Another Judge Figures Out What Prenda Is Up To, Reopens Closed Case, Demands Information On Settlements
from the well,-look-at-that dept
It would appear that yet another federal judge has taken an interest in what Prenda Law was up to for the past few years. Over in Minnesota, US Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel has reopened a case that Prenda had dismissed and ordered Prenda's local counsel, Michael Dugas, to supply an awful lot of information about the settlements they collected from people during the shakedown. The court points out:In light of Mr.Cooper's letter and Judge Wright's order, it appears to the Court that the plaintiff has relied on forged documents in securing multiple court orders authorizing the discovery of information that, in turn, led to settlements in the above-captioned cases.Because of that, it's reopening the case:
The Court agrees with the reasoning of Pino and concludes--based on its own interpretation of Rule 60(b)(3) and Rule 60(d)(3)--that it has jurisdiction to strike a plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, reopen the case, and award appropriate relief when allegations of a possible fraud on the court come to its attention. This interpretation of Rule 60 is necessary to preserve the integrity the of judicial system.Given that, the court has ordered Dugas to supply the details of everyone in the case who settled, including their contact info, their attorneys' contact info, the exact terms of the settlement agreements, "including to whom any money was paid and the manner of payment" while also saying that Dugas needs to supply all of those who settled (and their attorneys) with Judge Wright's order in California describing Prenda's scheme. Given the identifying info, this will be filed under seal, but Dugas has only five days to do so. Either way, it seems that more and more judges are aware of what happened, and they're even going back into old cases to explore...
All three elements of the Pino test are met here: (1) the plaintiff attached a fraudulent document to the complaint; (2) the Court relied upon that document in authorizing the discovery of internet subscriber information--information the plaintiff was not entitled to receive absent a court order; and (3) after obtaining the discovery (which--at least as far as the Court is aware--is the only relief the plaintiff ever seeks in these cases), the plaintiff settled and voluntarily dismissed all of these cases.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alan cooper, franklin noel, michael dugas, minnesota, otis wright, prenda
Companies: prenda, prenda law
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I hope
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ahhhemmmmm....
Precisely -when- do the various State's Attorneys General get involved and start criminal racketeering and fraud investigations against Pr(et)enda over this scheme?
Seems to me that some search warrants are long overdue here.
.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ahhhemmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahhhemmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahhhemmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ahhhemmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ahhhemmmmm....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kaboom!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor defendants...
It's important to contact them and figure out how badly Prenda has been abusing this discovery process.
I just hope Prenda receives some serious punishment when the full extent of their extortion is revealed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poor defendants...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poor defendants...
There is no discovery, its is letters, robocalls, calls, emails with mentions of the news making the papers, or neighbors finding out...
One can only hope one of them still has all of those records to share with the court so that courts finally have "proof" enough of the bad acts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Poor defendants...
The fraud is not in the signature but in the submission of a document with a signature that they knew to be false.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Poor defendants...
They have already had the nightmare of Pretenda on the attack against them, they settled to make it stop and protect themselves, and a "mistake" in filing a supposed to be sealed document (amazingly finding an emergency number for a court clerk is really hard... Why yes, this stunts happened before) can devastate these people to a degree more than the empty coffers of the empty shell can compensate.
The court could also ask questions about sharkMP4, the statements of 6881, the "expert" certification, the mythical magical super software that is never wrong unless the press asks to many questions.
Hell I'd be happy if someone in power finally seized the property rather than allowing them months to clean up the records of their actions. But then the 'Wheels of Justice' seem to move slowest against its own parts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Postulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Postulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Postulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Postulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He worked a case and has no records of it... seems like that isn't how the system is supposed to work.
He doesn't know who settled with his client... huh so who spoke with the Does and why were you unaware of the legal negotiations in a case with your name on it sir?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you hear that Prenda?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More courts are becoming aware after Judge Wright's ruling how Prenda lawsuits are not really about suing anyone but more of a shakedown to collect settlements.
This will be another case of a lawyer Prenda hired thru Craiglist to be on the hook for Steele, Duffy and Hansmeier's misdeeds.
Prenda I doubt will turn this information over to Dugas, they will more than likely try and delay turning this over or they will file to try and stay this Magistrate Judge order.
Can you imagine if Prenda let this stand and turned over the information. Steele would be quaking in his shoes that an avalanche effect might start and there is no way they are going to want to give people they made pay a settlement their money back.
Steele, Duffy and Hansmeier not only have to deal with this but they are still on Judge Wright's radar and still have Judge Snow's questions to answer in the AZ case and also have to deal with Mr.Harris who is being a thorn in their side since they made him a target in their lawsuit in AZ case.
It will be interesting to see how they handle all the collateral damage they are receiving since Judge Wrights order.
It will be interesting to watch what unfolds with their new cases under their latest re-incarnation that they have been filing, I would bet Lawerys for the clients being sued will quite pleased to inform the Judge of Prenda's past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
An avalanche can start slow, & end up mighty destructive in a limited area.
However, a total cascade failure also starts slow (usually w/ a single node), but as each part of the system fails, the damage becomes worse & worse, w/ the next failure more damaging than the previous, until the entire system collapses.
As more judges become wise to the scam, look into it & require sanctions, they'll draw the attention of even more judges, some of whom will require more sanctions, & they'll draw even more attention, w/ a larger number of judges sanctioning (& w/ prior findings & sanctions, those multiple additional sanctions could be larger), & so on. Eventually, enough judges will be aware that the scam will collapse on itself, not only making the scam unworkable, but unsustainable as the sanctions pile up. Hopefully, this collapse will include jail time & refunds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the smell of burning paper
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]