Toronto School Board Spokesperson Sends Police Out To Hassle One Of Its Critics
from the if-you-can't-beat-'em,-intimidate-'em dept
As we've seen occur in multiple instances, bogus infringement claims have been used to make things disappear from the web. When that isn't an option, vague claims of libel or defamation are used to shut down critics. And if it isn't either of the above, the entity being criticized will fall back on the law -- or rather, law enforcement -- to achieve silence through intimidation.Sometimes it works all too well. Other times, it backfires completely. Such is the case with longtime critic of the TDSB (Toronto District School Board), Arnie Lemaire, who writes the Blazingcatfur blog. A member of the school board sent the Toronto PD over to Lemaire's place after finding something "threatening" in a six-week old blog comment. (via)
"We received a knock at our door a little after 8 a.m.," said Lemaire. "Two detectives from Toronto Police Services identified themselves and asked if they could come in to discuss a matter."Unlike other cases where the police have overreacted first before circling back to ask a few questions (for instance, strip-searching a man whose daughter drew a picture of a gun in class, or detaining a teen for three hours over some misheard Will Smith lyrics on a voicemail message), the responding officers had this sorted out in a matter of minutes, finding the whole thing nearly as laughable as Lemaire did.
Enter Det.-Consts. Irene Liska and Sergiy Lobanets, from 32 Division.
They presented "a photocopy of my post about the TDSB teaching children that the Black Panthers were a harmless social justice organization link" and specifically the "OISE and the TDSB need to be purged, or burnt to the ground" stinger.
It was almost laughable. He thought everybody would understand it was meant figuratively and obviously not literally.
[Lemaire] added he "assured them I had no intention of torching the TDSB."The police must have been less than amused by being used to run errands for the school district as they generously gave up the name of the complainant -- TDSB spokesperson Sheri Schwartz-Maltz. Schwartz-Maltz was "out of the office" when contacted for comment but another board member offered this in the way of explanation.
Police, he said, "were immediately satisfied with that explanation and assured me there would be no charges."
[F]ellow TDSB spokesman Ryan Bird explained "when certain words or terms are used in relation to schools or the board, they are flagged -- as per protocol -- to the Toronto Police Service without exception to determine if there is any threat that would require further investigation."Oh, look. It's our old friend "zero tolerance," once again making an ass of itself and the people willing to blindly adhere to "protocol." Lemaire's comment was clearly non-threatening. Note the lack of first-person ("I would like to burn TDSB to the ground...") or any call to action directed at others ("someone needs to burn TDSB to the ground...").
If it is indeed the policy of the school board to flag certain terms for police investigation, one wonders why it took the board six weeks to get this horrible "threat" investigated. Presumably, safety still remains first for the district. A lag of six weeks from threat to response isn't going to stop bad things from happening, no matter how low the "tolerance." [Currently at "zero."]
No, this is just old-school intimidation. Call the cops around to make a point about saying things the offended party feels just shouldn't be said. But Lemaire's having none of it, returning to his anti-TDSB blogging with the headline "Dear TDSB, You Can't Silence Me." The school board, on the other hand, has returned to the security of its "protocol," apparently seeing nothing wrong with calling the cops over a few nasty, hyperbolic words.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: critics, free speech, school board, toronto
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I wonder if they hired Dtecnet to monitor for the words to trigger the protocol.
While someone could try to make a case about certain words and the school being used together might make people twitchy, the fact the board decided to include themselves once again confirms my hypothesis...
When you give people power, they develop a kind of brain damage.
I think the parents of the district should be in the Board offices asking why it took them 6 weeks to notice what they assumed was threat to the board. Are they as caviler protecting the children... or maybe they should be shopping for a new spokesperson who thinks sending the cops after the boards "enemies" is a bad idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Those in power will abuse that power." or perhaps the better known "Power corrupts..." Be very careful who you give power to.
Generally, those seeking power are not worthy to wield it. Those who have power thrust upon them are much less likely, at least in the beginning, to abuse that power. Hence the need for term limits on ALL forms of public service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is a good case for public shaming of the board and leave it at that - just like what has happened.
The good news is that the police in this case acted responsibly. Instead of showing up with assault weapons, they knocked on the door and asked what was going on. Another display of Canadians having good manners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Unless you are reporting something that a reasonable person would constitute a crime or that comes under mandatory reporting legislation (if any exists) then this case would seem to be very well done for malicious reasons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you see something say something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Careful, Tim! They'll be at your door next.
(Evil threatening sentences replaced with [...] to protect myself.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
newest trend to squelch free speech
Here is the official press release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/131452030/Press-Release-ELI-March-19-2013
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: newest trend to squelch free speech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> these alternate ways of expressing the same sentiment is
> slender as a hair. The meaning isn't changed simply by using
> passive voice.
