Prenda's Brett Gibbs Finally Answers Some Questions; No Mention Of Alan Cooper
from the heading-for-a-showdown dept
With the news breaking of copyright troll firm Prenda Law, along with John Steele and Paul Duffy (who basically appear to be Prenda) suing a bunch of critics for defamation, it's worth remembering that the challenges to some of their existing lawsuits are still ongoing.Brett Gibbs, who has been trying to weasel out of a variety of troubling situations concerning his acting as a lawyer for Prenda in California, was finally forced to answer some questions from Judge Otis Wright -- the same judge Gibbs tried to have kicked off the case once Wright started asking Gibbs to explain who the mysterious Alan Cooper really is. That effort failed (miserably) and last we'd seen, Judge Wright was threatening sanctions (including potential incarceration) against Gibbs for his, um, lack of candor.
Late last week, Judge Wright also consolidated a bunch of Gibbs' Prenda cases, so that they were all included for the sanction hearings on March 11, and also ordered Gibbs to answer some basic questions:
The names and contact information of the “senior members of the law firm that employed Mr. Gibbs in an ‘of counsel’ relationship.” (Gibbs Resp. 2.);Gibbs names John Steele and Paul Hansmeier as the "senior members" from whom he took orders, both when he was working with Steele Hansmeier and with Prenda Law. That's not surprising, but marginally interesting since Steele, at times, likes to pretend that he's not working for Prenda. The more interesting tidbit concerned the "CEO" of AF Holdings and Ingenuity 13, the two shell companies that Prenda has been using for a bunch of these lawsuits, which many believe are controlled by Steele and Hansmeier. Those are the companies who supposedly had "Alan Cooper" as their CEO, until Alan Cooper, who took care of one of Steele's homes, spoke up to the court, wondering if his identity was being used illegally. Apparently "Alan Cooper" is no longer CEO, but Mark Lutz is the CEO (of both companies).
The names and contact information of the persons who make “strategic decisions . . . whether to file actions, who to sue, and whether to make a certain settlement demand or accept an offer of settlement.” (Gibbs Resp. 2.);
The names and contact information of the “owners of these copyrights.” (Gibbs Resp. 2.) If these owners are business entities, then provide in addition the names and contact information of the principals of these entities.
The names and contact information of the principals of AF Holdings LLC and Ingenuity 13 LLC.
You may remember Mark Lutz for his laugh-o-riffic appearance in that Florida Prenda case which consisted of a hearing worthy of Abbott and Costello. Lutz, who was identified as a "former" paralegal for Steele, was there to be the "representative" of the plaintiff, a company called SunLust. However, an absolutely hilarious exchange with the judge (which came about after she saw Lutz talking to Steele, who claimed he was just there to "observe" but had no actual involvement in the case) showed that Lutz was not a representative of the company, but a stand-in for Steele. Here's just a snippet.
THE COURT: Mr. Lutz, you're under oath, you have to give truthful answers or you face penalties of perjury. Do you understand that?If you follow the FightCopyrightTrolls site, they've spent plenty of time tracking Lutz, who (that site claims) is Prenda's main "enforcer" in trying to get people to pay up. People receiving phone calls related to Prenda cases, asking the recipient to pay up to avoid getting sued, often report that it's Lutz who is calling (though it appears he may use another name on some phone calls). That "Alan Cooper" is gone from Ingenuity 13 and AF Holdings, and Lutz has been put in his place, adds even more weight to what most people suspected: that the companies are mere shells for Steele and Hansmeier, who seem to be trying to layer on more and more and more bullshit to avoid getting in serious trouble for their actions in these cases, seeking any way possible to try to demand money from people they accuse of infringing copyrights (or, in some crazy cases, accessing computers in an unauthorized manner).
MR. LUTZ: Yes.
THE COURT: What is your position with Sunlust?
MR. LUTZ: I'm a representative of them.
THE COURT: What does that mean?
MR. LUTZ: Corporate representative.
THE COURT: What does that mean?
MR. LUTZ: They asked me to appear on various matters throughout the country.
THE COURT: Are you an officer of the company?
MR. LUTZ: I'm not, no.
THE COURT: Are you authorized to bind the company to any legal contracts?
MR. LUTZ: I am not.
THE COURT: Are you salaried?
MR. LUTZ: No, 1099.
THE COURT: So you are a 1099 contracted entity and you just go around and sit in a Court and represent yourself to be the corporate representative of the company?
MR. LUTZ: Yes.
THE COURT: Mr. Torres, did you know this was Mr. Lutz's position, a paid corporate representative?
MR. TORRES: No, Your Honor, I did not.
