AT&T Continues To Mock The Concept Of Net Neutrality; This Time With Google Hangouts Block

from the you-need-permission-to-innovate-on-our-network dept

Thu, May 16th 2013 12:52pm — Mike Masnick

The big telcos (AT&T and Verizon) have been trying to move more and more to wireless networks over wired networks, in large part because they've realized that, for whatever reason, the FCC more or less gave them pretty free rein to completely ignore net neutrality concepts on their wireless networks. So it really shouldn't come as much of a surprise to see that AT&T has responded to the latest Google Hangouts app, which replaces the standard Google Talk app, by blocking video while on a cellular connection on Android phones (oddly, it works on iPhones). As you may recall, AT&T actually got into trouble for doing the same thing with FaceTime on the iPhone. AT&T's statement about this, as given to The Verge, parses its words very carefully, as if they think everyone is a complete moron:

All AT&T Mobility customers can use any video chat app over cellular that is not pre-loaded on their device, but which they download from the Internet. For video chat apps that come pre-loaded on devices, we offer all OS and device makers the ability for those apps to work over cellular for our customers who are on Mobile Share, Tiered and soon Unlimited plan customers who have LTE devices. It's up to each OS and device makers to enable their systems to allow pre-loaded video chat apps to work over cellular for our customers on those plans.

The whole focus on "pre-loaded" apps was how AT&T tried to tap dance around net neutrality questions last year with FaceTime. And it's completely made up and bogus.

Basically, they're saying if you want to do video, you have to ask permission. That's a broken system. It goes against what makes the internet good and useful: the fact that you can innovate without permission. A mobile carrier -- one who may see video chat apps as competition, for example -- being able to act as a gatekeeper to block the usefulness of such apps is a dangerous situation for those who believe in promoting innovation. We shouldn't stand for an internet where one company gets to pick what you're allowed to do.

And, just to cut this off before anyone brings up a really silly argument to defend AT&T: yes, bandwidth on mobile broadband networks is somewhat more limited (though not as limited as they would have you believe). But, these networks, for the most part, have all done away with unlimited accounts anyway. So if people use up all their broadband quota on video calls, that should be their own decision. AT&T has already made pricing decisions that limit bandwidth to consumers, so further limiting their choice in apps makes no sense on top of that.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: blocks, google hangouts, mobile networks, net neutrality, permission, pre-installed apps
Companies: at&t, google

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 1:21pm

Wait, what?
Isn't the Hangouts thingy a new app, downloaded by the Google App Store as an update? It cannot be a pre-loaded app since it did not even exist when the phone was pre-loaded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- SirThoreth (profile), 16 May 2013 @ 1:37pm
  
  Re: Wait, what?
  Hangouts replaces Talk, which is a preloaded app, which is how AT&T is making the claim it's preloaded.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Christopher Best (profile), 16 May 2013 @ 1:46pm
    
    Re: Re: Wait, what?
    Yeah except that I'm pretty sure Talk wasn't pre-loaded on my S3. I'm pretty sure I had to download it...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - SirThoreth (profile), 16 May 2013 @ 5:47pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Wait, what?
      I had it preloaded on both my Samsung Galaxy Nexus phone and my Lenovo IdeaTab A2107 tablet. I suspect plenty of other phones had it preloaded, too.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Reynn, 17 May 2013 @ 11:38am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Wait, what?
      Talk can only be pre-loaded on a device, it was never made available in the Android Market/Play Store until it changed to Hangouts the other day.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Christopher Best (profile), 16 May 2013 @ 1:29pm

Wait, what?

Hangouts didn't come pre-loaded on my S3. I had to add it myself. So is it blocked? No? What? Bueller? Bueller?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 1:32pm

this is no different to what all companies that rely on customers using the Internet do. they charge extra, they restrict, they inhibit, they block, the remove. this has been happening for as long as the Internet has been available and classed as a must have, just like food and clothing, with the USA entertainment industries being the biggest offender and inhibitor. seems as if your line 'We shouldn't stand for an internet where one company gets to pick what you're allowed to do' is not only rather late but is and has been falling on deaf ears for years! with the entertainment industries now trying to get Sweden�s top-level domain convicted of aiding in copyright infringement, how long do you think it will be before the same stunt is pulled everywhere? once the industries get this and then get control of the Internet, it wont be worth having. it will become useless rather than the best distribution platform that it should be. it's what the industries have been striving for but they forget that they have made such a fuck up of how and why they have approached things that i doubt if they will be trusted for anything. i bet the net will die. what we have gotten used to will be driven underground or out of existence. either way, there wont be the money made that the industries think. and serves them right!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Corrupt, 16 May 2013 @ 1:34pm

Missing the Point
"It goes against what makes the internet good and useful: the fact that you can innovate without permission."

You are missing the point. The purpose of everything is not to be useful and innovative; it is to acquire money and power.

Additionally, politicians and companies LOVE it when you have to ask for their permission...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2013 @ 7:01am
  
  Re: Missing the Point
  I am an att wireless employee and can confirm this
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some Other AC (profile), 16 May 2013 @ 2:06pm

Bandwidth does not equal data amount used
Bandwidth is the size of the pipe. Data is what flows thru the pipe.
Ergo, Data Cap(amount you can use) is pointless when trying to control Bandwidth issues(size of pipe). Throttling, while just as heinous, would do more to satisfy the bandwidth issues that capping the amount of data a person can use.