In the U.S., it's a key legal distinction, backed by Supreme Court precedent. Direct threats (against the president, for example) are prosecutable under federal law, while indirect threats like the one in this case are not. You'll still get a visit from the Secret Service, but the U.S. Attorney can't charge you for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Although even more so when it comes to deciphering legal documents, the words you say can be excruciatingly picked apart.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blame Canada?
Not saying that Canadian policing is without it's incidents (Tasering death at Vancouver airport mainly due to communication/translation issues or the G20 summit) but they seems to be a lot less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blame Canada?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Blame Canada?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you want to get to the bottom of the Cyprus issue the here is the explanation of the source.
Did I say Cyprus? Well really it is all of Europe, North America, US, and South America.' Judeo, Christian, Muslim heritage.
Asia is sufficiently different that the issues are general completely differ; different thought pattern; different morality; same results.
In Spain, Running With The Bulls**t
By Eric Ellis
March 21, 2013
Tracking the epidemic of small town corruption that has crippled Spain — and Europe with it.
http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/in-spain-running-with-the-bullst/578/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prioritize
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wouldn't that mean that they have to call the police on themselves any time they post about no GUNS ALLOWED in School, after all we're talking about GUNS BEING or not in the Toronto District School Board buildings?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sue them!!! As you pointed out, they failed in their fiduciary responsibility...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sue them!!! As you pointed out, they failed in their fiduciary responsibility...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time for a Tim Horton's run!
Dear Toronto Police Services officers; please to bring a dozen donuts and a cup of coffee when you leave your country to interview me. Grab some of that sweet sweet Quebecois maple syrup on the way past, too, please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canada is F@%#' 'D up when it comes to free speach
Now on top of it, our education system is further NUTS! And this is something the USA is encountering too.
To give an example (link below) a man in Kitchener Ontario was strip searched, his house searched and thoroughly humiliated when his kindergarten daughter drew a picture of her father shooting aliens and bad guys on a piece of paper.
Read the link below for more detail. But in the end, the education system, CAS and the Police all said they did nothing wrong, the protocol is proper and remains in place. I would like to know how idiots can get a job for the education system and why the F@%$@ are they teaching our children!
http://www.citynews.ca/2012/02/24/kitchener-man-strip-searched-after-daughter-draws-p icture-of-gun/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously. A normal greeting would be like; How the fuckk have you been doing lately? Ya haven't goddammn talked to me in fuckking ages where the hhell have you been bitchingg around the whole goddammn time since then you asshhole? I'll fuckking kill you if you don't explain why? Shiit! Your Deadd man.
Haven't felt this comradeship for a while. -wistful-
I remember getting some backstage passes to a (edited) rock-band concert. While schmoozing with the star while exiting the arena and old friend approached and spoke, in much the same way of the above paragraph, very personally and I'd guess friendly a very way. The star glanced at his bodyguard/staff and tossed the (now -ex) friend out. I still like the music but the rock-star seems aloft and distant now.
Since then have tried to couch my text and speech with conservative reasoning (and spelling). Obviously the ex-friend was misunderstood. Is this the same thing China citizens go through to avoid censorship or worse?
Any automated word or phrase detection that does not incur the review of a qualified human is nonsense to the extent that civil law might provide a remedy. What orders does the human follow. Democratic free speech or oppressive black-listing?
Reactionary: (reading the cool comments)
Mr. Applegates comment on power are appropriate. Great personal example.
Ninja, Michael. The police seemed very sensitive. (not breaking the door down and pointing guns at the kids) Did the School superintendent cry wolf? One of the worst things one can suffer from is being ignored when a real problem happens. Imagine this same official calling for help when a real delinquent intrudes on school property.
AB; did you read this? http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/national/oppn-slammed-over-nsw-right-to-silence-law/story-e6frf ku9-1226601328430 From reddit.com . Is scary but contrast the problems they deal with. (cars with guns and rifles) Nothing an exceptional zoom camera could not solve. [remember the Russian lesson of car cams capturing the chonderite (volatile chemical composition) meteorite. They have car cams because every official is bought and in every accident both parties lie and actual evidence is the only defense regardless of what government policy about such is.]
Personal input; Abuse must be prevented or civil lawsuits will curtail. If local enforcement officials think along the lines of “have SWAT team will use” thinking... (fill in the blank)
No comment otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zero tolerance
Back when I was a kid (in the '80s) I once drew a penis in class. Should the school have pointed a gun at my parents for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Zero tolerance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]