Sweet Brown Has Her Voice Autotuned, Sues 'iTunes' And Others For $15 Million

from the not-likely-to-go-over-well dept

Thu, Mar 21st 2013 11:09am — Mike Masnick

Eric Wisti alerts us a case we hadn't heard about before. You may recall a few years back how the Bed Intruder song became a huge hit, after the Autotune the News guys took an offbeat TV interview and turned it into a song. They, famously, provided some of the proceeds from that song to the interviewee, Antoine Dodson. Apparently, last year, a radio show called the Bob Rivers show sought to do something similar with an interview with a woman in Oklahoma, who goes by the name Sweet Brown (real name: Kimberly Wilkins), about a fire in her apartment complex. Here's the original interview. Then here's the "No time for bronchitis" song: And, because it's interesting, here's a video from a day or two later showing her general reaction, including a mention that her son had posted the video to his own Facebook page: Months later, however, it appears that Sweet Brown decided to sue the radio program and also iTunes since the song is there. Since the article is woefully unclear on the details, I pulled up the docket, and have posted some of the key filings below. My guess is that she's going to have a difficult time. The original lawsuit was filed without a lawyer in state court and it shows. It claims "plagiarism sampling," "fraud," and "negligence" -- and demands $15 million. Somewhere along the way, she actually found lawyers to represent her and they filed a very different complaint that focused on Oklahoma's publicity rights law. The case was then removed to federal court, where it belonged in the first place, and the Bob Rivers show made a compelling case for dismissal -- noting that she had consented to the interview and is not a well known person, for which a right of publicity would apply. Not long after that, her lawyers sought to withdraw from the case, citing "unresolvable differences between counsel and the plaintiffs that require withdrawal of counsel," which the court later allowed.

There was also an attempt at summary judgment that failed, when Brown failed to show that she had served "iTunes." Of course, even if that happens, Apple has plenty of reasonable defenses, as a third party service provider, for why it's not liable.

All that said, there is something about the video that feels exploitative. The Autotune the News guys made sure that Antoine Dodson got something out of his unexpected fame, and you can see why it might have made good general sense to have cut Brown in on any proceeds, even if the Bob Rivers show was not legally required to do so.

Sweet Brown Complaint (PDF)Sweet Brown Complaint (Text)

Sweet Brown First Amended Complaint (PDF)Sweet Brown First Amended Complaint (Text)

Bob Rivers Motion to Dismiss (PDF)Bob Rivers Motion to Dismiss (Text)

Sweet Brown Lawyers Withdraw (PDF)Sweet Brown Lawyers Withdraw (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: autotuned, lawsuits, sweet brown
Companies: apple

18 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Nigel (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 11:28am

pfft, well done. That is actually pretty damn funny.

Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 11:40am

No
All that said, there is something about the video that feels exploitative.

How? She said something in public, and the public ran with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zos (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 1:31pm
  
  Re: No
  something being legal, while still being a dick move are not mutually exclusive.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 11:45am

Somewhere along the way, she actually found lawyers to represent her and they filed a very different complaint that focused on Oklahoma's publicity rights law. The case was then removed to federal court, where it belonged in the first place . . . .

Why would a state law claim necessarily belong in federal court?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- cpt kangarooski, 21 Mar 2013 @ 12:22pm
  
  Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 21st, 2013 @ 11:45am
  Why would a state law claim necessarily belong in federal court?
  
  Diversity jurisdiction is the typical reason.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 5:02pm
    
    Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 21st, 2013 @ 11:45am
    That's a reason to remove to federal court, sure. But there could very well have been jurisdiction over the defendant in state court. I'm wondering why Mike thinks it belonged in state court in the first place. I doubt he was thinking of diversity jurisdiction.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Robert (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 11:56am

Awesome
It was really well done! I wonder how many others will copy such an idea. I can see where she's coming from with feeling exploited, but maybe she should take it with a grain of salt.

Better yet, run with it! Do performances!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 1:24pm
  
  Re: Awesome
  She's done at least one commercial already. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6wH0k4X3Us
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Marcel de Jong (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 5:37am
    
    Re: Re: Awesome
    Which will undermine her case, I think.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 12:08pm

I knew this was going to happen one day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PlagueSD (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 12:31pm

Lawsuit??? Ain't nobody got time for that!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 3:33pm

Greed
Sweet Brown goes from a typical unknown person to internet famous overnight, gains new employment opportunities appearing in commercials as a result of video and autotune remixes like this, but wants to sue those that took her from obscurity into the public spotlight in a positive way for millions?

The fable of The Dog and Its Reflection comes to mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 7:19pm
  
  Re: Greed
  Sounds like the MPAA and the Boston Strangler VCR.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
G Thompson (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 9:19pm

with the profuse amount of parody Songs that this gas done, and they are ALL extremely funny and have targeted people/bands more famous than this upstart woman I think they know more about the law of transformation, parody and Publicity rights then these stupid lawyers with their *hand waving signifying unknown magicks* "Plagiarism Sampling" (WTF is that!!!) and neg.. (LOL in your dreams)

Here are a few of Bob's famous hits: {Note: A lot of people think Weird Al wrote/sung these.. he didn't]
Dirty Deeds done with Sheep: You will never listen to AC/DC the same EVER again {Warning: New Zealanders should refrain from clicking]

Cats in the Kettle: Garfield and Cat lovers will howl

Windows 95 Sucks : This is parodied from the original Rolling Stones song that was done for Win 95. YES Bob Rivers has been doing this for decades and I loved it then too ;)

Bisexual: Parody of the Queen song Bicycle (no fat bottomed girls to be seen either) A Queen parody

He also has done a major "American Pie Eulogy" song (Parody of original Don Maclean) that totally bagged Madonna's interpretation of the song that peeved Madonna's management no end [not on Youtube but on Bob's website - below]

PMS : Lock up ya wives and daughters before you hear this ;P Another AC/DC parody that's awesome

and my favourite of all time: 99 Luft Balloon's Parody : I'll let you all click and learn the parody name and song: *BFG* And it works with his other song here

For more full length songs (there are over 300] with lyrics for all, go to Bob's website and click on the Twisted Tunes link on left hand side. Have fun!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- G Thompson (profile), 21 Mar 2013 @ 9:21pm
  
  Re:
  *gas = guy's [tablets for the spelling LOSS!]
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Mar 2013 @ 10:52pm

Her exploiting the tune gone viral didn't work out so now she's trying to make a buck this way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Mar 2013 @ 1:11am
  
  Re:
  And yet, out_of_the_asscrack will still find some way to claim YouTube is a grifter.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 22 Mar 2013 @ 2:00am

More evidence that once they were able to set a price to sampling they started screwing it all up. They all raised the prices to stupid levels, to beat the other guy to the punch and in the meantime screwed up the path of music...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]