This is nothing more than a straight money grab by all Wireless and Wireline telcos. Even with using basic services like Facebook, Google+, Twitter, Pinterest, etc... you can blow thru a Data Cap. This does not include the 2-6 email accounts a number of people have and access.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 17 May 2013 @ 8:05am
  
  Re: Bandwidth does not equal data amount used
  Ergo, Data Cap(amount you can use) is pointless when trying to control Bandwidth issues(size of pipe).
  
  Except that it will tend to cause customers to limit their use of high-bandwidth applications over mobile data.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Johnny Canada, 16 May 2013 @ 2:13pm

How can they block "Google" product from accessing the internet.

Google owns the internet.

Or it seems that way, anything goes wrong (piracy) it is Googles fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_bob, 16 May 2013 @ 2:18pm

suht up miek hitler
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Nemesh, 16 May 2013 @ 3:10pm

Simple solution....
Quit giving AT&T your business and this will cease to be a problem, one was or another! I am truly astounded at how many people continue to renew their AT&T contracts, or elect to get new ones! Even the ones "grandfathered" into unlimited data plans! Go to a different carrier guys! Preferably, one that has no interest in being a gatekeeper or in providing services or software! Both Sprint and T-Mobile have unlimited data and NO gatekeeping problem!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 5:59pm
  
  Re: Simple solution....
  Oh it's that easy? Just stop giving AT&T Business?
  
  Okay well I'll just get that magic phone that doesn't use Cellular or Wired communication run by an oligopoly. Along with my magic data plan which has reasonable speeds at a reasonable price with a telco who does not have a stranglehold grip on communications.
  
  Want me to give you their number? All you really gotta do is say an incantation five times into a mirror (though there's a twenty percent chance a demon will leap out instead)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- B. Hallock, 17 May 2013 @ 8:53am
  
  Re: Simple solution....
  Or you could go with a socially responsible company like Credo Mobile and stop funneling your dollars into this nonsense.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Matt, 19 May 2013 @ 9:30pm
  
  Re: Simple solution....
  I'm with you, but unfortunately Sprint and T-Mobile are a distant third and fourth when it comes to coverage in my semi-rural area.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wolfy, 16 May 2013 @ 4:18pm

WE should pick an arbitrary date, and everyone cancel their ATT/CAble/ whatever service and leave it off for two days. They would FREAK if enough people got on-board. It would have to planned out far enough ahead of time for the idea to percolate across the web. I'd happily go without my ISP (through which I get everything)for two days to put the fear of the American Consumer into the asshat corporate bigwigs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 4:56pm
  
  Re:
  Sadly this would make AT&T more money than hurt them.
  Say, for example, everyone who was an AT&T customer quit tomorrow all at once and then re-joined two days later.
  How much money do you think AT&T would make from Early Termination Fees vs lost subscriber income?
  Let's say people quit for a full month so that's one full month they are not making money. How much padding do they have from Early Termination?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 4:53pm

What frustrates me the most is that we're supposed to be making progress and yet these things are clear indications of regress.

Getting rid of Unlimited plans: Regress
Disabling features: Regress (Google Wallet (Verizon), Video Chat (ATT), Tethering (Verizon), IRC (Verizon))...

How can any company or person make the claim that regression is good for us?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 May 2013 @ 8:59pm

Maybe Google should just pay the wireless guys a fee like ESPN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Howard (profile), 17 May 2013 @ 3:59am
  
  Re:
  Oh, I don't see how THAT could go wrong...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich in CT, 16 May 2013 @ 10:09pm

Talk has always been blocked.
Google Talk came pre- loaded. It had an option to allow video over cellular. Itv was unchecked and disabled. My guess is that when Google refreshed it to Hangouts they either enabled this option or removed the shutoff. ATT would have to block it now if the software allows it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2013 @ 12:15am

Homophones are hard, let's go riding...
I think you meant "free rein" (an equine analogy), and not "free reign" (a royalty analogy?). It's an easy mistake - they'd like you to think them king, but really they're a horse's ass (sorry, horses everywhere).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Josef Anvil (profile), 17 May 2013 @ 12:29am

Wait for it...
Seems that all of the big players should keep a close eye on Google. Google is lighting up fiber networks and it might not be long until they cover those same areas with WiMax or similar 4G service.

My best guess is that Google has done the math and realizes that the profit on IP traffic is insanely high. So they can compete with the big players by offering service at say 300% mark up instead of 30,000% mark up and look like saints.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Noah, 17 May 2013 @ 9:37am
  
  Re: Wait for it...
  I agree with this but I think wimax was a poor choice of example. Hspa+ or lte are more likely due to them actually working well inside buildings.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vern Grey, 17 May 2013 @ 2:39am

AT&T
is one of the biggest corporate pieces of **** out there, equal to monsanto. May fleas, the amount, of every grain of sand on the planet infest their loins.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Real Michael, 17 May 2013 @ 4:36am

I've always wondered why certain YouTube videos wouldn't work from mobile phones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 17 May 2013 @ 7:15am

Would a VPN fix it?

In any case I wonder why Americans aren't protesting already. Seems they like to be abused in all sorts of fronts...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
job, 18 May 2013 @ 5:42am

find new job new you
applications are preloaded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
joe, 20 May 2013 @ 10:13am

hangouts works on tmobilr
Hmm... interesting. I have att and my wife has tmobile. She has a gs3 I have a gs4. I can use hangouts on wifi while she can video call on cellular. When we use tango we both can use cellular to make a video call no problem. Its so ridiculousthat you pay for service and can't use it the way you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]