Senators To NSA: Your 'Fact Sheet' Isn't Factual; Can You Tell Us The Truth For Once?
from the look-at-that dept
We recently wrote about the NSA's highly questionable "talking points" about the various NSA surveillance programs that have leaked. Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall -- who have long been leading the fight to get people to understand how the NSA was spying on Americans -- have now sent a letter to NSA boss Keith Alexander saying that the "facts" in the NSA's "fact sheets" do not, in fact, appear to be factual, and asking him to correct the errors.We were disappointed to see that this fact sheet contains an inaccurate statement about how the section 702 authority has been interpreted by the US government. In our judgment this inaccuracy is significant, as it portrays protections for Americans' privacy as being significantly stronger than they actually are. We have identified this inaccurate statement in the classified attachment to this letter.Later in the letter, they also point to another "misleading" statement, amusingly using a letter that the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) sent to Wyden and Udall two years ago. This was back when they two were asking the DNI to at least reveal how many Americans had their info collected, and the DNI responded that "...it is not reasonably possible to identify the number of people located in the United States whose communications may have been reviewed...." Now Wyden and Udall are using that line to show that the latest "fact sheet" must be wrong:
We urge you to correct this statement as soon as possible. As you have seen, when the NSA makes inaccurate statements about government surveillance and fails to correct the public record, it can decrease public confidence in the NSA's openness and its commitment to protecting Americans' constitutional rights. Rebuilding this confidence will require a willingness to correct misstatements and a willingness to make reforms where appropriate.
Separately, we note that this same fact sheet states that under section 702, "Any inadvertently acquired communication of or concerning a US person must be promptly destroyed if it is neither relevant to the authorized purpose nor evidence of a crime." We believe that this statement is somewhat misleading, in that it implies that the NSA has the ability to determine how many American communications it has collected under section 702, or that the law does not allow the NSA to deliberately search for the records of particular Americans. In fact, the intelligence community has told us repeatedly that it is "not reasonably possible to identify the number of people located in the United States whose communications may have been reviewed under the authority" of the FISA Amendments Act.So, basically: were you lying to us then, or are you lying to us now?
We'll see what the NSA's response is, but I imagine it will likely involve more lying.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 215, 702, james clapper, keith alexander, mark udall, nsa, nsa surveillance, prism, ron wyden
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Had you done your job right in the first place, none of this would have been an issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A lot of [REDACTED] brackets or shitloads of black ink. Isn't it time to reboot such agencies? Seems the current structure is not engaged in actually following the Constitution..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
rm -rf /
kill -9 -1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Finger firmly on the shutdown button.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Those senators are cleared to know just about anything as they're part of the committee that has oversight for the NSA. One would think with how upset they sound, it would be very unwise for the NSA to continue to lie to them as they are basically like a judge at this point. They are more or less collecting evidence to be used against whoever is sponsoring the acts they feel are illegal or against the spirit of the law.
Think NSA = Prenda and Wyden/Udall = Judge Otis Wright. Something is about to give and there hopefully wont be enough popcorn in the world to enjoy it. The big problem here is it's a full committee rather than just Wyden/Udall and some of the members seem content turning a blind eye...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It has got to be said
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It has got to be said
...and the US has fought like hell to bring it back ever since then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It has got to be said
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It has got to be said
FTFY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom on the Rocks - Federal Tyranny versus Terrorism
Here�s the REAL problem: Freedom on the Rocks - Federal Tyranny versus Terrorism will give you the true scope, intent and end-goal of the NSA�s digital dragnet:
http://www.argusleader.com/article/20130620/VOICES05/306200011/My-Voice-Freedom-Rocks-fe deral-tyranny-versus-terrorism
Here�s the solution (at least individually). It�s a free Digital Privacy Black Paper; it shows you, with simple technical references and resources, how to disappear yourself and your personal communications from the prying eyes and master data recorders of the NSA and other elements of our intrusive national security apparatus. Enjoy!
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sm-cdn/reports/NSA-Black-Paper.pdf
Please pass this onto your friends, family, and business associates.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Freedom on the Rocks - Federal Tyranny versus Terrorism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In any case, it doesn't matter much who's in office (in any branch). The problem is systemic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA to Senators: Yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]