Startups And Innovators Speak Out In Favor Of Fixing CFAA
from the good-for-them dept
The good folks over at the EFF have posted a letter from a group of startups and innovators to Congress seeking reform of the CFAA (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act), which has been abused for years, most notably and recently, in the case against Aaron Swartz (full disclosure: I helped review the initial letter and helped the EFF get some of the signatures on the letter). This is important, because, as we have noted, plenty of innovators and entrepreneurs could have been charged under this law for some of their random hacking experiments, some of which directly led them to create amazing innovations.Many people have thought that the tech industry isn't as interested in CFAA reform, since it supposedly protects them in cases where they have been hacked, but that's not the case. Through out the startup community, I've heard many people who were horrified to learn about the charges against Aaron Swartz, as they quickly realized how easy it would be for a Justice Department official to spin what they themselves were doing into something nefarious sounding. That does not help innovation.
No one is in favor of having no rules at all, but clearly the CFAA is outdated, broken and widely abused. Fixing the law to focus on actual malicious and nefarious attacks would be a huge step forward, not just for the public, but for innovators and entrepreneurs who often build great things by starting with a simple hack.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aaron swartz, cfaa, entrepreneurship, hacking, innovation
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just have the supreme court rule it unconstitutional
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CFAA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CFAA
FWIW, Kevin Mitnick was charged under the CFAA (among other things), but agree with your general point. Other statutes often can cover many of the necessary issues. The CFAA often allows them to "double up" charges.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
However, I'm more struck by how Mike sees only good in tech giants Microsoft and Apple, when for the last 20 years at least, both of those have been roundly reviled for doing all they can to hinder "disruptive" start-ups besides established companies of all sizes. Their actual day-to-day evil is well known to those who had to struggle against the massive control of money and influence that both STILL use ruthlessly to suppress competitors. And they've both used copyright and patents to the extent possible. -- But all that history is whitewashed -- no, just erased as if never existed, by Monopolist Mike.
IF the Reagan Justice Department hadn't gone catatonic and had prosecuted Microsoft for its actual crimes by the standards of the decades prior, then Gates and his cohorts wouldn't have just been fined, but would have spent time in jail, and the country and world would be far better off.
This piece and the one prior present Gates and Jobs so contrary to actual events that reads like a paid puff piece. -- And ain't out of the question because billionaires spend their ill-gotten money freely to revise history. -- But maybe Mike is just ignorant, as he's never had to compete against these ruthless techno-thugs.
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
All Techdirt logo T-shirts are hand-made. ... By laborers, a class of people whom Mike never even mentions, let alone favorably.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
Until you learn how to criticise the RIAA, go fuck yourself with a plank of wood. With splinters and nails hammered in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gates and Jobs both recognized themselves as criminals,
Pretty much everyone who advocates or has ever advocated civil disobedience disagrees.
I don't disagree that breaking laws creates disorder and unrest. The civil rights movements of the 1960s created all sorts of disorder. But we're in a better society now because of that disorder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]