the whole country starts right in your own head. Don't expect others to be moral when you reject it.
Catchphrase for short attention spans: Violence in, violence out.
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
If you like yapping ankle-biters, you'll love Techdirt!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
What "productive hobby" would you suggest, blue?
Most of my youth was lived prior to video games existing. I spent plenty of days playing make believe "cowboys & indians" or "army man". How is it being on a computer screen all that different?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
Well, since you asked, I think the major difference is playing video games, spending a lot of time on the internet... doesn't teach kids how to behave in society.
When you played cowboys and Indians or army man you were interacting directly with other children. You were learning a lot about social interaction, learning to read people, learning what was acceptable and what was not. There were other adults around that you observed. Today a lot of that doesn't happen. Interaction over a computer or video game is not the same as interaction on a playground or at a park, or in the woods.
So while violence in video games isn't really a direct cause of violence in real life. Video games, when played to excess (much like anything) can be detrimental to social growth.
I am not saying there shouldn't be video games, just like everything else, parents need to, well, parent and control how much time is spent in a dark room with a controller in your hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Point, But
Today, not all video games are played solo. For example, World of Warcraft is an "multi-player" game where you can meet other people playing the game. Now, I will admit, meeting a digital elf is not equivilant to meeting a real person but it is more than nothing.
Now that is one out of many examples. For me, I thought video games as a healthy alternative. If I'm upset with the world and would like to rip someone's head off, I'll play Mortal Kombat. If I feel like stealing stuff and running over pedistrians, GTA X. Or, if I want to connect with my family and have fun when we live in different cities, states, or countries, an online interactive game is the best way to communicate because just talking can be boring without an activity to tie it together.
The answer to this problem they are trying to solve is not gonna be as simple as banning violent games. Besides, they do not believe what they are saying in the first place. If they did, you think they would make games that focus on happy things, how to behave in society, obey the laws, or simply how to be an obedient mindless sucker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good Point, But
I am not saying there is anything wrong with games themselves, but much like TV or anything else, it must be in moderation.
I have nephews that are limited in how long they are allowed to play, and another nephew that literally will play WOW 10 or even 14 hours a day or more. Care to guess which one has trouble in groups of kids his own age.
Computers (games by extension) make it very easy to become an introverted sociopath and many parents are unwilling to drag their kids away from the games so that they get the needed interaction with society while they are young.
Some years later, we are starting to see the fruits from the garden.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good Point, But
WoW teaches you how to be social *online*, which is used in the vast majority of businesses today. Nonverbal communication is not the only form of human communications (and this is completely ignoring the typical use of emotes in games and online communication).
TV and video games are very different from the perspective of the one participating. TV requires no input from the viewer; you passively accept the story or actions as they happen. Video games require input, reflexes, critical thinking, and social interaction (depending on the game) in order to be successful. You may want to read about "gamification" and how turning traditional passive learning into active "video game" learning has improved retention and application of real-world skills.
I agree that parents need more interaction with their children, but I would argue that it's better to do so by engaging with your children in the video games themselves, not by discouraging them from having fun. You can't fix bad parenting by outlawing video games, music, TV, books, or whatever scapegoat you decide is "destroying the country" today.
Oh, and if the fruits of the garden are our reduced violent crime rates among children, then that's awesome news!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Good Point, But
"WoW teaches you how to be social *online*, which is used in the vast majority of businesses today."
My experience with nearly all on-line gaming is that there is not a lot of social to it. If I treated my business clients on-line like people are treated on WOW I wouldn't have many clients.
I agree! I am not saying gaming (violent or otherwise) has no value or is intrinsically bad, I am saying just like everything else in life. In moderation it is fine, this is especially true for those who are growing up and learning how to interact with people. I don't blame, TV, games or books for "destroying the country".
I can offer no citation (well I am sure I could google something up), as I am only expressing my opinion based on anecdotal evidence, as a result of my observations of many people, including family members, whom I have watched raised since birth over many, many years. Many of the people that play games excessively (not all children) are socially awkward and some are extremely introverted. On the other hand those that don't game excessively, even when raised in the same family, don't seem exhibit the same problems.
Again, I am not saying gaming is evil or the root of societies problems, but like any other thing, when taken to excess it is not good for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
Were you the kid who wrote "The cake is a lie" when asked the question "What is 2 + 2 ?", or did you not do well at Big Mathematics as a child?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
Also, a basic reason video game violence doesn't lead to real-world violence is because the player can and will die too as he or she learns the game. It's not a fantasy where a player is rendered invincible so he or she can spill as much blood as desired, but rather a scenario where the player's repeat failures lead to learning and experience, and even humor in retrospect.
Case in point: this death montage video. (Warning: contains violence, obviously) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V5kIV3eCrY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confirmatory bias by ardent game player, n'est pas?
The majority of the voices in OotB's head are children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Others have used Videogames as a scapegoat in the past, but the recent wave the last few months in the news has been entirely pushed by the NRA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So Says CBS News
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Video games don't cause violence...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Video games don't cause violence...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Video games don't cause violence...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Video games don't cause violence...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Statistics and critical thinking need to be part of general education.
Most hostility towards video games isn't even rising to the level of mistaking correlation for causation, but instead merely assuming "monkey see, monkey do".
Even your own article notes that the FBI profiler saw what sounds like a positive correlation between violent video games and violent acts, while not blaming the games but rather a preexisting predisposition on the violent person's part, while citing Ferguson pointing out what sounds like a negative correlation; what it doesn't do is suggest the likely reason for this seeming contradiction: the positive correlation was observed in a biased sample, namely, "people who come to the attention of FBI profilers".
This fallacy is an unfortunately very common one, and not solely on the part of those being intentionally dishonest. Well-meaning but biased parties may commit it as an honest mistake. There is much more at this link, which (along with much else at the same site) should probably be required reading in high school:
http://lesswrong.com/lw/js/the_bottom_line/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Site defaced!
http://s23.postimage.org/7fvbdlgkb/techdirt_deleted.png
This needs to be fixed urgently, lest people get the idea you've closed up shop or something.
That means restoring the front page to normal and figuring out how whoever did this got in and plugging the hole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Site defaced!
Usually it's because you've requested access to the story database at the exact same moment it's being updated (ie: adding a new article).
Wait a couple of minutes and refresh your browser and that usually fixes it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Site defaced!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Site defaced!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Site defaced!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comment deleted???
As I don't believe the first comment constituted spam or any kind of violation of the rules I want it reinstated immediately. As for the second one, I'll consider its having been intercepted or deleted as evidence that someone in a position to act on it has read it, which means it served its purpose. Do with this only-meta-on-topic comment as you see fit, but please reinstate the first, fully-on-topic comment. And fix your site's security issues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comment deleted???
In either case, thank you. Now about that security hole ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Comment deleted???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Comment deleted???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Comment deleted???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Comment deleted???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That and equip myself with a Giant Hammer three times my own size and find some Orcs to put down.
See how ridiculous that sounds? That's how ridiculous it sounds to me when these clowns say its the games causing real world violence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spoken like a true psychologist :-)
The ideation is a huge problem in most cases. This is the reason why parents should actually pay attention to the ESRB ratings system. It has not changed one iota since its standardization.
I will however, once again, blame the MPAA for jading us with any lack of reliability towards any other ratings systems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
g8
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vidio gams r edukAtIoNAl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love braging
1. Blackness then redness then whiteness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I love braging
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I blames stupidity!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I blames stupidity!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I blames stupidity!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
video games don't cause it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mad den
to download
Click here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't blame video games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violent Video Games
-=[Just Sayin]=-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Violent Video Games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Violent Video Games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]