THE COURT: Who is the president of Sunlust?
MR. LUTZ: I'm unaware.
THE COURT: Who is the vice president?
MR. LUTZ: I'm unaware
THE COURT: Who is the secretary?
MR. LUTZ: I have no idea.
THE COURT: Who owns Sunlust?
MR. LUTZ: I do not know.
THE COURT: Who signs your checks?
MR. LUTZ: I believe somebody in the accounting department.
THE COURT: What is their name?
MR. LUTZ: To be honest with you, I can't read the signature.
THE COURT: Where is the accounting department located?
MR. LUTZ: I'm sorry?
THE COURT: Where is the accounting department located?
MR. LUTZ: I've received checks from California.
In the answer, Gibbs also refuses to directly respond to Judge Wright's question to reveal the contact information for Steele and Hansmeier, but does offer to file them under seal. There is, of course, no mention of Alan Cooper.
I imagine the hearing on March 11th should be quite the spectacle.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alan cooper, brett gibbs, john steele, otis wright, prenda, prenda law, sanction
Companies: prenda, prenda law
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Crud. I'm out.
I think i'll run out and get some more for March 11th. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Crud. I'm out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For some reason...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: For some reason...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why the hell not for frauding, stealing (or should that be Steeleing?), and harassing the public?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh Prenda, those who say you do nothing good, fail to see the joy you create for others... when loosing bad in court.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The understanding bystanders thus refused to even spit in their general direction.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Prenda Law! A staple in the "At The Bench" series. Mike sez (short version): "Wow. Wow. Wow. ... The story is gripping."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation .shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You see, they're actually doing us all a huge favor!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All that salt and butter is bad and maybe we'll just drop dead and stop laughing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
You're just mad that this is the best excuse your copyright heroes can come up with for a trump card.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hmmmmm......
Judge Wright is not one to trifle with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
Incessantly and inanely - did I mention lamely?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
You truly are a child.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
I care not one whit about his floor-vs-ass fetishes. To each his own; even perverts need release.
But, dear A.C., please don't "release" all over our faces. Please limit your response (a.k.a. "substantive debate") to the subject matter at hand. (So to speak.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110121/16003912772/karls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtm l#comments
As time passes, it seems like I've been right, and you've been wrong. Whenever I've made a prediction about any case that has been decided in court, I've been on the side of the law - and you haven't.
Perhaps you should demand a refund of the money you've been paying to your college. Just sayin'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hmmmmm......
Please do!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some jail time should send shivers down an **AA executive who have basically lied every time they submitted statistics and outright faulty research.
Theres been a run on popcorn n butter. The local store is out. I may be in a panic soon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The MPAA must be quite pleased
The MPAA must be pleased at the rise of popcorn consumption related to the entertainment spectacle of copyright trolls Gordian knots of shell companies and litigation being unraveled.
The MPAA thanks you for fighting copyright trolls.
The corn farmers thank you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's just impossible to get laughed at enough, Mike.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's just impossible to mock you enough, Mike.
I remember when trolls tried on this website. It was stuff that you can laugh about. It was interesting thought experiments in insanity.
This though! This lousy excuse of crap has put you on par with Nigerian prince emails.
Have some god damn pride in your trolling and rub a couple brain cells together!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hmmmmm......
Can you also carry a sign that says Don't worry, I'm from the internet?
I wish I could be there, but I would end up tossed out of court laughing uncontrollably...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
When he's actually trying, he wants to come off as "reasonable" to those who look at his posting history, and not a dickmunching shithole.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
HOLY SHIT...
DTD just dropped this little bit of knowledge...
OK. I will make this short and sweet!Judge Wright has ordered the following personnel to be present at the 11 Mar 13, hearing.
John Steele, of Steele Hansmeier PLLC and/or Livewire Holdings
Paul Hansmeier, of Steele Hansmeier PLLC and/or Livewire Holdings LLC
Paul Duffy, of Prenda Law, Inc.
Angela Van Den Hemel, of Prenda Law, Inc.
Mark Lutz, CEO of AF Holdings LLC and Ingenuity 13 LLC
Alan Cooper, of AF Holdings LLC
Peter Hansemeier of 6881 Forensics, LLC
Alan Cooper, of 2170 Highway 47 North, Isle, MN 56342.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
Or I could just be reading too much into this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2013 @ 6:12pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hmmmmm......
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130302/02591022179/prendas-brett-gibbs-finally-answers-s ome-questions-no-mention-alan-cooper.shtml#c465
Might I suggest wearing a t-shirt that says 'not here to be questioned'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: HOLY SHIT...
[ link to this | view in thread ]